Hearth Record

Amedisys Home Health

A home health agency in Grove, Oklahoma 74344

1637 S Main Street, Grove, Oklahoma 74344. (918) 787-9496.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jul 9, 2025: a recertification inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jul 9, 2025: recertification inspection4 deficiencies
  • Infection Prevention

    The inspectors’ words, 338 words

    “Infection Prevention CFR(s): 484.70(a) Standard: Infection Prevention. The HHA must follow accepted standards of practice, including the use of standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, observation and interview, the staff failed to adhere to current infection control standards of practice for three (#1, #2 and #3) of four (#1 - #4) patients observed during home visits. Patient #1 Review of POC for SOC period 06/27/25 - 08/25/25 showed primary diagnosis of Osteoporosis and Fractured Right Femur with orders for PT and OT services. During a home visit on 07/08/25 at 9:30 AM, the OT was observed to place the clinician bag directly on the patients dining table without a protective barrier to prevent transmission of infections. Patient #2 Review of the POC for SOC period 06/06/25 - 08/04/25 showed a primary diagnosis of Metabolic Encephalopathy and Malignant Neoplasm of the Tongue with wound care orders of 06/27/25 for SN to perform wound care 2 times a week to the left forearm graft site and the left thigh graft site. On 07/08/25 at 10:30 AM, the SN was observed to place the clinician bag directly on the patients dining table without a protective barrier. During the wound care procedure, the SN failed to sanitize hands between glove changes, failed to change gloves between removing old dressing to new dressing, reused opened single-use products on the wounds and entered clinician bag with gloves on. Patient #3 Review of the POC for initial certification period 06/28/25- 08/26/25 showed a primary diagnosis of Hypo-osmolarity and Hyponatremia with orders for SN to provide wound care 2 times a week. During a home visit on 07/08/25 at 2:30 PM, the SN was observed during the procedure to place the clinician bag and wound care supplies on a barrier directly on the floor. During an interview on 07/09/25 at 9:45 AM, Staff A stated the clinicians failed to follow infection control practices for Patients #1, #2 and #3.”

    Rule G0682. Standard-level.

  • 5 Calendar Days After Start Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 220 words

    “5 calendar days after start of care CFR(s): 484.55(b)(1) The comprehensive assessment must be completed in a timely manner, consistent with the patient’s immediate needs, but no later than 5 calendar days after the start of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the Physical Therapist failed to conduct a PT evaluation timely as part of the comprehensive assessment for two (#3 and #4) of eight (#1-#7 and #10) records reviewed with orders for PT services. Patient #3 Review of the POC for initial certification period 06/28/25- 08/26/25 showed a primary diagnosis of Hypo-osmolarity and Hyponatremia with referral orders of 06/26/25 for SN and PT evaluations. Further review failed to provide evidence a PT evaluation was completed as of the date of this survey and no documentation as to the reason for the delay. Patient #4 Review of the POC for initial certification period 06/04/25- 08/02/25 showed a primary diagnosis of Acute Cystitis and Hematuria with SOC orders of 06/04/25 for a PT evaluation. Further review showed a PT evaluation was completed as part of the comprehensive assessment on 06/10/25, 1 day late with no documentation as to the reason for the delay. During an interview on 07/09/25 at 9:45 AM, Staff C stated the PT failed to conduct the evaluations timely.”

    Rule G0520. Element-level.

