Enhabit Home Health of Western Oklahoma
A home health agency in Weatherford, Oklahoma 73096
1405 East Main Street, Weatherford, Oklahoma 73096. (469) 621-8696.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.
- 3.5of 5 quality of patient care rating
- 4of 5 patient survey rating
- 6 deficiencies cited in the last three years
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Jan 24, 2024: a recertification inspection.
6 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Jan 24, 2024: recertification inspection6 deficiencies
-
Names And Contact Information
The inspectors’ words, 414 words
“Names and Contact Information CFR(s): 484.102(c)(1) §403.748(c)(1), §416.54(c)(1), §418.113(c)(1), §441.184(c)(1), §460.84(c)(1), §482.15(c)(1), §483.73(c)(1), §483.475(c)(1), §484.102(c)(1), §485.68(c)(1), §485.542(c)(1), §485.625(c)(1), §485.727(c)(1), §485.920(c)(1), §486.360(c)(1), §491.12(c)(1), §494.62(c)(1). [(c) The [facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness communication plan that complies with Federal, State and local laws and must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years [annually for LTC facilities]. The communication plan must include all of the following:] (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians (iv) Other [facilities]. (v) Volunteers. *[For Hospitals at §482.15(c) and CAHs at §485.625(c)] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians (iv) Other [hospitals and CAHs]. (v) Volunteers. *[For RNHCIs at §403.748(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Next of kin, guardian, or custodian. (iv) Other RNHCIs. (v) Volunteers. *[For ASCs at §416.45(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians. (iv) Volunteers. *[For Hospices at §418.113(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Hospice employees. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians. (iv) Other hospices. *[For HHAs at §484.102(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians. (iv) Volunteers. *[For OPOs at §486.360(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (2) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Volunteers. (iv) Other OPOs. (v) Transplant and donor hospitals in the OPO’s Donation Service Area (DSA). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure an Emergency Preparedness Communication Plan included updated required information related to the staff contact information for the agency for all patients and staff. Findings: A review of emergency preparedness records showed no updated Emergency Preparedness Communication Plan which included current staff contact information for the agency. On 01/24/24 at 2:30 p.m., Staff B stated the Emergency Preparedness Communication Plan did not include contact information for current staff of the agency.”
-
Communication With All Physicians
The inspectors’ words, 510 words
“Communication with all physicians CFR(s): 484.60(d)(1) Assure communication with all physicians or allowed practitioners involved in the plan of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure care was coordinated between the agency, alternate service providers and physician for three (Patient #12, 14 and #15) of 18 patients. Findings: Patient #12 A review of a plan of care dated 12/22/23 to 02/19/24 documented a primary diagnosis of urinary tract infection. Documentation showed a physician order dated 01/18/24 for urine collection for urinalysis with culture. On 01/20/24 documentation showed a missed SN visit due to no urine collected (by the ALF staff). A coordination note dated 01/22/24 documented no urine had been collected as the ALF staff were not aware they were responsible to collect the urine sample. A SN note dated 01/23/24 documented the SN pick up the urine sample from the ALF and delivered the sample to the lab for processing. Documentation showed no coordination of care communications with the physician that the urine sample was not collected from 01/18/24 (date of the order) through 01/23/24 (date of sample pick up from the ALF) and showed no coordination of care with the ALF from 01/18/24 (date of the order) until 01/22/24 (date of coordination of care note). On 01/24/24 at 1:47 p.m., Staff A stated the physician for patient #12 should have had communications to ensure coordination of care between the physician and the ALF related to urinalysis sample collection for the patient. Patient #14 A review of a plan of care dated 07/28/23 to 09/25/23 documented a primary diagnosis of cognitive impairment. A physicians order dated 08/28/23 documented discharge from agency services to a hospice care service provider on 08/24/23. Documentation showed a PT discharge dated 08/28/23 (four days after the ordered discharge date). Documentation showed no coordination of care communications between the agency, PT service discipline, hospice service provider and to the physician that the patient was not discharge from agency services on 08/24/23. On 01/24/24 at 1:55 p.m., Staff A stated the physician for patient #14 should have had coordination of care communications to ensure coordination of care with the PT service discipline, hospice service provider and the physician that the patient was not discharge from agency services on 08/24/23. Patient #15 A review of a plan of care dated 12/23/23 to 02/20/24 documented a primary diagnosis of left lower extremity wound. Documentation showed a physician’s order dated 01/02/24 discharge to hospice service provider effective 12/31/23. Documentation showed a desk (non-visit) discharge on 01/01/24 (one day after the ordered discharge date). Documentation showed no coordination of care communications between the agency, hospice service provider and to the physician that the patient was not discharge from agency services on 12/31/23. On 01/24/24 at 2:02 p.m., Staff A stated the physician for patient #15 should have had coordination of care communications to ensure coordination of care with the agency, hospice service provider and the physician that the patient was not discharge from agency services on 12/31/23.”
