Hearth Record

Northeastern Health System Sequoyah

A home health agency in Sallisaw, Oklahoma 74955

213 East Redwood, Sallisaw, Oklahoma 74955. (918) 774-1171.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 22 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jun 26, 2025: a complaint and recertification inspection.

22 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 2 of them at condition level, the most serious.

2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

22 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

22 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jun 26, 2025: complaint and recertification inspection22 deficiencies
  • Quality Assessment/Performance Improvement

    The inspectors’ words, 456 words

    “Quality assessment/performance improvement CFR(s): 484.65 Condition of participation: Quality assessment and performance improvement (QAPI). The HHA must develop, implement, evaluate, and maintain an effective, ongoing, HHA-wide, data-driven QAPI program. The HHA’s governing body must ensure that the program reflects the complexity of its organization and services; involves all HHA services (including those services provided under contract or arrangement); focuses on indicators related to improved outcomes, including the use of emergent care services, hospital admissions and re-admissions; and takes actions that address the HHA’s performance across the spectrum of care, including the prevention and reduction of medical errors. The HHA must maintain documentary evidence of its QAPI program and be able to demonstrate its operation to CMS. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interviews, the agency failed to ensure evidence of a patient centered QAPI Program in calendar years 2023, 2024 and 01/01/25 to 06/24/25 for all patients and employees. The failed practice had the potential to place all patients and employees at risk for insufficient self-monitoring and efforts to improve care, services and operations. See tag G642. Based on record review and interviews, the agency failed to ensure utilization of QAPI quality indicator data in calendar years 2023, 2024 and 01/01/25 to 06/24/25 for all patients and employees. The failed practice had the potential to place all patients at risk of repeated agency mishaps, ineffective management of care and poor quality of care. See Tag #G644. Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure conduction of patient centered QAPI program activities included self-monitoring efforts that identified and evaluated outcomes to improve care, services, and operations in calendar years 2023, 2024 and 01/01/25 to 06/24/25 for all patients and employees. The failed practice had the potential to place all patients and employees at risk loss of opportunity to identify problems and loss of ability to correct problems that threaten the health and safety of all patients and staff. See tag #G646. Based on record review and interviews, the agency failed to ensure performance improvement projects for the agency in calendar years 2023 and 2024 for all patients and three employees. The failed practice had the potential to place the agency, its patients and all employees at risk for stagnated efforts for improvement because of unidentified problematic clinical, administrative, infection control or personnel problems. See Tag #G658. Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure governing body oversite of conduction of a patient centered QAPI program in calendar years 2023 and 2024 for all patients and employees. The failed practice had the potential to place all patients and employees at risk for insufficient governing body oversite of agency services and operations. See Tag #G660. .”

    Rule G0640. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Organization And Administration Of Services

    The inspectors’ words, 304 words

    “Organization and administration of services CFR(s): 484.105 Condition of participation: Organization and administration of services. The HHA must organize, manage, and administer its resources to attain and maintain the highest practicable functional capacity, including providing optimal care to achieve the goals and outcomes identified in the patient’s plan of care, for each patient’s medical, nursing, and rehabilitative needs. The HHA must assure that administrative and supervisory functions are not delegated to another agency or organization, and all services not furnished directly are monitored and controlled. The HHA must set forth, in writing, its organizational structure, including lines of authority, and services furnished. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure governing body oversite of the agency for program evaluation, operating budget, and capital expenditure plan in calendar years 2023 and 2024 for all patients and employees. The failed practice had the potential to impact on the care and services provided by the agency in the communities that it serves. See tag G942. Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure governing body appointment of the administrator for the agency in calendar years 2023 and 2024 and 01/01/25 to 06/24/25 for all patients and staff. The failed practice had the potential to effect day-to-day operational oversite responsibilities of the agency, impacting the services its patients received. See tag G946. Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure governing body appointment of a supervising nurse for the agency in calendar years 2023 and 2024 and 01/01/25 to 06/24/25 for all patients and employees. The failed practice had the potential to effect the services provided by the agency and the subsequent care outcomes of its patients and to provide adequate clinical supervisory oversite of its staff. See tag G958. .”

