Hearth Record

Sunshine Home Care, Inc.

A home health agency in Altus, Oklahoma 73521

417 East Tamarack, Suite C, Altus, Oklahoma 73521. (580) 477-2014.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jul 23, 2025: a complaint and recertification inspection.

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jul 23, 2025: complaint and recertification inspection7 deficiencies
  • Names And Contact Information

    The inspectors’ words, 416 words

    “Names and Contact Information CFR(s): 484.102(c)(1) §403.748(c)(1), §416.54(c)(1), §418.113(c)(1), §441.184(c)(1), §460.84(c)(1), §482.15(c)(1), §483.73(c)(1), §483.475(c)(1), §484.102(c)(1), §485.68(c)(1), §485.542(c)(1), §485.625(c)(1), §485.727(c)(1), §485.920(c)(1), §486.360(c)(1), §491.12(c)(1), §494.62(c)(1). [(c) The [facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness communication plan that complies with Federal, State and local laws and must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years [annually for LTC facilities]. The communication plan must include all of the following:] (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians (iv) Other [facilities]. (v) Volunteers. *[For Hospitals at §482.15(c) and CAHs at §485.625(c)] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians (iv) Other [hospitals and CAHs]. (v) Volunteers. *[For RNHCIs at §403.748(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Next of kin, guardian, or custodian. (iv) Other RNHCIs. (v) Volunteers. *[For ASCs at §416.45(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians. (iv) Volunteers. *[For Hospices at §418.113(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Hospice employees. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians. (iv) Other hospices. *[For HHAs at §484.102(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians. (iv) Volunteers. *[For OPOs at §486.360(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (2) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Volunteers. (iv) Other OPOs. (v) Transplant and donor hospitals in the OPO’s Donation Service Area (DSA). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure an Emergency Preparedness Communication Plan included current employee contact information for the agency for 93 patients and 17 employees. Findings: A review of administrative records showed an Emergency Preparedness Communication Plan did not include contact information for two of 17 current employees for the agency. On 07/23/25 at 1:20 p.m., Staff A stated the Emergency Preparedness Communication Plan was not updated to include contact information for all current employees of the agency.”

    Rule E0030. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Program Data

    The inspectors’ words, 193 words

    “Program data CFR(s): 484.65(b)(1),(2),(3) Standard: Program data. (1) The program must utilize quality indicator data, including measures derived from OASIS, where applicable, and other relevant data, in the design of its program. (2) The HHA must use the data collected to- (i) Monitor the effectiveness and safety of services and quality of care; and (ii) Identify opportunities for improvement. (3) The frequency and detail of the data collection must be approved by the HHA’s governing body. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interviews, the agency failed to ensure statistical quality indicator data was utilized in the analysis and reporting of data in the agency’s QAPI program in calendar years 2023, 2024 and 01/01/25 to 03/31/25 for all patients and employees. Findings: A review of administrative QAPI records showed no statistical quality indicator data was utilized in the analysis and reporting of data in the agency’s QAPI Program in calendar years 2023, 2024 and 01/01/25 to 03/31/25. On 07/23/25 at 1:20 p.m., Staff A stated QAPI records didn’t include statistical data for analysis and reporting of QAPI data during calendar years 2023, 2024 and 01/01/25 to 03/31/25.”

    Rule G0644. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Performance Improvement Projects

    The inspectors’ words, 163 words

    “Performance improvement projects CFR(s): 484.65(d)(1)(2) Standard: Performance improvement projects. Beginning July 13, 2018 HHAs must conduct performance improvement projects. (1) The number and scope of distinct improvement projects conducted annually must reflect the scope, complexity, and past performance of the HHA’s services and operations. (2) The HHA must document the quality improvement projects undertaken, the reasons for conducting these projects, and the measurable progress achieved on these projects. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interviews, the agency failed to ensure performance improvement projects included measurable goals for the agency in calendar years 2023, 2024 and 01/01/25 to 03/31/25 for all patients and employees. Findings: A review of administrative QAPI Program records showed no measurable goals for performance improvement projects for the agency in calendar years 2023, 2024 and 01/01/25 to 03/31/25. On 07/23/25 at 1:20 p.m., Staff A stated the agency’s PIPS did not have measurable goas in calendar years 2023, 2024 and 01/01/25 to 03/31/25.”

