Nightingale Visiting Nurses of Connecticut
A home health agency in Stamford, Connecticut 06901
1 Landmark Sq., Suite 611, Stamford, Connecticut 06901. (203) 569-4900.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.
- 3of 5 quality of patient care rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Apr 20, 2026: a recertification inspection.
3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Apr 20, 2026: recertification inspection3 deficiencies
-
Plan Of Care
The inspectors’ words, 626 words
“Plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(1) Each patient must receive the home health services that are written in an individualized plan of care that identifies patient-specific measurable outcomes and goals, and which is established, periodically reviewed, and signed by a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, or podiatry acting within the scope of his or her state license, certification, or registration. If a physician or allowed practitioner refers a patient under a plan of care that cannot be completed until after an evaluation visit, the physician or allowed practitioner is consulted to approve additions or modifications to the original plan. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of agency documentation, and interview with agency staff for two of eight patients (Patient #1 and #2) in the survey sample who required nursing and therapy services, the agency failed to ensure the physician ordered therapy services were provided. The findings include: Patient #1 had a start of care date of 4/02/26 and diagnoses that included acute cholecystitis, urinary tract infection and left breast cancer. The physician’s orders dated 4/02/26 included nursing services twice a week for assessments, home health aide services three times weekly for assistance with personal care and a physical therapy/PT evaluation and treatment. Review of the clinical record identified a Physical Therapy (PT) evaluation was ordered 4/2/26 by the patient’s provider, but was not conducted until 4/10/26 (eight days after the start of care). Interview and review of the clinical record on 4/15/26 at 10:40 AM with the Acting Administrator/Supervisor of Clinical Services (SCS) indicated that the PT evaluation should have been conducted within 48 hours of referral per the agency policy, but the Physical Therapist works on an “as needed basis”, so the evaluation was conducted at the PT’s convenience, on 4/10/26, and the SCS further indicated the staff failed to follow the patient’s individualized plan of care and the agency expectations. Patient #2 had a start of care date of 03/31/2026 with diagnoses that included lumbar spondylosis, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, narcolepsy, and osteoporosis. The physician’s orders for the certification period of 03/31/2026 through 05/29/2026 included nursing services two (2) times per week for four (4) weeks for assessments. The orders also included physical and occupational therapy evaluations for pain management, functional mobility, therapeutic exercises, safe equipment use and fall prevention. Review of Patient #2’s clinical record from 03/31/2026 through 04/13/2026 identified that Patient #2 had lumbar spine decompression surgery and bilateral sacral Tarlov cysts surgery. The Patient was discharged to home 3/26/26 with documentation identifying patient had an unsteady gait, was at risk for falls, required the use of a walker and needed assistance with personal care. Further review of the clinical record identified no documentation of the completion of the physician ordered physical or occupational therapy evaluations, or communication with the Patient’s physician regarding the delay in initiating and/or inability for the agency to complete the ordered therapy service evaluations. Interview with the Acting Administrator/Supervisor of Clinical Services (SCS) on 04/16/2026 at 11:00 AM, identified that Patient #2’s physical and occupational therapy evaluations should have been completed within 48 hours of admission. The Acting Administrator/SCS stated the agency didn’t have staff members that would go to the patient’s geographical area, resulting in the agency’s inability to complete the physician ordered physical or occupational therapy evaluations for Patient #2. The clinical record did not indicate communication with the patients physician regarding the delay and/or inability in providing therapy services. Subsequently, the Patient’s responsible caregiver requested that Patient #2 be discharged to another home health agency. Review of the agency policy for Assessments and Plan of Care Development directed the initial assessment is conducted within 48 hours of the patient’s return home, unless the physician specifies a specific time to conduct the initial assessment”
-
5 Calendar Days After Start Of Care
The inspectors’ words, 586 words
