Hearth Record

Family Choice Home Care

A home health agency in Elk City, Oklahoma 73644

801 W 2nd Street, Elk City, Oklahoma 73644. (580) 225-4140.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Apr 8, 2026: a recertification inspection.

13 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

13 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Apr 8, 2026: recertification inspection13 deficiencies
  • Develop Ep Plan, Review And Update Annually

    The inspectors’ words, 288 words

    “Develop EP Plan, Review and Update Annually CFR(s): 484.102(a) §403.748(a), §416.54(a), §418.113(a), §441.184(a), §460.84(a), §482.15(a), §483.73(a), §483.475(a), §484.102(a), §485.68(a), §485.542(a), §485.625(a), §485.727(a), §485.920(a), §486.360(a), §491.12(a), §494.62(a). The [facility] must comply with all applicable Federal, State and local emergency preparedness requirements. The [facility] must develop establish and maintain a comprehensive emergency preparedness program that meets the requirements of this section. The emergency preparedness program must include, but not be limited to, the following elements: (a) Emergency Plan. The [facility] must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be [reviewed], and updated at least every 2 years. The plan must do all of the following: * [For hospitals at §482.15 and CAHs at §485.625(a):] Emergency Plan. The [hospital or CAH] must comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local emergency preparedness requirements. The [hospital or CAH] must develop and maintain a comprehensive emergency preparedness program that meets the requirements of this section, utilizing an all-hazards approach. * [For LTC Facilities at §483.73(a):] Emergency Plan. The LTC facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least annually. * [For ESRD Facilities at §494.62(a):] Emergency Plan. The ESRD facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be [evaluated], and updated at least every 2 years. . This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure administrative review of the Emergency Preparedness Plan at least every other year for all patients and employees. Findings: A review of emergency preparedness plan records showed an administrative review of the Emergency Preparedness Plan dated 10/02/20. On 04/08/26 at 12:25 p.m., Staff B stated the agency did not review the Emergency Plan since 2020.”

    Rule E0004. Standard-level.

  • Names And Contact Information

    The inspectors’ words, 422 words

    “Names and Contact Information CFR(s): 484.102(c)(1) §403.748(c)(1), §416.54(c)(1), §418.113(c)(1), §441.184(c)(1), §460.84(c)(1), §482.15(c)(1), §483.73(c)(1), §483.475(c)(1), §484.102(c)(1), §485.68(c)(1), §485.542(c)(1), §485.625(c)(1), §485.727(c)(1), §485.920(c)(1), §486.360(c)(1), §491.12(c)(1), §494.62(c)(1). [(c) The [facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness communication plan that complies with Federal, State and local laws and must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years [annually for LTC facilities]. The communication plan must include all of the following:] (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians (iv) Other [facilities]. (v) Volunteers. *[For Hospitals at §482.15(c) and CAHs at §485.625(c)] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians (iv) Other [hospitals and CAHs]. (v) Volunteers. *[For RNHCIs at §403.748(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Next of kin, guardian, or custodian. (iv) Other RNHCIs. (v) Volunteers. *[For ASCs at §416.45(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians. (iv) Volunteers. *[For Hospices at §418.113(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Hospice employees. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians. (iv) Other hospices. *[For HHAs at §484.102(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians. (iv) Volunteers. *[For OPOs at §486.360(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (2) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Volunteers. (iv) Other OPOs. (v) Transplant and donor hospitals in the OPO’s Donation Service Area (DSA). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure an emergency preparedness communication plan included current employee and physician contact information for the agency for all patients and employees. Findings: A review of emergency preparedness program records did not include contact information for all its current employees and showed a patient roster which did not include physician contact information dated 09/25/25. On 04/08/26 at 12:25 p.m., Staff B stated the communication plan was not updated to include all current employees and physicians who worked with the agency.”

    Rule E0030. Standard-level.