    Rule G0940. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Names And Contact Information

    The inspectors’ words, 429 words

    “Names and Contact Information CFR(s): 484.102(c)(1) §403.748(c)(1), §416.54(c)(1), §418.113(c)(1), §441.184(c)(1), §460.84(c)(1), §482.15(c)(1), §483.73(c)(1), §483.475(c)(1), §484.102(c)(1), §485.68(c)(1), §485.542(c)(1), §485.625(c)(1), §485.727(c)(1), §485.920(c)(1), §486.360(c)(1), §491.12(c)(1), §494.62(c)(1). [(c) The [facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness communication plan that complies with Federal, State and local laws and must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years [annually for LTC facilities]. The communication plan must include all of the following:] (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians (iv) Other [facilities]. (v) Volunteers. *[For Hospitals at §482.15(c) and CAHs at §485.625(c)] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians (iv) Other [hospitals and CAHs]. (v) Volunteers. *[For RNHCIs at §403.748(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Next of kin, guardian, or custodian. (iv) Other RNHCIs. (v) Volunteers. *[For ASCs at §416.45(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians. (iv) Volunteers. *[For Hospices at §418.113(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Hospice employees. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians. (iv) Other hospices. *[For HHAs at §484.102(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians. (iv) Volunteers. *[For OPOs at §486.360(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (2) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Volunteers. (iv) Other OPOs. (v) Transplant and donor hospitals in the OPO’s Donation Service Area (DSA). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure an Emergency Preparedness Communication Plan included current employee contact information for the agency for nine (Patients #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and #9) of nine patients and seven employees. Findings: A review of administrative records showed an Emergency Preparedness Communication Plan with former employee contact information and had no current employee contact information for the agency. On 06/25/25 at 1:50 p.m., Staff A stated the Emergency Preparedness Communication Plan was not updated to include contact information for current employees of the agency.”

    Rule E0030. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Program Scope

    The inspectors’ words, 213 words

    “Program scope CFR(s): 484.65(a)(1),(2) Standard: Program scope. (1) The program must at least be capable of showing measurable improvement in indicators for which there is evidence that improvement in those indicators will improve health outcomes, patient safety, and quality of care. (2) The HHA must measure, analyze, and track quality indicators, including adverse patient events, and other aspects of performance that enable the HHA to assess processes of care, HHA services, and operations. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interviews, the agency failed to ensure evidence of a patient centered QAPI Program in calendar years 2023, 2024 and 01/01/25 to 06/24/25 for all patients and employees. The failed practice had the potential to place all patients and employees at risk for insufficient self-monitoring and efforts to improve care, services and operations. Findings: A review of QAPI records showed no QAPI program improvement quarterly meeting activity, measurements, analysis, tracking or evaluation of data by the agency in calendar years 2023, 2024 and 01/01/25 to 06/24/25. On 06/25/25 at 2:40 p.m., Staff A stated: 1. All the QAPI program documentation was provided. 2. There were no QAPI program meeting minutes or documented activities for calendar years 2023 and 2024 and 01/01/25 to 06/24/25. 3. We failed at QA.”

    Rule G0642. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Program Data

    The inspectors’ words, 218 words

    “Program data CFR(s): 484.65(b)(1),(2),(3) Standard: Program data. (1) The program must utilize quality indicator data, including measures derived from OASIS, where applicable, and other relevant data, in the design of its program. (2) The HHA must use the data collected to- (i) Monitor the effectiveness and safety of services and quality of care; and (ii) Identify opportunities for improvement. (3) The frequency and detail of the data collection must be approved by the HHA’s governing body. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interviews, the agency failed to ensure utilization of QAPI quality indicator data in calendar years 2023, 2024 and 01/01/25 to 06/24/25 for all patients and employees. The failed practice had the potential to place all patients at risk of repeated agency mishaps, ineffective management of care and poor quality of care. Findings: A review of QAPI records showed no quality indicator data collection sources were utilized in the analysis and reporting of data in the agency’s QAPI Program in calendar years 2023, 2024 and 01/01/25 to 06/24/25. On 06/25/25 at 2:40 p.m., Staff A stated: 1. All the QAPI program documentation was provided. 2. There were no QAPI program meeting minutes or documented activities for calendar years 2023 and 2024 and 01/01/25 to 06/24/25. 3. We failed at QA.”