“5 calendar days after start of care CFR(s): 484.55(b)(1) The comprehensive assessment must be completed in a timely manner, consistent with the patient’s immediate needs, but no later than 5 calendar days after the start of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of clinical records, agency documentation and staff interviews, for two of eight patients (Patient #1 and #2) who required nursing services and/or therapy services, the agency licensed personnel failed to follow the physician’s-certified plan of care and agency policies for therapy evaluations. The findings include: Patient #1 had a start of care date of 4/02/26 and diagnoses that included acute cholecystitis, urinary tract infection and left breast cancer. The physician’s orders dated 4/02/26 included nursing services twice a week for assessments, home health aide services three times weekly for assistance with personal care and a physical therapy/PT evaluation and treatment. Review of the clinical record identified a Physical Therapy (PT) evaluation was ordered 4/2/26 by the patient’s provider, but was not conducted until 4/10/26 (eight days after the start of care). Interview and review of the clinical record on 4/15/26 at 10:40 AM with the Acting Administrator/Supervisor of Clinical Services (SCS) indicated that the PT evaluation was ordered on 4/2/26, and was not completed until 4/10/26 (eight days later) and should have been conducted within 48 hours of the referral per the agency policy. The SCS further stated the delay was a result of the Physical Therapist working on an “as needed basis”, so the evaluation was conducted at the PT’s convenience, on 4/10/26, and further indicated the staff failed to follow agency expectations. Patient #2 had a start of care date of 03/31/2026 with diagnoses that included lumbar spondylosis, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, narcolepsy, and osteoporosis. The physician’s orders for the certification period of 03/31/2026 through 05/29/2026 included nursing services two (2) times per week for four (4) weeks for assessments. The orders also included physical and occupational therapy evaluations for pain management, functional mobility, therapeutic exercises, safe equipment use and fall prevention. Review of Patient #2’s clinical record from 03/31/2026 through 04/13/2026 identified that Patient #2 had lumbar spine decompression surgery and bilateral sacral Tarlov cysts surgery. The Patient was discharged to home 3/26/26 with documentation identifying patient had an unsteady gait, was at risk for falls, required the use of a walker and needed assistance with personal care. Further review of the clinical record identified no documentation of the completion of the physician ordered physical or occupational therapy evaluations, or communication with the Patient’s physician regarding the delay in initiating and/or inability for the agency to complete the ordered therapy service evaluations. Interview with the Acting Administrator/Supervisor of Clinical Services (SCS) on 04/16/2026 at 11:00 AM, identified that Patient #2’s physical and occupational therapy evaluations should have been completed within 48 hours of admission. The Acting Administrator/SCS stated the agency didn’t have staff members that would go to the patient’s geographical area, resulting in the agencies inability to complete the physician ordered physical or occupational therapy evaluations for Patient #2. It was also noted that the agency did not communicate with the patients physician regarding the delay and/or inability in providing therapy services. Subsequently, the Patient’s responsible caregiver requested that Patient #2 be discharged to another home health agency. Review of the agency policy for Assessments and Plan of Care Development directed the initial assessment is conducted within 48 hours of the patient’s return home, unless the physician specifies a specific time to conduct the initial assessment”
-
Communication With Physicians
The inspectors’ words, 558 words
“Communication with physicians CFR(s): 484.75(b)(7) Communication with all physicians involved in the plan of care and other health care practitioners (as appropriate) related to the current plan of care; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of agency documentation, and interview with agency staff for two of eight patients (Patient #1 and #2) in the survey sample who required nursing and therapy services, the agency failed to ensure physician notification for a delay and/or the agencies inability to provide the ordered services. Patient #1 had a start of care date of 4/02/26 and diagnoses that included acute cholecystitis, urinary tract infection and left breast cancer. The physician’s orders dated 4/02/26 included nursing services twice a week for assessments, home health aide services three times weekly for assistance with personal care and a physical therapy/PT evaluation and treatment. Review of the clinical record identified a Physical Therapy (PT) evaluation was ordered 4/2/26 by the patient’s provider, but was not conducted until 4/10/26 (eight days after the start of care). Interview and review of the clinical record on 4/15/26 at 10:40 AM with the Acting Administrator/Supervisor of Clinical Services (SCS) identified the PT evaluation was conducted on 4/10/26, 8 days after the patients start of home care services, and should have been conducted within 48 hours of