-
Provide Services In The Plan Of Care
The inspectors’ words, 494 words
“Provide services in the plan of care CFR(s): 484.75(b)(3) Providing services that are ordered by the physician or allowed practitioner as indicated in the plan of care; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure: SN visits were conducted as ordered for one (Patients #12) of 18 patients; SN obtained a urine sample for one (Patient #12) of 18 patients and; SN conducted wound care as ordered for one (Patient #13) of 18 patients. Findings: Patient #12 A review of a plan of care dated 12/22/23 to 02/19/24 documented a primary diagnosis of urinary tract infection with a SN visit frequency of one week one, one every two weeks for two weeks, one week one, one every two weeks for two weeks, then one week two. Documentation showed during the week of 12/24/23 and 12/30/23 no SN visit was conducted (one visit ordered, no visit conducted). Documentation showed a physician order dated 01/18/24 for urine collection for urinalysis with culture. A SN visit note dated 01/23/24 documented pick up of the urine sample from the ALF and delivery of the sample to the lab for processing. Documentation showed no patient refusal of SN visits or urine collection and showed no coordination of care communications with the physician of missed SN visits or that the urine sample was not collected from 01/18/24 (date of the order) through 01/23/24 (date of sample pick up from the ALF). On 01/24/24 at 1:47 p.m., Staff A stated the during the week of 12/24/23 to 12/30/23 no SN visit was conducted and SN did not collect the urine sample from the patient as ordered on 01/18/24, the order did not state the urine sample was to be collected by the ALF staff and showed no coordination of care between the agency and the physician related to urinalysis sample collection for the patient. Patient #13 A review of a plan of care dated 12/28/23 to 02/25/24 documented a primary diagnosis of Diabetes mellitus Type II with foot ulcer; with a SN visit frequency of one week one, three week eight. SN visit notes dated 01/05/24 and 01/10/24 showed no documentation of wound care provided to the left great toe (ordered wound care was Vashe wound cleanser, apply Max org alginate and cover with a Tubigrip dressing and SN visit note dated 01/19/24 documented wound care provided to the left great toe was not the updated wound care ordered by the service provider on 01/18/24 (wound site cleanser, apply Prisma and cover with gauze dressing). Documentation showed no patient refusal of ordered wound care to the left great toe, no physician notification and no change in orders. On 01/24/24 at 1:50 p.m., Staff A stated SN did not document type of wound care performed during SN visits on 01/05/24 and 01/10/24 and SN did not perform updated (changed) wound care to the left great toe during SN visit on 01/19/24.”
-
Preparing Clinical Notes
The inspectors’ words, 562 words
“Preparing clinical notes CFR(s): 484.75(b)(6) Preparing clinical notes; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure clinical visit note documentation was completed timely per agency policy for five (Patients #7, 8, 9, 10 and #11) of 18 patients. Findings: Patient #7 A review of the POC dated 12/14/23 to 02/11/24 showed orders for SN visit frequency of one week one, two week one, then one week seven. Documentation showed SN visit dated 01/09/24 was completed/submitted on 01/12/24 and SN visit dated 01/17/24 was completed/submitted on 01/22/24. Documentation showed no coordination of care related to delayed completion/submission of clinical visit notes. On 01/24/24 at 1:41 p.m., Staff A stated: 1. Clinical visit notes are due within 24 hours of the visit and; 2. SN visit documentation for 01/09/24 and 01/17/24 were not completed/submitted timely. Patient #8 A review of the POC dated 11/20/23 to 01/18/24 showed orders for SN visit frequency of one week two, one every two weeks for two weeks, one week one, one every two weeks for two weeks, then one week one. Documentation showed SN visit dated 12/07/23 was completed/submitted on 12/11/23, 