    Rule G0644. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Program Activities

    The inspectors’ words, 225 words

    “Program activities CFR(s): 484.65(c) (1) The HHA’s performance improvement activities must— (i) Focus on high risk, high volume, or problem-prone areas; (ii) Consider incidence, prevalence, and severity of problems in those areas; and (iii) Lead to an immediate correction of any identified problem that directly or potentially threaten the health and safety of patients. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure conduction of patient centered QAPI program activities included self-monitoring efforts that identified and evaluated outcomes to improve care, services, and operations in calendar years 2023, 2024 and 01/01/25 to 06/24/25 for all patients and employees. The failed practice had the potential to place all patients and employees at risk loss of opportunity to identify problems and loss of ability to correct problems that threaten the health and safety of all patients and staff. Findings: A review of QAPI records showed no patient centered QAPI Program activities that included self-monitoring efforts that identified and evaluated outcomes to improve care, services, and operations in calendar years 2023, 2024 and 01/01/25 to 06/24/25. On 06/25/25 at 2:40 p.m., Staff A stated: 1. All the QAPI program documentation was provided. 2. There were no QAPI program meeting minutes or documented activities for calendar years 2023 and 2024 and 01/01/25 to 06/24/25. 3. We failed at QA.”

    Rule G0646. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Performance Improvement Projects

    The inspectors’ words, 219 words

    “Performance improvement projects CFR(s): 484.65(d)(1)(2) Standard: Performance improvement projects. Beginning July 13, 2018 HHAs must conduct performance improvement projects. (1) The number and scope of distinct improvement projects conducted annually must reflect the scope, complexity, and past performance of the HHA’s services and operations. (2) The HHA must document the quality improvement projects undertaken, the reasons for conducting these projects, and the measurable progress achieved on these projects. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interviews, the agency failed to ensure performance improvement projects for the agency in calendar years 2023 and 2024 for all patients and three employees. The failed practice had the potential to place the agency, its patients and all employees at risk for stagnated efforts for improvement because of unidentified problematic clinical, administrative, infection control or personnel problems. Findings: A review of QAPI Program records showed no performance improvement project goals, collection, analysis and review of related data and follow up monitoring and reporting of the identified performance improvement project problem in calendar years 2023 and 2024. On 06/25/25 at 2:40 p.m., Staff A stated: 1. All the QAPI program documentation was provided. 2. There were no QAPI program meeting minutes or documented activities for calendar years 2023 and 2024 and 01/01/25 to 06/24/25. 3. We failed at QA.”

    Rule G0658. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Executive Responsibilities For Qapi

    The inspectors’ words, 212 words

    “Executive responsibilities for QAPI CFR(s): 484.65(e)(1)(2)(3)(4) Standard: Executive responsibilities. The HHA’s governing body is responsible for ensuring the following: (1) That an ongoing program for quality improvement and patient safety is defined, implemented, and maintained; (2) That the HHA-wide quality assessment and performance improvement efforts address priorities for improved quality of care and patient safety, and that all improvement actions are evaluated for effectiveness; (3) That clear expectations for patient safety are established, implemented, and maintained; and (4) That any findings of fraud or waste are appropriately addressed. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure governing body oversite of conduction of a patient centered QAPI program in calendar years 2023 and 2024 for all patients and employees. The failed practice had the potential to place all patients and employees at risk for insufficient governing body oversite of agency services and operations. Findings: A review of governing body meeting minute records showed no governing body oversite in the conduction of a patient centered QAPI program for calendar years 2023 and 2024. On 06/25/25 at 2:40 p.m., Staff A stated there were no QAPI program meeting minutes or documented activities for calendar years 2023 and 2024 to report to the governing body.”

