Teachable Moments Preschool LLC
A child day center in Lynchburg, Virginia 24501
1915 Thomson Drive, Lynchburg, Virginia 24501. (434) 215-3148.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 36 deficiencies in the last three years
- Jul 82026 the latest visit on record
- 86 children, its licensed capacity
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
17 inspections on record, the latest on Jul 8, 2026.
36 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
26 deficiencies in 8 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. The last 3 years, to Nov 2, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
Jul 8, 2026: subsidy health and safety inspection3 deficiencies
-
If hazardous substances are not kept in original containers, the substitute containers shall clearly indicate their contents.
“There were two plastic spray bottles containing liquid solutions in the diapering area of Classroom 5 that were not labeled to indicate the contents.”
-
Children’s hands shall be washed with soap and running water or a disposable wipe before eating meals and snacks and with soap and running water after toileting.
“Staff 1 did not wash a child’s hands after a diaper change; the child was immediately placed in a highchair for a meal.”
-
Disposable diapers shall be disposed in a leak-proof or plastic lined storage system that is either foot-operated or used in a way that neither the staff member’s hand nor the soiled diaper touches the exterior surface of the storage system during disposal, and the diapering surface shall be cleaned with soap and water and sanitized after each use.
“Staff 1 used their hand to open the lid of the disposal storage system to dispose of a soiled diaper. Staff 1 did not sanitize the diapering surface after each use.”
May 18, 2026: inspection1 deficiency
-
The action or threat of roughly handling is forbidden.
The inspectors’ words, 97 words
“05/06/2026, Staff 1 roughly handled Child 1 (age 4 years) when they jerked the child by the arm, lifted the child off the floor by their arms, and moved the child to another area of the room. Staff 1 roughly handled Child 1 (age 4 years) when they picked the child up out of a chair by their arms and moved the child to another area of the room. 05/14/2026, Staff 1 roughly handled Child 1 (age 4 years) when they roughly grabbed Child 1 by the arm, and forcefully led the child out of the class.”
Jan 14, 2026: subsidy health and safety inspection3 deficiencies
-
The center must request a search of the central registry prior to the employee’s first day of employment.
“The central registry for Staff 2 was requested more than one week after the first day of employment.”
-
Areas and equipment of the center, inside and outside, shall be maintained in a clean, safe and operable condition.
“The exterior paint of the building that is adjacent to the playground is peeling; the peeling paint is on an exterior wall that is accessible to the children. There are various areas of peeling paint in Classroom 4; the peeling paint is accessible to the children.”
-
Repeat violation
“When an authorization for medication expires, the parent shall be notified that the medication needs to be picked up within 14 days or the parent must renew the authorization. The authorization for Medication 3 expired over 3 months ago; the medication was still on-site.”
Aug 25, 2025: inspection2 deficiencies
-
A nonabsorbent surface for diapering or changing shall be used.
“The diapering surface in Class 1 had tears and cut creating an absorbent surface.”
-
When an authorization for medication expires, the parent shall be notified that the medication needs to be picked up within 14 days or the parent must renew the authorization.
“The authorization for Medication 1 has been expired for 20 days and was still at the center.”
May 27, 2025: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Repeat violation
“Children under 10 years of age always shall be within actual sight and sound supervision of staff. On 05/22/2025, Child 1 (age 18 months) was left alone on the centers outside playground for approximately 4 minutes. Child 1 was not within the actual sight and sound supervision of staff during the time that they were alone on the playground.”
-
The center shall maintain compliance with the center’s own policies and procedures that are required by the standards.
“The center’s required playground safety plan states that teachers are required to take a head count of students before departing the playground to head back inside from outdoor play. On 05/22/2025, Staff 1 and Staff 2 left Child 1 (age 18 months) on the outdoor playground alone for approximately 4 minutes. The staff did not conduct a head count of the students prior to departing the playground to head back inside.”
Feb 4, 2025: inspection3 deficiencies
-
Children under 10 years of age always shall be within actual sight and sound supervision of staff.
“Child 5 was sleeping in a crib in Classroom 1. The crib was in an area of the classroom that was not within the actual sight supervision of the staff.”
-
Prepared infant formula shall be refrigerated, dated, and labeled with the child’s name.