12/19/23 was completed/submitted on 12/26/23, 01/09/24 was completed/submitted on 01/15/24 (SN and PT visit notes), 01/16/24 was completed/submitted on 01/22/24 and 01/18/24 was completed/submitted on 01/23/24. Documentation showed no coordination of care related to delayed completion/submission of clinical visit notes. On 01/24/24 at 1:42 p.m., Staff A stated: 1. Clinical visit notes are due within 24 hours of the visit and; 2. SN visit documentation for 12/07/23, 12/19/23, 01/09/24, 01/16/24, 01/18/24 were not completed/submitted timely. Patient #9 A review of the POC dated 12/21/23 to 02/13/24 showed orders for SN visit frequency of one week two, one every two weeks for two weeks, one week one, one every two weeks for two weeks, then one week two. Documentation showed SN visit dated 12/19/23 was completed/submitted on 12/26/23. Documentation showed no coordination of care related to delayed completion/submission of clinical visit notes. On 01/24/24 at 1:43 p.m., Staff A stated: 1. Clinical visit notes are due within 24 hours of the visit and; 2. SN visit documentation for 12/19/23 was not completed/submitted timely. Patient #10 A review of the POC dated 11/16/23 to 01/14/24 showed orders for SN visit frequency of one time a week for seven weeks. Documentation showed SN visit dated 12/13/23 was completed/submitted on 12/18/23, 12/21/23 was completed/submitted on 01/08/24 and SN visit dated 01/10/24 was completed/submitted on 01/15/24. Documentation showed no coordination of care related to delayed completion/submission of clinical visit notes. On 01/24/24 at 1:44 p.m., Staff A stated: 1. Clinical visit notes are due within 24 hours of the visit and; 2. SN visit documentation for 12/13/23, 12/21/23 and 01/10/24 were not completed/submitted timely. Patient #11 A review of the POC dated 12/26/23 to 02/23/24 showed orders for SN visit frequency of one time a week for nine weeks. Documentation showed SN visit dated 12/12/23 was completed/submitted on 12/18/23, 12/21/23 was completed/submitted on 12/26/23 and SN visit dated 01/16/24 was completed/submitted on 01/22/24. Documentation showed no coordination of care related to delayed completion/submission of clinical visit notes. On 01/24/24 at 1:46 p.m., Staff A stated: 1. Clinical visit notes are due within 24 hours of the visit and; 2. SN visit documentation for 12/12/23, 12/21/23 and 01/16/24 were not completed/submitted timely.”
-
Interventions And Patient Response
The inspectors’ words, 273 words
“Interventions and patient response CFR(s): 484.110(a)(2) All interventions, including medication administration, treatments, and services, and responses to those interventions; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure SN visit note documentation was complete for two (Patients #6 and #10) of 18 patients. Findings: Patient #6 A review of the POC dated 01/05/24 to 03/04/24 showed a SN visit frequency of one week two, one every two week two, one week one, one every two week two, then one time a week for one week. A physicians order dated 01/10/24 documented SN to remove and reapply surgical site dressing in four days. SN visit note dated 01/15/24 documented no removal and reapplication of a surgical site dressing. Documentation showed no patient refusal of care, no physician notification and no change in orders. On 01/24/24 at 1:40 p.m., Staff A stated the SN visit notes dated 01/19/24 for patient #6 showed no documentation of removal and reapplication of the surgical site dressing as ordered by the physician. Patient #10 A review of the POC dated 11/16/23 to 01/14/24 showed a SN visit frequency of one time a week for one week for SN to assess the patient’s weight and report to the physician weight less than 122 pounds and greater than 132 pounds. SN visit note dated 12/13/23 documented no weight assessment. Documentation showed no patient refusal, physician notification or change in orders. On 01/24/24 at 1:45 p.m., Staff A stated the SN visit notes dated 12/13/23 for patient #10 showed no documentation of assessment of the patient’s weight as ordered by the physician.”
