Hearth Record

Community Home Health, Inc.

A home health agency in Claremore, Oklahoma 74017

2000 West Blue Starr Drive, Claremore, Oklahoma 74017. (918) 342-3621.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Apr 24, 2025: a recertification inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Apr 24, 2025: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Communication With All Physicians

    The inspectors’ words, 477 words

    “Communication with all physicians CFR(s): 484.60(d)(1) Standard: Coordination of Care. The HHA must: (1) Assure communication with all physicians or allowed practitioners involved in the plan of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure the physician was notified of missed skilled nurse visits for three (Patients #1, 2 and 9) of twenty-one patients. Patient #1 A review of the plan of care dated 01/28/25 to 03/28/25 showed a primary diagnosis of peritoneal abscess with a skilled nurse frequency of four visits per week for one week and three visits per week for six weeks. A review of the clinical record showed the following: Skilled nurse assessments dated 03/24/25 and 03/26/25 and a skilled nurse missed visit note (due to the patient and sister being able to change the incision dressing) dated 03/28/25 for the week of 03/24/25 to 03/28/25. Documentation showed two of three completed visits and no physician notification of the missed frequency. Patient #2 A review of the plan of care dated 01/12/25 to 03/12/25 showed a primary diagnosis of hypertensive heart with heart failure with a skilled nurse frequency of one visit per week for nine weeks. A review of the clinical record showed the following: A skilled nurse missed visit note (due to the patient having enough medications and can wait until next week) dated 02/19/25 for the week of 02/17/25 to 02/23/25. Documentation showed no completed visits for the week and no physician notification of the missed frequency. Patient #9 A review of the plan of care dated 01/21/25 to 03/21/25 showed a primary diagnosis of encounter for change or removal of surgical wound dressing and a skilled nurse frequency of two visits per week for one week, three visits per week for three weeks. A physician’s order dated 02/17/25 ordered continued skilled nurse frequency of three visits per week for three weeks. Skilled nurse assessments dated 01/27/25 and 01/29/25 and a skilled nurse missed visits (due to no answer at the door or phone) dated 01/31/25 for the week of 01/27/25 to 02/02/25 (two of three completed visits). Documentation showed no physician notification of the missed visit. Skilled nurse assessments dated 02/10/25 and 02/12/25 and a skilled nurse missed visits (due to an appointment with surgeon) dated 02/14/25 for the week of 02/10/25 to 02/16/25 (two of three completed visits). Documentation showed no physician notification of the missed visit. Skilled nurse assessments dated 02/17/25 and 02/20/25 and a skilled nurse missed visit (due to inclimate weather, the patient can manage) dated 02/19/25 for the week of 02/17/25 to 02/23/25 (two of three completed visits). Documentation showed no physician notification of the missed visit. On 04/23/25 at 1:30 pm., Staff B stated the physician was not notified of the missed skilled nurse visits for Patients #1, 2 and 9.”

    Rule G0602. Element-level.

  • Visit Schedule

    The inspectors’ words, 521 words

    “Visit schedule CFR(s): 484.60(e)(1) Visit schedule, including frequency of visits by HHA personnel and personnel acting on behalf of the HHA. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure skilled nursing services were provided as ordered for three (Patients #1, 2 and 9) of twenty-one patients. Patient #1 A review of the plan of care dated 01/28/25 to 03/28/25 showed a primary diagnosis of peritoneal abscess with a skilled nurse frequency of four visits per week for one week and three visits per week for six weeks. A review of the clinical record showed the following: Skilled nurse assessments dated 03/24/25 and 03/26/25 and a skilled nurse missed visit note (due to the patient and sister being able to change the incision dressing) dated 03/28/25 for the week of 03/24/25 to 03/28/25 (two of three completed visits). Documentation showed no patient refusal, no attempts to reschedule the missed visit and no new orders to change the ordered frequency. Patient #2 A review of the plan of care dated 01/12/25 to 03/12/25 showed a primary diagnosis of hypertensive heart with heart failure with a skilled nurse frequency of one visit per week for nine weeks. A review of the clinical record showed the following: A skilled nurse missed visit (due to the patient having enough medications and can wait until next week) dated 02/19/25 for the week of 02/17/25 to 02/23/25 (no completed visits for the week.). Documentation showed no patient refusal, no attempts to reschedule the missed visit and no new orders to change the ordered frequency. Patient #9 A review of the plan of care dated 01/21/25 to 03/21/25 showed a primary diagnosis of encounter for change or removal of surgical wound dressing, a skilled nurse frequency of two visits per week for one week, three visits per week for three weeks, and a physician’s order dated 02/17/25 for continued skilled nurse frequency of three visits per week for three weeks. Skilled nurse assessments dated 01/27/25 and 01/29/25 and a skilled nurse missed visits (due to no answer at the door or phone) dated 01/31/25 for the week of 01/27/25 to 02/02/25 (two of three completed visits). Documentation showed no patient refusal, no attempts to reschedule the missed visits and no new orders to change the ordered frequency. Skilled nurse assessments dated 02/10/25 and 02/12/25 and a skilled nurse missed visits (due to an appointment with surgeon) dated 02/14/25 for the week of 02/10/25 to 02/16/25 (two of three completed visits). Documentation showed no patient refusal, no attempts to reschedule the missed visits and no new orders to change the ordered frequency. Skilled nurse assessments dated 02/17/25 and 02/20/25 and a skilled nurse missed visit (due to inclimate weather, the patient can manage) dated 02/19/25 for the week of 02/17/25 to 02/23/25 (two of three completed visits). Documentation showed no patient refusal, no attempts to reschedule the missed visit and no new orders to change the ordered frequency. On 04/23/25 at 1:30 pm., Staff B stated the skilled nurse frequencies were not met for Patients #1, 2 and 9.”

    Rule G0614. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 24, 2025Recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Oct 3, 1990.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 7 owners or officers are people: Chad Choat (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Chad Choat (corporate officer, 100%); Jonathan L Wohlgemuth (runs it (operational or managerial control), 50%); Danna Curnett (managing employee (on the payroll), 40%); Debra Hughes (managing employee (on the payroll), 10%); John Brennan Travis (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Pamela Robinson (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (307 surveys completed): 91% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 88% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, better; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate92.71% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate5.82% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.68% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 33 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 74017, where this agency’s office is, 29 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.