    Rule G0660. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Infection Control

    The inspectors’ words, 185 words

    “Infection control CFR(s): 484.70(b)(1)(2) Standard: Control. The HHA must maintain a coordinated agency-wide program for the surveillance, identification, prevention, control, and investigation of infectious and communicable diseases that is an integral part of the HHA’s quality assessment and performance improvement (QAPI) program. The infection control program must include: (1) A method for identifying infectious and communicable disease problems; and (2) A plan for the appropriate actions that are expected to result in improvement and disease prevention. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure infection control program surveillance data was included in QAPI program activities in calendar years 2023, 2024 and 01/01/25 to 06/24/25 for all patients and employees. Findings: A review of QAPI records for calendar years 2023, 2024 and 01/01/25 to 06/24/25 were requested for review. No records were provided that showed infection control surveillance data. On 06/25/25 at 2:40 p.m., Staff A stated: 1. All QAPI program documentation was provided. 2. There were no QAPI program meeting minutes or documented activities for calendar years 2023 and 2024 and 01/01/25 to 06/24/25.”

    Rule G0684. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Home Health Aide Assignments And Duties

    The inspectors’ words, 319 words

    “Home health aide assignments and duties CFR(s): 484.80(g)(1) Standard: Home health aide assignments and duties. Home health aides are assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional, with written patient care instructions for a home health aide prepared by that registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional (that is, physical therapist, speech-language pathologist, or occupational therapist). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure a home health aide care plan was reviewed and updated for the certification period for three (Patients #3, 5 and #9) of nine patients. Findings: Patient #3 A review of the clinical record showed no documented home health aide care plan or receipt of assignment by the CHHA for the episode of 05/04/25 through 07/02/25. The clinical record showed home health aide visits were completed on 05/05/25, 05/08/25, 05/12/25, 05/15/25, 05/19/25, 05/22/25, 05/29/25, 06/02/25, 06/05/25, 06/09/25, 06/12/25, 06/16/25 and on 06/19/25. On 06/26/25 at 12:46 p.m., Staff B stated the clinical record showed no home health aide care plan. Patient #5 A review of the clinical record showed no documented home health aide care plan or receipt of assignment by the CHHA for the episode of 05/13/25 through 07/11/25. The clinical record showed home health aide visits were completed on 05/13/25, 05/20/25, 05/27/25, 06/03/25, 06/10/25 and on 06/17/25. On 06/26/25 at 1:00 p.m., Staff B stated the clinical record showed no home health aide care plan. Patient #9 A review of the clinical record showed no documented home health aide care plan or receipt of assignment by the CHHA for the episode of 05/15/25 through 07/13/25. The clinical record showed home health aide visits were completed on 05/16/25, 05/20/25, 05/23/25, 05/27/25, 05/29/25, 06/03/25, 06/05/25, 06/10/25, 06/13/25, 06/17/25 and on 06/20/25. On 06/26/25 at 1:25 p.m., Staff B stated the clinical record showed no home health aide care plan.”

    Rule G0798. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Governing Body

    The inspectors’ words, 186 words

    “Governing body CFR(s): 484.105(a) Standard: Governing body. A governing body (or designated persons so functioning) must assume full legal authority and responsibility for the agency’s overall management and operation, the provision of all home health services, fiscal operations, review of the agency’s budget and its operational plans, and its quality assessment and performance improvement program. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure governing body oversite of the agency for program evaluation, operating budget, and capital expenditure plan in calendar years 2023 and 2024 for all patients and employees. The failed practice had the potential to impact on the care and services provided by the agency in the communities that it serves. Findings: A review of governing body records showed no governing body oversite of the agency program evaluation, operating budget, and capital expenditure plan in calendar years 2023 and 2024. On 06/26/25 at 1:45 p.m., Staff A stated governing body meeting minutes showed no governing body oversite of the agency program evaluation, operating budget, and capital expenditure plan in calendar years 2023 and 2024.”

