Hearth Record

Complete Home Health of Stigler

A home health agency in Stigler, Oklahoma 74472

806 East Main, Stigler, Oklahoma 74472. (918) 967-9443.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Feb 14, 2024: a recertification inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Feb 14, 2024: recertification inspection4 deficiencies
  • Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 302 words

    “Plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(1) Each patient must receive the home health services that are written in an individualized plan of care that identifies patient-specific measurable outcomes and goals, and which is established, periodically reviewed, and signed by a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, or podiatry acting within the scope of his or her state license, certification, or registration. If a physician or allowed practitioner refers a patient under a plan of care that cannot be completed until after an evaluation visit, the physician or allowed practitioner is consulted to approve additions or modifications to the original plan. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the Agency failed to provide an individualized POC to include patient specific vital sign parameters based on the assessed needs of each patient for five (#2, #4 - #7) of seven (#1- #7) records reviewed. A review of the POCs for Patients #2, #4, #5, #6 and #7 each revealed Vital Sign Parameters with orders to contact physician if the following is outside of parameters: Weight: low value 125 to high value 250; Pain: low value 0.0 and high value 10.0; Fasting Blood sugar: low value 70.0 to high value 200.0; Random Blood sugar: low value 70.0 to high value 300.0; PT Result low value 11.0 to high value 13.0; INR result: low value 2.0 to high value 3.0 Further review of records #2, #4, #5, #6 and #7 failed to provide evidence of patient specific assessed needs to support the vital sign parameters for weight, pain, CBG results, PT or INR results. On 02/14/24 at 12:15 PM, the Administrator stated the Agency failed to revise default parameters provided within the Electronic Medical Record and failed to include patient specific vital sign parameters for Pts #2, #4, #5, #6 and #7.”

    Rule G0572. Standard-level.

  • Conformance With Physician Orders

    The inspectors’ words, 317 words

    “Conformance with physician orders CFR(s): 484.60(b) Standard: Conformance with physician or allowed practitioner orders. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, record review and interview, the Skilled Nurse failed to monitor weights and CBG results as ordered on the POC for two (#4 and #6) of seven (#1 - #7) records reviewed. Patient #4 A review of the POC for Patient #4 for the re-certification period 01/11/24 to 03/10/24 revealed a primary diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and a secondary diagnosis Congestive Heart Failure. Review of the POC revealed orders for SN visits 1 time a week for eight weeks and vital sign parameters of “weight: low value 125 and high value 250” to be reported to the Physician. During a home observation visit conducted on 02/14/24 at 09:30 AM, the Caregiver demonstrated the home monitoring equipment and vital sign log which included daily weights and maintained by Pt. #4 to share with the physician as needed. Further review of SN Visit documentation indicated a weight of 155 pounds was obtained on 12/13/23 but failed to provide evidence weights were obtained or monitored for the following 8 weekly SN visits. Patient #6 A review of the POC for Patient #6 for the re-certification period 11/07/23 to 01/05/24 revealed a primary diagnosis of Type II Diabetes Mellitus and orders for SN visits every 14 days for the episode. Review of the POC revealed orders for “SN to assess diabetic status ...report significant changes to physician. SN may perform ... fingerstick blood glucose. SN instruct patient ... blood sugar monitoring...”. Further review of SN Visit documentation failed to provide evidence blood glucose results were obtained or assessed as ordered for SN visits conducted 01/07/24, 01/10/24 or 11/24/24. On 02/14/24 at 12:15 PM, the Administrator stated the SN failed to monitor weights and CBGs results as ordered on the POC for Patient #4 and #6.”

    Rule G0578. Standard-level.

  • Preparing Clinical Notes

    The inspectors’ words, 229 words

    “Preparing clinical notes CFR(s): 484.75(b)(6) Preparing clinical notes; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the Skilled Nurse failed to prepare and submit timely the clinical visit notes for two (#1 and #4) of seven (#1 - #7) records reviewed. Patient #1 A review of the POC for Patient #1 for the re-certification period 01/24/24 to 03/23/24 revealed a primary diagnosis of Hemiplegia and secondary diagnosis of Dysphagia. Review of the POC revealed orders for SN visits 1 time a week for 9 weeks. Further review of SN Visit documentation revealed a SN visit note for 01/19/24 but failed to provide evidence of a SN Visit or clinical record documentation tor the following 3 weeks of 01/21/24, 01/28/24 and 02/04/24. Patient #4 A review of the POC for Patient #4 for the re-certification period 01/11/24 to 03/10/24 revealed a primary diagnosis of COPD and secondary diagnosis of Heart Failure. Review of the POC revealed orders for SN visits 1 time a week for 8 weeks. Further review of SN Visit documentation revealed a SN visit was conducted on 02/01/24 but failed to provide evidence of a SN Visit or clinical record documentation tor the following week of 02/04//24. On 02/14/24 at 12:15 PM, the Administrator stated the SN failed to complete and submit clinical note documentation timely for Patients #4 and #6.”

    Rule G0716. Element-level.

  • Onsite Supervisory Visit Every 14 Days

    The inspectors’ words, 217 words

    “Onsite supervisory visit every 14 days CFR(s): 484.80(h)(1)(i) If home health aide services are provided to a patient who is receiving skilled nursing, physical or occupational therapy, or speech-language pathology services, a registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional who is familiar with the patient, the patient’s plan of care, and the written patient care instructions described in §484.80(g), must make an onsite visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days. The home health aide does not have to be present during this visit. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the RN failed to conduct onsite supervisory visits to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days for one (#2) of two (#2 and #5) records reviewed with orders for Home Health Aide services. Patient #2 Review of the POC for recertification periods 01/19/24 - 03/18/24 revealed a Primary Diagnosis of Paranoid Schizophrenia with orders for Home Health Aide services 2 times a week for 9 weeks. Further review of RN documentation for Supervisory Aide Visits indicated onsite visits were conducted on 01/17/24 and 02/29/24 (3 days late). On 02/14/24 at 12:15 PM, the Administrator stated the RN failed to conduct Supervisory Aide Visits at least every 14 days as required for Pt#2.”

    Rule G0808. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 14, 2024Recertification inspection4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Sep 18, 1989.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and home health aide services.
  • Doesn’t offer medical social services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 4 owners or officers are people: Lola J Edwards (corporate officer, 100%); Lola J Edwards (corporate director, 50%); Iren Edwards (owns 5% or more directly); Dona Almack (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 2.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (47 surveys completed): 89% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 80% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, worse; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars2.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate64.71% (worse than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate14.00% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.91% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 13 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 74472, where this agency’s office is, 11 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 2.5 of 5, and this one is rated 2.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.