Rhema’s “Gentle Care” Child Development Center
A child day center in Lynchburg, Virginia 24501
321 Alleghany Avenue, Lynchburg, Virginia 24501. (434) 847-0257.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 28 deficiencies in the last three years
- Sep 292026 the latest visit on record
- 75 children, its licensed capacity
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
27 inspections on record, the latest on Sep 29, 2026.
28 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
28 deficiencies in 8 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. The last 3 years, to Nov 2, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
Jul 1, 2026: subsidy health and safety inspection2 deficiencies
-
The center is required to obtain background checks from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years.
“The center has not requested a criminal history record check, a sex offender registry check, and child abuse and neglect registry check from two states for Staff 3, who has been employed for one week and was working with children at the time of the inspection.”
-
The center shall ensure that during transportation of children Virginia state statutes about safety belts and child restraints are followed.
“Virginia state statutes require that children through the age of seven must be properly secured in an approved car seat or booster seat. Staff 6 stated that Child 6 (age 6 years) was not in an approved car seat or booster seat while being transported to and from a recent field trip.”
Jul 1, 2026: complaint inspection3 deficiencies
-
Children under 10 years of age always shall be within actual sight and sound supervision of staff.
“06/18/2026, Staff 1 left Classroom 1 and stood on the other side of the half wall in Classroom 2 for approximately one minute. During the time, the children in Classroom 1 (ages 3-4 years old) were not within sight and sound supervision of a staff member.”
-
When time out is used it shall be used sparingly and shall not exceed one minute for each year of the child’s age.
“06/18/2026, Child 2 (age 3 years) was placed into time out on two occasions, once for approximately 10 minutes and a second time for approximately six minutes.”
-
The following actions or threats thereof are forbidden: roughly handling or shaking a child.
“06/18/2026, Staff 1 roughly handled Child 2 (age 3 years) when they jerked the child by the arm, lifted the child up by their arms, and carried the child to another area of the room for time out. 06/18/2026, Staff 1 roughly handled Child 2 (age 3 years) when they jerked the child across the floor by their ankles, lifted the child up off of the ground by their arms, and carried the child to another area of the room for time out.”
Jan 8, 2026: subsidy health and safety inspection1 deficiency
-
Children 3 years of age or younger may not be offered foods that are considered to be potential choking hazards.
“Child 3 (age 3 years) was eating a pancake and sausage link on a stick that was provided by the center. The sausage link was a potential choking hazard.”
Aug 26, 2025: inspection3 deficiencies
-
Documentation of a negative tuberculosis (TB) screening must be submitted at the time of employment, before coming into contact with children, and shall have been completed within the last 30 days of the date of employment.
“The TB screening for Staff 2 was completed more than 2 months prior to employment.”
-
Staff shall wash their hands with soap and running water before preparing or serving food or beverages.
“Staff 2 did not wash their hands before preparing a bottle.”
-
At least one staff member in each classroom or area where children are present shall have a current CPR and first aid certification from an organization that includes an in-person competency demonstration.
“Staff 2 does not have a current CPR and first aid certification from an organization that includes an in-person competency demonstration; Staff 2 was the only staff member observed supervising Class 1.”
Jun 3, 2025: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Repeat violation
“The center shall be in compliance with the center’s own policies and procedures that are required by the standards. The center’s required discipline policy states that striking a child and roughly handling a child is not permitted. On 05/28/2025, Staff 1 roughly handled Child 1 (age 4 years) and struck Child 1 five times with a pencil. The center was previously cited on 04/09/2025 for not following the center’s own discipline policy.”
-
Repeat violation
The inspectors’ words, 167 words
“The following actions or threats thereof are forbidden: striking a child or roughly handling a child. On 05/28/2025, the following forbidden actions occurred during a period of approximately 5-7 minutes: Staff 1 grabbed Child 1 (age 4 years) around the waist and pulled the child down onto their cot. Staff 1 grabbed Child 1 by the left arm and jerked the child down onto their cot. As Child 1 was standing by their cot, Staff 1 grabbed Child 1 by their left arm and pulled the child across the classroom. After returning to their cot, Child 1 stood on the cot with their hands on the half wall of the classroom. Staff 1 struck the child on their upper right arm, which was covered by a shirt sleeve, with a pencil five times. Following the final strike of the pencil, Child 1 immediately took their hands off the wall and walked away rubbing their arm. The center was previously cited on 04/09/2025 for using a forbidden action.”
Apr 9, 2025: inspection4 deficiencies
-
The center shall be in compliance with the center’s own policies and procedures that are required by the standards.