    Rule G0658. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Governing Body

    The inspectors’ words, 167 words

    “Governing body CFR(s): 484.105(a) Standard: Governing body. A governing body (or designated persons so functioning) must assume full legal authority and responsibility for the agency’s overall management and operation, the provision of all home health services, fiscal operations, review of the agency’s budget and its operational plans, and its quality assessment and performance improvement program. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure governing body oversite of the agency’s program evaluation, budget authorization and capital expenditures for calendar year 2024 and 01/01/25 to 07/22/25 for all patients and employees. Findings: A review of administrative governing body meeting records showed no governing body oversite of the agency’s program evaluation, budget authorization and capital expenditures for calendar year 2024 and 01/01/25 to 07/22/25. On 07/23/25 at 1:25 p.m., Staff A stated governing body meeting minutes showed no governing body oversite of the agency’s program evaluation, budget authorization and capital expenditures for calendar year 2024 and 01/01/25 to 07/22/25.”

    Rule G0942. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Hha Can No Longer Meet The Patient’S Needs

    The inspectors’ words, 282 words

    “HHA can no longer meet the patient’s needs CFR(s): 484.50(d)(1) The transfer or discharge is necessary for the patient’s welfare because the HHA and the physician or allowed practitioner, who is responsible for the home health plan of care agree that the HHA can no longer meet the patient’s needs, based on the patient’s acuity. The HHA must arrange a safe and appropriate transfer to other care entities when the needs of the patient exceed the HHA’s capabilities; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure notification to the physician prior to discharge for two (Patients #7 and #9) of nine patients. Findings: Patient #7 A review of the clinical records showed the patient was discharged from the agency on 03/23/25 as the agency was unable to meet the patient’s needs. Documentation showed no communication or coordination of care with the ordering medical provider prior to the date of discharge to notify that the patient was being discharged from home care services. On 07/23/25 at 1:00 p.m., Staff A stated the agency did not communicate with the ordering provider prior to the discharge from the agency. Patient #9 A review of the clinical records showed the patient was discharged from the agency on 02/28/25 for change in the payor source and showed no communication or coordination of care with the ordering medical provider prior to the date of discharge that the patient was being discharged from home care services. On 07/23/25 at 1:08 p.m., Staff A stated the agency did not communicate with the ordering medical provider prior to the discharge date that the patient was being discharged from the agency.”

    Rule G0454. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • Patient/Payer Will No Longer Pay For Services

    The inspectors’ words, 112 words

    “Patient/payer will no longer pay for services CFR(s): 484.50(d)(2) The patient or payer will no longer pay for the services provided by the HHA; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure advance beneficiary notice was provided prior to discharge from agency services to one (Patient #9) of nine patients. Findings: Patient #9 A review of the clinical record showed no advance notice of discharge was provided to the patient prior to discharge from the agency on 02/28/25 for a change in the payor source. On 07/23/25 at 1:08 p.m., Staff A stated an ABN was not provided to the patient.”

    Rule G0456. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • Onsite Supervisory Visit Every 14 Days

    The inspectors’ words, 235 words

    “Onsite supervisory visit every 14 days CFR(s): 484.80(h)(1)(i) (1)(i) If home health aide services are provided to a patient who is receiving skilled nursing, physical or occupational therapy, or speech language pathology services— (A) A registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional who is familiar with the patient, the patient’s plan of care, and the written patient care instructions described in paragraph (g) of this section, must complete a supervisory assessment of the aide services being provided no less frequently than every 14 days; and (B) The home health aide does not need to be present during the supervisory assessment described in paragraph (h)(1)(i)(A) of this section. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure certified home health aide supervisory visits were completed every 14 days for one (Patient #2) of nine patients. Findings: Patient #2 A review of the POC dated 06/13/25 to 08/11/25 showed orders for CHHA visits of two times a week for eight weeks. A review of the clinical record showed CHHA supervisory visits were completed on 06/09/25 and 07/01/25 (23 days). Home health aide visits were conducted on 06/17/25, 06/19/25, 06/23/25 and on 06/24/25. Documentation showed no patient refusal of supervisory visits, no physician notification and no change in orders. On 07/23/25 at 12:47 p.m., Staff A stated a CHHA supervisory visit should have occurred on or before 06/23/25.”

    Rule G0808. Element-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 23, 2025Complaint and recertification inspection7 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Aug 9, 1995.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 7 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and home health aide services.
  • Doesn’t offer medical social services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Sunshine Homecare Inc. owns 100% directly since Jan 3, 2012.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: Jeremi Finley (corporate officer); Jeremi Finley (corporate director); Jeremi Finley (managing employee (on the payroll)); P.s. Vasantha Nair (owns 5% or more directly); P.s. Vasantha Nair (corporate director); Carolyn Richardson (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Sunshine Homecare Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Jan 3, 2012
Sunshine Homecare Inc.General partner100%Jan 5, 1995

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (57 surveys completed): 87% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 91% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, worse; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 55 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate34.52% (worse than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate14.50% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.13% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 12 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 73521, where this agency’s office is, 12 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4 of 5, and this one is rated 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.