-
Discharge And Transfer Summaries
The inspectors’ words, 461 words
“Discharge and transfer summaries CFR(s): 484.110(a)(6)(i-iii) (i) A completed discharge summary that is sent to the primary care practitioner or other health care professional who will be responsible for providing care and services to the patient after discharge from the HHA (if any) within 5 business days of the patient’s discharge; or (ii) A completed transfer summary that is sent within 2 business days of a planned transfer, if the patient’s care will be immediately continued in a health care facility; or (iii) A completed transfer summary that is sent within 2 business days of becoming aware of an unplanned transfer, if the patient is still receiving care in a health care facility at the time when the HHA becomes aware of the transfer. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record reviews and interview, the agency failed to ensure a completed transfer/discharge summary was provided: 1. To the receiving service provider for four (Patients #14, 15, 16 and #17) of 18 patients and; 2. To the physician within 5 days of discharge for four (Patients #14, 15, 16 and #18) of 18 patients. Findings: Patient #14 A review of the clinical record documented discharge from the agency to hospice service provider on 08/28/23. Documentation showed no discharge summary was provided to the receiving hospice service provider at the time of discharge and documentation showed the discharge summary was faxed to the physician on 09/06/23 (nine days after discharge). Patient #15 A review of the clinical record documented discharge from the agency to hospice service provider on 01/01/24. Documentation showed no discharge summary was provided to the receiving hospice service provider at the time of discharge and documentation showed the discharge summary was faxed to the physician on 01/17/24 (16 days after discharge). Patient #16 A review of the clinical record documented transfer to inpatient service provider with subsequent discharge from the agency on 11/14/23. Documentation showed no transfer/discharge summary was provided to the inpatient service provider and documentation showed the discharge summary was faxed to the physician on 01/05/24 (52 days after discharge). Patient #17 A review of the clinical record documented transfer to inpatient service provider on 12/03/23. Documentation showed no transfer summary was provided to the inpatient service provider or to the physician. Patient #18 A review of the clinical record documented discharge from the agency on 11/09/23. Documentation showed a discharge summary was provided to the physician on 11/15/23 (six days after discharge. On 01/24/24 at 1:55 p.m. to 2:10 p.m., Staff A stated: 1. No transfer/discharge summary was sent to the receiving service providers for Patients #14, 15, 16 and #17 and; No transfer/discharge summary was sent to the physician within 5 days of the transfer/discharge for Patients #14, 15, 16 and #18.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2024 | Recertification inspection | 6 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified home health agency since Mar 26, 2003.
- Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Who does the caring?
- Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy and speech pathology.
- Doesn’t offer medical social services and home health aide services.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Advanced Homecare Management LLC owns 100% directly since Feb 6, 2013.
- 8 owners or officers are people: Evan D. Bertrand (corporate officer, 0%); Keri A Gaytan (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Lisa M Arbuckle (managing employee (on the payroll)); Julie A. Farmer (managing employee (on the payroll)); Debra Heck (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Dale R Clift (corporate officer); Sean P Richardson (corporate officer); Melinda K. Lokey (corporate officer, 0%).
- A private-equity firm is among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enhabit Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Dec 31, 2014 |
| Advanced Homecare Management LLC | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Feb 6, 2013 |
| Anchor Parent, LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | May 15, 2026 |
| Anchor Midco, LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | May 15, 2026 |
| Anchor Topco, LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | May 15, 2026 |
| Kinderhook Capital Fund 8, L.P. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 34.52% | May 15, 2026 |
| Kinderhook Capital Fund 8-B, L.P. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 29.14% | May 15, 2026 |
| Stepstone K Strategic Opportunities Fund V, L.P. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 7.27% | May 15, 2026 |
| Pacific Life Insurance Company | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 7.27% | May 15, 2026 |
| Enhabit Holdings, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | Jul 1, 2022 | |
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Holds 5% or more security interest | Jun 30, 2022 |
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates its quality of patient care 3.5 of 5.
- Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (199 surveys completed): 87% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 77% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars | 3.5 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 76.62% (same as the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 13.63% (same as the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 3.63% (same as the national rate) |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 16 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 73096, where this agency’s office is, 15 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 3.5 of 5.
CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Quality rating |
|---|---|
| A Path of Care Home Health VII, LLC | 3.5 |
| Enhabit Home Health of Western Oklahoma This home health agency | 3.5 |
| Assured Home Health of Clinton | 3.5 |
| Great Plains Home Care | 4 |
| Angels Care Home Health of Oklahoma | 4 |
| Carter Healthcare of Central Oklahoma, LLC | 4 |
| Traditions Health of Enid | 4.5 |
| Complete Home Health of Oklahoma City | 2.5 |
| Choice Health at Home - Kingfisher | 3.5 |
| Elara Caring Xxiv | 5 |
| Mays Housecall Home Health of Ada, LLC | 4 |
| Shepherd Home Health & Hospice, LLC | 3 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
- Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Care Agencies (6jpm-sxkc).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Patient Survey (ccn4-8vby).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR home health inspection reports (HHA_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency All Owners (fc009b2d-7846-44b1-b4a1-692f0c143879).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency Enrollments (15f64ab4-3172-4a27-b589-ebd67a6d28aa).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health ZIP Codes (m5eg-upu5).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.
From the agency
The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.