“The center’s required discipline policy states that roughly handling a child is not permitted and that punishment by another child is not acceptable. On 04/04/2025, two staff roughly handled multiple preschool children while in their care and allowed punishment by another child.”
-
Systemic violation
“Behavioral guidance shall be constructive in nature, age and stage appropriate, and shall be intended to redirect children to appropriate behavior and resolve conflicts. On 04/04/2025, two children had a physical altercation. Instead of redirecting the children, Staff 1 held one child to allow the other child to physically retaliate.”
-
Systemic violation
The inspectors’ words, 142 words
“The following actions or threats thereof are forbidden: roughly handling or shaking a child. On 04/04/2025, the following forbidden actions occurred with children age 4 years old over approximately 10 minutes: Staff 1 pushed Child 3 backwards by striking the child in the forehead. Staff 1 swatted at Child 4, then struck the child in the head and then pulled the child’s hair. Child 4 rubbed their head in the area where their hair was pulled as they walked away. Staff 1 grabbed Child 2 and pushed the child’s head down by the back of their head. Staff 1 then wrapped their arm around the child’s neck, placing the child in a headlock. Staff 1 pushed Child 2 backwards by striking the child in the forehead. Staff 2 roughly handled Child 1 when they jerked the child by their arm multiple times.”
-
Systemic violation
“The following actions or threats thereof are forbidden: punishment by another child. Staff 1 held Child 3 (age 4 years) by their shoulders and allowed Child 2 (age 4 years) to strike Child 3 in the face three times.”
Jan 23, 2025: inspection2 deficiencies
-
The center is required to have applicants undergo a background check every five years.
“The most recent central registry for Applicant 1 was overdue by 3 months.”
-
A tuberculosis (TB) screening is required every two years from the date of the last screening.
“Applicant 1 confirmed that their TB screening was overdue.”
Aug 6, 2024: inspection3 deficiencies
-
Based on record review, the center failed to ensure that staff shall undergo a background check in accordance with the Code of Virginia prior to the employment and every five years thereafter.
“Evidence: The most recent criminal record check for Staff 5 was dated 09/11/2018. There was not an updated criminal record check obtained by 09/11/2023 available for review.”
-
Based on observations, the center failed to ensure that when pillows are used, they shall be assigned for individual use and covered with pillowcases.
“Evidence: A child in the school-aged group was observed using a pillow from the reading area of the classroom during rest time; the pillow was not assigned for individual use and was not covered with a pillowcase.”
-
Based on document review and observations, the center failed to ensure that a least one staff in each classroom or area where children are present shall have a current CPR and first aid certification from one of the recognized organizations and the training shall include an in-person competency demonstration.
“Evidence: Staff 2 was the only staff member observed in the infant class; the CPR/first aid certification obtained by Staff 2 was not from one of the recognized organizations and did not contain an in-person competency demonstration.”
Jan 10, 2024: inspection8 deficiencies
-
Based on record review, the center failed to ensure that every applicant for licensure of a child day center shall undergo a background check in accordance with the Code of Virginia prior to the issuance of a license and every five years thereafter.
“Evidence: The most recent criminal record check for Applicant 1 was dated 06/18/2018. There was not an updated criminal record check obtained by 06/18/2023 available for review.”
-
Based on record review, the center failed to ensure that each staff member shall submit documentation of a negative tuberculosis screening at least every two years from the date of the original screening or test.
“Evidence: The tuberculosis screening in the record for Staff 1 was dated 12/04/2021; there was not a follow-up screening obtained by 12/04/2023.”
-
Based on observation, the center failed to ensure that cleaning and sanitizing materials shall not be located above food, food equipment, utensils or single-service articles and shall be stored in areas physically separate from food.
“Evidence: There were two containers of animal crackers and various cleaning and sanitizing materials (surface disinfectant, Palmolive, air freshener) on the top shelf of a storage cabinet in the Transitional Room.”
-
Based on observation and staff interviews, the center failed to ensure that if hazardous substances are not kept in original containers, the substitute container shall clearly indicate their contents.
“Evidence: There was an unlabeled clear plastic spray bottle containing a liquid solution on the top self of a cabinet in the Transitional Room. Staff 6 stated that the bottle contained a soap and water solution.”
-
Based on observations and staff interviews, the center failed to ensure that infant walkers shall not be used.
“Evidence: There was an infant walker observed in the infant class. Staff 4 verified that the walker was used by children enrolled at the center.”
-
Based on observations, the center failed to ensure that play yards do not use any pillows or filled comforters.
“Evidence: There was a pink tent style play yard in the infant class that contained two pillows.”
