Disciples of Christ Fellowship Ministries
A religious exempt child day center in Roanoke, Virginia 24015
2719 Colonial Avenue, SW, Roanoke, Virginia 24015. (540) 524-9661.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 11 deficiencies in the last three years
- Aug 172026 the latest visit on record
- 45 children, its capacity in the state’s list
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
15 inspections on record, the latest on Aug 17, 2026.
11 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
11 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Aug 17, 2026: subsidy health and safety inspection1 deficiency
-
TB screening are required at least every two years from the date of the initial screening.
“Staff #2 did not have a current TB screening. It was overdue by 10 months.”
Feb 20, 2024: complaint inspection10 deficiencies
-
Based on inspection, the Center failed to post the fact that it is exempt from licensure in a visible location on the premises.
“EVIDENCE: The religious exempt certificate was not posted in a conspicuous location visible to the parents and the public.”
-
Based on observation, the center failed to be in compliance with applicable laws and regulations with regard to building codes, and/or the Uniform Statewide Building Code.
“EVIDENCE: 1. There were 10 children in care under the age of 2-1/2 years old. Per the Building Official, the maximum number of children under the age of 2-1/2 years old cannot exceed 5 children. 2. Attendance documents for billed subsidy recorded more than 5 children under the age of 2-1/2 years old were in attendance on the following dates: 2/1/24, 2/2/24, 2/6/24, 2/8/24, 2/9/24, and 2/14/24. Children ranged in age from 3 months to 23 months.”
-
Based on observations, the Center failed to maintain 1 staff member to 5 children from ages 16 months to 24 months.
“EVIDENCE: Upon arrival at 3:00 PM, there were 11 children in care with 2 staff members. The youngest child was 18 months. 3 staff would be required.”
-
REPEAT VIOLATION Based on observation, the Center failed to have Fingerprint Background Checks completed for each staff person before date of employment.
“EVIDENCE: Fingerprint Background Checks were unavailable for Staff #2 (unknown date of hire). Staff #2 was observed working with children during the inspection.”
-
REPEAT VIOLATION Based on record review, the Center failed to have Sworn Disclosure Background Check completed for each staff person before date of employment; Center failed to have Central Registry Background Check completed for each staff person by the end of the 30th day of employment.
“EVIDENCE: 1 Staff #1 (date of hire 11/06/2023) did not have a Sworn Disclosure Statement. Staff #1 was observed working with children during the inspection. 2 Staff #2 (date of hire unknown) did not have a Sworn Disclosure Statement. Staff #2 was observed working with children during the inspection. 3 Staff #1 (date of hire 11/06/2023) did not have a Central Registry Check completed within 30 days of hire.”
-
Based on inspection, the Vendor failed to maintain a written hard copy record of daily attendance that documents the arrival and departure of each child in care as it occurs for each group of children.
“EVIDENCE: Written daily attendance was unavailable from January 24 through February 16.”
-
2nd REPEAT VIOLATION Based on record review, the Vendor failed to ensure each staff member is evaluated by a health professional and be issued a statement that the individual is determined to be free of communicable tuberculosis (TB) received at the time of employment and prior to coming into contact with children.
“EVIDENCE: 1. TB skin test/screening was unavailable for Staff #1 (date of hire 11/06/2023). 2. TB skin test/screening was unavailable for Staff #2 (date of hire unavailable). 3. Both staff members were present during the inspection and were observed working with the children in care”
-
Based on observations, the Vendor failed to ensure staff wash their hands with soap and running water before and after changing a diaper.
“EVIDENCE: Licensing Inspector observed staff member changing multiple diapers without washing their hands before and after each diapering.”
-
Based on inspection, the Vendor failed to dispose disposable diapers in a leak-proof or plastic lined storage system that is either foot operated or used in such a way that neither the staff member’s hand not the soiled diaper touches an exterior surface of the storage system during disposal.
“EVIDENCE: Licensing Inspector observed 2 uncovered trash cans (infant and toddler areas) used to dispose soiled diapers.”
-
Based on observations, the Vendor failed to ensure prepared infant formula is refrigerated, dated and labeled with the child’s name when more than one infant is in care.