    Rule G0942. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Clinical Manager

    The inspectors’ words, 161 words

    “Clinical manager CFR(s): 484.105(c) Standard: Clinical manager. One or more qualified individuals must provide oversight of all patient care services and personnel. Oversight must include the following-- This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure governing body appointment of a supervising nurse for the agency in calendar years 2023 and 2024 and 01/01/25 to 06/24/25 for all patients and employees. The failed practice had the potential to effect the services provided by the agency and the subsequent care outcomes of its patients and to provide adequate clinical supervisory oversite of its staff. Findings: A review of administrative governing body records showed no designated supervising nurse for the agency in calendar years 2023 and 2024 and 01/01/25 to 06/24/25. On 06/26/25 at 1:45 p.m., Staff A stated governing body meeting minutes did not show appointment of the administrator for the agency in calendar years 2023 and 2024 and 01/01/25 to 06/24/25.”

    Rule G0958. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Hha Administrator Contact Information

    The inspectors’ words, 133 words

    “HHA administrator contact information CFR(s): 484.50(a)(1)(ii) (ii) Contact information for the HHA administrator, including the administrator’s name, business address, and business phone number in order to receive complaints. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure the administrator’s name and contact information was a part of the admission packet information provided at a patient’s SOC for nine (Patients #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and #9) of nine patients. Findings: A review of administrative records (start of care patient information packet) identified contact information for the prior administrator who left the agency on or about 05/01/25. On 06/26/25 at 1:45 p.m., Staff A stated the contact information for the current administrator had not been updated in the patient information packet.”

    Rule G0414. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • Hha Can No Longer Meet The Patient’S Needs

    The inspectors’ words, 544 words

    “HHA can no longer meet the patient’s needs CFR(s): 484.50(d)(1) The transfer or discharge is necessary for the patient’s welfare because the HHA and the physician or allowed practitioner, who is responsible for the home health plan of care agree that the HHA can no longer meet the patient’s needs, based on the patient’s acuity. The HHA must arrange a safe and appropriate transfer to other care entities when the needs of the patient exceed the HHA’s capabilities; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure: 1. Attempted resolution of non-compliance and refusal of care for two (Patients #6 and #8) of nine patients. 2. Notification to the physician prior to discharge for three (Patients #6, 7 and #8) of nine patients. Findings: Patient #6 A review of the clinical records showed the patient was discharged from the agency on 02/24/25 for non-compliance. The clinical record showed no POC from 02/18/25 to 02/24/25. The clinical record identified no issues of non-compliance, showed no communication or coordination of care attempts with the patient to resolve issues of the non-compliance, and showed no communication or coordination of care with the ordering medical provider to notify the patient was being discharged from home care services. On 06/26/25 at 1:05 p.m., Staff B stated: 1. The nurse did not identify or document issues of non-compliance by the patient or attempts to resolve issues of non-compliance. 2. The SN did not communicate with the ordering medical provider that the patient was being discharged from the agency prior to the patient’s discharge from HHA services on 02/24/25. Patient #7 A review of the clinical records showed the patient was discharged from the agency on 04/16/25 to hospice provider services. The clinical record showed no communication or coordination of care attempts with the hospice and showed no communication or coordination of care with the ordering medical provider to notify the patient was being discharged from home care services. On 06/26/25 at 1:10 p.m., Staff B stated the nurse did not communicate with the ordering medical provider that the patient was being discharged from the agency to hospice services prior to the patient’s discharge from HHA services on 04/16/25. Patient #8 A review of the clinical records showed the patient was discharged from the agency on 05/26/25 for refusal of care. The clinical record showed a POC from 03/28/25 to 05/26/25 for SN visit frequency of weekly to assess and instruct health conditions and to perform catheter change treatment intervention monthly for urinary management. The clinical record identified no issues of refusal of care, showed no communication or coordination of care attempts with the patient to resolve issues of the refusal of care, and showed no communication or coordination of care with the ordering medical provider, to notify the patient was being discharged from home care services. On 06/26/25 at 1:15 p.m., Staff B stated: 1. The nurse did not identify or document issues of refusal of care by the patient or attempts to resolve issues related to refusal of care. 2. The SN did not communicate with the ordering medical provider that the patient was being discharged from the agency prior to the patient’s discharge from HHA services on 05/26/25.”

