Hearth Record

Green Valley Hospice & Palliative Care, LLC

A hospice in Apple Valley, California 92307

19031 Highway 18, Suite 160, Apple Valley, California 92307. (760) 242-0088.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 92 hospices serving ZIP code 92307 had 6.5.

The last inspection on record was on Aug 6, 2026: a complaint inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Aug 6, 2026: complaint inspection by the state4 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 646 words

    “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the agency failed to ensure a medication reconciliation (process of identifying the most accurate list of all medications that the patient is taking) was conducted during the initial and recertification assessment for one of five sampled patients (Patient 1) when during a home visit, medications available in the Patient 1’s home did not match those listed on the Medication Profile (MP).This failure had the potential to cause ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects and noncompliance with drug therapy, which could place Patient 1’s health and safety at risk. Findings:A review of Patient 1’s face sheet (document that gives a summary of patient’s information), indicated a start of care date of July 23, 2026, with a certification period (a specific timeframe during which a patient is eligible to receive hospice services) of July 23, 2026, to October 10, 2026. Further review indicated Patient 1 had primary diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of lower lobe, left bronchus or lung (a cancerous tumor growing in the lower part of the left lung or its airway)During a home visit observation on August 4, 2026, at 11:40 AM, with Medical Social Worker (MSW), in the presence of Patient 1 and Patient 1’s wife, Patient 1’s actual medication bottles, which were available at home, were compared with Patient 1’s most current MP.During a concurrent observation and interview on August 4, 2026, at 11:45 AM, with MSW, MSW checked a bottle of Atorvastatin (a prescription medication used to lower cholesterol and reduce the risk of heart disease). MSW reviewed and acknowledged Atorvastatin was not in Patient 1’s MP.During an interview on August 4, 2026, at 11:50 AM, with Patient 1’s and Patient 1’s wife, Patient 1’s stated, “...had been taking Atorvastatin since long before starting hospice (care that helps people with a terminal illness feel comfortable and supported in their final stages of life) ... doctor is aware of it.”During further concurrent observation and interview on August 4, 2026, at 11:55 AM, with MSW, MSW verified that Ambien (a prescription medication used to treat insomnia by helping people fall asleep faster and stay asleep through the night) 5 milligram (mg-unit of dosing medication), one tablet by mouth, was listed as an active medication that Patient 1 was taking in the MP.During an interview on August 4, 2026, at 12:05 PM, with Patient 1’s wife, Patient 1’s wife stated, “...has never taken Ambien. The visiting nurse advised Ambien to help him sleep, but the medication never arrived. I don’t [do not] think I want that medication anyway; it may be too strong for my husband. His doctor is aware of it.”During an interview on August 6, 2026, at 1:30 PM, with the Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS), the DPCS stated, “It was the visiting nurse and case manager’s responsibility to update Medication Profile when there’s any new order or changes. Nurses should have been reviewing, updating medication profile on their visits and the printed MP should have been updated accordingly.”During a concurrent interview and record review on August 6, 2026, at 1:35 PM, with the DPCS, the agency’s policy and procedure (P&P) titled “Medication Profile,” dated April 2022, was reviewed. The P&P indicated, “ PURPOSE To define the use of the medication profile in evaluating a patient’s current medication regimen. POLICY Patients receiving medications administered by hospice will have a current, accurate medication profile in the clinical record. Medication profiles will be updated for each change to reflect current medications and new and/or discontinued medications. PROCEDURE… 2. The admitting nurse will initiate a medication profile to document the current medication regiment… 5. During subsequent hospice visits, the medication profile will be used as a care planning and teaching guide to ensure that the patient and family/caregiver, as well as other clinicians, understand the medication regimen. …”. The DPCS stated the agency did not follow the policy.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 982 words

