Arbour Hospital
A psychiatric hospital in Boston, Massachusetts 02130
49 Robinwood Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02130. (617) 522-4400.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.
- Not rated CMS’s overall rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 118 beds
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean2
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Apr 10, 2024: a complaint inspection.
2 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 2 of them under EMTALA, the law requiring an emergency department to examine and stabilise anyone who comes to it.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Apr 10, 2024: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
-
Compliance With 489.24
The inspectors’ words, 1,186 words
“COMPLIANCE WITH 489.24 CFR(s): 489.20(l) [The provider agrees,] in the case of a hospital as defined in §489.24(b), to comply with §489.24. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 41143 Based on record review and interview, the Hospital was not in compliance with (Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act) EMTALA regulations because the Hospital failed to ensure one Patient (#1), who was accepted as a patient transfer from another Hospital’s Emergency Department, to maintain the Patient’s admission at the Hospital out of a total sample of 30 patients. Patient #1 was admitted to an inpatient unit in the Hospital and was subsequently inappropriately transferred back to the acute care Hospital’s Emergency Department after a few hours on the unit. Findings include: Review of the Hospital’s policy “Assessment and Referral Services, Completion of EMTALA Log”, dated May 2011 indicated the following: -As per EMTALA, the Hospital does not refuse care to anyone who is present on our grounds. -MOT (Memorandum of Transfer) paperwork completed if an EMTALA transfer to Emergency Department. Patient #1 arrived at the Hospital on 4/4/24 around 3:00 P.M. for an admission to an inpatient psychiatric unit. Review of Patient #1’s record indicated prior to the Patient’s transfer from an acute care hospital to the Hospital, information regarding the Patient’s history had been sent to the Hospital on 4/3/24. Patient #1’s documentation from the acute care Hospital indicated the Patient was on probation, in the custody of protective services, had impulsive behaviors, had made homicidal comments towards his/her school principal, and attempted to elope from his/her mother’s vehicle with a knife in order to kill his/her principle. Patient #1 was evaluated by Physician #1 at 3:15 P.M. on 4/4/24 while admitted to the inpatient unit. Patient #1 was assessed by the Admission Registered Nurse (RN) on 4/4/24 at 3:37 P.M.; the Patient told the Admission RN he/she had three open court cases, and the Patient was alert and oriented and cooperative with the admission process. An initial treatment plan was created by the Admission RN. Physician orders were in place for admission to the Hospital as a voluntary admission under section 10 and 11, monitoring, aggression precautions, and medications. Patient #1 was transferred back to the acute care hospital via ambulance and arrived there on 4/4/24 at 6:57 P.M. Further review of Patient #1’s record failed to indicate any documentation regarding transfer back to the acute care hospital’s emergency department, any orders for the transfer, nor any consent for transfer by the Patient’s guardian from the Department of Children and Families (DCF). During an interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing on 4/10/24 at 9:15 A.M., he said Patient #1’s screen from the acute care hospital’s emergency department was reviewed by the Evening RN Supervisor on 4/3/24 and the Patient was accepted for admission to the Hospital. He said Patient #1 arrived at the Hospital on 4/4/24, and on admission the Hospital was made aware of pending criminal cases for the Patient that had not been disclosed prior to transfer of the Patient. He said after the Patient was brought to the inpatient unit, the Physician revoked the section 12B on the Patient and he/she was transferred back to the acute care hospital emergency department. He said normally the Hospital could have cared for Patient #1, however, there was another patient on the inpatient unit who already required a 2:1 at all times secondary to violent and dangerous behaviors; he said having both Patient #1 and the other patient on the unit together could create a dangerous and catastrophic situation for both the patients on the unit and staff working there. He said the Hospital could not provide safe staffing for the unit if Patient #1 had been admitted to the Hospital and allowed to stay. During an interview with Physician #1 on 4/10/24 at 10:00 A.M., he said Patient #1 arrived at the Hospital after threatening his/her principle with a knife and threatening to kill the principle. He said the Hospital had accepted Patient #1 for admission. He said Patient #1 was medically cleared for admission to the Hospital. He said after the during the admission of Patient #1 to the Hospital, it was realized the Patient was similar to another patient on the inpatient unit; he said there would likely be an altercation between Patient #1 and the other patient on the unit. He said he revoked Patient #1’s section 12 after observing the Patient on the unit after his/her admission, spoke with the Chief Medical Officer, and the decision was made to send Patient #1 back to the acute care hospital emergency department for the safety of the Patients and staff on the unit. He said nursing staff reached out to the acute care hospital to notify of the transfer; he did not speak with another physician at the acute care hospital. He said this particular scenario had not happened before at the Hospital, and normally the Hospital could care for Patient #1 if it