Vitalcaring Group
A home health agency in Tulsa, Oklahoma 74135
4520 South Harvard Ave, Suite 200, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74135. (918) 508-7333.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.
- 3.5of 5 quality of patient care rating
- 4of 5 patient survey rating
- 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Oct 31, 2024: a recertification inspection.
3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Oct 31, 2024: recertification inspection3 deficiencies
-
Plan Of Care
The inspectors’ words, 802 words
“Plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(1) Each patient must receive the home health services that are written in an individualized plan of care that identifies patient-specific measurable outcomes and goals, and which is established, periodically reviewed, and signed by a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, or podiatry acting within the scope of his or her state license, certification, or registration. If a physician or allowed practitioner refers a patient under a plan of care that cannot be completed until after an evaluation visit, the physician or allowed practitioner is consulted to approve additions or modifications to the original plan. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure weights were obtained in accordance with the plan of care for three (Patients #3, 6 and 8) of 17 patients. Patient #3 A review of the plan of care dated 08/24/24 to 10/06/24 showed a skilled nurse frequency of three visits per week for one week, seven visits per week for eight weeks and one visit per week for one week with orders to obtain the patient’s weight with each skilled nurse visit. A review of the clinical record showed the following: Skilled nurse assessments dated 08/08/24 and 08/10/24 documented no weights for the week of 08/08/24 to 08/10/24 (two of three visits with no weights obtained). Skilled nurse assessments dated 08/11/24, 08/12/24, 08/13/24, 08/14/24, 08/15/24 and 08/16/24 documented no weights for the week of 08/11/24 to 08/17/24 (six of seven visits with no weights obtained). Skilled nurse assessments dated 08/18/24, 08/19/24, 08/21/24, 08/22/24 and 08/24/24 documented no weights for the week of 08/18/24 to 08/24/24 (five of seven visits with no weights obtained). Skilled nurse assessments dated 08/25/24, 08/26/24, 08/27/24, 08/28/24, 08/29/24 and 08/30/24 documented no weights for the week of 08/25/24 to 08/31/24 (six of seven visits with no weights obtained). Skilled nurse assessments dated 09/03/24, 09/04/24 and 09/05/24 documented no weights for the week of 09/01/24 to 09/07/24 (three of seven visits with no weights obtained). Skilled nurse assessments dated 09/09/24 documented no weights for the week of 09/08/24 to 09/14/24 (one of seven visits with no weights obtained). Skilled nurse assessments dated 09/17/24, 09/18/24 and 09/19/24 documented no weights for the week of 09/15/24 to 09/21/24 (three of seven visits with no weights obtained). Skilled nurse assessments dated 09/23/24, 09/24/24, 09/25/24, 09/26/24 and 09/27/24 documented no weights for the week of 09/22/24 to 09/28/24 (five of seven visits with no weights obtained). Skilled nurse assessments dated 09/30/24, 10/01/24, 10/02/24 and 10/03/24 documented no weights for the week of 09/29/24 to 10/05/24 (four of seven visits with no weights obtained). Patient #6 A review of the plan of care dated 08/05/24 to 10/03/24 showed a skilled nurse frequency of one visit per week for nine weeks with orders to obtain the patient’s weight with each skilled nurse visit. A review of the clinical record showed the following: A skilled nurse assessment dated 08/07/24 documented no weights for the week of 08/05/24 to 08/10/24 (one of one visit with no weights obtained). A skilled nurse assessment dated 08/16/24 documented no weights for the week of 08/11/24 to 08/17/24 (one of one visit with no weights obtained). A skilled nurse assessment dated 08/30/24 documented no weights for the week of 08/25/24 to 08/31/24 (one of one visit with no weights obtained). A skilled nurse assessment dated 09/10/24 documented no weights for the week of 09/08/24 to 09/14/24 (one of one visit with no weights obtained). A skilled nurse assessment dated 09/18/24 documented no weights for the week of 09/15/24 to 09/21/24 (one of one visit with no weights obtained). Patient #8 A skilled nurse assessment dated 08/28/24 documented no weights for the week of 08/28/24 to 08/31/24 (one of one visit with no weights obtained). A skilled nurse assessment dated 09/03/24 documented no weights for the week of 09/01/24 to 09/07/24 (one of one visit with no weights obtained). A skilled nurse assessment dated 09/17/24 documented no weights for the week of 09/15/24 to 09/21/24 (one of one visit with no weights obtained). A skilled nurse assessment dated 09/24/24 documented no weights for the week of 09/22/24 to 09/28/24 (one of one visit with no weights obtained). A skilled nurse assessment dated 10/03/24 documented no weights for the week of 09/29/24 to 10/05/24 (one of one visit with no weights obtained). A skilled nurse assessment dated 10/08/24 documented no weights for the week of 10/06/24 to 10/12/24 (one of one visit with no weights obtained) A skilled nurse assessment dated 10/14/24 documented no weights for the week of 10/13/24 to 10/19/24 (one of one visit with no weights obtained) On 10/31/24 at 1:55 pm., Staff A stated the plan of care was not followed for the obtainment of weights for Patients #3, 6 and 8.”
