Hearth Record

Centerwell Home Health

A home health agency in Stratford, Connecticut 06614

99 Hawley Lane, Suite 1101, Stratford, Connecticut 06614. (203) 377-5117.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jul 1, 2025: a recertification inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jul 1, 2025: recertification inspection3 deficiencies
  • Services By Skilled Professionals

    The inspectors’ words, 671 words

    “Services by skilled professionals CFR(s): 484.75(a) Standard: Provision of services by skilled professionals. Skilled professional services are authorized, delivered, and supervised only by health care professionals who meet the appropriate qualifications specified under §484.115 and who practice according to the HHA’s policies and procedures. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record reviews, reviews of agency policies and interviews with agency personnel, for two of thirteen patients (Patient’s #5 & #6) requiring medication pre-pouring and/or administration, the agency nurses failed to follow agency policies. The findings include: a. Patient #5 had a start of care date of 4/15/21 and diagnoses that included paranoid schizophrenia, anxiety and type II diabetes mellitus. The physician’s orders for the certification period of 5/24/25 to 7/22/25 included nursing services once weekly for assessments and pre-pouring of medications. During a joint home visit on 7/01/25 at 9:30 AM with Registered Nurse/RN #1, the surveyor observed the pre-pouring of the patient’s medications, including the removal of medications from a lockbox, including removal of one (1) packet (from a storage bag of 7 individual packets) of MiraLAX powder 17 grams. Review of the clinical record identified that the patient was admitted to the hospital on 5/13/25 with a small bowel obstruction and discharged on 5/16/25 with instructions to take MiraLAX 17 grams (1 packet) daily as needed for constipation, although, review of the medication profile lacked documentation of the MiraLAX 17 grams on the physician’s orders dated 5/24/25. Interview and review of the hospital discharge summary dated 5/16/25 and the current medication profile with the Administrator on 7/01/25 at 12:30 PM failed to identify the MiraLAX order was included on the medication profile and failed to identify RN #1 followed agency policies. b. Patient #6 had a start of care date of 2/22/24 and diagnoses that included bipolar and anxiety disorder. The physician’s orders for the certification period of 5/16/25 to 7/14/25 included nursing services once weekly for assessments and pre-pouring of medications. During a joint home visit on 7/01/25 at 10:15 AM with RN #2, the surveyor observed the pre-pouring of the patient’s medications and the nurses attempted to administer Ozempic 2 milligrams/mg subcutaneously/SQ, although, the medication was not available onsite. A refill was needed and reordered during the visit. RN #2 indicated that she administers the Ozempic weekly for the patient. Review of the physician’s orders dated 5/16/25, lacked documentation in the medication profile of the weekly Ozempic 2 mg injection and the administration of the medication by the nurse. Review of the weekly nursing notes from 5/21/25 to 6/24/25 (six visits) identified the administration by the nurse of the Ozempic 2 mg in the narrative note, but lacked documentation of the Ozempic injection on the electronic medication administration section in accordance with agency policies. i. Interview and review of the weekly nursing notes and the current medication profile with the Administrator on 7/01/25 at 12:40 PM failed to identify the administration of Ozempic 2 mg SQ, with the site of the injection, was included in the electronic medication administered section in accordance with agency policies. Review of agency policies for Medication Review and Documentation directed that during each visit, the Home Health agency clinical associate will review all medications the patient is currently taking, including the routes of administration to ensure medications are current, accurate and documented on the medication profile. Review of agency policy for Administered Medications directed that the written orders must include documentation of the medication name, strength, dose, route of administration, site of administration, date and time of administration. ii. Interview and review of the weekly nursing notes with the Administrator on 7/01/25 at 12:45 PM identified the weekly pre-pouring of medications in the electronic medications administered section identified the number of tablets pre-poured for the week, but failed to include the dates that the medications were pre-poured, in accordance with agency expectations. Review of agency Pre-Poured Medication expectations directed documenting the medications pre-poured for (time frame to be administered) per the medication list of (provide specific date).”

    Rule G0702. Standard-level.