-
Based on observations, the center failed to ensure that the diapering surface shall be used for diapering or cleaning children.
“Evidence: 1. The changing table in the Transitional Room had a timer, various containers of play-dough and a pacifier laying on it. 2. The changing table in the infant room had a puzzle laying on it.”
-
Based on observation and staff interviews, the center failed to ensure that medication, including refrigerated medication and staff’s personal medication, shall be kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children.
“Evidence: There was a bottle of DG Rapid Release Pain Reliver on top of the refrigerator in the infant room. Staff 4 stated that it was their medication.”
Jul 26, 2023: inspection7 deficiencies
-
Based on record review, the center failed to obtain the finding from a search of the central registry within 30 days of employment.
“Evidence: The record for Staff 5 contained a documented hire date of 06/23/2023; there were not findings from the search of the central registry available for review during the inspection.”
-
Repeat violation
“Based on record review, the center failed to obtain documentation that each child shall have a physical examination by or under the direction of a physician before the child’s attendance or within 30 days after the first day of attendance. Evidence: The record for Child 3 contained a documented start date of 06/02/2023. There was not documentation of a physical examination in the record for Child 3.”
-
Repeat violation
The inspectors’ words, 96 words
“Based on record review, the center failed to ensure that each staff member shall submit documentation of a negative tuberculosis screening at the time of employment or prior to coming into contact with children and that the documentation shall have been completed within the last 30 calendar days of the date of employment. Evidence: The record for Staff 1 contained a documented hire date of 02/08/2023. The tuberculosis screening in the record for Staff 1 was dated 02/16/2022; the tuberculosis screening had not been completed within the last 30 calendar days of the date of employment.”
-
Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the center failed to maintain the required staff-to-child ratio for children 3 year olds up to school age eligibility.
The inspectors’ words, 118 words
“Evidence: There were 12 children observed in the school-age group of children. Staff 2 was the only staff member supervising the group. Staff 2 identified Child 2 as the youngest child in the group. Child 2 was determined to be 3 years old. Based on an allowable variance for staff-to-child ratio issued to the center, the required staff-to-child ratio for children 3 year olds up to school age eligibility is 1:11. Staff 2 stated that Child 2 had been in the school-age group of children since approximately 8:30 am. Child 2 was observed with the school-age group at 10:55 am. Child 2 was observed with the school-age group during lunch and during the designated rest/quiet time after lunch.”
-
Based on staff interviews, the center failed to ensure that crib sheets shall be clean and washed daily.
“Evidence: Staff 4 stated that the crib sheets are washed weekly.”
-
Repeat violation
The inspectors’ words, 189 words
“Based on observation, the center failed to ensure that that children’s hands shall be washed with soap and running water or a disposable wipe before and after eating meals or snacks and that staff shall wash their hands with soap and running water before preparing or serving food or beverages. Evidence: 1. The school-age group of children were observed leaving the upstairs classroom to come downstairs to eat lunch. The children were observed using hand sanitizer as they entered the room. The children did not wash their hands with soap and running water or a disposable wipe before eating lunch. 2. Child 2 was observed eating lunch, getting up from the table and immediately running around the classroom playing and climbing on various items in the classroom. Child 2 did not wash their hands with soap and running water or a disposable wipe after eating lunch. 3. Staff 2 was observed leaving the upstairs classroom to come downstairs to serve the children lunch. Staff 2 was observed serving lunch to the children. Staff 2 did not wash their hands with soap and running water before serving food or beverages.”
-
Repeat violation
The inspectors’ words, 244 words
“Based on document review and interviews, the center failed to ensure that for each grouping of children, the center shall maintain a written record of daily attendance that documents the arrival and departure of each child in care as it occurs. Evidence: 1. Child 6 was documented in attendance on the pre-k group attendance record. Child 6 was not observed with the pre-k group of children but rather with the school-age group of children. 2. Child 5 was observed in the pre-k group of children but their attendance was not documented on the pre-k group attendance record. 3. There were 6 children were observed in the 2 year old group of children. The attendance record for the 2 year old group contained documentation that there were currently 4 children in care. A total of 6 children had been marked as arriving on 07/26/2023. Two children had been marked as having departed for the day, however, the 2 children were observed to still be in attendance. The attendance record did not document the departure of each child as it occurred. 4. There were 10 children observed in the infant group of children. The attendance record for the infant group contained documentation that there were 6 children in care. The attendance record did not document the arrival of each child as it occurred. 5. The attendance records for each group of children did not properly document the arrival and/or departure of each child as it occurred.”