  • Plan Of Care Must Include The Following

    The inspectors’ words, 559 words

    “Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to provide an individualized POC based on the assessed needs of the patient for three (#5, #6 and #10) of ten (#1 - #10) records reviewed. Patient #5 Review of the POC for initial certification period 06/20/25 - 08/18/25 showed a primary diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Hyperglycemia and Polyneuropathy and long-term use of oral Hypoglycemic drugs with orders for “Diabetes Management”. “Diabetes Management specified by the POC included orders for RN/LVN/LPN “to...assess, observe and teach ... instructions of diabetic care to include: ...to observe and teach patient/caregiver ability to perform and record blood glucose testing as ordered and to report abnormal findings to physician. ...RN/LVN/LPN may perform blood glucose test as needed. ... to report to physician blood glucose readings greater than 300 or less than 70 mg/dl...instruct patient on importance of HCBA1C monitoring”. Review of SOC RN Visit note 06/20/25 stated “ Patient’s A1C on 6/11/25 was at 7.7 which is up from 7.1 6 months prior...placed on new med Sitagliptin. No current orders to monitor daily blood glucose levels as patient is not on insulin, no glucometer in home, knowledge deficit of T2DM”. Further record review failed to provide evidence of DME/ Supplies for CBG testing or orders for testing frequency on the POC and no documentation the SN staff notified the physician of the need for CBG testing supplies and orders for testing frequency. The Vital Signs Record showed no CBG results documented for SN visits conducted 6/20/25, 6/27/25, 7/2/25 and 7/9/25 Patient #6 Review of the POC for initial certification period 05/20/25 - 07/18/25 showed a primary diagnosis of Orthopedic Aftercare and secondary diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Neuropathy with orders for SN “Diabetes Management” Further review of the POC failed to include DME /Supplies for CBG testing. Patient #10 Review of the POC for re-certification period 04/08/25 - 06/06/25 showed a primary diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and secondary diagnosis of Hypertensive Heart Disease with Heart Failure and Type II Diabetes Mellitus with orders for SN “Oxygen Therapy’ and “Diabetes Management.” Further review of the POC failed to include DME /Supplies for CBG testing or Safety Measures for Oxygen Precautions. During an interview on 07/09/25 at 9:45 AM, Staff C stated the POC for Patients #5, #6 and #10 were not individualized to meet the patients’ needs based on the documented assessments.”

    Rule G0574. Element-level.

  • Only As Ordered By A Physician

    The inspectors’ words, 280 words

    “Only as ordered by a physician CFR(s): 484.60(b)(1) Drugs, services, and treatments are administered only as ordered by a physician or allowed practitioner. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, observation and interview the SN failed to provide wound care as ordered for one (#2) of two (#2 and #3) wound care procedures observed. Patient #2 Review of the POC for SOC period 06/06/25 - 08/04/25 showed a primary diagnosis of Metabolic Encephalopathy and Malignant Neoplasm of the Tongue with wound care orders of 06/27/25 for SN to perform wound care 2 times a week to the left forearm graft site and the left thigh graft site. On 07/08/25 at 10:30, the SN was observed performing wound care: Current wound care orders to the left forearm specified: Cleanse with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply hydrofera blue to hyper granulated area, apply Aquaphor to dry skin of forearm, wrap with kerlix, secure with coban. The SN applied an opened single-use Xeroform dressing to the wound instead of hydrofera blue as ordered, did not apply Aquaphor to forearm and informed the patient she would contact the physician to get wound care orders changed. Current wound care orders to the left thigh specified: Cleanse with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply Xeroform to the wound, cover with meplix. The SN applied Xeroform to the wound and covered with a bordered dressing the patient had ordered to use for comfort. The SN informed the patient she would contact the physician to get orders for a new dressing. During an interview on 07/09/25 at 09:45 AM, Staff A stated the SN did not provide wound care as ordered for Patient #2.”

    Rule G0580. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 9, 2025Recertification inspection4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Apr 25, 1984.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy and speech pathology.
  • Doesn’t offer medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Amedisys Holding LLC owns an unstated share directly since Dec 31, 2009.
  • 11 owners or officers are people: Sandra K. Morrison (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Marcus Macip (corporate officer); Kimberly Seymour (corporate officer); Bridget R Kaigler (managing employee (on the payroll)); Bridget R Kaigler (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Joni Babineaux (corporate officer); Kristina J Braud (managing employee (on the payroll)); Kristina J Braud (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Jeanne Shingleton (corporate officer); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate officer); Sandra K. Morrison (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Unitedhealth Group IncorporatedOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 14, 2025
Amedisys Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 1, 2006
Amedisys Holding LLCOwns 5% or more directlyDec 31, 2009

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (88 surveys completed): 82% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 76% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate91.47% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate11.20% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.49% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 11 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 74344, where this agency’s office is, 11 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4 of 5, and this one is rated 4.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.