Honeytree Early Learning Center #4
A child day center in Salem, Virginia 24153
1980 Electric Road, Salem, Virginia 24153. (540) 769-2300.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 23 deficiencies in the last three years
- Aug 112026 the latest visit on record
- 238 children, its licensed capacity
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
31 inspections on record, the latest on Aug 11, 2026.
23 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
23 deficiencies in 7 months of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated weekly.
Aug 11, 2026: subsidy health and safety inspection1 deficiency
-
Staff who work directly with children shall, in addition to preservice and orientation training required, shall obtain the annual health and safety updated courses.
“Staff #4 had not obtained an annual health and safety update since 2023.”
Nov 12, 2025: inspection1 deficiency
-
Staff are to complete the VDOE sponsored online orientation course within 90 days of hire.
“Staff #2, who is working with children, has not yet completed this course which is overdue by1 month..”
Sep 3, 2025: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
-
Behavioral guidance shall be constructive in nature, age and stage appropriate, and shall be intended to redirect children to appropriate behavior and resolve conflicts.
“On multiple occasions over multiple days, Staff 1 was frustrated with Child 1 (age 14 months), and their actions were not constructive or appropriate in redirecting the child.”
-
When time out is used as a behavior guidance technique, it shall not be used for toddlers.
“On multiple occasions over multiple days, Child #1 (age 14 months) was put in time out for several minutes.”
Jan 31, 2025: inspection1 deficiency
-
For staff hired before July 1, 2024, providers must obtain the results of a central registry search for an employee, within 30 days of service.
“The most recent central registry check for staff #5 was dated 6 months after employment.”
Sep 5, 2024: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Each staff member shall submit documentation of a negative tuberculosis screening at the time of employment and prior to coming into contact with children.
“Staff #1 is currently working and has a TB screening that was dated 3 days after their first day of employment.”
-
Documentation of at least 2 references to character, reputation and competency are to be checked prior to employment.
“Staff #1, who has been actively working at the center for the past 5 months, had reference checks that were 3 days late. Staff #2, who has been actively working at the center for the past 2 years, had reference checks that were one day late.”
Jul 8, 2024: inspection6 deficiencies
-
Based on observation, the center failed to ensure areas and equipment of the center, inside and outside, shall be maintained in a clean, safe and operable condition.
“Evidence: 1. In the school-age classroom, there was a hole in the wall under the fire extinguisher. This hole had been patched but re-opened. 2. In the school-age boys bathroom, there was water leaking from the ceiling onto the floor. 3. In the school-age classroom, there was an electrical socket that was missing a piece of the cover on the socket.”
-
Based on observation, the center failed to ensure that hazardous substances, shall be kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children.
“Evidence: In the afterschool classroom, there was an unlocked gallon jug underneath the sink with chemicals in it. There were children playing in this area.”
-
Based on observation, the center failed to ensure that hazardous substances shall be stored in areas physically separate from food
“Evidence: In classroom 5, there was food on the shelf with cleaning products.”
-
Based on observation, the center failed to ensure that cots used by children during the designated rest period shall have linens consisting of a top cover and a bottom cover.
“Evidence: In classroom #5, there were 7 children on cots with no top sheet.”
-
Based on observation, the center failed to dispose of a soiled diaper in foot-operated storage system with a lid.
“Evidence: In the two’s classroom, there was a soiled diaper in an open trashcan in the bathroom.”
-
REPEAT VIOLATION Based on interview, the center failed to ensure for each group of children, the center shall maintain a written record of daily attendance that documented the arrival and departure of each child in care as it occurs.
“Evidence: 1. In classroom #1, there were 7 children present and only 6 children written on the attendance sheet. 2. In classroom #6, there were 8 children signed in on the tadpoles app and 14 children written in on the attendance sheet. There were 16 children present in the classroom at the time of the inspection on 7/8/2024.”
Feb 8, 2024: inspection8 deficiencies
-
Based on observation, the center failed to ensure areas and equipment of the center, inside and outside, shall be maintained in a clean, safe and operable condition.
“Evidence: Two of the bus seats have ripped apart on the backside of the seat. The vinyl material no longer covers the entire back seat area and the inside foam cushion is exposed. Some of the foam is gone exposing the underneath metal of the seat. Bus seat backs need to be well-padded, as children could strike them if there’s an incident or accident.”
-
Based on interviews, documentation review, and video recording, the center failed to ensure that when staff are supervising children, they shall always ensue their care, protection, and guidance.