“EVIDENCE: Licensing Inspector observed 3 infant bottles containing infant formula/milk sitting on the counter. Bottles were not refrigerated, dated not labeled with names. There were a total of 4 infants present during the inspection.”
Sep 11, 2023: subsidy health and safety inspection13 deficiencies
-
Based on documentation review, the Vendor failed to maintain a written hard copy record of daily attendance that documents the arrival and departure of each child in care as it occurs.
“EVIDENCE: Written hard copy of daily attendance was unavailable.”
-
Based on record review, the Vendor failed to ensure each child’s record included all the requirements per the standard.
“EVIDENCE: 1. Record for Child #1 did not include the employers name, address, and work phone for Parent/Guardian #1. 2. Record for Child #2 did not include the employers work phone for Parent #1. 3. Record for Child #3 did not include the employers address and work phone for Parent #1 and Parent #2.”
-
Based on record review, the Vendor failed to keep a record containing the date of employment, address, and verification of age for each staff person.
“EVIDENCE: 1. Record for Staff #1 did not include the date of employment, address, or verification of age. 2. Record for Staff #2 did not include the date of employment, address, or verification of age. 3. Record for Staff #3 did not include the date of employment, address, or verification of age.”
-
Based on record review, the Vendor failed to ensure each staff person is evaluated by a health professional and issued a statement that the individual is determined to be free of communicable tuberculosis (TB) submitted at the time of employment and completed prior to coming into contact with children.
“EVIDENCE: 1. Record for Staff #1 did not include documentation of a TB test. Staff #1 was observed working on the day of the inspection. 2. Record for Staff #2 did not include documentation of a TB test. Staff #2 was observed working on the day of the inspection. 3. Record for Staff #3 did not include documentation of a TB test. Staff #3 was observed working on the day of the inspection.”
-
Based on record review, the Vendor failed to ensure each staff person completes center orientation training prior to the staff member working alone with children and within seven days of the date of employment.
“EVIDENCE: 1. Record for Staff #1 did not include documentation on orientation training on the facility specific topics. Staff #1 was observed working on the day of the inspection. 2. Record for Staff #2 did not include documentation on orientation training on the facility specific topics. Staff #2 was observed working on the day of the inspection. 3. Record for Staff #3 did not include documentation on orientation training on the facility specific topics. Staff #3 was observed working on the day of the inspection.”
-
Based on record review, the Vendor failed to ensure all staff who work directly with children completes CPR certification within 90 days of hire.
“EVIDENCE: 1. Record for Staff #1 did not include documentation of CPR certification. Licensing Inspector observed Staff #1 working during the previous inspection (9/03/2022). 2. Record for Staff #2 did not include documentation of CPR certification. Licensing Inspector observed Staff #2 working during the previous inspection.”
-
Based on record review, the Vendor failed to ensure all staff who work directly with children completes First aid certification within 90 days of hire.
“EVIDENCE: 1. Record for Staff #1 did not include documentation of First Aid certification. Licensing Inspector observed Staff #1 working during the previous inspection (9/03/2022). 2. Record for Staff #2 did not include documentation of First Aid certification. Licensing Inspector observed Staff #2 working during the previous inspection.”
-
Based on record review, the Vendor failed have at least one staff person on duty who has obtained within the last three years instruction in performing a daily health observation of children.
“EVIDENCE: There were no staff present during the inspection who has received Daily Health Observation of children training.”
-
Based on observation, the Vendor failed to keep areas and equipment of the center, inside and outside in a clean, safe and operable condition.
“EVIDENCE: The wrought iron handrail on the entrance steps were missing multiple slats on the top platform level (approximately 12 feet from the ground level) creating a fall hazard.”
-
Based on observation, the Vendor failed to keep hazardous substances in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children.
“EVIDENCE: Licensing Inspector observed unlocked hazardous cleaning agents at the outside entrance of the center. Agents were accessible to the children in care.”
-
Based on documentation review, the Vendor failed to have a written emergency preparedness plan.
“EVIDENCE: An emergency preparedness plan was unavailable.”