-
Make Complaints To The Hha
The inspectors’ words, 192 words
“Make complaints to the HHA CFR(s): 484.50(c)(3) Make complaints to the HHA regarding treatment or care that is (or fails to be) furnished, and the lack of respect for property and/or person by anyone who is furnishing services on behalf of the HHA; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to conduct and/or document the resolution of a complaint for five (Complainant #1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) of five complaints. Complainant #1 A review of agency complaint records showed an incomplete resolution of the complaint dated 12/02/23. Complainant #2 A review of agency complaint records showed an incomplete resolution of the complaint dated 02/22/24. . Complainant #3 A review of agency complaint records showed an incomplete resolution of the complaint dated 03/19/24. Complainant #4 A review of agency complaint records showed an incomplete resolution of the complaint dated 03/25/24. Complainant #5 A review of agency complaint records showed an incomplete resolution of the complaint dated 04/23/24. On 10/31/24 at 1:50 pm, Staff A stated documentation failed to show a resolution to the complaints for Complainant #1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.”
-
Plan Of Care Must Include The Following
The inspectors’ words, 826 words
“Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure an individualized plan of care for sixteen (Patient #1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17) of 17 patients. Patient #1 A review of the plan of care dated 08/20/24 to 10/18/24 showed a primary diagnosis of encounter for fitting and adjustment of urinary device with no patient specific individualized interventions developed for the management of the primary diagnosis. Patient #2 A review of the plan of care dated 08/12/24 to 10/10/24 showed a primary diagnosis of hypertensive heart with heart failure with no patient specific individualized interventions developed for the management of the primary diagnosis. Patient #3 A review of the plan of care dated 08/08/24 to 10/06/24 showed a primary diagnosis of diabetes mellitus type II with no patient specific individualized interventions developed for the management of the primary diagnosis. Patient #4 A review of the plan of care dated 08/25/24 to 10/23/24 showed a primary diagnosis of hypothyroidism with no patient specific individualized interventions developed for the management of the primary diagnosis. Patient #6 A review of the plan of care dated 08/05/24 to 10/03/24 showed a primary diagnosis of hypertensive heart chronic kidney disease with heart failure with no patient specific individualized interventions developed for the management of the primary diagnosis. Patient #7 A review of the plan of care dated 08/05/24 to 10/03/24 showed a primary diagnosis of diabetes mellitus type II with foot ulcer with no patient specific individualized interventions developed for the management of the primary diagnosis. Patient #8 A review of the plan of care dated 08/28/24 to 10/26/24 showed a primary diagnosis of systemic lupus with no patient specific individualized interventions developed for the management of the primary diagnosis. Patient #9 A review of the plan of care dated 08/08/24 to 10/06/24 showed a primary diagnosis of unspecified atrial fibrillation with no patient specific individualized interventions developed for the management of the primary diagnosis. Patient #10 A review of the plan of care dated 07/26/24 to 09/23/24 showed a primary diagnosis of pressure ulcer stage II right heel with no patient specific individualized interventions developed for the management of the primary diagnosis. Patient #11 A review of the plan of care dated 08/02/24 to 09/30/24 showed a primary diagnosis of hypertensive chronic kidney disease with no patient specific individualized interventions developed for the management of the primary diagnosis. Patient #12 A review of the plan of care dated 08/02/24 to 09/30/24 showed a primary diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with no patient specific individualized interventions developed for the management of the primary diagnosis. Patient #13 A review of the plan of care dated 10/10/24 to 12/08/24 showed a primary diagnosis of age-related osteoporosis with no patient specific individualized interventions developed for the management of the primary diagnosis. Patient #14 A review of the plan of care dated 09/20/24 to 11/18/24 showed a primary diagnosis of encounter for orthopedic aftercare with no patient specific individualized interventions developed for the management of the primary