Zion United Methodist Church
A religious exempt child day center in Troy, Virginia 22974
1674 Zion Road, Troy, Virginia 22974. (434) 459-1913.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 7 deficiencies in the last three years
- Aug 192026 the latest visit on record
- 92 children, its capacity in the state’s list
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
9 inspections on record, the latest on Aug 19, 2026.
7 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. The last 3 years, to Nov 2, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
Jul 18, 2024: subsidy health and safety inspection6 deficiencies
-
Based on interview, the center failed to maintain, in a way that is accessible to staff who work with children, a current written list of all children’s allergies, sensitivities, and dietary restrictions that is dated and kept confidential in each room or area where children are present.
“Evidence: In the school age classroom the teacher advised that one child had a food allergy but the allergy was not posted in the classroom.”
-
Based on record review and interview, the center failed to ensure a written allergy care plan was obtained for each child with a diagnosed food allergy that includes instructions from a physician regarding the food to which the child is allergic and steps to be taken in the event of a suspected or confirmed allergic reaction.
“Evidence: The review of child 3’s record showed there was no allergy care plan for the allergy listed in the file. The director stated they did not have an allergy care plan.”
-
Based on observation, the center failed to ensure fans were kept out of reach of preschool children or younger.
“Evidence: In the 2’s classroom, a fan was on the floor.”
-
Based on observation, the center failed to ensure hazardous substances were kept in a locked location to prevent access by children.
“Evidence: In the older 2’s room Febreze and Air Wick air freshener were on the top open shelf.”
-
Based on observation, the center failed to ensure a complete first aid kit was kept in each building.
“Evidence: In the building used by school age children the first aid kit did not contain: scissors, tweezers, gauze pads, adhesive tape, antiseptic cleansing solution and a thermometer.”
-
Based on observation and interview, the center failed to ensure food containers were clearly labeled in a way that identifies the owner when brought from home.
“Evidence: In the Frogs classroom a child’s water bottle was not labeled. In the Tadpoles classroom four water bottles were not labeled.”
Jul 18, 2024: inspection1 deficiency
-
Based on observation and interview, the center failed to implement a procedure to ensure that all areas of the premises accessible to children are free of obvious injury hazards.
“Evidence: The center failed to implement there procedure to have fans out of reach of children. A fan was on the floor in the 2’s classroom. The center failed to implement there procedure to keep hazardous substances in a locked location. Febreze and Air Wick air freshener were on an open top shelf in the older 2’s room.”
Oct 30, 2023: subsidy health and safety inspection3 deficiencies
-
Based on observation and interview, the center failed to maintain, in a way that is accessible to all staff who work with children, a current written list of all children’s allergies, sensitivities, and dietary restrictions that is dated and kept confidential in each room or area where children are present.
“Evidence: 1. Staff 3 stated two children in the class had food allergies. The food allergy list posted in the classroom only contained the name of one child. 2. The assistant director verified only one child’s name was on the posted list in the classroom. 3. Staff 4 stated one child has a food allergy in the class. There was no food allergy list in the classroom.”
-
(REPEAT VIOLATIONS) on record review and interview, the center failed to ensure the results of the fingerprint-based national criminal background check were obtained prior to first date of employment.
“Evidence: 1. The record for staff 1 documented the employment date as 2/6/23. The fingerprint results were dated 2/21/23. 2. The assistant director verified the dates.”
-
Based on observation, the center failed to ensure all hazardous substances were kept in a locked place.
“Evidence: In the 4’s classroom (Turtles) a spray bottle of Clorox disinfectant and a spray bottle of Windex were on a low shelf accessible to children.”
Oct 30, 2023: inspection3 deficiencies
-
Based on record review and interview, the center failed to ensure each staff member has been certified by a physician, physician assistant, or nurse practitioner to be free from any disability which would prevent him from caring for children under his/her supervision.
“Evidence: 1. The record for staff 1 documents the employment date as 2/6/23. The staff health report is dated 3/6/23. 2. The assistant director verified the dates.”
-
Based on a observation and interview, the center failed to implement a procedure to ensure that all areas of the premises accessible to children are free of obvious injury hazard.
“Evidence: 1. In the 4’s classroom (Turtles) a spray bottle of Clorox disinfectant and Windex was on a low shelf accessible to children. 2. The center’s procedure is for all hazardous substances to be kept in a locked closet.”