The inspectors’ words, 276 words
“Evidence: On 2/2/2024, Child 1 (age 5 years) was left unattended on the center bus by Staff 2 at approximately 2:44 pm. Staff 2 did not remove all children from the center bus who were picked up from schools and brought to the center. Staff 2 did not complete the transportation attendance of children on 2/2/2024. Staff 2 checked Child 1 into after school care at approximately 2:52pm, even though the child was still on the bus. Staff 4 stated they were taking out the trash in the afternoon and observed Child 1 standing in the center bus banging on the front windows and screaming. Staff 4 ran over to the bus and stated the child’s face was ?blood red? and the child was crying hysterically. Staff 4 went to get help and at approximately 4:45 pm, Staff 3 unlocked the bus to get the child off. Staff 3 stated the child jumped into their arms once the door was opened. The child stated they had fallen asleep and stated Staff 2 left them on the bus. The child forgot to ask to unbuckle and fell asleep. When the child woke up, no one else was on the bus . The child stated they couldn’t get out and was screaming and crying very loud until the teacher came. Staff 4 stated that after the child was taken into the center, they talked with Staff 2 about the incident. Staff 2 was unaware any children were missing in after school care. Staff 2 did not ensure the care, protection, and guidance of Child 1 when they were left unsupervised on a locked bus for approximately 2 hours.”
-
Based on interviews and video recording, the center failed to ensure that children under 10 years of age shall always be within actual sight and sound supervision of staff.
“Evidence: On 2/2/2024, Child 1 (age 5 years) was left alone and unsupervised on a locked center bus for approximately 2 hours.”
-
Based on documentation review and interviews, the center failed to maintain the operational responsibility of the licensee to ensure that the center’s activities, services, and facilities are maintained in compliance with the center’s own policies and procedures that are required by the standards.
“Evidence: Per the transportation procedure in the parent handbook, children are assisted on and off the bus and are never left unattended. On 2/2/2024, Child 1 (age 5 years) was not assisted off the center bus and left alone and unsupervised on the center bus for approximately 2 hours.”
-
SYSTEMIC VIOLATION Based on interviews and video recording, the center failed to meet all the requirements of the standards during the transportation of children.
“Evidence: 1. Multiple staff interviewed stated that on 2/2/2024, Staff 2 left Child 1 (age 5 years) on the center bus. There were no other staff on the bus with the child. The child was left unsupervised on a locked bus for approximately 2 hours. 2. The list of children being transported on bus 39 and bus 25 was not completed on 2/1/2024 and 2/2/2024.”
-
SYSTEMIC VIOLATION Based on interviews and video recording, the center failed to ensure that staff shall verify that all children have been removed from the vehicle at the conclusion on any trip.
“Evidence: Multiple staff interviewed stated that on 2/2/2024, Staff 2 left Child 1 (age 5 years) alone on the center bus. Staff 2 did not remove all children from the center bus who were picked up from schools and brought to the center for after school care. The child was left unsupervised on a locked bus from approximately 2:44 pm until 4:45 pm.”
-
SYSTEMIC VIOLATION Based on record review, the center failed to ensure that parental permission for transportation and field trips shall be secured before the scheduled activity.
“Evidence: Child 1 was transported on the center bus on 2/2/2024. Child 1 had no parental permission for transportation in the record during the inspection on 03/05/2024.”
-
Based on interviews and documentation review, the center failed to ensure for each group of children, the center shall maintain a written record of daily attendance that documented the arrival and departure of each child in care as it occurs.
“Evidence: The arrival of Child 1 into afterschool care was logged on the attendance of approximately 2:52pm, even though the child was left alone on the center bus after being transported. Child 1 did not arrive into the center until approximately 4:45pm, after they were taken off be locked center bus .”
Feb 7, 2024: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Based on observation, the center failed to ensure areas and equipment of the center, inside and outside, shall be maintained in a clean, safe and operable condition.
The inspectors’ words, 130 words
“Evidence: 1.On the playground, the bottom step to the children’s boat was cracked and broken, creating a gap. This is an entrapment hazard to children. 2. The picnic table under the outdoor play structure on the School age playground, had a board that was broken and splintered. This creates a snagging hazard to children. 3. Children (ages 3-5 years) were observed during the nap period sleeping on mats. The plastic bags that are used to store the mats (after nap) were placed under the mats where the children’s heads were laying. During nap, several children had transitioned from the mat and their heads were observed laying on or near the plastic bags under the mats. To avoid danger of suffocation, plastic bags must be kept away from babies and children.”
-
Based on review and interview, the center failed to ensure that the record of each child’s feeding schedules.
“Evidence: In the infant 2 class, there were no child feeding schedules available to staff.”
Jul 26, 2023: inspection1 deficiency
-
Based record review, the center failed to ensure that the separate record for each enrolled child shall contain name, address, and phone number of two designated people to call in an emergency if a parent cannot be reached.
“Evidence: 1.Child #1 had no address for one emergency contacts on record. 2.Child #2 had no address for emergency contacts on record.”
Jan 30, 2023: inspection4 deficiencies
-
Based on record review and interview, the center failed to ensure that no person shall be hired for compensated employment prior to the facility obtaining an employment eligibility letter upon the competition of a fingerprint background check as required by the Code of Virginia.
“Evidence: Staff #1, hire date of 10/22/2021 had fingerprint eligibility letter was dated 11/01/2022.”
-
Based on observation and interview with the staff, the center failed to keep hazardous substances such as cleaning materials in a locked place.