were not for the other patient with violent behaviors residing on the unit. He said Patient can be transferred to an emergency department from the Hospital under section 21 for medical treatment and stabilization or transfer of a section 12A back to an emergency department because the patient is not medically stable. During an interview with the Chief Medical Officer on 4/10/24 at 10:40 A.M., he said the transfer of Patient #1 back to the acute care Hospital was unfortunate but needed to happen. He said without another violent patient on the inpatient unit the Hospital could have potentially managed Patient #1, however, with another volatile patient on the unit with Patient #1 was dangerous situation. He said Patient #1’s transfer back to the acute care hospital’s emergency department was necessary for everyone’s safety. During an interview with the Admission RN on 4/4/10 at 11:08 A.M., she said Patient #1 had a lack of insight on admission to the Hospital, and a DCF representative was with the Patient as well. She said on admission to the Hospital, Patient #1 denied any suicidal or homicidal ideation, although he/she did admit to wanting to use a pocketknife against his/her principle. She said the general process for accepting and receiving a patient to the Hospital is the transferring hospital sends information over to the Hospital, the Hospital screens the patient referral, if the Hospital accepts the patient for admission the patient is transferred to the Hospital and admitted for treatment. During an interview with the Evening Nursing Supervisor on 4/4/24 at 2:55 P.M., he said he accepted Patient #1 for transfer to the Hospital on 4/3/24 and the Patient was transferred on 4/4/24. He said the Physician decided it was not safe to keep Patient #1 on the unit, so the Patient was transferred back to the acute care hospital. He said he called the emergency department to notify the staff Patient #1 was returning to the acute care hospital. The Hospital failed to ensure Patient #1’s admission was maintained for inpatient psychiatric treatment and stabilization after accepting the Patient’s transfer from an acute care hospital emergency department.”
-
Recipient Hospital Responsibilities
The inspectors’ words, 1,273 words
“RECIPIENT HOSPITAL RESPONSIBILITIES CFR(s): 489.24(f) A participating hospital that has specialized capabilities or facilities (including, but not limited to, facilities such as burn units, shock-trauma units, neonatal intensive care units, or (with respect to rural areas) regional referral centers, which, for purposes of this subpart, means hospitals meeting the requirements of referral centers found at §412.96 of this chapter) may not refuse to accept from a referring hospital within the boundaries of the United States an appropriate transfer of an individual who requires such specialized capabilities or facilities if the receiving hospital has the capacity to treat the individual. This requirement applies to any participating hospital with specialized capabilities, regardless of whether the hospital has a dedicated emergency department. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 41143 Based on record review and interview, the Hospital failed to ensure one Patient (#1), who was accepted as a patient transfer from another Hospital’s Emergency Department, to maintain the Patient’s admission at the Hospital out of a total sample of 30 patients. Patient #1 was admitted to an inpatient unit in the Hospital and was subsequently inappropriately transferred back to the acute care Hospital’s Emergency Department after a few hours on the unit. Findings include: Review of the Hospital’s policy “Assessment and Referral Services, Completion of (Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act) EMTALA Log”, dated May 2011 indicated the following: -As per EMTALA, the Hospital does not refuse care to anyone who is present on our grounds. -MOT (Memorandum of Transfer) paperwork completed if an EMTALA transfer to Emergency Department. Patient #1 arrived at the Hospital on 4/4/24 around 3:00 P.M. for an admission to an inpatient psychiatric unit. Review of Patient #1’s record indicated prior to the Patient’s transfer from an acute care hospital to the Hospital, information regarding the Patient’s history had been sent to the Hospital on 4/3/24. Patient #1’s documentation from the acute care Hospital indicated the Patient was on probation, in the custody of protective services, had impulsive behaviors, had made homicidal comments towards his/her school principal, and attempted to elope from his/her mother’s vehicle with a knife in order to kill his/her principle. Patient #1 was evaluated by Physician #1 at 3:15 P.M. on 4/4/24 while admitted to the inpatient unit. Patient #1 was assessed by the Admission Registered Nurse (RN) on 4/4/24 at 3:37 P.M.; the Patient told the Admission RN he/she had three open court cases, and the Patient was alert and oriented and cooperative with the admission process. An initial treatment plan was created by the Admission RN. Physician orders were in place for admission to the Hospital as a voluntary admission under section 10 and 11, monitoring, aggression precautions, and medications. Patient #1 was transferred back to the acute care hospital via ambulance and arrived there on 4/4/24 at 6:57 P.M. Further review of Patient #1’s record failed to indicate any documentation regarding transfer back to the acute care hospital’s emergency department, any orders for the transfer, nor any consent for transfer by the Patient’s guardian from the Department of Children and Families (DCF). During an interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing on 4/10/24 at 9:15 A.M., he said Patient #1’s screen from the acute care hospital’s emergency department was reviewed by the Evening RN Supervisor on 4/3/24 and the Patient was accepted for admission