Hearth Record

Via Life Home Health Care

A home health agency in Pryor, Oklahoma 74361

100 S. Rowe Street, Pryor, Oklahoma 74361. (918) 824-9600.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jan 24, 2025: a recertification inspection.

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jan 24, 2025: recertification inspection5 deficiencies
  • Advise The Patient Of Discharge For Cause

    The inspectors’ words, 232 words

    “Advise the patient of discharge for cause CFR(s): 484.50(d)(5)(i) (i) Advise the patient, representative (if any), the physician(s) or allowed practitioner(s), issuing orders for the home health plan of care, and the patient’s primary care practitioner or other health care professional who will be responsible for providing care and services to the patient after discharge from the HHA (if any) that a discharge for cause is being considered; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure documentation of notification of the potential for discharge for cause was provided to the patient for one patient (Patient #10) of 17 patients. A review of the plan of care dated 10/29/24 to 12/27/24 showed a primary diagnosis of hypertensive chronic kidney disease with a skilled nurse frequency of one visit per week for nine weeks. A review of the clinical record showed the following; A start of care assessment dated 10/29/24 documented no power of attorney or medical power of attorney. Skilled nurse assessments dated 10/29/24, 11/05/24, 11/12/24, 11/21/24 and 11/27/24 documented no behaviors or attempts to resolve unacceptable behaviors and no documentation of reason for potential discharge was provided to the patient. A skilled nurse discharge note was dated 11/27/24. On 01/24/25 at 1:25 pm., Staff B stated Patient #10 was not provided information in regard to the potential for discharge for cause.”

    Rule G0464. Element-level.

  • Make Efforts To Resolve The Problem(S)

    The inspectors’ words, 186 words

    “Make efforts to resolve the problem(s) CFR(s): 484.50(d)(5)(ii) (ii) Make efforts to resolve the problem(s) presented by the patient’s behavior, the behavior of other persons in the patient’s home, or situation; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure documentation of efforts to resolve the patient’s behavior for one (Patient #10) of 17 patients. A review of the plan of care dated 10/29/24 to 12/27/24 showed a primary diagnosis of hypertensive chronic kidney disease with a skilled nurse frequency of one visit per week for nine weeks. A review of the clinical record showed the following; A start of care assessment dated 10/29/24 documented no power of attorney or medical power of attorney. Skilled nurse assessments dated 10/29/24, 11/05/24, 11/12/24, 11/21/24 and 11/27/24 documented no behaviors or attempts to resolve unacceptable behaviors and no documentation of reason for potential discharge was provided to the patient.. A skilled nurse discharge note was dated 11/27/24. On 01/24/25 at 1:25 pm., Staff B stated Patient #10 was not informed of or provided the opportunity to correct unacceptable behaviors.”

    Rule G0466. Element-level.

  • Provide Contact Info Other Services

    The inspectors’ words, 187 words

    “Provide contact info other services CFR(s): 484.50(d)(5)(iii) (iii) Provide the patient and representative (if any), with contact information for other agencies or providers who may be able to provide care; and This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure it provided contact information to other agencies to provide care for one (Patient #10) of 17 patients. A review of the plan of care dated 10/29/24 to 12/27/24 showed a primary diagnosis of hypertensive chronic kidney disease with a skilled nurse frequency of one visit per week for nine weeks. A review of the clinical record showed the following; A start of care assessment dated 10/29/24 documented no power of attorney or medical power of attorney. Skilled nurse assessments dated 10/29/24, 11/05/24, 11/12/24, 11/21/24 and 11/27/24 documented no behaviors or attempts to resolve unacceptable behaviors and no documentation of reason for potential discharge was provided to the patient.. A skilled nurse discharge note was dated 11/27/24. On 01/24/25 at 1:25 pm., Staff B stated Patient #10 was not provided contact information for other agencies to provide care.”

    Rule G0468. Element-level.

  • Plan Of Care Must Include The Following

    The inspectors’ words, 582 words

    “Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure an individualized plan of care was developed for eleven (Patients #1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15) of 17 patients. Patient #1 A review of the plan of care dated 11/25/24 to 01/23/25 showed a primary diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia with no patient specific individualized interventions or goals developed for the management of the primary diagnosis. Patient #2 A review of the plan of care dated 10/18/24 to 12/16/24 showed a primary diagnosis of hypertension with no patient specific individualized interventions or goals developed for the management of the primary diagnosis. Patient #4 A review of the plan of care dated 10/18/24 to 12/16/24 showed a primary diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia with no patient specific individualized interventions or goals developed for the management of the primary diagnosis. Patient #5 A review of the plan of care dated 01/07/25 to 03/07/25 showed a no plan of care development. Patient #6 A review of the plan of care dated 10/23/24 to 12/21/24 showed a primary diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with no patient specific individualized interventions or goals developed for the management of the primary diagnosis. Patient #10 A review of the plan of care dated 10/29/24 to 12/27/24 showed a primary diagnosis of hypertensive chronic kidney disease with no patient specific individualized interventions or goals developed for the management of the primary diagnosis. Patient #11 A review of the plan of care dated 11/22/24 to 01/20/25 showed a primary diagnosis of dementia with no patient specific individualized interventions or goals developed for the management of the primary diagnosis. Patient #12 A review of the plan of care dated 12/21/24 to 02/18/25 showed a primary diagnosis of urinary tract infection with no patient specific individualized interventions or goals developed for the management of the primary diagnosis. Patient #13 A review of the plan of care dated 01/16/25 to 03/16/25 showed a no plan of care development. Patient #14 A review of the plan of care dated 01/16/25 to 03/16/25 showed a no plan of care development. Patient #15 A review of the plan of care dated 12/13/24 to 02/10/25 showed a primary diagnosis of diabetes mellitus type II with no patient specific individualized interventions or goals developed for the management of the primary diagnosis. On 01/24/25 at 1:50 pm, Staff B stated the plan of care for Patients #1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15 were not individualized for the management of the primary diagnosis.”

    Rule G0574. Element-level.

  • Revised Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 167 words

    “Revised plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(c)(2) A revised plan of care must reflect current information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment, and contain information concerning the patient’s progress toward the measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and patient in the plan of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure the plan of care was updated to reflect services provided for the current certification period for one (Patient #10) of 17 patients. A review of the plan of care dated 10/29/24 to 12/27/24 showed a primary diagnosis of hypertensive chronic kidney disease with no updated skilled nurse frequencies, no updated physical therapy frequencies, updated occupational therapy frequencies or home health aide frequencies (all frequencies were stated to start the week of 08/28/24). On 01/24/25 at 2:00 pm., Staff B stated the plan of care for Patient #10 did not update the frequencies for skilled nurse, physical therapy, occupational therapy or home health aide.”

    Rule G0592. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 24, 2025Recertification inspection5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Aug 10, 2005.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 3 owners or officers are people: Alesha Penderson (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Alesha Penderson (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); April Myers (managing employee (on the payroll), 5%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 2 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (235 surveys completed): 90% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 82% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, worse; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars2 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate77.66% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate16.43% (worse than the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.15% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 28 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 74361, where this agency’s office is, 27 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.