Hearth Record

Patient Care

A home health agency in Rocky Hill, Connecticut 06067

500 Enterprise Dr Ste 307, Rocky Hill, Connecticut 06067. (860) 257-1887.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Nov 4, 2024: a complaint inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Apr 25, 2024: recertification inspection3 deficiencies
  • Services By Skilled Professionals

    The inspectors’ words, 240 words

    “Services by skilled professionals CFR(s): 484.75(a) Standard: Provision of services by skilled professionals. Skilled professional services are authorized, delivered, and supervised only by health care professionals who meet the appropriate qualifications specified under §484.115 and who practice according to the HHA’s policies and procedures. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record review and interviews with agency personnel for one of eight patients (Patient #9), requiring medication management, the agency licensed personnel failed to follow agency expectations for medication documentation in the electronic clinical record. The findings include: Patient #9 had a start of care date of 11/16/23 and diagnoses that included chronic pain syndrome and post laminectomy syndrome. The physician’s orders for the certification periods of 1/15/24 through 5/13/24 included nursing services daily for pain assessment, medication administration of morning medications, and pre-pouring of the afternoon and evening medications. Patient #9’s medications included Belbuca Buccal film (an opioid analgesic controlled substance) 900 micrograms/mcg twice daily for pain, Gabapentin 800 milligrams/mg three times a day for pain and Tizanidine Hydrochloride 2 mg every eight hours for muscle spasms. Interview and review of LPN #1’s nursing notes dated 3/02/24, 3/04/24, 3/09/24, 3/10/24, 3/23/24 and 3/24/24 with the Administrator on 4/25/24 at 11 AM identified documentation of the Controlled Substance count of the Belbuca film administered and pre-poured daily, but failed to identify documentation of the medications administered and pre-poured during the nursing visit according to agency expectations.”

    Rule G0702. Standard-level.

  • Plan Of Care Must Include The Following

    The inspectors’ words, 319 words

    “Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record review, review of agency policies and interview with agency personnel, for one of one patient (Patient #2) with a diagnosis of congestive heart failure requiring weight monitoring, the agency nurses failed to ensure the plan of care addressed the patient’s individual needs. Patient #2 had a start of care date of 2/04/23 and diagnoses that included heart failure, type II diabetes mellitus and hypertension. The physician’s orders for the certification periods of 1/30/24 through 5/28/24 included nursing services once weekly for medication pre-pour, diabetic and cardiac assessments. Interview and review of the physician’s certified plan of care with the Administrator on 4/25/24 at 10 AM failed to identify communication with the physician for the need to monitor weights and parameters for reporting abnormal findings to the physician. Review of the agency policy for Plan of Care directed that the plan of care includes patient specific interventions and education, measurable outcomes and goals identified by the agency and patient.”

    Rule G0574. Element-level.

  • Interdisciplinary Assessment Of The Patient

    The inspectors’ words, 229 words

    “Interdisciplinary assessment of the patient CFR(s): 484.75(b)(1) Ongoing interdisciplinary assessment of the patient; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record reviews, review of an agency policies and interview with agency staff, for one of five patients (Patient #6) who required nursing assessments and blood glucose monitoring, the agency failed to perform the necessary assessments in accordance with the agency’s expectation and policy. The findings include: a. Patient #6 had a start of care date 04/08/2022 with diagnosis that included high blood pressure, type II diabetes and acid reflux. The physician’s orders for the certification periods of 01/28/2024 to 03/27/2024 included nursing services once per week for nursing assessments, weekly pre-pour of medications, assess the Patient’s diabetic status and review the Patient’s blood glucose log. i. Interview and review of Patient #6’s nursing notes with the Administrator on 04/25/2024 at 11:30 AM, failed to identify blood glucose levels were assessed and documented on 01/31/2024, 03/06/2024, 03/13/2024 and 03/27/2024. The Administrator indicated the agency’s expectation was to assess and document blood glucose levels at each nursing visit, to assess the Patient’s condition, and and the patient’s response to the medication and diabetic education. Review of the agency’s Patient Assessment, Initial and Reassessment policy, identified a patient’s status would be reviewed as an ongoing process. Patients are assessed for continued need and response to care and services.”

    Rule G0706. Element-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 4, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Apr 25, 2024Recertification inspection3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jan 27, 1984.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care and home health aide services.
  • Doesn’t offer physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and medical social services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this agency.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 1 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (79 surveys completed): 84% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 69% would definitely recommend it.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars1 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 53 of 5

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 29 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 06067, where this agency’s office is, 26 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3 of 5, and this one is rated 1 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.