Fmc Wake Dialysis Clinic
A dialysis facility in Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
3604 Bush Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27609. (919) 876-7501.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 3of 5 CMS’s star rating
- 1of 5 patient survey rating
- 1 deficiency cited in the last three years
- 40 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Apr 30, 2025: a complaint inspection.
1 deficiency cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Nov 21, 2024: complaint inspection1 deficiency
-
Involuntary Discharge Process Requirements
The inspectors’ words, 820 words
“GOV-INVOL DISCHARGE PROCESS REQUIREMENTS CFR(s): 494.180(f)(4) The medical director ensures that no patient is discharged or transferred from the facility unless - (4) The facility has reassessed the patient and determined that the patient’s behavior is disruptive and abusive to the extent that the delivery of care to the patient or the ability of the facility to operate effectively is seriously impaired, in which case the medical director ensures that the patient’s interdisciplinary team- (i) Documents the reassessments, ongoing problems(s), and efforts made to resolve the problem(s), and enters this documentation into the patient’s medical record; (ii) Provides the patient and the local ESRD Network with a 30-day notice of the planned discharge; (iii) Obtains a written physician’s order that must be signed by both the medical director and the patient’s attending physician concurring with the patient’s discharge or transfer from the facility; (iv) Contacts another facility, attempts to place the patient there, and documents that effort; and (v) Notifies the State survey agency of the involuntary transfer or discharge. (5) In the case of immediate severe threats to the health and safety of others, the facility may utilize an abbreviated involuntary discharge procedure. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 26622 Based on facility policy review, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a 30-day discharge notification to a hospitalized patient and/or guardian for 1 of 1 sampled discharged patient records reviewed. Findings include: Review on 11/21/2024 of the facility policy titled “Immediate and Non-Immediate Involuntary Patient Discharge” published 11/02/2024 revealed “... Non-Immediate Involuntary Discharge (30-day Discharge) Patient is notified in person and by letter that effective in 30 days, their current (Name) clinic is no longer able to provide them with medical care or dialysis treatments. This is based on...(...unable to meet medical needs...). ... Patient Notification Non-immediate involuntary discharge: The patient must be notified by certified letter and regular mail at least 30 days prior to the non-immediate involuntary discharge. ... Reason for Non-Immediate Involuntary Discharge (30-day notice required) ... Facility Unable to Meet Documented Medical Needs If a patient’s medical condition is deemed to require non-routine, extensive monitoring, or other interventions that are not available in the facility, discharge of the patient may be necessary. Depending on the severity of the medical need, the discharge may need to be less than 30 days. All reasonable alternatives for continuing to provide care to the patient in the facility must be considered before discharge occurs. A meeting between the IDT (interdisciplinary team) and the patient and/or patient’s representative or family should take place to discuss the patient’s current status and barriers to providing safe treatment environment for the patient. ...” Review on 11/20/2024 of the medical record for Patient #1 revealed a 61-year-old female admitted for ICHD (in-center hemodialysis) on 08/11/2020. Review of the medical record revealed a “special attention” discharge order placed in the electronic medical record on 11/21/2024 at 1707. Review of the order revealed a start date/time of 11/12/2024 at 1606. Review of the discharge order revealed “Instruction: Patient to be discharged due to no longer meeting outpatient dialysis criteria per Dr. (Name). Review of the medical record revealed the last documented conversation with Patient #1’s daughter was on 09/20/2024 at 1019. The documentation by the Facility Administrator revealed no evidence of Patient #1’s discharge being discussed during the conversation with the patient’s daughter. Review of a nephrology physician progress note documented on 09/25/2024 at 0953 and 09/26/2024 at 0909 revealed “End stage renal disease ... Not an outpatient dialysis candidate given critical airway” with no documentation of plans for discharge from the ICHD outpatient clinic. Review of the medical record failed to reveal documented conversations with the patient/patient representative related to discharge plans. Interview on 11/20/2024 at 1420 with Social Worker (SW) #1 revealed that the SW had not had any conversations with the patient or patient’s daughter about discharge. Interview on 11/21/2024 at 1615 with Facility Administrator (FA) #2 revealed the facility was unable to locate any documentation in the medical record related to discharge conversations with the patient and/or patient’s daughter. The FA indicated that she had a conversation with the patient’s daughter in September 2024 and that review of the documented conversation did not reveal a discussion about the possibility of discharge. Interview revealed the last documented in-clinic provider note was written on 12/07/2023. The FA did have access to nephrology progress notes documented in September 2024 but a review of the notes did not reveal documentation of discharge conversations with the patient and/or the patient’s daughter. Interview revealed that the FA was unable to locate documentation of discharge discussions for Patient #1 in the medical record. Interview revealed that the facility received an email from the attending physician to discharge Patient #1 due to the clinics inability to provide dialysis in the outpatient setting due to the patient’s current medical care needs. NC00216338, NC00217675, NC00212162, NC00211461”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2025 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Nov 21, 2024 | Complaint inspection | 1 deficiency cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jul 7, 1986.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
- Doesn’t offer a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 40 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 1 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- Patients rate it 1 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (57 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 50% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | 1 of 5 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 20 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Wake County, 19 have a star rating from CMS: 2 rated 5 of 5, 6 rated 4 of 5, 9 rated 3 of 5, 2 rated 2 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.