“There were 2 bottles of prepared infant formula in Classroom 1 that were not dated.”
-
For each group of children, the center shall maintain a written record of daily attendance that documents the arrival and departure of each child in care as it occurs.
“There were 7 children observed in Classroom 1. The written attendance for Classroom 1 documented 5 children in attendance and the electronic attendance documented 6 children in attendance.”
Jul 9, 2024: inspection4 deficiencies
-
Based on record review, the center failed to obtain the findings from a search of the central registry within 30 days of employment.
The inspectors’ words, 147 words
“Evidence: 1. The record for Staff 1 contained a documented hire date of 08/21/2023. There were no findings from a search of the central registry for Staff 1 available for review during the inspection. Staff 1 was observed working during the inspection. 2. The record for Staff 2 contained a documented hire date of 04/08/2024. The search of the central registry for Staff 2 was dated 06/28/2024; the findings were not obtained within 30 days of employment. 3. The record for Staff 3 contained a documented hire date of 04/08/2024. The search of the central registry for Staff 3 was dated 06/28/2024; the findings were not obtained within 30 days of employment. 4. The record for Staff 5 contained a documented hire date of 11/27/2023. The search of the central registry for Staff 5 was dated 01/22/2024; the findings were not obtained within 30 days of employment.”
-
Based on observation, the center failed to ensure that staff shall wash their hands with soap and running water before feeding or helping children with feeding.
“Evidence: Staff 6 did not wash their hands before feeding a child a bottle.”
-
Based on document review, the center failed to ensure that all nonprescription drugs shall be used in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations.
“Evidence: The manufacturer’s instruction for Medication 2 states the following, ?Ages 2-11 years?. The dosage amount for Medication 2, when used for children under 2 years states, ?ask a doctor?. The medication authorization form for Medication 2 did not include dosage instructions from a physician. The medication administration log contained documentation that Medication 2 had been administered to Child 6 (age 13 mo.) on the following dates: 05/01/2024, 05/02/2024, 05/07/2024, 06/03/2024, and 06/12/2024.”
-
Based on observation and staff interviews, the center failed to ensure that the record for each child on formula shall contain the brand of formula and the child’s feeding schedule.
“Evidence: Staff 7 stated that there was not a record with the brand of formula and the child’s feeding schedule for each of the 3 children on formula.”
Jan 22, 2024: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Based on the review of video footage, the center failed to ensure that when staff are supervising children, they shall always ensure their care, protection and guidance.
The inspectors’ words, 122 words
“Evidence: Video footage shows Staff 1 sitting in a chair in front of 3 children that were seated in highchairs. Child 1 (7 months old) can be seen falling forward out of the highchair, striking their head on a small refrigerator, landing on their face and shoulder on the floor, and coming to rest on their face/stomach; Child 1 immediately began to cry. The tray of the highchair had not been placed on the highchair nor had Child 1 been strapped into the highchair. Child 1 fell approximately 23 inches from the seat of the highchair to the floor. Staff 1 did not ensure the care and protection of Child 1 when she did not place strap the child into the highchair.”
-
Based on the review of video footage, the center failed to ensure that when a child is placed into an infant seat or highchair, the protective belt shall be fastened securely.
“Evidence: Video footage shows Child 1 (7 months old) falling forward out of a highchair, striking their head on a small refrigerator, landing on their face and shoulder on the floor, and coming to rest on their face/stomach. The protective belt of the highchair had not been securely fastened around Child 1.”
Jan 11, 2024: inspection6 deficiencies
-
Systemic violation
“Based on record review, the center failed to obtain documentation that each child has received the immunizations required by the State Board of Health before the child can attend the center. Evidence: The record for Child 1 did not contain an immunization record. Child 1 was observed in care during the inspection.”
-
Repeat violation/systemic violation
“Based on record review, the center failed to obtain a copy of the child’s physical examination before the child’s attendance or within 30 days after the first day of attendance. Evidence: 1. The record for Child 4 did not contain physical examinations. Staff 7 verified the start date for Child 4 was 10/02/2023. 2. The record for Child 5 did not contain physical examinations. Staff 7 verified the start date for Child 5 was 10/30/2023.”
-
Based on record review and staff interview, the center failed to ensure that one of the program leader qualifications is met when assigning the position of program lead.