-
(REPEAT VIOLATIONS) Based on record review and interview, the center failed to obtain fingerprint-based criminal history check determination letters prior to the first day of employment.
“Evidence: 1. The record for staff 1 documents the employment date as 2/6/23. The fingerprint results are dated 2/21/23. 2. The assistant director verified the dates.”
Jul 7, 2022: subsidy health and safety inspection5 deficiencies
-
Based on record review and interview, the center failed to obtain the name, address and telephone number of at least one person designated by the parent to contact in case of an emergency and the parent cannot be reached.
“Evidence: 1. The record for child 2 was reviewed. The start date is documented as 8/16/21. The record does not contain an emergency contact number that is not the parents. 2. The director stated she was unaware the emergency contact person could not be the parents.”
-
8VAC20-790-550-2-a
“Based on record review and interview, the center failed to have a completed central registry record check by the end of the 30th day of employment. Evidence: 1. The record of staff 1 documents the hire date as 4/25/22. The central registry background check is dated 6/20/22. 2. The director stated staff 1 returned to working at Zion after being gone over a year. The director thought the previous background checks could be used as long as they were not over five years old.”
-
8VAC20-790-550-2-a
“Based on record review and interview, the center failed to obtain fingerprint-based criminal history check determination letters prior to the first day of employment. Evidence: The record for staff 1 documents the start date as 4/25/22. There is no current fingerprint based criminal history check determination letter in the file. 2. The director stated staff 1 returned to working at Zion after being gone over a year. The director thought the previous background checks could be used as long as they were not over five years old.”
-
8VAC20-790-550-2-d
“Based on record review and interview, the center failed to have staff sign a sworn disclosure statement prior to the first day of employment. Evidence: 1. The record of staff 1 documents the hire date as 4/25/22. There is no current sworn statement in the file.2. The director stated staff 1 returned to working at Zion after being gone over a year. 2. The director thought the previous background checks could be used as long as they were not over five years old.”
-
Based on observation, the staff failed to provide behavioral guidance that is constructive in nature, age and state appropriate and intended to redirect children to appropriate behavior and to resolve conflicts.
“Evidence: A staff member in the Tadpole’s classroom was heard loudly telling a child if he did not stop playing with his water bottle he would not be allowed to have water the rest of the day. This is the one year old classroom.”
Jul 7, 2022: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Based on record review and interview, the center failed to obtain fingerprint-based criminal history check determination letters prior to the first day of employment.
“Evidence: The record for staff 1 documents the start date as 4/25/22. There is no current fingerprint-based criminal history check determination letter in the file. 2. The director stated staff 1 returned to working at Zion after being gone over a year. The director thought the previous background checks could be used as long as they were not over five years old.”
-
Based on record review and interview, the center failed to have staff sign a sworn disclosure statement prior to the first day of employment and have a completed central registry record check by the end of the 30th day of employment.
“Evidence: 1. The record of staff 1 documents the hire date as 4/25/22. There is no current sworn statement in the file. The central registry background check is dated 6/20/22. 2. The director stated staff 1 returned to working at Zion after being gone over a year. The director thought the previous background checks could be used as long as they were not over five years old.”
All 9 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2026 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Sep 8, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Sep 8, 2025 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Jul 18, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 6 violations cited |
| Jul 18, 2024 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Oct 30, 2023 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Oct 30, 2023 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Jul 7, 2022 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 5 violations cited |
| Jul 7, 2022 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Religious Exempt Child Day Center: Exempt from licensure, expires Aug 24, 2027.
- A current subsidy provider.
- Ages: 2 years - 12 years 11 months.
- Capacity: 92 children.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 0 complaint inspections on record.
- No complaint allegations published with findings.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 15 child care providers in Louisa County, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 7.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| Zion United Methodist Church This child care provider | 7 |
| Providence Presbyterian Church | 4 |
| Bethany Christian Church | 3 |
| New Life Community Church | 1 |
| Abundant Love Child Development Center | 7 |
| Ms. Phyllis Richardson-Holland | Not given |
| Ms. Elizabeth’s Daycare, LLC | 3 |
| Salem Christian School | 5 |
| Abundant Love Learning Center - Louisa | 33 |
| Louisa Park & Rec - Thomas Jefferson Elementary | 9 |
| Louisa Park & Rec - Jouett Elementary | 4 |
| Louisa Park & Rec - Trevillians Elementary | 5 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 2, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.