  • Emergency Officials Contact Information

    The inspectors’ words, 264 words

    “Emergency Officials Contact Information CFR(s): 484.102(c)(2) §403.748(c)(2), §416.54(c)(2), §418.113(c)(2), §441.184(c)(2), §460.84(c)(2), §482.15(c)(2), §483.73(c)(2), §483.475(c)(2), §484.102(c)(2), §485.68(c)(2), §485.542(c)(2), §485.625(c)(2), §485.727(c)(2), §485.920(c)(2), §486.360(c)(2), §491.12(c)(2), §494.62(c)(2). [(c) The [facility] must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness communication plan that complies with Federal, State and local laws and must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years [annually for LTC facilities]. The communication plan must include all of the following: (2) Contact information for the following: (i) Federal, State, tribal, regional, and local emergency preparedness staff. (ii) Other sources of assistance. *[For LTC Facilities at §483.73(c):] (2) Contact information for the following: (i) Federal, State, tribal, regional, and local emergency preparedness staff. (ii) The State Licensing and Certification Agency. (iii) The Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. (iv) Other sources of assistance. *[For ICF/IIDs at §483.475(c):] (2) Contact information for the following: (i) Federal, State, tribal, regional, and local emergency preparedness staff. (ii) Other sources of assistance. (iii) The State Licensing and Certification Agency. (iv) The State Protection and Advocacy Agency. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure development, implementation, and maintenance of processes for an integrated emergency preparedness response with Federal, State, Tribal, Regional and Local emergency management officials for all patients and employees. Findings: A review of emergency preparedness records showed no administrative processes and resource contact information for an integrated emergency preparedness response with Federal, State, Tribal, Regional and Local emergency management officials. On 04/08/26 at 12:25 p.m., Staff B stated the plan did not include processes and resource contact information.”

    Rule E0031. Standard-level.

  • Discharge Planning

    The inspectors’ words, 406 words

    “Discharge Planning CFR(s): 484.58(a) Standard: Discharge planning. An HHA must develop and implement an effective discharge planning process. For patients who are transferred to another HHA or who are discharged to a SNF, IRF or LTCH, the HHA must assist patients and their caregivers in selecting a post-acute care provider by using and sharing data that includes, but is not limited to HHA, SNF, IRF, or LTCH data on quality measures and data on resource use measures. The HHA must ensure that the post-acute care data on quality measures and data on resource use measures is relevant and applicable to the patient’s goals of care and treatment preferences. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record reviews and interviews, the agency failed to ensure discharge planning included patient case conference activities for six (Patients #1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and #7) of seven patients. Findings: Patient #1 A review of the clinical record showed no case conference communications since the start of care date of 03/14/24 and showed no coordination of care or communication notes of why the case conferences were not conducted. Patient #2 A review of the clinical record showed no case conference communications since the start of care date of 06/28/24 and showed no coordination of care or communication notes of why the case conferences were not conducted. Patient #3 A review of the clinical record showed no case conference communications since the start of care date of 11/12/25 and showed no coordination of care or communication notes of why the case conferences were not conducted. Patient #5 A review of the clinical record showed no case conference communications since the start of care date of 03/13/23 and showed no coordination of care or communication notes of why the case conferences were not conducted. Patient #6 A review of the clinical record showed no case conference communications since the start of care date of 01/18/25 and showed no coordination of care or communication notes of why the case conferences were not conducted. Patient #7 A review of the clinical record showed no case conference communications since the start of care date of 12/30/25 and showed no coordination of care or communication notes of why the case conferences were not conducted. On 04/08/26 at 1:15 p.m., Staff B stated the case conferences for patients #1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and #7 were: 1.Not conducted every month. 2.Not documented in a binder.”

    Rule G0562. Standard-level.

  • Home Health Aide Assignments And Duties

    The inspectors’ words, 196 words

    “Home health aide assignments and duties CFR(s): 484.80(g)(1) Standard: Home health aide assignments and duties. Home health aides are assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional, with written patient care instructions for a home health aide prepared by that registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional (that is, physical therapist, speech-language pathologist, or occupational therapist). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure a care plan for home health aide services was completed prior to the first aide visit assignment for one (Patient #7) of seven patients. Findings: Patient #7 A review of the clinical record showed the patient had a comprehensive start of care assessment on 12/30/25 for an episode period of 12/30/25 to 02/27/26. The clinical record showed a home health aide visit was conducted on 01/06/26 and showed the care plan and assignment of staff for home health aide services was completed on 01/08/26 (two days after the first aide visit). On 04/08/26 at 1:05 p.m., Staff B stated the care plan for home health aide services was not completed before the first aide visit.”

    Rule G0798. Standard-level.