-
Based on documentation review, the Vendor failed to ensure shelter-in-place procedures are practiced twice a year.
“EVIDENCE: The provider did not have documentation of an annual shelter-in-place drill completed.”
-
Based on inspection, the Vendor failed to ensure lockdown procedures are practiced at least annually.
“EVIDENCE: The provider did not have documentation of an annual lockdown emergency drill.”
Sep 11, 2023: inspection4 deficiencies
-
Based on record review, the Center failed to ensure each staff person complete health exam prior to supervising children.
“EVIDENCE: Records for Staff #1 and Staff #3 did not include documentation of a health exam. Both staff were observed supervising children during the inspection.”
-
Based on record review, the Center failed to complete Central Registry Background Check within 5 years from the date of the most recent Central Registry Background Check.
“EVIDENCE: Staff #2 did not have an updated Central Registry Background Check. Most recent Central Registry was completed 9/14/2017.”
-
Based on record review, the Center failed to have Fingerprint Background Check completed for each staff person before date of employment.
“EVIDENCE: Fingerprint Background Check results for Staff #1 and Staff #2 were unavailable. Date of employment was not documented in each record. Both Staff #1 and Staff #2 were observed working with children during inspection.”
-
Based on record review, the Center failed to have Sworn Disclosure Background Check completed for each staff person before date of employment; Center failed to have Central Registry Background Check completed for each staff person by the end of the 30th day of employment.
“EVIDENCE: Sworn Disclosure for Staff #1 and Staff #2 were unavailable. Date of employment was not documented in each record. Both Staff #1 and Staff #2 were observed working with children during inspection. Central Registry Background Check results for Staff #1 and #3 were unavailable. Date of employment was not documented in each record. Staff advised Licensing Inspector that they have worked at the center more than 30 days. Staff #1 and #3 were observed working with children during inspection.”
Oct 12, 2022: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
-
Based on inspection, Religiously Exempt day care failed to maintain required adult to child ratios, one staff member to five children, for children ages 16 months to 24 months.
“EVIDENCE: Licensing Inspector observed 11 children ages 16 months through 2 years old under the direct supervision of 2 staff members. Required adult to child ratios were not maintained.”
-
Based on observations, the Religiously Exempt day care failed to maintain required adult to child ratios, one staff member to 10 children, for children 3 to 5 years old.
“EVIDENCE: Licensing Inspector observed a total of 13 children ages 3 to 5 years old under the direct care of 1 staff member. Adult to child ratios were not maintained.”
Sep 21, 2022: subsidy health and safety inspection8 deficiencies
-
Based on record review, the Vendor failed to have the name, home address and telephone number for each parent who has custody, 1st day of attendance, documentation of immunizations on or before the 1st day of attendance and the name address and telephone number of at least one person designated by the parent to contact in case of an emergency and the parent cannot be reached.
The inspectors’ words, 107 words
“EVIDENCE: The Licensing Inspector reviewed 6 children records. Record for Child #1, Child #2 and Child #5 did not include the address for each parent who has custody. Records for Children #1, #2, #3 #4 and #5 did not include documentation of the 1st day of enrollment. Records for Children #5 and #6 did not have documentation of immunization records received on or before the child’s first day of attendance. Records for Children #5 and #6 did not include the name, address and telephone number of at least one person designated by the parent to contact in case of an emergency and the parent cannot be reached.”
-
Based on record review, the Vendor failed to obtain proof of a child’s identity and age.
“EVIDENCE: Licensing Inspector reviewed 6 children records. Record for Child #5 did not include documentation of proof of identity and age. Child #5 did not have documentation of the 1st day of attendance.”
-
Based on record review, the Vendor failed to obtain documentation that each child has received the immunizations required by the State Board of Health before the child can attend the center.
“EVIDENCE: Licensing Inspector reviewed 6 children records. Records for Child #5 and Child #6 did not include documentation of immunizations. The enrollment date for Child #6 is 9/16/2022. Record for Child #5 did not include the 1st day of attendance.”
-
Based on inspection, the Vendor failed to ensure electrical outlets have protective covers.
