Hearth Record

Inland Valley Hospice

A hospice in Riverside, California 92506

6370 Magnolia Ave, Suite 350, Riverside, California 92506. (951) 360-5848.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 128 hospices serving ZIP code 92506 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Jan 23, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jan 23, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner3 deficiencies
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 428 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care identifies planned interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 3 of 19 (16%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure the plan of care included planned interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments. CLINICAL RECORD 5: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/16/2025 with diagnoses of cerebral infarction, urinary tract infections, chronic constipation, and sigmoid volvulus. Clinical record review revealed at the time of admission, and continuing to the present, the patient had an indwelling Foley (indwelling urinary catheter used to drain urine from the bladder) catheter (16 Fr with a 30cc balloon) in place due to a neurogenic bladder. The patient’s plan of care dated 12/06/2025 did not include identification of the patient’s genitourinary status and interventions related to management of the Foley catheter. CLINICAL RECORD 7: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 11/07/2025 with diagnoses of Parkinson’s disease, repeated falls, convulsions, tremors, and hypertension. The patient is currently prescribed Phenytoin 100 mg, four tablets daily, for seizure management. The plan of care dated 11/07/2025 did not include interventions related to the patient’s neurological status and seizure activity. CLINICAL RECORD 19: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 10/11/2025 with diagnoses of Tay-Sachs disease, chronic respiratory failure, and seizures. Clinical record review revealed documentation that at the time of admission, the patient was mechanically ventilated and was scheduled for a compassionate extubation by respiratory therapy later that same day. The patient had an existing tracheostomy (a surgical hole in the windpipe that helps with breathing when the usual way is blocked or reduced) and, after extubation on 10/11/2025, was transitioned to 2–5 liters of oxygen via the tracheostomy. The plan of care did not include interventions to address care and management of the tracheostomy. The clinical record also included documentation that the patient had a gastrostomy tube (an artificial external opening into the stomach for nutritional support and gastric decompression). The plan of care included an order for feedings to be administered per the G-tube; however, the plan of care did not include interventions for care and management of the G-tube. Following a joint review of the records and interview with the Director of Clinical Operations and the Vice President of Clinical Operations on 01/22/2026, they agreed the plans of care did not include interventions that corresponded to management of medical equipment and patient symptoms documented on nursing assessments.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 436 words

    “It is required that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and record of the patient’s progress toward the outcomes and goals specified in the plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 19 (11%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure the revised plan of care included updated information from the patient’s comprehensive assessment. CLINICAL RECORD 8: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 10/25/2025 with diagnoses of systemic lupus, atherosclerotic heart disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clinical record review revealed the interdisciplinary team (IDT) meeting documentation by the Registered Nurse Case Manager did not include updates to the plan of care in accordance with the patient’s reported symptoms. Review of nursing visit notes revealed, the nurse documented on the nursing visit note dated 11/24/2025: The patient reported morning nausea and heartburn, noting episodes of vomiting yellow bile daily. On the nursing visit note dated 01/05/2026, the nurse documented: The patient continued to report nausea and decreased oral intake, though Zofran (medication) provided some relief. The nurse documented on the nursing visit note dated 01/26/2026: The patient reported symptoms consistent with a possible lupus flare, including generalized swelling, heaviness, and joint pain. The IDT documentation from 11/25/2025, 12/23/2025, 01/06/2026, and 01/20/2026 included the following nursing update: “SN (skilled nurse) in agreement with current plan of care.” There was no documented evidence that the nurse had updated the patient’s plan of care to address the patient’s evolving symptoms. CLINICAL RECORD 4: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 01/06/2026 Alzheimer’s disease, lower back pain, and major depressive disorder. Clinical record review revealed the IDT meeting documentation by the Registered Nurse Case Manager did not include updates to the plan of care in accordance with the patient’s reported symptoms and clinical needs. Review of nursing visit notes revealed, the nurse documented on the nursing visit note dated 01/15/2026: the patient was observed moaning, and the hospice nurse contacted the patient’s son, who authorized administration of morphine for pain, with effective relief noted. Additionally, wounds were identified on the patient’s right ear and coccyx. The IDT documentation included the following nursing update: “SN in agreement with current plan of care.” There was no documented evidence that the nurse had updated the patient’s plan of care to address the patient’s evolving symptoms and assessment findings. Following a joint record review and interview with the Vice President of Clinical Services and the Director of Clinical Services on 01/23/2026, both leaders agreed that IDT documentation must reflect updates identified during comprehensive assessments.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 588 words

