Hearth Record

Bios Home Health Care LLC

A home health agency in Sapulpa, Oklahoma 74066

307 East Dewey Avenue, Sapulpa, Oklahoma 74066. (918) 358-2483.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jan 4, 2024: a complaint and recertification inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jan 4, 2024: complaint and recertification inspection3 deficiencies
  • Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 350 words

    “Plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(1) Each patient must receive the home health services that are written in an individualized plan of care that identifies patient-specific measurable outcomes and goals, and which is established, periodically reviewed, and signed by a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, or podiatry acting within the scope of his or her state license, certification, or registration. If a physician or allowed practitioner refers a patient under a plan of care that cannot be completed until after an evaluation visit, the physician or allowed practitioner is consulted to approve additions or modifications to the original plan. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed notify the physician of missed SN visits for two (Patients #6 and 9) of ten patients. Patient #6 A review of the POC dated 10/25/23 to 12/23/23 showed a primary diagnosis of pressure ulcer of right buttock, stage 4. The POC also shows a SN frequency of two visits per week for one week and then three visits per week for eight weeks. A review of SN missed visit notes showed the following: A SN missed visit note the week of 10/23/23 to 10/29/23 (one of two visits) showed no notification was made to the physician of the missed visits. A SN missed visit note the week of 10/30/23 to 11/05/23 (two of two visits) showed no notifications were made to the physician of the missed visits. A SN missed visit note the week of 12/11/23 to 12/17/23 (one of three visits) showed no notifications were made to the physician of the missed visits. Patient # 9 A review of the POC dated 09/19/23 to 11/17/23 showed a primary diagnosis of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The POC also showed a SN frequency of one visit per week for nine weeks. A review of a SN missed visit note dated 09/21/23 showed no notification was made to the physician of the missed visit. On 01/04/24 at 12:25 pm, Staff A stated no notifications of the missed SN visits were made to the physician for Patient’s #6 and #9.”

    Rule G0572. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Conformance With Physician Orders

    The inspectors’ words, 381 words

    “Conformance with physician orders CFR(s): 484.60(b) Standard: Conformance with physician or allowed practitioner orders. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure: 1. SN assessed the blood sugar as ordered for one (Patient #1) of ten patients; 2. a medication order was completed as ordered for one (Patient #3) of ten patients; and 3. SN notified the physician of systolic blood pressure levels outside the ordered parameters for one (Patient #6) of ten patients. 1. Patient #1 A review of the POC dated 10/21/23 to 12/19/23 showed an order for SN to assess blood sugar via finger stick during each visit for Patient #1. Clinical records showed no finger sticks were completed and no blood sugar results were documented during SN visits dated 10/23/23, 10/30/23, 11/6/23, 11/14/23, 11/20/23, 11/27/23, 12/08/23, 12/12/23, and 12/18/23. Documents showed no refusal of services from the patient or caregiver and no changes in the physician’s order. 2. Patient #3 A review of a POC dated 10/21/23 to 12/19/23 showed a medication order for Rivaroxaban (common name: Xarelto) 15 mg to be taken by mouth daily. A physician’s order dated 11/16/23 showed an order to discontinue Xarelto and begin taking Apixaban 5 mg BID (twice a day), once Apixaban is received. A review of clinical records showed no Apixaban medication being administered, and no changes were made on Patient #3’s current medications list as ordered by the physician. Documents showed no refusal of medication from the patient or caregiver and no changes in the physician’s order. 3. Patient #6 A review of the POC dated 10/25/23 to 12/23/23 showed an order for SN to notify the physician of systolic blood pressure greater than 170. A review of SN visit dated 11/15/23 showed a systolic blood pressure reading of 178. Documents showed no physician notification for the systolic blood pressure reading greater than 170. On 01/04/23 at 1:15 pm, Staff A stated: 1. SN visits did not show documentation of blood sugar assessments as ordered by the physician for Patient #1; 2. the medication order was not completed as ordered by the physician for Patient #3; and 3. there was no documentation of physician notification of the systolic blood pressure being out of parameters for Patient #6.”

    Rule G0578. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Performance Improvement Projects

    The inspectors’ words, 145 words

    “Performance improvement projects CFR(s): 484.65(d)(1)(2) Standard: Performance improvement projects. Beginning July 13, 2018 HHAs must conduct performance improvement projects. (1) The number and scope of distinct improvement projects conducted annually must reflect the scope, complexity, and past performance of the HHA’s services and operations. (2) The HHA must document the quality improvement projects undertaken, the reasons for conducting these projects, and the measurable progress achieved on these projects. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure performance improvement projects were for all current patients and staff. A review of the agency’s documentation showed no records of performance improvement projects implemented, n in development, on-going or completed for calendar year 2022 and 2023. On 01/04/24 at 1:35 p.m., Staff A stated there were no performance improvement projects written out or documented for 2022 and 2023.”

    Rule G0658. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 4, 2024Complaint and recertification inspection3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Dec 17, 1985.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and medical social services.
  • Doesn’t offer home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Bios Companies Inc. owns 100% directly since Jul 1, 2018.
  • 2 owners or officers are people: Kimberly A Weir (managing employee (on the payroll)); Carole Brandl (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Bios Companies Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Jul 1, 2018
Bios Home Health Care LLCOther role (CMS gives no detail)Jul 1, 2018

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (153 surveys completed): 80% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 74% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 53 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate75.48% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate10.07% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.03% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 34 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 74066, where this agency’s office is, 31 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3 of 5, and this one is rated 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.