“Evidence: The record for Staff 2 contained a documented job title of program leader. Staff 2 stated that they were a program lead and was observed in the role of program lead during the inspection. The documentation in the record for Staff 2 did not support that Staff 2 meets one of the qualifications required by the standards to hold the position of a program leader.”
-
Based on observation, the center failed to ensure that cribs shall be identified for use by a specific child.
“Evidence: Child 1 was observed sleeping in crib that was not identified for their use; the crib was not labeled.”
-
Based on document review and observation, the center failed to ensure that when an authorization for medication expires, the parent shall be notified that the medication needs to be picked up within 14 days or the parent must renew the authorization. Medications that are not picked up by the parent within 14 days will be disposed of.
“Evidence: The authorization for Medication 6 expired on 12/22/2023. The medication was still on-site during the 01/11/2024 inspection; the authorization was not renewed nor was the medication disposed of by 01/05/2024.”
-
Repeat violation/systemic violation
The inspectors’ words, 632 words
“Based on record review, the center failed to ensure that the separate record for each child enrolled contains all of the elements as required by the standards. Evidence: 1. The record for Child 1 did not contain the following information: the home address for each parent who has custody; when applicable, work phone number and play of employment of each parent who has custody; the name, address and phone number of two designated people to call in an emergency if a parent cannot be reached (there was no addressed provided for either designated person); written agreements between the parent and the center as required by the standards; previous child day care and schools attended by the child; name of any additional programs or school that the child is concurrently attending and the grade or class level; and first date of attendance. 2. The record for Child 2 did not contain the following information: : the home address for each parent who has custody; when applicable, work phone number and play of employment of each parent who has custody; the name, address and phone number of two designated people to call in an emergency if a parent cannot be reached (there was no addressed provided for either designated person); written agreements between the parent and the center as required by the standards; previous child day care and schools attended by the child; name of any additional programs or school that the child is concurrently attending and the grade or class level; and first date of attendance. 3. The record for Child 3 did not contain the following information: written agreements between the parent and the center as required by the standards; and first date of attendance. 4. The record for Child 4 did not contain the following information: the home address for each parent who has custody; when applicable, work phone number and play of employment of each parent who has custody; the name, address and phone number of two designated people to call in an emergency if a parent cannot be reached (there was only one designated person provided and there was not an addressed provided for that person); written agreements between the parent and the center as required by the standards; previous child day care and schools attended by the child; name of any additional programs or school that the child is concurrently attending and the grade or class level; and first date of attendance. 5. The record for Child 5 did not contain the following information: the home address for each parent who has custody; when applicable, work phone number and play of employment of each parent who has custody; the name, address and phone number of two designated people to call in an emergency if a parent cannot be reached (there was no addressed provided for either designated person); written agreements between the parent and the center as required by the standards; previous child day care and schools attended by the child; name of any additional programs or school that the child is concurrently attending and the grade or class level; and first date of attendance. 6. The record for Child 6 did not contain the following information: the home address for each parent who has custody; when applicable, work phone number and play of employment of each parent who has custody; the name, address and phone number of two designated people to call in an emergency if a parent cannot be reached (there was no addressed provided for either designated person); written agreements between the parent and the center as required by the standards; previous child day care and schools attended by the child; name of any additional programs or school that the child is concurrently attending and the grade or class level; and first date of attendance.”
Nov 6, 2023: inspection10 deficiencies
-
Based on record review, the center failed to obtain a copy of a criminal history record check and a copy of a child abuse and neglect search from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years.
“Evidence: The record for Staff 4 contained documentation that Staff 4 has resided outside of the state of Virginia within the preceding five years. The record for Staff 4 had a documented hire date of 08/21/2023. There was not a criminal history record check or a copy of a child abuse and neglect search from all of the states in which the individual had resided in the preceding five years available for review during the inspection.”
-
Based on record review, the center failed to ensure that an employee must not be employed until the agency has the person’s completed sworn statement or affirmation.
