Human Touch Palliative and Hospice Care, Inc.
A hospice in Manhattan Beach, California 90266
3629 North Sepulveda Blvd, Suite 102, Manhattan Beach, California 90266. (310) 674-4940.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 24 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- 9of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean2
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
24 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 66 hospices serving ZIP code 90266 had 7.
The last inspection on record was on Jun 23, 2025: a follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
24 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Jun 23, 2025: follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission5 deficiencies
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 155 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 3 patient records reviewed, During review of RR#1, it was noted on three of four problems identified on the POC the established goals lacked measurable outcomes on the POC. For example: Patient will demonstrate proper use of assistive device (Walker), Patient will report a reduction in itching and pain to a tolerable level. During RR#2 it was noted lack of goals for the SC and the MSW on the POC. During RR#3 it was noted lack of goals for the MSW and the SC on the POC. In addition it was noted 2 out of 5 goals on the POC lacked measurable, individualized outcomes. For example: Patient will maintain orientation to person and place, with verbal cueing as needed, Patient will experience a sense of security and comfort in her environment and under Impaired Activity there was lack of goals identified. This was discussed with the organization leadership.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 3 patient records reviewed, During RR#2 it was noted during an IDG meeting in May 2025, the addition of new bowel regimen orders and changes to wound care orders. There was lack of an update to the POC for additional interventions related to the GI and skin problems. This was discussed with the organization leadership.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 3 patient records reviewed, During RR#2 it was noted wound care was provided on SN visits however the wound care procedure was not documented by the SNs. This was noted during SN visits reviewed from the middle of May 2025 to date. This was discussed with the leadership team.”
-
Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 3 patient records reviewed, During RR#2 it was noted lack of RN supervision of the hospice aide at least once every 14 days. The time frame reviewed was 28 days without documentation of an RN assessment of the aide care and services. This was discussed with the leadership team.”
-
Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))
“Observed in Document Review. In 1 of 1 contracts reviewed, During review of the therapy contract it was noted lack of the stipulation that the outside agency will complete criminal background checks on contracted employees who provide direct patient care or have access to patient records. This was discussed with the organization leadership.”
May 14, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission19 deficiencies
-
EP Training and Testing (42 CFR 418.113(d))
The inspectors’ words, 113 words
“Observed in Emergency Management Session. During review of the emergency plan, it was noted a disaster drill in 2025 was identified as an earthquake drill, participating in the national shakeout earthquake drill initiated by the shake out org. The drill lacked the following documentation: the disaster scenario and documentation that the planned drill stressed the limits of its emergency response procedures in order to assess how prepared the organization may be if a real event or disaster were to occur. The outcome and after action evaluation of the organization documented everyone participated and took cover, everyone exited in appropriate exits and met at the designated areas. This was discussed with the organization leadership.”
-
Exercise of rights/respect for proprty/person (42 CFR 418.52(b)(1)(i))
The inspectors’ words, 98 words
“Observed in Record Review. During review of the organization admission packet information on patient’s rights to make decisions about their care, treatment or services it was noted lack of the Patient Notification of Hospice Non-Covered Items, Services and Drugs form for the patients to review. This was discussed with the organization leadership. Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 patient records reviewed, who were discharged alive. During LiveD/C record review #1 it was noted the Notice of Non Medicare Coverage (NOMNC) was signed by the patient on the date of discharge. This was discussed with the DPCS.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))
“Observed in Record Review. In 12 of 14 patient records reviewed, During HV#1-3, RR#1, RR#2, RR#3, RR#5, RR#6 BRRR#1, LiveD/C #1 and #2, BRRR#1 and #2. it was noted the initial bereavement risk assessment completed by the MSW for the survivor lacked documentation of the nature of the relationship with the patient, availability of coping mechanisms, and potential for pathological grief reactions. The documentation stated the risk factor without any other identifying information about the bereaved. This was discussed with the organization leadership.”
-
Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))
The inspectors’ words, 109 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 14 patient records reviewed, During LiveD/C#1 record review it was noted the RN summary during the IDG meeting the end of March 2025 lacked documentation that the physician ordered a new bowel regimen for the patient. In addition the patient was placed on contact precautions due to the results of a wound culture the middle of March 2025 that was not documented on the RN summary at the IDG meeting. During HV#1 record review it was the IDG RN summary the end of February 2024 lacked the documentation that medications were ordered for a UTI. This was discussed with the organization leadership.”