the referral per the agency policy. Review of the clinical record did not indicate communication with the patients provider related to the delay in services. Patient #2 had a start of care date of 03/31/2026 with diagnoses that included lumbar spondylosis, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, narcolepsy, and osteoporosis. The physician’s orders for the certification period of 03/31/2026 through 05/29/2026 included nursing services two (2) times per week for four (4) weeks for assessments. The orders also included physical and occupational therapy evaluations for pain management, functional mobility, therapeutic exercises, safe equipment use and fall prevention. Review of Patient #2’s clinical record from 03/31/2026 through 04/13/2026 identified that Patient #2 had lumbar spine decompression surgery and bilateral sacral Tarlov cysts surgery. The Patient was discharged to home 3/26/26 with documentation identifying patient had an unsteady gait, was at risk for falls, required the use of a walker and needed assistance with personal care. Further review of the clinical record identified no documentation of the completion of the physician ordered physical or occupational therapy evaluations, or communication with the Patient’s physician regarding the delay in initiating and/or inability for the agency to complete the ordered therapy service evaluations. Interview with the Acting Administrator/Supervisor of Clinical Services (SCS) on 04/16/2026 at 11:00 AM, identified that Patient #2’s physical and occupational therapy evaluations should have been completed within 48 hours of admission. The Acting Administrator/SCS stated the agency didn’t have staff members that would go to the patient’s geographical area, resulting in the agencies inability to complete the physician ordered physical or occupational therapy evaluations for Patient #2. It was also noted that the agency did not communicate with the patients physician regarding the delay and/or inability in providing therapy services. Subsequently, the Patient’s responsible caregiver requested that Patient #2 be discharged to another home health agency. Review of the agency policy for Assessments and Plan of Care Development directed the initial assessment is conducted within 48 hours of the patient’s return home, unless the physician specifies a specific time to conduct the initial assessment”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2026 | Recertification inspection | 3 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified home health agency since Sep 27, 2011.
- Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Who does the caring?
- Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Homecare Providers Inc. owns 100% directly since Jan 13, 2022.
- 4 owners or officers are people: Dev A Brar (owns 5% or more through other companies, 100%); Dev A Brar (corporate officer, 100%); Dev A Brar (corporate director, 100%); David A Pratt (managing employee (on the payroll), 5%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Homecare Providers Inc. | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Jan 13, 2022 |
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates its quality of patient care 3 of 5.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Zero, or very few, patients met the survey’s rules for inclusion.”
- CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars | 3 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 78.74% (same as the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 12.08% (same as the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 4.01% (same as the national rate) |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 18 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 06901, where this agency’s office is, 16 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.25 of 5, and this one is rated 3 of 5.
CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Quality rating |
|---|---|
| Nightingale Visiting Nurses of Connecticut This home health agency | 3 |
| Rvnahealth | 3 |
| Visiting Nurse & Hospice of Fairfield County, Inc. | 3 |
| Western Connecticut Home Care Inc. | 3 |
| Amedisys Home Health | 4 |
| Patient Care | 1 |
| Elara Caring | 5 |
| Patient Care | 4 |
| Pathwell Home Health | 4.5 |
| Constellation Home Care | 3.5 |
| Family Care Visiting Nurse & Home Care Agency, LLC | 3.5 |
| Centerwell Home Health | Not given |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
- Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Care Agencies (6jpm-sxkc).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Patient Survey (ccn4-8vby).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR home health inspection reports (HHA_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency All Owners (fc009b2d-7846-44b1-b4a1-692f0c143879).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency Enrollments (15f64ab4-3172-4a27-b589-ebd67a6d28aa).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health ZIP Codes (m5eg-upu5).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.
From the agency
The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.