    Rule G0454. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • Patient/Payer Will No Longer Pay For Services

    The inspectors’ words, 157 words

    “Patient/payer will no longer pay for services CFR(s): 484.50(d)(2) The patient or payer will no longer pay for the services provided by the HHA; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure advance beneficiary notices prior to discharge from agency services were provided to two (Patients #6 and 8) of nine patients. Findings: Patient #6 A review of the clinical record showed no advance notice of discharge or home health change of care notice prior to discharge from the agency on 02/24/25 for non-compliance. Patient #8 A review of the clinical record showed no advance notice of discharge or home health change of care notice prior to discharge from the agency on 05/26/25 for refusal of care. On 06/26/25 at 1:05 p.m., Staff B stated there were no ABN notices in the clinical records for patients #6 and #8 prior to being discharged from the agency.”

    Rule G0456. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • Plan Of Care Must Include The Following

    The inspectors’ words, 707 words

    “Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure individualized patient POC included: Removal of outdated PT evaluation and treatment orders were removed for one (Patient #1) of nine patients.SN interventions and goals for two (Patients #3 and #9) of nine patients.An individualized patient POC for two (Patients #4 and #7) of nine patients. Catheter treatment/intervention last changed and/or treatment due date for one (Patient #8) of nine patients. SN and CHHA goals for one (Patient #9) of nine patients. Findings: Patient #1 A review of the POC dated 05/11/25 to 07/09/25 showed orders for PT to evaluate and treat the week of 11/17/24 (174 days before the start of the certification period). The clinical record showed no communications or physician orders for PT evaluation from 05/11/25 to 06/26/25. On 06/26/25 at 12:40 p.m., Staff B stated the nurse should have reviewed, revised and updated the POC at the time of the recertification assessment visit prior to 05/11/25. Patient #3 A review of the POC dated 05/04/25 to 07/02/25 showed orders for SN visit frequency of one time a week for eight weeks to assess health conditions and home health aide visit frequency of two times a week for nine weeks. The POC showed no SN or CHHA interventions and goals. The clinical record showed no physician notifications or changes in orders. On 06/26/25 at 12:46 p.m., Staff B stated the POC should have SN and home health aide interventions and goals. Patient #4 A review of the clinical record showed no POC (physician orders) for the certification period of 06/08/25 to 08/06/25. The clinical record showed no physician notifications or changes in orders. On 06/26/25 at 12:55 p.m., Staff B stated the patient should have a POC (physician orders) for the certification period. Patient #7 A review of the clinical record showed no POC (physician orders) for the certification periods of 01/14/25 to 03/14/25 and 03/15/25 to 04/16/25. The clinical record showed no physician notifications or changes in orders. On 06/26/25 at 1:10 p.m., Staff B stated the patient should have had a POC (physician orders) for the certification periods of 01/14/25 through 04/16/25. Patient #8 A review of the POC dated 03/28/25 to 05/26/25 showed orders for SN to perform monthly catheter changes using an 18 French 30 cubic centimeter catheter. The POC showed no catheter treatment intervention last changed or next due date. SN visits dated 04/03/25, 04/09/25, 04/16/25, 04/23/25, 04/30/25, 05/07/25 and 05/14/25 showed no catheter change treatment intervention was conducted. The clinical record showed no patient refusal of catheter treatment intervention, no physician notification and no changes in orders. On 06/26/25 at 1:15 p.m., Staff B stated the POC should have included catheter treatment interventions last changed or next due date for urinary catheter management. Patient #9 A review of the POC dated 05/15/25 to 07/13/25 showed orders for SN visit frequency of one time a week for eight weeks to assess health conditions and home health aide visit frequency of one time a week for one week, then two times a week for nine weeks. The POC showed no SN or CHHA goals. The clinical record showed no physician notifications or changes in orders. On 06/26/25 at 12:46 p.m., Staff B stated the POC should have SN and home health aide goals.”