-
Patient outcome measures (42 CFR 418.54(e)(2))
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, During LiveD/C RR#2 it was noted lack of the documentation of accurate clinical findings. The RN initial assessment stated the patient has a #20 Foley catheter (F/C) for long term urinary incontinence. The subsequent SN notes within the GU status documented the presence of a F/C as none. This was discussed with leadership.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 116 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 12 of 14 patient records reviewed, During review of 14 patient medical records, HV#1-3, RR #1,2,3,5,and 7, Live D/C RR#1 and BRRR#1-2, it was noted lack of goals with measurable outcomes on the POC. The goals were not based on the individual patient assessments. The goals from patient to patient with the same for the deficits identified during comprehensive assessments. For example, the goals for alteration in bowel elimination was Verbalizing understanding of etiology and factors affecting bowel disturbance, and appropriate interventions, demonstrating the safe use of bowel regimen, establishing or regaining normal pattern of bowel function was the same for all the patients. .This was discussed with the organization leadership.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 693 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 14 of 14 patient records reviewed, During HV#1 record review it was noted during an IDG meeting in October 2024 the patient has a UTI and was started on Cipro 500 mg twice a day for 3 days. The POC lacked an update that included interventions related to the GU system and UTI. During review of the IDG POC it was noted lack of interventions on the POC for the MSW and the SC. During HV#3 it was noted lack of interventions on the POC for the MSW and SC. During the 7th certification for HV#3 the POC was not updated to include wound care and interventions for a coccyx pressure ulcer and a pressure ulcer on the left malleolus was not added to the POC. In addition the POC was not updated to include assessment and interventions of the respiratory system when antibiotics were ordered for a respiratory infection. During the 8th certification the patient developed an infection in the suprapubic region with an order for wound care and antibiotics. There was lack of an update to the POC to include interventions related to the suprapubic wound. During HV#2 record rview it was noted dysphagia was checked on the nutritional assessment portion of the RN initial assessment however instruction on aspiration precautions were not added to the POC. The POC lacked MSW and SC interventions. During RR#2 it was noted a new right leg wound documented on the RN summary in March 2025 however the POC was not updated to include interventions related to the wound. In addition the POC lacked interventions for the MSW and SC with a discipline frequency for both of 1x/month. During RR#3 it was noted lack of interventions related to aspiration precautions added to the POC. In addition the POC lacked MSW and SC interventions with frequencies of 1x/month for both disciplines. There was an order for Fentanyl 25 mcg patches for pain the end of December 2024 however the POC was not updated to add interventions related to the new medication effectiveness. During LiveD/C#1 it was noted a physician order for medications for a new bowel regimen however bowel assessments and interventions were not added to the POC in March 2025. The patient was prescribed antibiotics and placed on contact precautions due to wound culture results, however infection control measures and interventions were not added to the POC. The POC lacked MSW and SC interventions. During BRRR#1 it was noted lack of MSW and SC interventions on the POC. During RR#6 it was noted lack of MSW and SC interventions on the POC with MSW and SC frequencies of once a month. During RR#6 it was noted the patient had a G-tube with feedings ordered. The POC lacked assessment and interventions related to the nutritional deficit documented on the RN initial assessment. The patient had oxygen therapy at 4L/min per the initial RN assessment. The POC lacked interventions on the use and safety of oxygen use. During HV#1-3, RR#1,2,3,4,5,7, BRRR#1, BRRR#2, LiveD/C#1 and #3, it was noted patients had oxygen ordered for PRN use. The POCs lacked interventions on 02 safety and use. During RR#7 it was noted during an IDG meeting the patient had a foley catheter inserted for urinary issues. The POC was not updated with GU deficit interventions. This was discussed with the organization leadership. Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 14 patient records reviewed, During HV#3 it was noted the following medications ordered for constipation without clear direction in what order to take which medication: senna 8.6mg 2 tabs 3x per day, senna 8.6 mg 2 tabs daily as needed for no BM x 2 days, MiraLAX 17 grams 3x/day however in the treatment column it is written as 17 grams for constipation daily, lactulose 30 ml 3x/day as needed for constipation, Colace 100mg 3x/day for constipation and Dulcolax supp every 3 days as needed for constipation. During HV#2 record review it was noted orders on the POC for Senna, MiraLAX in addition to Dulcolax and Colace in the comfort kit without direction on which medication to take first. This was discussed with the organization leadership.”
-
Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))
The inspectors’ words, 153 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 5 of 14 patient records reviewed, During HV#1, HV#2, HV#3 and RR#5 it was noted lack of documentation of progress toward goals. The patients had multiple certification periods with SOCs 9-12 months prior to the current survey. The same goals were documented as completed with each certification. During each subsequent certification, the goals remained the same, however the goal date would be changed to the new certification period. For example, RR#5 SOC was February 2024 with goals and interventions documented as accomplished for that certification period in February. The next certification in May 2024 had the same goals with the dates advanced to the new certification period and continued on the same way through 5 additional 60 day certifications. During RR#6 it was noted the goals on the certification in January 2025 lacked documentation of progress to date in May 2025. This was discussed with the organization leadership.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, During LiveD/C#2 record review it was noted care, treatment, or services according to the patient’s individualized plan of care were not followed. An order for 0xygen therapy at 2L/min PRN was written on the initial POC and the RN initial assessment documented 02 at 2L/min PRN. The subsequent SN notes documented O2 at 4-5 L/min without documentation of a physician order changing the liter flow. This was discussed with leadership.”