    “It is required that hospice aides are assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse who is a member of the Interdisciplinary Group. Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide are prepared by a RN who is responsible for the supervision of the hospice aide. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 4 of 16 (25%) clinical records reviewed with hospice aide services provided, the agency did not ensure the Registered Nurse developed patient specific care instructions for the Hospice Aide. CLINICAL RECORD 10: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 10/22/2025 with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ventricular tachycardia, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The plan of care included an order for hospice aide services twice weekly. Clinical record review revealed the patient had an indwelling Foley (indwelling urinary catheter used to drain urine from the bladder) catheter and two unstageable pressure injuries, one located on the sacrum and one on the right ankle. The pressure ulcers required wound care every other day. The hospice aide plan of care dated 10/26/2025 did not include instructions for the aide related to Foley catheter care or instructions for how to care for the wounds/wound dressings while providing care to the patient. CLINICAL RECORD 16: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/29/2025 with diagnoses of senile degeneration of the brain, heart failure, hypertension, chronic pain, and cerebral vascular accident. The patient was ordered to receive hospice aide services three times per week. The hospice aide plan of care dated 09/19/2025 assigned the aide the task of bed bath. However, the registered nurse’s additional comments documented, “bed bath/shower 3x weekly MWF (Monday, Wednesday, Friday).” The hospice aide plan of care did not identify who was responsible for determining whether the patient should receive a bed bath or a shower. CLINICAL RECORD 17: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 10/25/2024 with diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of the brain, weakness, insomnia, edema, and seizures. The patient was ordered to receive hospice aide services three times per week. The hospice aide plan of care dated 10/25/2024 did not include information to the aide related to the patient’s history of seizures. CLINICAL RECORD 19: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 10/11/2025 with diagnoses of Tay-Sachs disease, chronic respiratory failure, and seizures. The hospice aide plan of care dated 10/11/2025, included information that the patient had a tracheostomy (a surgical hole in the windpipe that helps with breathing when the usual way is blocked or reduced) through which oxygen was being administered. However, the aide care plan did not include instructions to the aide related to care of the tracheostomy while providing care to the patient. The hospice aide plan of care instructed the aide to follow the current physician’s dietary orders, including feeding the patient 1/3 teaspoon at a time, allowing adequate time to chew and swallow, instructing the patient not to talk while eating, and monitoring for coughing. Clinical record review revealed a physician order dated 10/11/2025 that ordered the patient to be NPO (nothing by mouth) and noted that the patient was unresponsive. The hospice aide care plan was not updated to instruct the aide that the patient was NPO. Following joint clinical record reviews and interview conducted on 01/22/2026, the Vice President of Clinical Services and the Director of Patient Care Services, agreed that the hospice aide plans of care had not been updated to reflect the patient’s identified care needs as required following completion of the comprehensive assessment.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 23, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jun 24, 2009.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.1 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 10.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 96.4% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 44% at home, 53% in assisted living, 3% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.1 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends10.1%
Visits near death96.4% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Alleviate Care Operating Co., Inc. owns 100% directly since Mar 29, 2022.
  • Alleviate Care Operating Co., Inc. and Alleviate Care, LLC and Alleviate Care Holdings, LLC run it.
  • 19 owners or officers are people: Janet L Jones (corporate officer, 100%); Natalie Allen (holds 5% or more security interest, 100%); Stephen A Greene (owns 5% or more through other companies, 12.5%); Xiaoli Qiu (owns 5% or more through other companies, 5.03%); David Rothenstein (owns 5% or more through other companies, 5%); Nina Kjellson (owns 5% or more through other companies, 5%); Stephen A Greene (corporate director); Stephen A Greene (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Brent A Emery (corporate officer); Brent A Emery (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Janet L Jones (corporate director); Janet L Jones (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Guy J Rosenthal (corporate officer); Guy J Rosenthal (corporate director); Guy J Rosenthal (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Alan Kaplan (managing employee (under contract)); Alan Kaplan (corporate officer); Alan Kaplan (corporate director); Alan Kaplan (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Inland Valley Consultants, Inc.Holds 5% or more security interest100%Jun 1, 2022
Alleviate Care Operating Co., Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Mar 29, 2022
Alleviate Care Operating Co., Inc.Runs it (operational or managerial control)100%Mar 29, 2022
Inland Valley Hospice Care, Inc.Holds 5% or more security interest100%Jun 1, 2022
Alleviate Care, LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)100%Apr 25, 2022
Alleviate Care Holdings, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Apr 23, 2022
Alleviate Care Holdings, LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)100%Apr 25, 2022
Live Oak Banking CompanyHolds 5% or more security interest100%Jun 15, 2022
Cdc II LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies6.25%Apr 25, 2022
Alleviate Care, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies5.25%Apr 25, 2022

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 73% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 68% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 90.72% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 23.5% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 128 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 92506, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 3.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.