Muna Barkhadle
A family day home in Alexandria, Virginia 22315
7814 Seth Hampton Dr., Alexandria, Virginia 22315. (571) 484-3891.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 5 deficiencies in the last three years
- Oct 222026 the latest visit on record
- 12 children, its licensed capacity
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
11 inspections on record, the latest on Oct 22, 2026.
5 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
5 deficiencies in 3 months of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
May 4, 2026: inspection1 deficiency
-
The provider is required to maintain an up-to-date record at the family day home for each enrolled child.
“Child #7 was missing documentation of the Emergency Preparedness Plan, Information for Parents, and Medication Policy.”
May 30, 2025: inspection1 deficiency
-
The Provider is required to maintain an up-to-date record at the family day home for each child enrolled.
“Child #1 was missing the Emergency Preparedness Plan, Proof of Liability insurance and the Medication Policy form. Child #2 was missing the Emergency Preparedness Plan and the Proof of Liability Insurance. Child #3 did not have an annual update of emergency information.”
May 28, 2024: inspection3 deficiencies
-
Based on observations, areas outside of the family day home was not maintained in a safe and operable condition.
“Evidence: 1) Multiple tripping hazards were observed on the brick patio area located in the outdoor play area. Several bricks were protruding, creating potential trip hazards. 2) Long broken wires with sharp edges were observed next to the door that provides access to the playground. The wires were accessible to the children.”
-
Based on record review, the provider did not maintain all the required information for 2 out of 5 enrolled children.
“Evidence: 1. Child #1 was missing the address for one of the emergency persons to contact in case a parent cannot be reached. 2. Child #3 was missing documentation of the annual review of the child’s emergency contact information.”
-
Based on caregiver interview and record review, the provider did not document or review the emergency plan at least annually and did not update the plan as needed.
“Evidence: The provider last reviewed and documented the review on 2/20/2019. The provider confirmed that the plan was not updated annually.”
May 11, 2023: inspection1 deficiency
-
Based on a review of children’s records, the provider failed to obtain all required documentation for each child enrolled.
The inspectors’ words, 124 words
“Evidence: -Child #1, #2 and #3’s record do not contain documentation telephone number of each custodial parent’s place of employment. -Child #1’s record does not contain the name, address and telephone number of two designated persons to contact in case of an emergency if the parent can not be reached. -Child #2’s record does not contain documentation of the addresses of two designated persons to contact in case of an emergency if the parent can not be reached. -Child #4’s record does not contain documentation of the names of persons other than the custodial parents who are authorized to pick up child. -Child #2 and #3’s records do not contain documentation of the review of the child’s emergency contact information as required by 8VAC20-800-780-B.”
Dec 13, 2022: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Based on a review of children’s records, the provider failed to obtain documentation of a physical examination by or under the direction of a physician prior to a child’s attendance or within 30 days after the first day of attendance.
“Evidence: Child #1’s record did not contain documentation of a physical by the 30th day of attendance. First day of attendance 2/28/2022.”
-
Based on a review of children’s records, the provider failed to obtain required documentation for each child enrolled.
“Evidence: - Child #2’s record di not contain documentation of the phone number for each custodial parents place of employment. - Child #2’s record does not contain documentation of the names of persons other than parents who are authorized to pick up the child. - Child #2’s record did not contain documentation of the review of the child’s emergency contact information as required by 8VAC20-800-780-B.”
May 5, 2022: inspection10 deficiencies
-
Based on a review of household member records, the provider failed to obtain a current Criminal History record check.
“Evidence: Household member#1’s record does not contain documentation of a current Criminal History record check.”
-
Based on review of child records, the provider failed to obtain documentation of a physical exam by or under the director of a physician prior to c child’s attendance or within 30 days after the first day of attendance.
“Evidence: Child #1’s record does not contain documentation of a physical examination by the 30th day of attendance. First day of attendance - 09/07/2021”
-
Based on review of staff and household member records, the provider failed to obtain for each caregiver and adult household member a current Report of Tuberculosis Screening form in accordance with the requirements, every two years from the date of the first screening.
“Evidence: Household Member #1 and #2’s records do no have documentation of a current Tuberculosis Screening.”
-
Based on a review of caregiver records, caregivers failed to obtain a minimum of 16 clock hours of training annually in areas relevant to their job responsibilities.
“Evidence: Caregiver #1 and #2’s records did not have documentation of 16 hours of relevant training.”
-
Based on review of caregiver records, the provider failed to ensure that whenever the family day home has a agreed to administer prescription medications or nonprescription medications, the administration shall be performed by a caregiver who has satisfactorily completed a training program for this purpose developed or approved b the Board of Nursing and taught by a registered nurse, licensed practical nurse, doctor of medicine or osteopathic medicine or pharmacist.
“Evidence: Caregiver #1 and Caregiver #2’s records did not have documentation of Medication Administration Training.”
-
Based on a review of children’s records, the provider failed to obtain and maintain all required documents for each child enrolled.
“Evidence: Child #2’s record did not contain documentation of parent’s work address, liability insurance, medication policy. Child #4’s record did not contain documentation of parent’s work phone numbers. Child #5’s record did not contain documentation of the parent agreement or the medication policy.”
-
Based on a review of child records, the provider failed to obtain a written authorization from a parent to administer a medication for a child in care.
“Evidence: Child # 4 has an Auvi-q epinephrine injector at the FDH in case of an emergency due to a food allergy. There is no written authorization.”
-
Based on observation, the provider failed to ensure that the first aid kit contained all required supplies.
“Evidence: The first aid kit was missing a first aid manual.”
-
Based on review of evacuation log, the provider failed to ensure that shelter-in-place procedures will be practiced a minimum of twice per year.
“Evidence: The provider did not have documentation of shelter-in-place practice drill twice a year.”
-
Based on a review of child records, the provider failed to obtain documentation that the child has been adequately immunized according to requirements of 32.1-46 of the Code of Virginia and applicable State Board of Health regulations, by the first day of attendance.
“Evidence: Child #1’s record does not have documentation of immunizations by the first day of attendance. First day of attendance was 09/07/2021.”
All 11 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2026 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| May 4, 2026 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Nov 13, 2025 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| May 30, 2025 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Oct 11, 2024 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| May 28, 2024 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Feb 28, 2024 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| May 11, 2023 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Dec 13, 2022 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| May 5, 2022 | Inspection | 10 violations cited |
| Nov 17, 2021 | Inspection | No violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Family Day Home: Two Year license, expires Jun 2, 2028.
- Ages: Birth - 12 years 11 months.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 0 complaint inspections on record.
- No complaint allegations published with findings.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 1353 child care providers in Fairfax County, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 5.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| Muna Barkhadle This child care provider | 5 |
| KinderCare Learning Center #75122 | 19 |
| Hayfield SACC | 13 |
| SACC at Lane | 4 |
| KinderCare Learning Centers #1468 | 40 |
| Northern Virginia Academy of Early Learning-Landsdowne | 28 |
| Chesterbrook Academy #807 | 22 |
| Little Acorn Patch of Kingstowne | 21 |
| SACC at Island Creek | 9 |
| Bila Hamdael | 3 |
| Sandra Scruggs | 12 |
| Azeb Idris | 18 |
| Feriha Ibrahim | 9 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.