-
Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))
“Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 3 home visits conducted, During HV#2 it was noted the hospice aide changed her gloves multiple times without hand disinfection after removing and donning a clean pair including after providing peri-care to remove stool due to incontinence. This was discussed with the DPCS.”
-
Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1)(iv))
“Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 4 patient records reviewed, During BRRR#1, BRRR#2, RR#4 and RR#7, it was noted lack of a bereavement POC that specified the type of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery. This was discussed with the DPCS.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, During RR#6 it was noted the patient had a oxygen order for 4L/min continuous. The aide assignment form did not include direction on leaving the oxygen on during personal care or direction to remove for personal care. This was discussed with the organization leadership.”
-
Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))
The inspectors’ words, 104 words
“Observed in Document Review. There was lack of evidence that the governing body and leadership had established processes to support patient care treatment and services through sustained compliance as evidenced by repeat findings from the previous survey in the areas of establishing individualized goals, updating the POCs, and demonstrating progress toward goals. This was discussed with the organization leadership. Observed in Document Review. There was lack of evidence that the governing body and leadership had established processes to support patient care treatment and services through sustained compliance as evidenced by CLD findings at 418.54, 418.56 and 418.100. This was discussed with the organization leadership.”
-
Professional management responsibility (42 CFR 418.100(e)(1))
“Observed in Document Review. In 1 of 4 contracts reviewed, During review of the therapy contract it was noted lack of the stipulation that services may be provided only with the authorization of the hospice. The contract stated the contract was between a licensed home health agency and the therapy company. This was discussed with the organization leadership.”
-
Professional management responsibility (42 CFR 418.100(e))
“Observed in Document Review. In 1 of 4 contracts reviewed, During review of the therapy contract for PT,OT, and ST it was noted the organization did not describe, in writing, the nature and scope of services provided through contractual agreements. The therapy contract reviewed did not reference hospice services or describe the nature and scope of therapy in a hospice setting. This was discussed with the organization leadership.”
-
Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(2))
“Observed in HR File Review. In 2 of 10 HR files reviewed, During HR#5 file review it was noted lack of orientation for the RN to the duties of the DPCS designee. During HR#2 it was noted lack of orientation for the RN to the duties of the Administrator. This was discussed with the DPCS.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, During RR#3 it was noted an RN summary during an IDG meeting the end of December 2024 that the patient was started on Fentanyl 25 mcg patch however the medication was not added to the medication profile. This was discussed with the organization leadership.”
-
Written agreement (42 CFR 418.112(c)(9))
“Observed in Document Review. In 1 of 3 contracts reviewed, During review of the SNF contract it was noted lack of a delineation of the responsibilities of the hospice and the SNF, NF, or ICF/IID to provide bereavement services to SNF, NF, or ICF/IID staff. This was discussed with the organization leadership.”
-
Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))
“Observed in Document Review. In 2 of 4 contracts reviewed, During review of a contract for MSW and therapy contract, it was noted lack of a stipulation that the outside agency will complete criminal background checks on contracted employees who provide direct patient care or have access to patient records. This was discussed with the organization leadership.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2025 | Follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission | 5 deficiencies cited |
| May 14, 2025 | Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission | 19 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since May 12, 2011.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 15 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 17.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 73.2% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 59% at home, 30% in assisted living, 12% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 15.0 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 17.4% |
| Visits near death | 73.2% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- 6 owners or officers are people: Yimaj Kalifa (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Yimaj Kalifa (corporate officer, 100%); Yimaj Kalifa (managing employee (on the payroll)); Aziza Abdi (managing employee (on the payroll)); Sandra Edmonds (managing employee (on the payroll)); Olu O Oredugba (managing employee (under contract)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 87.88% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 11.4% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 9 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 66 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 90266, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 24.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Human Touch Palliative and Hospice Care, Inc. This hospice | 24 |
| Kaiser Foundation Hospital Hospice Program | 3 |
| Providence at Home With Compassus Hospice Care La County | 5 |
| Torrance Memorial Hospice | 4 |
| Roze Room Hospice | 28 |
| Vitas Healthcare Corporation of California | 23 |
| St Liz Hospice, Inc. | Not given |
| Bristol Hospice-Orange County | 8 |
| Silverado Hospice Inc. | 16 |
| Accentcare Hospice & Palliative Care of California- Los Angeles | 6 |
| Bristol Hospice- Greater Los Angeles | 8 |
| Ziba Hospice LLC | 10 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.