  • Plan Of Care Must Include The Following

    The inspectors’ words, 583 words

    “Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record reviews and interviews with agency personnel, for two of thirteen patients (Patient’s #5 & #6) requiring medication pre-pouring and/or administration, the agency nurses failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan. The findings include: a. Patient #5 had a start of care date of 4/15/21 and diagnoses that included paranoid schizophrenia, anxiety and type II diabetes mellitus. The physician’s orders for the certification period of 5/24/25 to 7/22/25 included nursing services once weekly for assessments and pre-pouring of medications. During a joint home visit on 7/01/25 at 9:30 AM with Registered Nurse/RN #1, the surveyor observed the pre-pouring of the patient’s medications including removal of one (1) packet (from a storage bag of 7 individual packets) of MiraLAX powder 17 grams. Review of the clinical record identified that the patient was admitted to the hospital on 5/13/25 with a small bowel obstruction and discharged on 5/16/25 with instructions to take MiraLAX 17 grams (1 packet) daily as needed for constipation, although, review of the medication profile lacked documentation of the MiraLAX 17 grams on the physician’s orders dated 5/24/25. Interview and review of the hospital discharge summary dated 5/16/25 and the current medication profile with the Administrator on 7/01/25 at 12:30 PM failed to identify the MiraLAX order was included in the physician’s orders and failed to identify RN #1 completed a comprehensive care plan. b. Patient #6 had a start of care date of 2/22/24 and diagnoses that included bipolar and anxiety disorder. The physician’s orders for the certification period of 5/16/25 to 7/14/25 included nursing services once weekly for assessments and pre-pouring of medications. During a joint home visit on 7/01/25 at 10:15 AM with RN #2, the surveyor observed the pre-pouring of the patient’s medications and the nurses attempt to administer Ozempic 2 milligrams/mg subcutaneously/SQ, although, the medication was not available onsite. A refill was needed and reordered during the visit. RN #2 indicated that she administers the Ozempic weekly for the patient. Review of the physician’s orders dated 5/16/25, lacked documentation in the medication profile of the weekly Ozempic 2 mg injection and the administration of the medication by the nurse. Review of the weekly nursing notes from 5/21/25 to 6/24/25 identified the administration by the nurse of the Ozempic 2 mg in the narrative note. Interview and review of the physician’s orders and the current medication profile with the Administrator on 7/01/25 at 12:40 PM failed to identify the Ozempic order was included in the physician’s orders and failed to identify RN #2 completed a comprehensive care plan.”

    Rule G0574. Element-level.

  • Interdisciplinary Assessment Of The Patient

    The inspectors’ words, 174 words

    “Interdisciplinary assessment of the patient CFR(s): 484.75(b)(1) Ongoing interdisciplinary assessment of the patient; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record review and interview with agency personnel, for one of thirteen patients (Patient #2) in the survey sample, the agency nurses failed to provide the necessary assessments. The findings include: Patient #2 had a start of care date of 3/06/25 and diagnoses that included major depressive disorder and epilepsy. The physician’s orders for the certification period of 5/05/25 to 7/03/25 included nursing services twice daily for medication administration and assessments. Review of the clinical record from 5/05/25 to 6/16/25 identified assessment of the patient’s vital signs on 5/07/25, 5/08/25, 5/21/25, 6/02/25 and 6/16/25. Interview and review of the nursing notes from 5/05/25 to 6/21/25 (six weeks) with the Administrator on 7/01/25 at 11:30 AM identified it is the agency expectation that vital sign assessments are completed weekly during a clinical visit, but failed to identify the weekly assessment of vital signs for this patient were completed, according to agency expectations.”

    Rule G0706. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 1, 2025Recertification inspection3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jul 1, 1997.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and home health aide services.
  • Doesn’t offer medical social services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Centerwell Health Services Holding Corp owns 100% directly since Sep 30, 1999.
  • 16 owners or officers are people: Courtney D Durall (corporate officer, 0%); Stuart Bradley Keller (corporate officer, 0%); Celeste Mellet (corporate officer, 0%); Daniel K Feld (corporate officer); Caleb Gallifant (corporate officer, 0%); Robert M Marcoux (corporate officer); Sharday Merdja (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Daniel A Pullo (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Valerie Talkers (corporate officer, 0%); Richard Lindsay-Jones (corporate officer, 0%); Cassie Houff (corporate officer, 0%); Amaka Agumadu (corporate officer, 0%); Casey Mckeon (corporate officer, 0%); Casey Mckeon (corporate director, 0%); Kendra Clark (corporate officer, 0%); Sean Turner (corporate officer, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 2, 2018
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 2, 2018
Centerwell Health Services Holding CorpOwns 5% or more directly100%Sep 30, 1999
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 17, 2021
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 10, 2000

How do patients fare?

  • CMS gives no : “The number of patient episodes for this measure is too small to report.”
  • Patients rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (76 surveys completed): 83% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 72% would definitely recommend it.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half starsNot rated
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 52 of 5

How does it compare nearby?

  • CMS gives this agency no quality of patient care rating to compare.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.