    “Based on interview and record review, the agency failed to update the comprehensive assessment (a thorough and complete evaluation of a person) as frequently as the patient’s condition required to ensure the individualized Plan of Care (POC is a guide that lists the patient’s medical and emotional needs, including treatments, medications, and personal wishes to ensure comfort and care) addressed the patient’s changing pain and symptom management needs for one of five sampled patients (Patient 4), when the License Vocational Nurse (LVN) documented that Patient 4 was unresponsive (a patient does not react to verbal or physical stimuli and cannot communicate or follow commands, often indicating a significant change or deterioration in their medical condition), exhibited a significant change in condition, and appeared to be actively transitioning (a hospice patient is showing signs that they are approaching the end of life, and care is focused on keeping them comfortable during this time) on April 13, 2026,This failure had the potential to result in unrecognized or untreated pain and symptoms and delayed interventions during the patient’s transition toward the end of life, placing Patient 4 at risk for avoidable discomfort and reduced quality of life. Findings:A review of Patient 4’s face sheet (document that gives a summary of patient’s information) indicated, a start of care date of April 9, 2026, with a certification period (a specific timeframe during which a patient is eligible to receive hospice services) of April 9, 2026, to April 14, 2026. Further review indicated Patient 4 had primary diagnoses that included Alzheimer disease (a type of dementia that causes problems with memory, thinking, and behavior, gradually worsening over time and interfering with daily life), pulmonary hypertension (high blood pressure in the arteries of the lungs that makes the heart work harder to pump blood through them, leading to shortness of breath and fatigue) and pulmonary fibrosis (condition where the lungs become scarred and stiff, making it harder to breathe and for oxygen to enter the bloodstream).During a concurrent interview and record review on August 6, 2026, at 11:30 AM, with the Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS), Patient 4’s “Visit Note LVN [License Vocational Nurse],” dated April 13, 2026, was reviewed. The “Visit Note LVN” indicated, “…Pain. Pain is in control? Yes. Pain level reported in this visit: 0 [zero for no pain] … SN [Skill Nurse] performed scheduled nursing visit. Patient found in bed, unresponsive to verbal and tactile stimuli... Patient exhibits mouth breathing and appears in active transition. Moderate shortness of breath and respiratory fatigue noted… SN requested an urgent RN [Registered Nurse] evaluation and recommended daily RN/LVN visits for transition management...” The DPCS verified and confirmed pain documentation.During a follow-up interview on August 6, 2026, at 11:35 AM, with the DPCS, the DPCS acknowledged that documenting a pain level of zero was inconsistent with Patient 4’s unresponsive condition, since Patient 4 was unable to verbally report pain. The DPCS stated that, according to agency policy, the visiting nurse should have used an appropriate observational pain assessment method to check the nonverbal patient for signs of pain, and the visiting nurse did not follow this procedure.During an interview on August 6, 2026, at 11:40 AM, with the DPCS, the DPCS stated that Patient 4’s change in condition and signs of active transitioning required a timely RN reassessment to identify the patient’s current pain, respiratory, and other symptom-management needs, which was crucial because its findings would provide the clinical information needed to update the POC with individualized interventions, medications, visit frequency, and monitoring instructions based on the patient’s current condition. The DPCS further stated that without the reassessment and POC update, staff might not have current instructions for managing Patient 4’s pain and symptoms during active transitioning. The DPCS confirmed that the clinical record did not contain evidence that the requested RN reassessment was completed to updated Patient 4’s POC to address Patient 4’s change in condition on April 13, 2026.During a concurrent interview and record review on August 6, 2026, at 11:45 AM, with the DPCS, the agency’s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, “PAIN ASSESSMENT”, dated April 2022, was reviewed. The P&P indicated, “PURPOSE. To provide guidelines for the appropriate identification and assessment of patients who may experience pain. POLICY. All patients will receive pain assessments. When pain is identified, a more comprehensive pain assessment will be completed … Pain assessments will be documented to facilitate regular reassessment and follow-up by clinicians. PROCEDURE. 1. During the initial assessment and on an ongoing basis, the patient will be asked a general screening question regarding current or recent pain as part of the baseline data…3. If-the patient is unable to communicate pain using the rating scale is cognitively impaired or is a child the clinician will assess behavioral factors that signal pain or discomfort and include this information in the assessment… 5. Pain assessments will be part of the comprehensive assessment and will be updated if significant changes occur…”. The DPCS stated the agency did not follow the policy.During a concurrent interview and record review on August 6, 2026, at 12:00 PM, with the DPCS, the agency’s P&P titled, “CARE OF THE DYING PATIENT”, dated April 2022, was reviewed. The P&P indicated, “PURPOSE. To provide guidance for the care of the dying patient… Procedure… 1. At the start of care and on an ongoing basis, hospice personnel will assess the patient and family/caregiver unit (when appropriate) for: A. Comfort/pain level and response to pain management… 3. With each patient visit, the hospice nurse will follow the plan of care and assess the need for change, update the plan of care, and document accordingly. Aspects of care that must be reflected in the clinical record, when applicable, include: A. The origin, location, severity (on a scale of 0- 10: 0=no pain, 10=unbearable pain), alleviating, and exacerbating factors for pain/discomfort …” The DPCS stated the agency did not follow the policy.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 749 words