“EVIDENCE: The Licensing Inspector observed several electrical outlets that were not protected with protective covers. An uncovered electrical outlet was observed beside a infant’s crib (child observed sleeping in the crib) that was accessible to the child through the crib slats. A second uncovered electrical outlet was located beside a child sleeping on a cot.”
-
Based on inspection, the Vendor failed to equip the restroom used by the children in care with toilet paper, soap and disposable towels or an air dryer within reach of the children.
“EVIDENCE: The restroom used by the children was not equipped with toilet paper, soap and paper towels.”
-
Based on inspection, the Vendor failed to develop and implement a written policy and procedure that describes how the vendor will ensure that each group of children receives care by consistent staff or team of staff members.
“EVIDENCE: Center has not developed a written policy and procedure continuity of care.”
-
Based on inspection, the Vendor failed to have required nonmedical emergency supplies.
“EVIDENCE: A working battery-operated radio was unavailable.”
-
Based on inspection, the Vendor failed to practice and document evacuation procedures at least once each month.
“EVIDENCE: Documentation of the monthly emergency evacuation drills were unavailable.”
Sep 21, 2022: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Based on record review & discussion with staff, the Center failed to ensure each staff member has been certified by a practicing physician or physician assistant to be free from any disability which would prevent him from caring for children under his supervision.
“EVIDENCE: The Licensing Inspector reviewed 3 staff records. Records for Staff #1 and Staff #2 did not contain documentation of a current staff health report.”
-
Based on record review, the Center failed to ensure staff, volunteer, or any other person who is expected to be alone with one or more children enrolled in the religious exempt child day center a Sworn Statement or affirmation before employment or commencement of service at the facility and a search of Central Registry within 30 days of employment or commencement of service.
“EVIDENCE: The Licensing Inspector reviewed 3 staff records. Record for Staff #2 did not contain documentation of a completed Sworn Disclosure or affirmation prior to employment. The hire date was not documented in the record. Records for Staff #1 and Staff #3 did not contain documentation of a completed Central Registry record check before the end of their 30th day of employment. The hire date for Staff #1 and Staff #2 were not identified in their prospective records.”
All 15 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2026 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Aug 18, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Aug 18, 2025 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Aug 5, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Aug 5, 2024 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Mar 15, 2024 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| Mar 15, 2024 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Feb 20, 2024 | Complaint inspection | 5 violations cited |
| Feb 20, 2024 | Complaint inspection | 5 violations cited |
| Sep 11, 2023 | Inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Sep 11, 2023 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 13 violations cited |
| Jan 17, 2023 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| Oct 12, 2022 | Complaint inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Sep 21, 2022 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 8 violations cited |
| Sep 21, 2022 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Religious Exempt Child Day Center: Exempt from licensure, expires Aug 30, 2027.
- A current subsidy provider.
- Ages: Birth - 12 years 11 months.
- Capacity: 45 children.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 5 complaint inspections on record.
- 2 complaint allegations published with Virginia’s findings, 2 of them found valid.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Date | What | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2024 | Complaint | Allegation: Staff Quantity. Virginia’s finding: Reported/Valid. |
| Oct 31, 2022 | Complaint | Allegation: Staff Quantity. Virginia’s finding: Reported/Valid. |
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 71 child care providers in the City of Roanoke, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 11.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| Young Men’s Christian Assoc of Virginia’s Blue Ridge-VA Heights | 21 |
| Grandin Court Baptist Church | 18 |
| Raleigh Court Presbyterian Church | 0 |
| Temple Emanuel | 2 |
| Disciples of Christ Fellowship Ministries This child care provider | 11 |
| Christ Lutheran Church | 4 |
| Total Action Against Poverty in Roanoke Valley @ Raleigh Court | 6 |
| Rosalind Hills Baptist Church | Not given |
| Young Men’s Christian Assoc of Virginia’s Blue Ridge -Grandin Ct | 27 |
| Little Sprouts of Roanoke | 11 |
| Shepherd’s Care Day School | 44 |
| Young Men’s Christian Assoc of VA’s Blue Ridge-Crystal Spring | 23 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.