  • Plan Of Care Must Include The Following

    The inspectors’ words, 305 words

    “Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure an individualized patient POC included a last conducted or an intervention due date for an indwelling foley catheter change for one (Patient #6) of seven patients. Findings: Patient #6 A review of the POC dated 11/14/25 to 01/12/26 showed orders for SN to conduct indwelling foley catheter change with a 16 French/10 cubic centimeter catheter and site care every three weeks. The foley management intervention orders did not identify the date the last catheter change was conducted or the date the next intervention was due. SN visits for foley catheter care and change intervention were conducted on 12/05/25 and on 12/23/25. The clinical record showed no physician notifications and no change in orders. On 04/08/26 at 12:55 p.m., Staff B stated the catheter orders did not identify when the intervention was conducted or when it was due.”

    Rule G0574. Element-level.

  • Only As Ordered By A Physician

    The inspectors’ words, 151 words

    “Only as ordered by a physician CFR(s): 484.60(b)(1) Drugs, services, and treatments are administered only as ordered by a physician or allowed practitioner. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure an order for SN to perform indwelling foley catheter irrigation with an identified solution was obtained from the physician for one (Patient #6) of seven patients. Patient #6 A review of the POC dated 11/14/25 to 01/12/26 showed no orders for SN to perform indwelling foley catheter irrigation. A SN visit conducted on 12/16/25 showed the nurse irrigated the foley catheter for observable increased sediment and showed no identification of what solution was used. The clinical record showed no physician notifications and no request to irrigate the catheter. On 04/08/26 at 12:55 p.m., Staff B stated there were no doctor orders for the nurse to irrigate the foley catheter.”

    Rule G0580. Element-level.

  • Communication With All Physicians

    The inspectors’ words, 402 words

    “Communication with all physicians CFR(s): 484.60(d)(1) Standard: Coordination of Care. The HHA must: (1) Assure communication with all physicians or allowed practitioners involved in the plan of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure care was coordinated between the agency and physician for one (Patient #5) of seven patients. Findings: Patient #5 A review of a plan of care dated 02/25/26 to 04/25/26 showed a primary diagnosis of Stage 5 chronic kidney disease, end stage renal disease. A review of a communication note dated 03/23/26 showed the patient was experiencing a productive cough with thick phlegm, a variable oxygen saturation rate of 88-93% with a blood pressure of 146/80 and a heart rate of 91. The communication note showed no date the physician was notified and showed no follow up communications to the physician. A review of a communication note dated 03/27/26 showed the patient was experiencing a dry cough, a variable oxygen saturation rate of 88-90% with a blood pressure of 174/74 with a weight of 115 pounds (increase of 3 pounds in four days). The communication note showed no date the physician was notified and showed no follow up communications with the physician. A review of a communication note dated 03/30/26 showed the patient had a weight of 118 pounds (an additional increase of 3 pounds in three days). The communication note showed no date of notification to the physician and showed no follow up communications to the physician. A review of a communication note dated 04/03/26 showed the type of communication note was emergency room visit but was blank. The communication note showed no date of notification to the physician and showed no follow up communications to the physician. On 04/08/26 at 12:45 p.m., Staff B stated: 1.The 03/23/26 note was sent by fax on 03/23/26 to the physician but had no follow-up communication with the physician. 2.The 03/27/26 note was sent by fax on 03/27/26 to the physician but had no follow-up communication with the physician. 3.The 03/30/26 note was not sent to the physician and had no follow-up communication with the physician. 4.The 04/03/26 note was entered as a file name to attach any documentation we receive from the emergency room. The physician was not notified the patient had gone to the emergency room and there was not any follow-up communication with the physician.”

    Rule G0602. Element-level.

  • Provide Services In The Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 160 words

    “Provide services in the plan of care CFR(s): 484.75(b)(3) Providing services that are ordered by the physician or allowed practitioner as indicated in the plan of care; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure the SN performed an indwelling foley catheter change intervention using a size of catheter different than what was ordered by the physician for one (Patient #6) of seven patients Findings: Patient #6 A review of the POC dated 11/14/25 to 01/12/26 showed orders for SN to conduct indwelling foley catheter change with a 16 French/10 cubic centimeter every three weeks. A review of a SN visit note dated 11/18/25 showed the indwelling foley catheter change was performed using an 18 French/10 cubic centimeter catheter and showed no change in the physician orders. On 04/08/26 at 12:55 p.m., Staff B stated the SN did not use the catheter size that was ordered by the physician.”