    “Based on interview and record review, the agency failed to develop an individualized Plan of Care (POC is a guide that lists the patient’s medical and emotional needs, including treatments, medications, and personal wishes to ensure comfort and care) or care plan that included interventions to manage pain and symptoms for one of five sampled patients (Patient 4), when Patient 4 was admitted to hospice services without a POC addressing the patient’s pain and symptom-management needs.This failure had the potential to result in Patient 4’s pain and symptoms remaining unrecognized or untreated and delayed interventions, placing Patient 4 at risk for avoidable discomfort and reduced quality of life. Findings:A review of Patient 4’s face sheet (document that gives a summary of patient’s information) indicated a start of care date of April 9, 2026, with a certification period (a specific timeframe during which a patient is eligible to receive hospice services) of April 9, 2026, to April 14, 2026. Further review indicated Patient 4 had primary diagnoses that included Alzheimer disease (a type of dementia that causes problems with memory, thinking, and behavior, gradually worsening over time and interfering with daily life), pulmonary hypertension (high blood pressure in the arteries of the lungs that makes the heart work harder to pump blood through them, leading to shortness of breath and fatigue) and pulmonary fibrosis (condition where the lungs become scarred and stiff, making it harder to breathe and for oxygen to enter the bloodstream).During a concurrent interview and record review on August 6, 2026, at 12:45 PM, with the Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS), Patient 4’s POC, dated April 9, 2026, was reviewed. There was no documented evidence to show Patient 4’s POC including individualized interventions designed to assess, monitor, and manage Patient 4’s pain were developed at the time of admission on April 9, 2026. The DPCS stated that he was unable to locate a pain care plan that should have been initiated upon admissionDuring an interview on August 6, 2026, at 12:50 PM, with the DPCS, the DPCS stated that the admitting RN was responsible for initiating an individualized care plan for each patient upon admission, including interventions to assess, monitor, and manage pain. The DPCS further stated that initiating patient’s pain care plan upon admission was crucial to provide staff with clear and consistent instructions for identifying and managing the patient’s pain.During a follow-up interview on August 6, 2026, at 1:15 PM, with the DPCS, the DPCS stated that he was the admitting RN for Patient 4 on April 4, 2026. The agency admission process is to initiate an individual care plan upon admission, including pain for management and intervention. The DPCS was unable to provide an explanation as to why and how the pain care plan for Patient 4 was missed, which should have been completed as part of the standard admission protocol.During a concurrent interview and record review on August 6, 2026, at 1:20 PM, with the DPCS, the agency’s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, “PAIN ASSESSMENT”, dated April 2022, was reviewed. The P&P indicated, “PURPOSE. To provide guidelines for the appropriate identification and assessment of patients who may experience pain. POLICY. All patients will receive pain assessments. When pain is identified, a more comprehensive pain assessment will be completed Pain assessments will be appropriate to the patient’s age, condition, ability to understand, and if the pain is acute or chronic. Pain assessments will be documented to facilitate regular reassessment and follow-up by clinicians. PROCEDURE. 1. During the initial assessment and on an ongoing basis, the patient will be asked a general screening question regarding current or recent pain as part of the baseline data. Clinicians will consider the patient’s personal, cultural, spiritual, and ethnic beliefs when assessing pain or discomfort…”. The DPCS stated the agency did not follow the policy.During a concurrent interview and record review on August 6, 2026, at 1:25 PM, with the DPCS, the agency’s P&P titled, “The Plan of Care”, dated April 2022, was reviewed. The P&P indicated, “PURPOSE. To ensure that an individualized plan of care is completed that complies with accepted standards of care and regulatory issues. POLICY. A written individualized patient and family/caregiver plan of care will be established and maintained for each individual admitted to the hospice program… PROCEDURE… 4. The plan of care will identify the patient’s needs and services to meet those needs including the management of pain and discomfort and symptom relief…”. The DPCS stated the agency did not follow the policy.”