Jul 26, 2023: complaint inspection1 deficiency
-
Complaint related
The inspectors’ words, 124 words
“Based on staff interviews and document review, the center failed to maintain a written record of children’s serious and minor injuries in which entries are made the day of the occurrence and that the record shall include all of the elements required by the standard. Evidence: 1. Staff 1 and Staff 2 verified that there had been three incidents, one on 05/09/2023, one on 05/10/2023 and one on 05/11/2023, that required an injury report to be completed. Staff 1 stated they had completed the injury reports. There were no injury reports from 05/09/2023 or 05/11/2023 available for review during the 07/26/2023 inspection. 2. The injury report from 05/10/2023 did not include the following required elements: any future action to prevent recurrence of the injury.”
Jan 24, 2023: inspection8 deficiencies
-
Based on document review, the center failed to obtain documentation of additional immunizations once every six months for children under the age of two years.
“Evidence: Child 2 was confirmed to be 14 months old. The most recent documentation of immunizations in the record for Child 2 was dated 10/20/2021. The documented first date of attendance for Child 2 was 12/13/2021. Documentation of additional immunizations were not obtained every six months for a child under two years.”
-
Based on record review, the center failed to obtain documentation that each child shall have a physical examination by or under the direction of a physician before the child’s attendance or within 30 days after the first day of attendance.
“Evidence: The record for Child 2 contained a documented start date of 12/13/2021. There was not documentation of a physical examination in the record for Child 2.”
-
Based on record review, the center failed to ensure that staff shall complete a minimum of 16 hours of training annually.
“Evidence: 1. The records for Staff 1, Staff 2, Staff 3, and Staff 4 contained documentation of completing only 12 hours of annual training for 2022. 2. The record for Staff 2 contained documentation of completing only 2 hours of annual training for 2022. 3. All 5 staff were employed for the entire 2022 year.”
-
Based on record review, the center failed to ensure that there shall always be at least one staff member on duty who has obtained within the last three years instruction in performing the daily health observation of children.
“Evidence: There was no one on duty during the 01/24/2023 inspection that has obtained instruction in performing daily health observations within the last three years.”
-
Based on document review, the center failed to obtain an annual fire inspection report from the appropriate fire official having jurisdiction.
“Evidence: The most recent fire inspection was conducted on 12/14/2021; a fire inspection was not conducted in 2022.”
-
Repeat violation
“Based on observation, the center failed to ensure that staff shall wash their hands with soap and running water after any contact with body fluids and before preparing or serving food or beverages. Evidence: Staff 3 was observed wiping a child’s nose and did not wash their hands. Staff 3 was then observed helping to serve the children’s lunch.”
-
Repeat violation
The inspectors’ words, 123 words
“Based on record review and discussion with the staff, the center failed to ensure that the separate record for each child enrolled contains all of the elements as required by the standards. Evidence: 1. The record for Child 2 did not contain documentation of child updates and confirmation of up-to-date information as required, the most recent update of the record took place on 12/13/2021. 2. The record for Child 4 did not contain documentation of child updates and confirmation of up-to-date information as required, the most recent update of the record took place on 09/13/2021. 3. The record for Child 5 did not contain information regarding allergies and intolerance to medication or any other substance, an actions to take in an emergency situation.”
-
Based on document review and interviews, the center failed to ensure that for each grouping of children, the center shall maintain a written record of daily attendance that documents the arrival and departure of each child in care as it occurs.
The inspectors’ words, 115 words
“Evidence: 1. The attendance record for the pre-k to school-age group contained documentation that there were 16 children in care. There were only 14 children in care at the time of the inspection. Staff 4 stated that 2 children had departed the center for school. The attendance record did not document the departure of each child as it occurred. 2. The attendance record for the infant/toddler class contained documentation that there were 7 children in care. There were actually 8 children in care at the time of the inspection. Staff 1 stated that one child had not yet been marked present. The attendance record did not document the arrival of each child as it occurred.”
Nov 21, 2022: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
-
Based on observations and discussion with staff, the center failed to ensure that staff shall wash their hands with soap and running water before and after helping a child use the toilet.
“Evidence: Staff 1 was observed helping children use the toilet after waking from nap. Staff 1 did not wash their hands after helping each child use the toilet.”
-
Based on observation and discussion with staff, the center failed to ensure that the diapering surface shall be cleaned with soap and water and sanitized after each use.
“Evidence: Staff 1 did not clean or sanitize the diapering surface after changing a diaper.”
Jul 25, 2022: inspection4 deficiencies
-
Based on record review and discussion with staff, the center failed to obtain a copy of the criminal record check from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years.
