Hearth Record

Elara Caring Xviii

A home health agency in Sallisaw, Oklahoma 74955

103 N Walnut Street, Suite A, Sallisaw, Oklahoma 74955. (918) 235-0536.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jan 19, 2024: a complaint and recertification inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jan 19, 2024: complaint and recertification inspection4 deficiencies
  • Conformance With Physician Orders

    The inspectors’ words, 192 words

    “Conformance with physician orders CFR(s): 484.60(b) Standard: Conformance with physician or allowed practitioner orders. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the Skilled Nurse failed to obtain weights or ankle measurements as ordered on the POC for one (#7) of thirteen (#1 - #13) records reviewed. Patient #7 A review of the POC for Patient #7 for the re-certification period 11/12/23 to 01/15/24 revealed a primary diagnosis of Sepsis and secondary diagnosis of Heart Failure and Paraplegia. Review of the POC revealed orders for “weight to be obtained by SN every SN visit and weight gain of 2 lbs overnight or 5 lbs in 1 week to be reported to the Physician. If unable to weigh patient, SN to obtain measurement of ankles in CM at each visit and report an increase of 1 CM to Physician”. Further review of SN Visit documentation failed to provide evidence of weights or ankle measurements as ordered for SN visits conducted 11/12/23 - 1/15/24. On 01/19/24 at 10:00 AM, the Administrator stated the SN failed to obtain weights or measurements as ordered on the POC for Patient #7.”

    Rule G0578. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Services By Skilled Professionals

    The inspectors’ words, 199 words

    “Services by skilled professionals CFR(s): 484.75(a) Standard: Provision of services by skilled professionals. Skilled professional services are authorized, delivered, and supervised only by health care professionals who meet the appropriate qualifications specified under §484.115 and who practice according to the HHA’s policies and procedures. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the Skilled Nurse failed to obtain wound measurements as required for one (#1) of thirteen (#1 - #13) records reviewed. Patient #1 A review of the POC for Patient #1 for the re-certification period 12/30/23 to 02/27/24 revealed a primary diagnosis of Aftercare of Surgical Wound and secondary diagnosis of Quadriplegia. Review of the POC revealed orders for SN or Caregiver to provide Wound care to the unstageable pressure ulcer of the Right distal ankle 3 times a week. Further review of the Wound Care Report indicated Wound #4 was activated on 09/01/23 and inactivated on 10/06/23. SN Visit documentation failed to provide evidence of wound measurements for weekly SN visits for the weeks of 9/3, 9/7, 9/17, 9/24 and 10/1. On 01/19/24 at 10:00 AM, the Administrator stated the SN failed to obtain wound measurements as required for Patient #1.”

    Rule G0702. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • 5 Calendar Days After Start Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 189 words

    “5 calendar days after start of care CFR(s): 484.55(b)(1) The comprehensive assessment must be completed in a timely manner, consistent with the patient’s immediate needs, but no later than 5 calendar days after the start of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the Physical Therapist failed to conduct an evaluation within 5 days of the SOC as part of the comprehensive assessment for one (#3) of six (#2, #3, #8 - #10, #12) records reviewed with orders for Physical Therapy evaluation. Patient #3 A review of the POC for Patient #3 for the initial certification period 11/29/23 to 01/27/24 revealed a primary diagnosis of Chronic Obstruction Pulmonary Disease. The referral orders and the POC included orders for “Physical Therapy to evaluate...”. Further review of Physical Therapy Notes revealed the Physical Therapy Evaluation was conducted on 12/05/23 (6 days after the Initial Start of Care Visit) and no documentation was evident as to the reason for delay. On 01/19/23 at 10:00 AM, the Administrator stated the Physical Therapist failed to conduct the evaluation within 5 days as required for Patient #3.”

    Rule G0520. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • A Review Of All Current Medications

    The inspectors’ words, 199 words

    “A review of all current medications CFR(s): 484.55(c)(5) A review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review and interview, the Skilled Nurse failed to conduct a review of all medications the patient was taking and maintain a current medication list for one (#3) of thirteen (#1 - #13) records reviewed. Patient #3 During a home observation visit on 01/18/24 at 2:00PM, Pt#3 informed this Surveyor that she requires Oxygen most of the day and placed her Oxygen on during the interview per nasal cannula at 2 liters per minute. A review of the POC for Patient #3 for certification period 11/29/23 to 01/27/24 revealed the last Drug Regimen Review was conducted 11/30/23 during the SOC RN visit. Further review of the “Client Medication Record” failed to provide evidence Oxygen was included on the medication list. On 01/19/24 at 10:00 AM, the Supervising Nurse stated Oxygen was not included on the agency’s medication list for Patient #3.”

    Rule G0536. Element-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 19, 2024Complaint and recertification inspection4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Dec 14, 2007.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and medical social services.
  • Doesn’t offer home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Healthcare Innovations in Home Services LLC owns 100% directly since Sep 30, 2013.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Daniel R Manley (corporate officer); Ananth P Mohan (corporate officer, 0%); Ananth P Mohan (corporate director); Lori Shearer (runs it (operational or managerial control)); John Mcmahon (corporate officer); Katie L Monastiere (corporate officer); Sande Garoutte (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Angel Stansbury (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Airjaguar Holdco, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%May 15, 2018
Ec Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 15, 2026
Ec Homecare Holdings Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 15, 2026
Airjaguar Acquisition, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%May 15, 2018
Ec Homecare Holdings Intermediate, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 15, 2026
Ec Homecare Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 15, 2026
HCI Holdings CorporationOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Sep 30, 2013
Healthcare Innovations Private Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Sep 30, 2013
Hci Parent Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Sep 30, 2013
Jhh/Cima Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Sep 30, 2013
Healthcare Innovations in Home Services LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Sep 30, 2013
Hci In-Home Services Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 1, 2012
Bw Nhhc Holdco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%May 15, 2018
Acof VII Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies49.3%Jul 15, 2026
Ares Corporate Opportunities Fund VII, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies35.8%Jul 15, 2026
Davita Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies32.9%Jul 15, 2026
Total Renal Care, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies32.9%Jul 15, 2026
Ares Corporate Opportunities Fund VII Parallel (Te), L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies9.07%Jul 15, 2026
Dawson Holdings (Armstrong), LPOwns 5% or more through other companies7.8%Jul 15, 2026
Acof VII Axiom Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies7.8%Jul 15, 2026

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (123 surveys completed): 88% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 78% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate80.01% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate12.91% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.94% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 25 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 74955, where this agency’s office is, 20 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 2.5 of 5, and this one is rated 5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.