Hearth Record

Cherokee Nation Home Health Services, Inc.

A home health agency in Tahlequah, Oklahoma 74464

1630 N Cedar Avenue, Tahlequah, Oklahoma 74464. (918) 458-6102.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Mar 20, 2025: a complaint and recertification inspection.

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Mar 20, 2025: complaint and recertification inspection7 deficiencies
  • Names And Contact Information

    The inspectors’ words, 408 words

    “Names and Contact Information CFR(s): 484.102(c)(1) §403.748(c)(1), §416.54(c)(1), §418.113(c)(1), §441.184(c)(1), §460.84(c)(1), §482.15(c)(1), §483.73(c)(1), §483.475(c)(1), §484.102(c)(1), §485.68(c)(1), §485.542(c)(1), §485.625(c)(1), §485.727(c)(1), §485.920(c)(1), §486.360(c)(1), §491.12(c)(1), §494.62(c)(1). [(c) The [facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness communication plan that complies with Federal, State and local laws and must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years [annually for LTC facilities]. The communication plan must include all of the following:] (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians (iv) Other [facilities]. (v) Volunteers. *[For Hospitals at §482.15(c) and CAHs at §485.625(c)] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians (iv) Other [hospitals and CAHs]. (v) Volunteers. *[For RNHCIs at §403.748(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Next of kin, guardian, or custodian. (iv) Other RNHCIs. (v) Volunteers. *[For ASCs at §416.45(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians. (iv) Volunteers. *[For Hospices at §418.113(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Hospice employees. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians. (iv) Other hospices. *[For HHAs at §484.102(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians. (iv) Volunteers. *[For OPOs at §486.360(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (2) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Volunteers. (iv) Other OPOs. (v) Transplant and donor hospitals in the OPO’s Donation Service Area (DSA). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure an Emergency Preparedness Communication Plan showed employee contact information for the agency for 465 patients and 51 employees. Findings: A review of Emergency Preparedness records showed no Emergency Preparedness Communication Plan which included current employee contact information for the agency. On 03/20/25 at 12:30 p.m., Staff A stated the Emergency Preparedness Communication Plan did not include contact information for current employees of the agency.”

    Rule E0030. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Program Data

    The inspectors’ words, 175 words

    “Program data CFR(s): 484.65(b)(1),(2),(3) Standard: Program data. (1) The program must utilize quality indicator data, including measures derived from OASIS, where applicable, and other relevant data, in the design of its program. (2) The HHA must use the data collected to- (i) Monitor the effectiveness and safety of services and quality of care; and (ii) Identify opportunities for improvement. (3) The frequency and detail of the data collection must be approved by the HHA’s governing body. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure utilization of QAPI quality indicator data to improve program effectiveness, quality of patient care and overall program improvement for 465 patients and 51 employees. Findings: A review of administrative QAPI records for 01/01/23 to 12/31/23 and 01/01/24 to 12/31/24 showed no quality indicator data collection sources from OASIS reporting utilized in the analysis of data in the agency’s QAPI Program. On 03/20/25 at 12:30 p.m., Staff A stated QAPI program documentation showed no collection or analysis of OASIS reporting data.”

    Rule G0644. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Infection Control

    The inspectors’ words, 209 words

    “Infection control CFR(s): 484.70(b)(1)(2) Standard: Control. The HHA must maintain a coordinated agency-wide program for the surveillance, identification, prevention, control, and investigation of infectious and communicable diseases that is an integral part of the HHA’s quality assessment and performance improvement (QAPI) program. The infection control program must include: (1) A method for identifying infectious and communicable disease problems; and (2) A plan for the appropriate actions that are expected to result in improvement and disease prevention. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure the Infection Control Program surveillance data was included in QAPI program activities for 01/01/23 to 12/31/23 and 01/01/24 to 12/31/24 for 465 patients and 51 employees. Findings: A review of an administrative policy titled; “Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (10.1.5)”, stated data collection will include infection prevention and control, surveillance/ identification/ reporting/ prevention system for the agency as a part of Quality Assurance reporting. A review of QAPI administrative records showed no infection control surveillance data in the QAPI program for 01/01/23 to 12/31/23 and 01/01/24 to 12/31/24. On 03/20/25 at 12:30 p.m., Staff A stated there was no infection surveillance activities shown in QAPI records for 01/01/23 to 12/31/23 and 01/01/24 to 12/31/24.”

    Rule G0684. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Patient/Payer Will No Longer Pay For Services

    The inspectors’ words, 234 words

    “Patient/payer will no longer pay for services CFR(s): 484.50(d)(2) The patient or payer will no longer pay for the services provided by the HHA; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure an advance beneficiary notice or HHCOC notice was provided to two (Patients #14 and #15) of 17 patients. Findings: Patient #14 A review of the clinical record showed a SOC date of 08/15/24. Documentation showed no physician order for discharge, no advance notice of discharge, no home health change of care notice, and no physician communications prior to the patient’s discharge from the agency on 12/30/24 for no insurance authorization for services. On 03/20/25 at 1:27 p.m., Staff B stated there was no ABN, HHCOC notices or physician communications in the clinical record prior to the patient being discharged from the agency for no insurance authorization for services. Patient #15 A review of the clinical record showed a SOC date of 12/30/23. Documentation showed no physician order for discharge, no advance notice of discharge, no home health change of care notice, and no physician communication prior to the patient’s discharge from the agency on 11/25/24 for no insurance authorization for services. On 03/20/25 at 1:28 p.m., Staff B stated there were no ABN, HHCOC notices or physician communications in the clinical record prior to the patient being discharged from the agency.”