    Rule G0574. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • All Orders Recorded In Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 171 words

    “All orders recorded in plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(3) All patient care orders, including verbal orders, must be recorded in the plan of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure physician orders were a part of the patient’s plan of care for one (Patient #3) of nine patients. Findings: Patient #3 A review of the clinical record for certification period of 05/04/25 to 07/02/25 showed a communication note dated 05/08/25 for PT to evaluate. The clinical record showed no order transcription into the clinical record. A PT evaluation dated 05/08/25 showed no physician notification of the proposed treatment plan and no order transcription for a PT visit frequency of one time a week for one week, two times a week for three weeks, then one time a week for three weeks. On 06/26/25 at 12:46 p.m., Staff B stated the clinical record for patient #3 showed no physician order transcription into the clinical record and no physician notifications.”

    Rule G0576. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • Provide Services In The Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 406 words

    “Provide services in the plan of care CFR(s): 484.75(b)(3) Providing services that are ordered by the physician or allowed practitioner as indicated in the plan of care; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure: 1. SN reported the patient’s pain level outside of reporting parameters every visit as ordered for one (Patients #1) of nine patients. 2. SN reported the patient’s fasting fingerstick blood sugar level outside of reporting parameters every visit as ordered for one (Patients #2) of nine patients. 3. CHHA visit was conducted as ordered on the POC for one (Patient #9) of nine patients. Findings: Patient #1 A review of the POC dated 05/11/25 to 07/09/25 showed orders for SN to monitor the patient’s pain level every visit and report pain levels outside of the reported pain parameters of greater than 5 of 10. A SN visit note dated: · 05/27/25 showed the patient reported a pain level of 6 of 10 · 06/10/25 showed the patient reported a pain level of 7 of 10 The SN visit notes showed no physician notification and no changes in orders. On 06/26/25 at 12:40 p.m., Staff B stated the SN should have reported the patient’s pain level as ordered on the POC at the time of the visits. Patient #2 A review of the POC dated 04/25/25 to 06/23/25 showed orders for SN to monitor the patient’s fingerstick blood sugar every visit and report fasting blood sugar levels outside of the reported pain parameters of greater than greater than 150. A SN visit note dated 06/05/25 showed a fasting blood sugar level of 165. The SN visit note showed no physician notification and no changes in orders. On 06/26/25 at 12:42 p.m., Staff B stated the SN should have reported the patient’s fasting blood sugar level as ordered on the POC at the time of the visits. Patient #9 A review of the POC dated 05/15/25 to 07/13/25 showed orders for CHHA visits one time a week for one week, then two times a week for eight weeks. A CHHA visit note dated 06/17/25 showed a CHHA visit was “not started” and showed no patient refusal of CHHA visit, no physician notification and no changes in orders. On 06/26/25 at 1:25 p.m., Staff B stated the CHHA visit marked as “not started” and should have been conducted as ordered on the POC.”

    Rule G0710. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • Participate In The Hha’S Qapi Program;

    The inspectors’ words, 129 words

    “Participate in the HHA’s QAPI program; CFR(s): 484.75(b)(8) Participation in the HHA’s QAPI program; and This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on a record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure multi-disciplined skilled professional staff were available to participate and provide input into the agency’s QAPI program for all patients and employees. Findings: A request for QAPI records for calendar years 2023, 2024 and 01/01/25 to 06/24/25 were requested. No records that showed multi-disciplined skilled professional staff participation in calendar years 2023, 2024 and 01/01/25 to 06/24/25 were provided. On 06/25/25 at 2:40 p.m., Staff A stated: 1. All QAPI program documentation was provided. 2. There were no QAPI program meeting minutes or documented activities for calendar years 2023 and 2024 and 01/01/25 to 06/24/25.”