    Rule L0546. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 554 words

    “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the agency failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) to develop and maintain a system of communication and integration for one of five sampled patients (Patient 1), when Patient 1’s home clinical record did not contain the current Plan of Care (POC is a guide that lists their medical and emotional needs, including treatments, medications, and personal wishes, to ensure their comfort and care), while Patient 1 was receiving hospice care (a specialized type of end of lice care focused on comfort, dignity and quality of life). This failure had the potential to result in poor care coordination, unmanaged symptoms, and medication errors, which could place Patient 1’s safety, comfort, and overall well-being at risk in his end-of-life care. Findings:A review of Patient 1’s face sheet (document that gives a summary of patient’s information) indicated, a start of care date of July 23, 2026, with a certification period (a specific timeframe during which a patient is eligible to receive hospice services) of July 23, 2026, to October 10, 2026. Further review indicated Patient 1 had primary diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of lower lobe, left bronchus or lung (a cancerous tumor growing in the lower part of the left lung or its airway)During a home visit on August 4, 2026, at 11:30 AM, with Medical Social Worker (MSW), in the presence of Patient 1 and Patient 1’s wife, a review of Patient 1’s home clinical record binder and the surrounding area was conducted. Patient 1’s most current POC including the MP (Medication Profile) were not found in the binder or anywhere in the house. Both MSW and Patient 1‘s wife confirmed that these essential documents were not available.During an interview on August 6, 2026, at 12:25 PM, with the Director of Patient Care Service (DPCS), the DPCS stated, “It is the responsibility of the visiting nurse and case manager to ensure that the current POC and other essential documents are left at the patient’s location and are easily accessible.” Furthermore, the DPCS stated the current POC was crucial for maintaining effective care coordination, proper medication management, timely clinical responses and to facilitate continuity of care.During a concurrent interview and record review on August 6, 2026, at 12:35PM, with the DPCS, the agency’s P&P titled, “The Plan of Care”, dated April 2022, was reviewed. The P&P indicated, “PURPOSE To ensure that an individualized plan of care is completed that complies with accepted standards of care and regulatory issues. POLICY. A written individualized patient and family/caregiver plan of care will be established and maintained for each individual admitted to the hospice program…PROCEDURE: 1. The Case Manager (or admitting registered nurse) will complete the initial assessment and will initiate the development of the plan of care after the consent forms are signed… 4. The plan of care will identify the patient’s needs and services to meet those needs, including the management of pain and discomfort and symptom relief. It must state, in detail, the scope and frequency of services needed to meet the patient’s and family/caregiver’s needs… 11… As needed, the patient and family/caregiver will receive written instructions regarding treatments or aspects of care that will be the responsibility of the patient and family/caregiver to provide or follow through…”. The DPCS stated the agency did not follow the policy.”

    Rule L0554. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 6, 2026Complaint inspection by the state4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 29, 2017.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 17.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.7% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97.7% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 71% at home, 24% in assisted living, 5% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day17.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.7%
Visits near death97.7% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Pillar Health Group Eight, LLC owns 100% directly since Apr 19, 2024.
  • Pillar Health Group Eight, LLC runs it.
  • 11 owners or officers are people: Patrick Pinder (owns 5% or more through other companies, 49%); Patrick Pinder (corporate officer, 49%); Patrick Pinder (managing employee (on the payroll), 49%); Patrick Pinder (runs it (operational or managerial control), 49%); Charles Joseph Lee (owns 5% or more through other companies, 49%); Charles Joseph Lee (corporate officer, 49%); Charles Joseph Lee (corporate director, 49%); Hari Naraya Reddy (managing employee (under contract)); Rex L Solomon (managing employee (on the payroll)); Charles Joseph Lee (managing employee (on the payroll)); Charles Joseph Lee (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Pillar Health Group Eight, LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Apr 19, 2024
Pillar Health Group Eight, LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)100%Apr 19, 2024

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 79.67% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 13% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 92 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 92307, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6.5; this one had 4.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.