“Evidence: In the classroom #1 there was a Swiffer mop with a bottle of cleaning chemicals attached for use. Under the cabinet, which was locked, there was cleaning chemicals in the same area as food. In classroom #7, there was food on the same shelf as the cleaning product. Staff #1 stated the food belonged to them and not the children”
-
Based on observation, the center failed to ensure that all climbable playground equipment had the required resilient surfacing.
“Evidence: Observed non-measurable amount of resilient surfacing under the required fall zone. The required amount is 6 inches of resilient surfacing.”
-
Based on staff record review, the center failed to ensure that each staff member had two or more references checked before employment or volunteering.
“Evidence: Staff #2 who was hired on 08/17/2022 did not have reference checks documented on file until 09/21/2022. Staff #4 who was hired on 11/21/2022 did not have reference checks documented on file until 11/22/2022.”
Aug 5, 2022: inspection5 deficiencies
-
Based on record review and interview, the center failed to obtain a copy of the results of a search of the central registry for any founded complaints of child abuse or neglect within 30 days of employment.
“Evidence: Staff #1 had a hire date of 6/23/2022 and #2 had a hire date of 5/11/2022, Neither staff had documentation of the required Central Registry check on file or documented follow-up on the search”
-
Based on review of children’s records, the center failed to ensure child had a physical examination by child’s first day, or within 30 days after the first day of attendance.
“Evidence: Child #6 had no physical examination on record during the inspection on 8/5/2022. The child’s start date was 6/6/2022.”
-
Based on observation the center failed to maintain the outside playground in a clean, safe, and operable manner
The inspectors’ words, 98 words
“Evidence: 1. Outside playhouse on older children’s playground had a broken plastic window in the top and a broken plastic panel on the inside. Both of these broken pieces have sharp edges which could snag skin or clothing of children. 2. On the wooden fence, one of the planks on the top of the fence has come up exposing the nails. There are also places in the fence that are missing boards. This is an entrapment hazard to children. 3. Outside playhouse on younger children’s playground had an active yellow jackets nest on the side of the playhouse.”
-
Based on review of medication the center failed to obtain written authorization from a parent or guardian for prescription medication.
“Evidence: Child #3 had a second medication on site that had no authorization from parent or guardian.”
-
Based on review of medication, the center failed to notify parent when an authorization for medication expires.
“Evidence: Child #3 had medication on site. The authorization from parent for this medication was dated 6/2/2022. The expiration for parent authorization was 6/12/2022.”
Jul 6, 2022: inspection1 deficiency
-
Based on review of children’s records, the center failed to obtain 2 designated people to call in emergency if parents cannot be reached.
“Evidence: Record for Child #2 did not include the names, addresses and phone numbers for at least 2 people who are not identified as parents/guardians.”
All 31 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2026 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Aug 11, 2026 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Mar 30, 2026 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Dec 18, 2025 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Nov 12, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Nov 12, 2025 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Sep 3, 2025 | Complaint inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Sep 3, 2025 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Aug 21, 2025 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Jun 5, 2025 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| Jun 5, 2025 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Jan 31, 2025 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| Jan 31, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Jan 31, 2025 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Oct 30, 2024 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Sep 5, 2024 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Aug 27, 2024 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| Aug 6, 2024 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| Jul 8, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Jul 8, 2024 | Inspection | 6 violations cited |
| Feb 8, 2024 | Inspection | 8 violations cited |
| Feb 7, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Feb 7, 2024 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Jul 26, 2023 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Jul 26, 2023 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Jan 30, 2023 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Jan 30, 2023 | Inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Aug 5, 2022 | Inspection | 5 violations cited |
| Jul 6, 2022 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Feb 3, 2022 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Feb 3, 2022 | Inspection | No violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Child Day Center: Two Year license, expires Feb 12, 2027.
- A current subsidy provider.
- Ages: 1 month - 12 years 11 months.
- Capacity: 238 children.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 5 complaint inspections on record.
- 1 complaint allegation published with Virginia’s findings, 1 of them found valid.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Date | What | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2025 | Complaint | Allegation: Restraints/Behavior Management. Virginia’s finding: Reported/Valid. |
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 17 child care providers in the City of Salem, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 23.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| Honeytree Early Learning Center #4 This child care provider | 23 |
| Salem Montessori School - Infant & Toddler Program | 12 |
| Loving Care Day Care | 5 |
| Roanoke Valley Children’s Academy | 34 |
| Noah-Christian Community Center, Inc. | 3 |
| Salem Montessori School, Inc. | 15 |
| Small Steps Learning Academy Inc. | 1 |
| Young Men’s Christian Assoc of Virginia’s Blue Ridge-South Salem | 1 |
| Bethel Baptist Church | Not given |
| Young Men’s Christian Assoc of Virginia’s Blue Ridge-West Salem | 6 |
| Young Men’s Christian Assoc of VA’s Blue Ridge - Salem YMCA | 8 |
| Young Men’s Christian Assoc of Virginia’s Blue Ridge-East Salem | 9 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.