Fresenius Medical Care Northern Wake
A dialysis facility in Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
2700 Leighton Ridge Drive, Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587. (919) 554-2359.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 14, 2026.
- 3of 5 CMS’s star rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 16 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Oct 31, 2024: a standard inspection.
3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 19, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.
Oct 31, 2024: standard inspection3 deficiencies
-
Initial Poc Implemented - 30 Days/13 Tx
The inspectors’ words, 266 words
“POC-INITIAL IMPLEMENTED-30 DAYS/13 TX CFR(s): 494.90(b)(2) Implementation of the initial plan of care must begin within the latter of 30 calendar days after admission to the dialysis facility or 13 outpatient hemodialysis sessions beginning with the first outpatient dialysis session. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 38766 Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a three-month comprehensive reassessment in 1 of 5 sampled patients receiving hemodialysis treatment at the facility (#8). The findings include: A review on 10/30/2024 of the facility’s policy “Comprehensive Interdisciplinary Assessment and Plan of Care” published on 07/03/2023 revealed “... CIA and POC for Patients New to Dialysis ...A follow-up CIA must occur within 90 days. The POC should be adjusted as appropriate and implemented within 15 days of reassessment...” An open medical record review on 10/30/2024 for patient #8 revealed that the patient was originally admitted to the facility on 03/14/2024. The review revealed that the facility completed the initial comprehensive assessment of the patient dated 03/26/2024. Further review of the clinical record revealed that the facility failed to complete a follow-up comprehensive reassessment (90-day assessment) within three months after the completion of the initial assessment on 03/26/2024. An interview on 10/30/2024 at 1110 with the CM revealed that the facility should have completed the three-month reassessment for the patient, but that it was an oversight that the initial assessment was marked as an annual assessment. The interview revealed that the clinic will prioritize the patient’s 90-day assessment to be done during the clinic’s next scheduled plan of care meeting.”
-
Fac Receive/Review Self Monitoring Data Every 2 Months
The inspectors’ words, 395 words
“H-FAC RECEIVE/REVIEW PT RECORDS Q 2 MONTHS CFR(s): 494.100(b)(2),(3) The dialysis facility must - (2) Retrieve and review complete self-monitoring data and other information from self-care patients or their designated caregiver(s) at least every 2 months; and (3) Maintain this information in the patient ’ s medical record. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 38766 Based on policy review, medical record review, and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to ensure a patient recorded treatment data as prescribed on the treatment sheets for 1 of 4 home dialysis patients (Patient #4). Findings included: A review on 10/31/2024 of the facility’s policy titled “Review and Documentations of Home Therapies Patient Health Data” published on 05/01/2023, revealed “...Review and Documentation of Health Date ...At a minimum, the home therapies nurse will perform a comprehensive monthly review of all treatment data, regardless of the method of data admission. Datta review will be discussed with the patient and/or care partner during the patient’s regular clinic visit and concerns will be addressed and documented accordingly...” An open medical record review on 10/31/2024 for Patient #4 revealed the patient was admitted to the home hemodialysis program on 10/17/2022. The order review revealed that the patient was prescribed four days a week of treatment. A review of the treatment flow sheets between 077/15/2024 and 10/08/2024 revealed no documented pre-treatment sitting blood pressure on 07/26/2024, 08/22/2024, 08/23/2024, 09/05/2024, 09/07/2024, 09/09/2024, 10/01/2024, 10/03/2024, 10/05/2024, and 10/08/2024. The review revealed no documented pre-treatment standing blood pressure on 07/29/2024, 08/17/2024, 08/20/2024, 08/22/2024, 08/23/2024, 09/05/2024, 09/07/2024, 09/09/2024, /01/2024, 10/03/2024, 10/05/2024, and 10/08/2024. The review revealed no documented post-treatment sitting blood pressure on 08/07/2024, 09/07/2024, 10/01/2024, and 10/05/2024. The review revealed no documented post-treatment standing blood pressure on 09/07/2024, 10/01/2024, and 10/05/2024. The review of nursing notes between 07/03/2024 and 10/24/2024 revealed no evidence that reeducation was provided by the registered nurse to Patient #4 on the reasons for patients to document daily blood pressure before and after each treatment. An interview on 10/31/2024 at 1150 with the CMHT and the Home Area Team Lead revealed that there was no reeducation documentation from the home therapy nurse regarding the missing data. The interview revealed that the staff was expected to review the treatment data collected by the patient at every clinic visit and at a minimum, every month and reeducate the patient on any missing data.”
-
Md Resp - Ensure All Adhere To P&P
The inspectors’ words, 309 words
“MD RESP-ENSURE ALL ADHERE TO P&P CFR(s): 494.150(c)(2)(i) The medical director must- (2) Ensure that- (i) All policies and procedures relative to patient admissions, patient care, infection control, and safety are adhered to by all individuals who treat patients in the facility, including attending physicians and nonphysician providers; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 38766 Based on policy review, observation, and staff interview, the facility staff failed to properly label medication syringes in six (6) of six (6) observed pre-drawn syringes. Findings included: A review on 10/29/2024 of the facility’s policy titled, Medication Preparation and Administration” published 02/06/2021 revealed “...Labeling Reconstituted medication Solutions and Syringes All medications in syringes not being administered immediately shall be labeled appropriately with the name of the medication, route, dose, name of patient, date, time and initials of the person who prepared the medication...” Observation on 10/29/2024 between 1040 and 1220 of the treatment areas revealed a medication preparation area near the nursing station. Observation revealed a total of 6 (six) syringes of Heparin (medication used to decrease the clotting ability of the blood) were stored in a locked drawer. The observation revealed the labels on the six syringes did not contain the preparation time or the initials of the staff who prepared them. The observation revealed the staff did not label the syringes according to policy. An interview on 10/29/2024 at 1200 with Registered Nurse #1 revealed that the nurse was unaware of when and by whom the syringes were prepared. The interview revealed that the staff should not put pre-filled syringes in the draw without the staff’s initials and preparation time. An interview on 10/30/2024 at 1000 with the Clinical Coordinator further reinforced the expectation for staff to adhere to all policies and procedures. The Clinical Coordinator reported that the staff did not follow the facility policy regarding medication labeling.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2024 | Standard inspection | 3 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jan 11, 2016.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
- Doesn’t offer a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 16 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | Not rated |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 20 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Wake County, 19 have a star rating from CMS: 2 rated 5 of 5, 6 rated 4 of 5, 9 rated 3 of 5, 2 rated 2 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 19, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 19, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 14, 2026 and checked Oct 19, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 19, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.