Ziba Hospice LLC
A hospice in Lakewood, California 90712
3950 Paramount Blvd Suite 107, Lakewood, California 90712. (310) 328-4865.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 10 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- 9of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean2
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
10 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 82 hospices serving ZIP code 90712 had 8.
The last inspection on record was on Mar 12, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Mar 12, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission10 deficiencies
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 195 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 8 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the plan of care reflect patient and family goals that were specific, measurable and time-bound. Throughout the active records reviewed there were goals established that were not specific, not measurable or not time-bound. In RRHV#1 an example of a non-specific goal was Family/caregiver will express satisfactory control of symptoms.. In RRHV#2 a not measurable goal was Husband/caregiver will demonstrate the ability to cope with limitations. In RRNHV#4 the goals were more measurable yet the goals were not time bound as target dates were not individualized and did not correlate with the goal. In RRNHV#5 examples of goals that were not measurable were Anxiety/agitation controlled through course of care and Patient will be free of preventable complications. In RRNHV#6, RRNHV#8, RRNHV#9, and RRNHV#10 goals target dates were not individualized as they all had the same target dates. An example of an goal that was not measurable in RRNHV#6 was Anxiety reduced and within manageable level during dyspneic episodes and an example in RRNHV#9 was Patient will experience optimal comfort with minimized anemia-related symptoms. These observations were reviewed with the DPCS.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the plan of care includes all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. On review of RRNHV#8 there was documentation of an initial evaluation for the Medical Social Worker (MSW) that indicated that follow up was needed yet there was no order for a MSW frequency for follow up patient visits. This observation was reviewed with the DPCS.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 226 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the plan of care include all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. On review of RRHV#3 the documentation noted a wound/non-blanchable redness to the buttocks with orders for treatment yet the care was not reflected in the care plan as the care plan had been resolved. Most care plans were noted to be closed yet the issues were ongoing. On home observation there was a dressing observed to the buttocks area and the caregiver noted it was for protection yet there was no order and the care was not reflected on the care plans. In RRNHV#6 there was documentation of the patient with a URI that required antibiotics yet the infection was not reflected in the care plan. In RRNHV#9 the wound care treatment was discontinued yet the plan of care was not updated as order remained as an intervention on the plan of care. In RRNHV#10 there was documentation of wounds yet the skin integrity care plan was not specific to the wound on the coccyx or the lateral malleolus. Further there was oxygen in the home with orders for use as needed yet there was no respiratory or oxygen safety care plan established. These observations were reviewed with the DPCS.”
-
Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 151 words
“Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 1 HR files reviewed, for hospice aide, the organization failed to ensure the registered nurse supervisor evaluate the required areas of: Communication skills, including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, caregivers, and other staff - Reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respirations - Appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming that include bed, sponge, tub, or shower bath; sink, tub, or bed shampoo; nail and skin care; oral hygiene; toileting and elimination - Safe transfer techniques and ambulation and Normal range of motion and positioning, by observing the hospice aide’s performance of the tasks with a patient or pseudo-patient as part of a simulation. On review of HR#7 for the Aide the initial competency was documented as being conducted only verbally with the required skills not being observed. This observation was reviewed with the DPCS.”
-
Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(2))
“Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 1 HR files reviewed, the organization failed to ensure a registered nurse make an annual on-site visit to the location where a patient is receiving care in order to observe and assess the aide while preforming care. On review of HR#7 for the Hospice Aide there was no documentation that competencies were observed as part of an annual on-site visit as required. This observation was reviewed with the DPCS.”
-
Cost saving (42 CFR 418.78(d))
“Observed in Tracer Activities. On review of the volunteer program, there was no documentation of the cost savings achieved through the use of volunteers. This observation was reviewed with the DPCS.”
-
Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))
“Observed in Tracer Activities. on review of the volunteer program there was no documentation that volunteers had provided administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equaled 5% of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract staff. The organization had documentation of volunteer hours yet there was calculation of the volunteer percentage of total patient care hours. This observation was reviewed with the DPCS.”
-
Retrieval of clinical records (42 CFR 418.104(f))
The inspectors’ words, 121 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the patient was accurately documented. On review of RRHV#1 the LVN documentation noted the patient continued to take Breyna inhaler for shortness of breath yet the plan of care orders noted that the medication was discontinued in December of last year. In RRNHV#5 there was a note from the LVN that was specified as a post-mortem visit yet the documentation in the note was for a skilled nursing visit on a live patient. In RRNHV#9 the psychosocial care plan noted plan to provide volunteer services to assist with home management yet volunteer services had been declined on admission. These observations were reviewed with the DPCS.”
-
Written agreement (42 CFR 418.112(c)(8))
The inspectors’ words, 98 words
“Observed in Tracer Activities. In 1 of 4 contracts reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the written agreement for the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) contained all required elements. On review of the contract for the SNF there was no provision stating that the hospice will report all mistreatment, neglect, or verbal, mental, sexual, and physical abuse to the SNF, NF, or ICF/IID administrator within 24 hours of the hospice becoming aware of the alleged violation, including injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of patient property by anyone unrelated to the hospice. This observation was reviewed with the DPCS.”
-
Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))
“Observed in Tracer Activities. In 1 of 4 contracts reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the written agreement with an outside agency providing contracted services for the hospice included all required elements. On review of the contract reviewed for the Skilled Nursing Facility there was no stipulation that the outside agency will complete criminal background checks on contracted employees who provide direct patient care or have access to patient records. This observation was reviewed with the DPCS.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2026 | Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission | 10 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since May 21, 2008.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 14.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.7% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 92.7% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 83% at home, 5% in assisted living, 12% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 14.3 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 6.7% |
| Visits near death | 92.7% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this hospice.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 94.29% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 8% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 9 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 82 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 90712, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 10.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Bristol Hospice- Greater Los Angeles | 8 |
| Admiral Hospice Care, Inc. | 27 |
| Ziba Hospice LLC This hospice | 10 |
| Trinitas Hospice Care LLC | Not given |
| Hygieia Hospice Care | 11 |
| Kaiser Foundation Hospital Hospice Program | 3 |
| Providence at Home With Compassus Hospice Care La County | 5 |
| Memorialcare Hospice and Palliative Services | 9 |
| Accentcare Hospice & Palliative Care of California | 3 |
| Torrance Memorial Hospice | 4 |
| Vitas Healthcare Corporation of California | 23 |
| Active Hospice Care, Inc. | 5 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.