    Rule G0720. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • Onsite Supervisory Visit Every 14 Days

    The inspectors’ words, 252 words

    “Onsite supervisory visit every 14 days CFR(s): 484.80(h)(1)(i) (1)(i) If home health aide services are provided to a patient who is receiving skilled nursing, physical or occupational therapy, or speech language pathology services— (A) A registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional who is familiar with the patient, the patient’s plan of care, and the written patient care instructions described in paragraph (g) of this section, must complete a supervisory assessment of the aide services being provided no less frequently than every 14 days; and (B) The home health aide does not need to be present during the supervisory assessment described in paragraph (h)(1)(i)(A) of this section. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure certified home health aide supervisory visits were completed every 14 days in the patients’ home for one (Patient #9) of nine patients. Findings: Patient #9 A review of a POC dated 05/15/25 to 07/13/25 showed orders for showed a CHHA visit frequency of one time a week for one week, then two times a week for eight weeks. The clinical record showed CHHA supervisory visits were scheduled for 05/27/25 and on 06/10/25. The SN visit notes dated 05/27/25 and 06/10/25 supervisory showed no aide supervision during the home visits and showed no patient refusal of aide supervision, no physician notification and no change in orders. On 06/26/25 at 1:25 p.m., Staff B stated the SN visit notes showed no in home CHHA supervisory visits were conducted.”

    Rule G0808. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • Administrator Appointed By Governing Body

    The inspectors’ words, 146 words

    “Administrator appointed by governing body CFR(s): 484.105(b)(1)(i) Standard: Administrator. The administrator must: (i) Be appointed by and report to the governing body; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure governing body appointment of the administrator for the agency in calendar years 2023 and 2024 and 01/01/25 to 06/24/25 for all patients and staff. The failed practice had the potential to effect day-to-day operational oversite responsibilities of the agency, impacting the services its patients received. Findings: A review of administrative governing body meeting minutes showed no appointment of the administrator for the agency in calendar years 2023 and 2024 and 01/01/25 to 06/24/25. On 06/26/25 at 1:45 p.m., Staff A stated governing body meeting minutes did not appoint or designate the administrator for the agency in calendar years 2023 and 2024 and 01/01/25 to 06/24/25.”

    Rule G0946. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • Discharge And Transfer Summaries

    The inspectors’ words, 253 words

    “Discharge and transfer summaries CFR(s): 484.110(a)(6)(i-iii) (i) A completed discharge summary that is sent to the primary care practitioner or other health care professional who will be responsible for providing care and services to the patient after discharge from the HHA (if any) within 5 business days of the patient’s discharge; or (ii) A completed transfer summary that is sent within 2 business days of a planned transfer, if the patient’s care will be immediately continued in a health care facility; or (iii) A completed transfer summary that is sent within 2 business days of becoming aware of an unplanned transfer, if the patient is still receiving care in a health care facility at the time when the HHA becomes aware of the transfer. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record reviews and interview, the agency failed to ensure a completed transfer/discharge summary was provided for two (Patients #6 and #7) of nine patients. Findings: Patient #6 A review of the clinical record showed a discharge date of 02/24/25 for non-compliance. The clinical record showed no discharge summary was provided to the physician service provider. Patient #7 A review of the clinical record showed a discharge date of 04/16/25 to hospice provider services. The clinical record showed no discharge summary was provided to the physician or the hospice provider. On 06/26/25 at 1:05 p.m., Staff C stated the agency had no evidence which showed the discharge summaries were sent to the receiving service providers for patients #6 and #7.”

    Rule G1022. Element-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 26, 2025Complaint and recertification inspection22 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Dec 18, 1990.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 22 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 5 owners or officers are people: Eric Carter (corporate director, 100%); Debbie Bartel (corporate officer); John Mayhan (corporate officer); Stephanie V Six (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Todd Martin (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS gives no : “The number of patient episodes for this measure is too small to report.”
  • CMS gives no : “Zero, or very few, patients met the survey’s rules for inclusion.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, worse; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half starsNot rated
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate22.71% (worse than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate9.86% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • CMS gives this agency no quality of patient care rating to compare.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.