    Rule G0710. Element-level.

  • Participate In The Hha’S Qapi Program;

    The inspectors’ words, 113 words

    “Participate in the HHA’s QAPI program; CFR(s): 484.75(b)(8) Participation in the HHA’s QAPI program; and This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on a record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure multi-disciplined skilled professional staff participated in its QAPI program for calendar year 2024 and 2025 for all patients and employees. Findings: A review of quality assessment performance improvement records showed no PT, OT or ST skilled professional staff participation in QAPI activities for calendar years 2024 and 2025. On 04/08/26 at 1:15 p.m., Staff B stated: 1.We did not have PT or OT participate in the QAPI program. 2.We contract therapy services for PT and OT when needed.”

    Rule G0720. Element-level.

  • Required Items In Clinical Record

    The inspectors’ words, 198 words

    “Required items in clinical record CFR(s): 484.110(a)(1) The patient’s current comprehensive assessment, including all of the assessments from the most recent home health admission, clinical notes, plans of care, and physician or allowed practitioner orders; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure clinical records were complete for four (Patients #2, 3, 4 and #5) of seven patients. Findings: Patient #2 A review of the clinical record showed a SN visit note dated 04/01/26 was blank and unsigned. Patient #3 A review of the clinical record showed a SN visit note dated 03/31/26 was blank and unsigned. Patient #4 A review of the clinical record showed SN and Aide visit notes dated 03/31/26 and 04/01/26 were suspended as not started, were blank and unsigned. Patient #5 A review of the clinical record showed SN and Aide visit notes dated 03/30/26 and 04/03/26 were suspended as not started, were blank and unsigned. On 04/08/26 at 12:45 p.m., Staff B stated: 1.The SN and Aide visit notes for patients #2, 3, 4 and #5 were not completed by staff. 2.Visit notes are due within 48 hours of the visits.”

    Rule G1012. Element-level.

  • Interventions And Patient Response

    The inspectors’ words, 138 words

    “Interventions and patient response CFR(s): 484.110(a)(2) All interventions, including medication administration, treatments, and services, and responses to those interventions; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure SN visit notes documented medication dose and injection administration site for one (Patient #3) of seven patients. Findings: Patient #3 A review of the POC dated 03/12/26 to 05/10/26 showed orders for SN to administer Rocephin one-gram intramuscular injection daily for three days beginning 03/13/26 for urinary tract infection. A review of SN visit notes conducted on 03/14/26 and 03/15/26 showed no medication administration intra-muscular site or gram dosage of the ordered medication. On 04/08/26 at 12:34 p.m., Staff B stated the nurse did not document where the medication was given or the dose of the medicine that was administered.”

    Rule G1014. Element-level.

  • Discharge And Transfer Summaries

    The inspectors’ words, 208 words

    “Discharge and transfer summaries CFR(s): 484.110(a)(6)(i-iii) (i) A completed discharge summary that is sent to the primary care practitioner or other health care professional who will be responsible for providing care and services to the patient after discharge from the HHA (if any) within 5 business days of the patient’s discharge; or (ii) A completed transfer summary that is sent within 2 business days of a planned transfer, if the patient’s care will be immediately continued in a health care facility; or (iii) A completed transfer summary that is sent within 2 business days of becoming aware of an unplanned transfer, if the patient is still receiving care in a health care facility at the time when the HHA becomes aware of the transfer. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record reviews and interviews, the agency failed to ensure a discharge summary was provided to hospice physician for one (Patient #6) of seven patients. Findings: Patient #6 A review of the clinical record showed discharge to care of self for referral to hospice services on 01/05/26 and showed no discharge summary was provided to the hospice physician. On 04/08/26 at 12:55pa.m., Staff B stated the discharge summary was not sent to the hospice physician.”

    Rule G1022. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 8, 2026Recertification inspection13 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since May 13, 2008.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and home health aide services.
  • Doesn’t offer medical social services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 4 owners or officers are people: Finny Joseph (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Finny Joseph (corporate director); Finny Joseph (managing employee (on the payroll)); Finny Joseph (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3.5 of 5.
  • CMS gives no : “Fewer than 70 patients completed the survey.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, worse; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate56.90% (worse than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate9.34% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.12% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 16 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 73644, where this agency’s office is, 16 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.75 of 5, and this one is rated 3.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.