diagnosis. Patient #15 A review of the plan of care dated 08/27/24 to 10/25/24 showed a primary diagnosis of diabetes mellitus type II with diabetic chronic kidney disease with no patient specific individualized interventions developed for the management of the primary diagnosis. Patient #16 A review of the plan of care dated 10/09/24 to 12/07/24 showed a primary diagnosis of encounter for other orthopedic aftercare with no patient specific individualized interventions developed for the management of the primary diagnosis. Patient #17 A review of the plan of care dated 08/29/24 to 10/27/24 showed a primary diagnosis of chronic pain syndrome with no patient specific individualized interventions developed for the management of the primary diagnosis. On 10/31/24 at 1:50 pm, Staff A stated the plan of care for Patients #1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17 were not individualized for the patient specific management of the primary diagnosis.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2024 | Recertification inspection | 3 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified home health agency since Nov 17, 2015.
- Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Who does the caring?
- Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Tvg Np Homecare Acquisition, Inc. owns 100% directly since Jan 31, 2023.
- 4 owners or officers are people: Mishalene Nash (corporate officer); Mishalene Nash (managing employee (on the payroll)); Chris Walker (corporate officer); Janice Riggins (corporate officer).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tvg Np Homecare Acquisition Holdings, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Jan 31, 2023 |
| Tvg Np Homecare Sponsorco, LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Jan 31, 2023 |
| Tvg Np Homecare Acquisition Intermediate, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Jan 31, 2023 |
| Tvg Np Homecare Topco, Gp, LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Jan 31, 2023 |
| Tvg Np Homecare Acquisition, Inc. | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Jan 31, 2023 |
| Tvg Np Homecare Topco, LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Jan 31, 2023 |
| Vistria Fund III LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 34% | Jan 31, 2023 |
| Nautic Partners Ix, LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 32% | Jan 31, 2023 |
| Nautic Partners Ix-A LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 18% | Jan 31, 2023 |
| Vistria Fund III (Ft) LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 16% | Jan 31, 2023 |
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates its quality of patient care 3.5 of 5.
- Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (249 surveys completed): 87% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 81% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars | 3.5 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 86.59% (better than the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 11.75% (same as the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 3.57% (same as the national rate) |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 30 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 74135, where this agency’s office is, 27 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3 of 5, and this one is rated 3.5 of 5.
CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Quality rating |
|---|---|
| Ascension at Home - Tulsa | 3 |
| Elara Caring Xxv | 5 |
| Vitalcaring Group This home health agency | 3.5 |
| Saint Francis Home Health | 4 |
| Complete Home Health of Western Oklahoma | 2 |
| Truheart Home Health | 2.5 |
| Millennium Home Health Care, Inc. | 2.5 |
| Care Plus Home Health Care, Inc. | 1.5 |
| Mays Housecall Home Health of Tulsa, LLC | 4.5 |
| Rice Home Health LLC | Not given |
| Faith Home Care Services, L.L.C. | 2 |
| Shanadoa Home Health, Inc. | 3.5 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
- Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Care Agencies (6jpm-sxkc).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Patient Survey (ccn4-8vby).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR home health inspection reports (HHA_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency All Owners (fc009b2d-7846-44b1-b4a1-692f0c143879).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency Enrollments (15f64ab4-3172-4a27-b589-ebd67a6d28aa).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health ZIP Codes (m5eg-upu5).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.
From the agency
The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.