The inspectors’ words, 126 words
“Evidence: 1. The record for Staff 1 contained a documented hire date of 08/21/2023. The sworn statement in the record for Staff 1 was dated 08/22/2023. 2. The record for Staff 2 contained a documented hire date of 08/21/2023. The sworn statement in the record for Staff 2 was dated 08/22/2023. 3. The record for Staff 3 contained a documented hire date of 08/21/2023. The sworn statement in the record for Staff 3 was dated 08/22/2023. 4. The record for Staff 4 contained a documented hire date of 08/21/2023. The sworn statement in the record for Staff 4 was dated 08/22/2023. 5. The record for Staff 5 contained a documented hire date of 08/21/2023. The sworn statement in the record for Staff 5 was dated 08/22/2023.”
-
Based on record review, the center failed to obtain the findings from a search of the central registry within 30 days of employment.
The inspectors’ words, 120 words
“Evidence: 1. The record for Staff 3 contained a documented hire date of 08/21/2023. There were no findings from a search of the central registry for Staff 3 available for review during the 11/06/2023 inspection. Staff 3 was observed working during the inspection. 2. The record for Staff 4 contained a documented hire date of 08/21/2023. The search of the central registry for Staff 4 was dated 10/16/2023; the findings were not obtained within 30 days of employment. 3. The record for Staff 5 contained a documented hire date of 08/21/2023. There were no findings from a search of the central registry for Staff 5 available for review during the 11/06/2023 inspection. Staff 5 was observed working during the inspection.”
-
Based on staff interviews, the center failed to obtain a copy of the child’s physical examination before the child’s attendance or within 30 days after the first day of attendance.
“Evidence: The records for Child 1, 2, 3 and 4 did not contain physical examinations. Staff 6 verified that 08/21/2023 was the first date of attendance for all four of the children.”
-
Based on record review, the center failed to ensure that each immunization/physical examination report shall include the date of the physical examination and dates immunization were received and shall be signed by a physician, his designee, or an official of the local health department.
“Evidence: The immunization records in the record for Child 1, 2 and 3 were not signed by a physician, his designee, or an official of the local health department.”
-
Based on record review, the center failed to obtain documentation of a negative tuberculosis screening at the time of employment and prior to coming into contact with children and that documentation shall have been completed within the last 30 calendar days of the date of employment.
The inspectors’ words, 156 words
“Evidence: 1. The record for Staff 1 contained a documented hire date of 08/21/2023. The tuberculosis screening was dated 10/13/2023; the screening was not completed prior to coming into contact with children. 2. The record for Staff 2 contained a documented hire date of 08/21/2023. The tuberculosis screening was dated 10/16/2023; the screening was not completed prior to coming into contact with children. 3. The record for Staff 3 contained a documented hire date of 08/21/2023. The tuberculosis screening was dated 10/19/2023; the screening was not completed prior to coming into contact with children. 4. The record for Staff 4 contained a documented hire date of 08/21/2023. The tuberculosis screening was dated 10/17/2023; the screening was not completed prior to coming into contact with children. 5. The record for Staff 5 contained a documented hire date of 08/21/2023. The tuberculosis screening was dated 10/12/2023; the screening was not completed prior to coming into contact with children.”
-
Based on observations, the center failed to ensure that children under 10 years of age always shall be within actual sight and sound supervision of staff.
“Evidence: Child 5 was observed being taken out of their classroom to receive services from an outside organization. During that time Child 1 was not within actual sight and sound supervision of staff.”
-
Based on document review, the center failed to ensure that the documentation of emergency evacuation drills contain all of the elements as required by the standards.
“Evidence: The documentation of the emergency evacuation drills did not contain the following information: identity of the person conducting the drill; the method used for notification of the drill; number of staff participating; any special conditions simulated; and problems encountered if any.”
-
Based on record review, the center failed to ensure that the separate record for each child enrolled contains all of the elements as required by the standards.