“Evidence: The record for Staff 2 contained documentation that Staff 2 had resided outside of the state of Virginia within the preceding five years. The record for Staff 2 contained a documented hire date of 12/12/2019. There was not a criminal record check from the state in which the individual had resided in the preceding five years available for review during the 07/25/2022 inspection.”
-
Based on record review and discussion with staff, the center failed to ensure that each staff member shall submit documentation of a negative tuberculosis screening at the time of employment and prior to coming into contact with children.
“Evidence: The record for Staff 5 contained a documented hire date of 05/17/2022. The tuberculosis screening in the record for Staff 5 was dated 05/27/2022.”
-
Based on observation and discussion with staff, the center failed to ensure that in areas used by children of preschool age electrical outlets shall have protective covers.
“Evidence: There were two uncovered electrical outlets in the Infant Classroom.”
-
Based on record review and discussion with the staff, the center failed to ensure that the separate record for each child enrolled contains all of the elements as required by the standards.
The inspectors’ words, 111 words
“Evidence: 1. The record for Child 1 did not contain the name, address and phone number of two designated people to call in an emergency if a parent cannot be reached (there was not an address for the first designated person). 2. The record for Child 5 did not contain the following information: the work phone number and place of employment of each parent who has custody (there was not a work phone number provided for the first parent listed); and the name, address and phone number of two designated people to call in an emergency if a parent cannot be reached (the address for the second designated person was incomplete).”
Jan 5, 2022: inspection3 deficiencies
-
Based on record review and discussion with staff, the center failed to obtain a copy of the criminal record check and a sex offender registry check from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years.
“Evidence: The record for Staff 1 contained documentation that Staff 1 had resided outside of the state of Virginia within the preceding five years. The record for Staff 1 contained a documented hire date of 08/04/2021. There was not a criminal record check or a sex offender registry check from the state in which the individual had resided in the preceding five years available for review during the 01/05/2022 inspection.”
-
Based on observation and discussion with the staff, the center failed to maintain the required nonmedical emergency supplies as required by the standards.
“Evidence: There was not a working, battery-operated radio onsite during the 01/05/2022 inspection.”
-
Based on record review and discussion with the staff, the center failed to ensure that the separate record for each child enrolled contains all of the elements as required by the standards.
The inspectors’ words, 113 words
“Evidence: 1. The record for Child 1 did not contain documentation of health information as required by 9VAC20-780-130. 2. The record for Child 3 did not contain documentation of health information as required by 9VAC20-780-130. 3. The record for Child 4 did not contain the name, address and phone number of two designated people to call in an emergency if a parent cannot be reached; the address for the second designated person was incomplete. 4. The record for Child 5 did not contain the name, address and phone number of two designated people to call in an emergency if a parent cannot be reached; the address for the second designated person was incomplete.”
All 27 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2026 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Jul 1, 2026 | Complaint inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Jul 1, 2026 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Jan 8, 2026 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Aug 26, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Aug 26, 2025 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Jun 3, 2025 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Apr 9, 2025 | Inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Jan 23, 2025 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Jan 23, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Jan 23, 2025 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Aug 6, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Aug 6, 2024 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Apr 29, 2024 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Jan 10, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Jan 10, 2024 | Inspection | 8 violations cited |
| Jul 26, 2023 | Complaint inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Jul 26, 2023 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Jul 26, 2023 | Inspection | 7 violations cited |
| Jan 24, 2023 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Jan 24, 2023 | Inspection | 8 violations cited |
| Nov 21, 2022 | Complaint inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Aug 23, 2022 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| Jul 25, 2022 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Jul 25, 2022 | Inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Jan 5, 2022 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Jan 5, 2022 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Child Day Center: Two Year license, expires Jan 30, 2028.
- A current subsidy provider.
- Ages: 1 month - 12 years 11 months.
- Capacity: 75 children.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 4 complaint inspections on record.
- No complaint allegations published with findings.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 44 child care providers in the City of Lynchburg, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 28.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| Jubilee Family Development Center | 20 |
| Rhema’s “Gentle Care” Child Development Center This child care provider | 28 |
| Faith Assembly Christian Center | 5 |
| Katherine Brown | 5 |
| Montessori Children’s House LLC | 3 |
| Prayer of Faith Temple | 16 |
| Change Me Ministries & Fellowship/Bright Hope, Inc. | 1 |
| Aslan Castle ELC | 13 |
| New Covenant Schools | Not given |
| Teachable Moments Preschool LLC | 36 |
| YMCA of Central Virginia-Little Scholars Academy | 13 |
| Christian Chapel | Not given |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 2, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.