    Rule G0456. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • A Review Of All Current Medications

    The inspectors’ words, 178 words

    “A review of all current medications CFR(s): 484.55(c)(5) A review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure a medication profile was updated for ordered medications for one (Patient #5) of 17 patients. Findings: Patient #5 A review of the clinical record showed a POC dated 02/11/25 to 04/11/25. A SN visit note dated 02/26/25 documented the patient reported the physician ordered Keflex 500 mg two times a day for five days to treat a urinary tract infection. Documentation showed no physician notification for order, no update to the medication profile, no follow up review by the SN, and no follow-up with the physician. On 03/20/25 at 1:05 a.m., Staff B stated the medication profile showed no update to the medication profile and no follow up review by the SN.”

    Rule G0536. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • Provide Services In The Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 544 words

    “Provide services in the plan of care CFR(s): 484.75(b)(3) Providing services that are ordered by the physician or allowed practitioner as indicated in the plan of care; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure: 1. PT visits as ordered for one (Patient #4) of 17 patients. 2. SN visits as ordered for one (Patient #6) of 17 patients. 3. Assess and monitor patients’ weights as ordered for two (Patients #6 and #9) of 17 patients. 4. Report to physician patient’s pain level greater than 8 of 10 to the physician for one (Patients #16) of 17 patients. Findings: Patient #4 A review of the POC dated 01/18/25 to 03/18/25 showed orders for PT visit frequency and duration of two times a week for eight weeks, then one time a week for one week. Documentation showed during the week of 02 16/25 to 02/22/25 a PT visit dated 02/20/25 (two visits ordered, one visit conducted). Documentation showed no physician notification and no changes in orders. On 03/20/25 at 1:00 p.m., Staff B stated the PT should have conducted two visits during the week of 02 16/25 to 02/22/25. Patient #6 A review of the POC dated 02/12/25 to 04/12/25 showed orders for SN visit frequency and duration of one time a week for nine weeks to assess, monitor and report the patient’s pain level (greater than 8 of 10) and weight (3 pounds in 24 hours and 5 pounds in one week) outside of reporting parameters as ordered by the physician. Documentation showed during SN visit on 02/20/25 no weight assessment and on 02/27/25, 03/15/25 and on 03/10/25 showed no pain assessments. Documentation showed no physician notification and no changes in orders. On 03/20/25 at 1:06 p.m., Staff B stated the SN should have conducted weight and pain assessments as ordered by the physician. Patient #9 A review of the POC dated 02/21/25 to 04/21/25 showed orders for SN visit frequency and duration of one time a week for eight weeks to assess, monitor and report the patient’s weight (3 pounds in 24 hours and 5 pounds in one week) outside of reporting parameters as ordered by the physician. Documentation showed during SN visit on 03/06/25 no weight assessment. Documentation showed no physician notification and no changes in orders. On 03/20/25 at 1:12 p.m., Staff B stated the SN should have conducted weight assessment as ordered by the physician. Patient #16 A review of the POC dated 11/28/25 to 01/15/25 showed orders for SN frequency and duration of one time a week for nine weeks to assess the patient’s pain level and instruct pain management interventions and report patient’s reported pain levels greater than 8 of 10 every visit. Documentation showed SN visits dated 11/27/24 reported a pain level of 10 of 10, 12/09/24 reported a pain level of 9, 12/16/24 reported a pain level of 10 of 10, 12/23/24 reported a pain level of 9 of 10 and on 01/06/25 reported a pain level of 9 of 10. Documentation showed no physician notification and no changes in orders. On 03/20/25 at 11:30 a.m., Staff B stated the SN should have contacted the physician and reported the patient’s pain level during the visits.”

    Rule G0710. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • Participate In The Hha’S Qapi Program;

    The inspectors’ words, 118 words

    “Participate in the HHA’s QAPI program; CFR(s): 484.75(b)(8) Participation in the HHA’s QAPI program; and This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure that multi-disciplined skilled professional staff were available to participate and provide input into the agency’s QAPI program for 01/01/23 to 12/31/23 and 01/01/24 to 12/31/24 for all patients and employees. Findings: A review of administrative QAPI records showed no multi-disciplined skilled professional staff (PT, OT, ST or MSW in addition to SN) participation in QAPI activities for 01/01/23 to 12/31/23 and 01/01/24 to 12/31/24. On 03/20/25 at 12:30 p.m., Staff A stated documentation showed no multi-disciplined skilled professional staff participation in ongoing QAPI program.”

    Rule G0720. Element-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 20, 2025Complaint and recertification inspection7 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jul 5, 1990.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 7 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and home health aide services.
  • Doesn’t offer medical social services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Cherokee Nation Home Health Services, Inc. owns 100% directly since Nov 17, 2014; Cherokee Nation owns 100% directly since Sep 29, 1994.
  • 4 owners or officers are people: April Moore (corporate director, 100%); April Moore (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Matt Rucker (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Denise Saunders (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Cherokee Nation Home Health Services, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Nov 17, 2014
Cherokee NationOwns 5% or more directly100%Sep 29, 1994

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (206 surveys completed): 87% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 80% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, worse; potentially preventable hospital stays, worse; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate65.27% (worse than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate15.35% (worse than the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.81% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 28 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 74464, where this agency’s office is, 26 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3 of 5, and this one is rated 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.