The inspectors’ words, 442 words
“Evidence: 1. The record for Child 1 did not contain the following information: the home address for each parent who has custody; when applicable, work phone number and play of employment of each parent who has custody; the name, address and phone number of two designated people to call in an emergency if a parent cannot be reached (there was no addressed provided for either designated person); written agreements between the parent and the center as required by the standards; and first date of attendance. 2. The record for Child 2 did not contain the following information: when applicable, work phone number and play of employment of each parent who has custody; name and phone number of the child’s physician; the name, address and phone number of two designated people to call in an emergency if a parent cannot be reached (there were not designated people listed); names of person authorized to pick up the child; allergies and intolerances to medication or any other substances, and actions to take in an emergency situation; written agreements between the parent and the center as required by the standards; and first date of attendance. 3. The record for Child 3 did not contain the following information: the home address for each parent who has custody; when applicable, work phone number and play of employment of each parent who has custody; the name, address and phone number of two designated people to call in an emergency if a parent cannot be reached (there was no addressed provided for either designated person); written agreements between the parent and the center as required by the standards; and first date of attendance. 4. The record for Child 4 did not contain the following information: the home address for each parent who has custody; when applicable, work phone number and play of employment of each parent who has custody; the name, address and phone number of two designated people to call in an emergency if a parent cannot be reached (both designated people listed were the child’s parents); written agreements between the parent and the center as required by the standards; and first date of attendance. 5. The record for Child 5 did not contain the following information: the home address for each parent who has custody; when applicable, work phone number and play of employment of each parent who has custody; the name, address and phone number of two designated people to call in an emergency if a parent cannot be reached (there was no addressed provided for either designated person); written agreements between the parent and the center as required by the standards; and first date of attendance.”
-
Based on record review, the center failed to ensure that staff records contain all of the elements required by the standards.
The inspectors’ words, 234 words
“Evidence: 1. The record for Staff 1 did not contain the following information: job title; documentation that two or more references as to character and reputation as well as competency were checked before employment (the reference check did not include the results of the telephone reference check); and documentation that the individual possesses the education, certification, and experience required by the job title. 2. The record for Staff 2 did not contain the following information: job title; and documentation that two or more references as to character and reputation as well as competency were checked before employment (the reference check did not include the results of the telephone reference check). 3. The record for Staff 3 did not contain the following information: job title; and documentation that two or more references as to character and reputation as well as competency were checked before employment (the reference check did not include the results of the telephone reference check). 4. The record for Staff 4 did not contain the following information: job title; and documentation that the individual possesses the education, certification, and experience required by the job title. 5. The record for Staff 5 did not contain the following information: job title; and documentation that two or more references as to character and reputation as well as competency were checked before employment (the reference check did not include the results of the telephone reference check).”
Aug 17, 2023: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Based on staff interviews, the center failed to develop written playground safety procedures that shall include provision for active supervision by staff to include positioning of staff in strategic locations, scanning play activities, and circulating among children and method of maintaining resilient surfacing.
“Evidence: Applicant 1 stated that the playground safety procedures had not been developed.”
-
Based on staff interviews, the center failed to have a written emergency preparedness plan that addresses staff responsibility and facility readiness with respect to emergency evacuation and relocation, shelter-in-place, and lockdown.
“Evidence: Applicant 1 stated that they did not have a written emergency preparedness plan.”
All 17 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2026 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 3 violations cited |
| May 18, 2026 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Jan 14, 2026 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Aug 25, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Aug 25, 2025 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Aug 25, 2025 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| May 27, 2025 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Feb 4, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Feb 4, 2025 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Jul 9, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Jul 9, 2024 | Inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Feb 15, 2024 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Jan 22, 2024 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Jan 11, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Jan 11, 2024 | Inspection | 6 violations cited |
| Nov 6, 2023 | Inspection | 10 violations cited |
| Aug 17, 2023 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Child Day Center: Two Year license, expires Feb 19, 2028.
- A current subsidy provider.
- Ages: 1 month - 5 years 11 months.
- Capacity: 86 children.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 0 complaint inspections on record.
- No complaint allegations published with findings.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 44 child care providers in the City of Lynchburg, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 36.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| Jubilee Family Development Center | 20 |
| Rhema’s “Gentle Care” Child Development Center | 28 |
| Faith Assembly Christian Center | 5 |
| Katherine Brown | 5 |
| Montessori Children’s House LLC | 3 |
| Prayer of Faith Temple | 16 |
| Change Me Ministries & Fellowship/Bright Hope, Inc. | 1 |
| Aslan Castle ELC | 13 |
| New Covenant Schools | Not given |
| Teachable Moments Preschool LLC This child care provider | 36 |
| YMCA of Central Virginia-Little Scholars Academy | 13 |
| Christian Chapel | Not given |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 2, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.