to the Hospital. He said Patient #1 arrived at the Hospital on 4/4/24, and on admission the Hospital was made aware of pending criminal cases for the Patient that had not been disclosed prior to transfer of the Patient. He said after the Patient was brought to the inpatient unit, the Physician revoked the section 12B on the Patient and he/she was transferred back to the acute care hospital emergency department. He said normally the Hospital could have cared for Patient #1, however, there was another patient on the inpatient unit who already required a 2:1 at all times secondary to violent and dangerous behaviors; he said having both Patient #1 and the other patient on the unit together could create a dangerous and catastrophic situation for both the patients on the unit and staff working there. He said the Hospital could not provide safe staffing for the unit if Patient #1 had been admitted to the Hospital and allowed to stay. During an interview with Physician #1 on 4/10/24 at 10:00 A.M., he said Patient #1 arrived at the Hospital after threatening his/her principle with a knife and threatening to kill the principle. He said the Hospital had accepted Patient #1 for admission. He said Patient #1 was medically cleared for admission to the Hospital. He said after the during the admission of Patient #1 to the Hospital, it was realized the Patient was similar to another patient on the inpatient unit; he said there would likely be an altercation between Patient #1 and the other patient on the unit. He said he revoked Patient #1’s section 12 after observing the Patient on the unit after his/her admission, spoke with the Chief Medical Officer, and the decision was made to send Patient #1 back to the acute care hospital emergency department for the safety of the Patients and staff on the unit. He said nursing staff reached out to the acute care hospital to notify of the transfer; he did not speak with another physician at the acute care hospital. He said this particular scenario had not happened before at the Hospital, and normally the Hospital could care for Patient #1 if it were not for the other patient with violent behaviors residing on the unit. He said Patient can be transferred to an emergency department from the Hospital under section 21 for medical treatment and stabilization or transfer of a section 12A back to an emergency department because the patient is not medically stable. During an interview with the Chief Medical Officer on 4/10/24 at 10:40 A.M., he said the transfer of Patient #1 back to the acute care Hospital was unfortunate but needed to happen. He said without another violent patient on the inpatient unit the Hospital could have potentially managed Patient #1, however, with another volatile patient on the unit with Patient #1 was dangerous situation. He said Patient #1’s transfer back to the acute care hospital’s emergency department was necessary for everyone’s safety. During an interview with the Admission RN on 4/4/10 at 11:08 A.M., she said Patient #1 had a lack of insight on admission to the Hospital, and a DCF representative was with the Patient as well. She said on admission to the Hospital, Patient #1 denied any suicidal or homicidal ideation, although he/she did admit to wanting to use a pocketknife against his/her principle. She said the general process for accepting and receiving a patient to the Hospital is the transferring hospital sends information over to the Hospital, the Hospital screens the patient referral, if the Hospital accepts the patient for admission the patient is transferred to the Hospital and admitted for treatment. During an interview with the Evening Nursing Supervisor on 4/4/24 at 2:55 P.M., he said he accepted Patient #1 for transfer to the Hospital on 4/3/24 and the Patient was transferred on 4/4/24. He said the Physician decided it was not safe to keep Patient #1 on the unit, so the Patient was transferred back to the acute care hospital. He said he called the emergency department to notify the staff Patient #1 was returning to the acute care hospital. The Hospital failed to ensure Patient #1’s admission was maintained for inpatient psychiatric treatment and stabilization after accepting the Patient’s transfer from an acute care hospital emergency department.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2024 | Complaint inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
How do patients fare?
- CMS gives no overall CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Data are shown only for hospitals that participate in the Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) and Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) programs.”
- CMS publishes no patient survey results for it.
CMS, Hospital General Information, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital and Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Complications and Deaths - Hospital and Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital. Released Sep 30, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5 | Not rated |
Is it certified, and in good standing?
- Medicare-certified psychiatric hospital since Jul 12, 1966.
- Ownership: proprietary.
- It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Proprietary.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
- CMS’s HAC Reduction Program file has no result for it: the program covers general acute care hospitals Medicare pays under its inpatient prospective payment system.
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
What do patients say about their care?
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Uhsl LLC owns 100% directly since Dec 4, 2007.
- Uhs of Delaware Inc. runs it.
- 19 owners or officers are people: George H Brunner (corporate officer, 100%); Katharine M Lyver (corporate officer, 100%); Matthew D Klein (corporate officer, 100%); Matthew J Peterson (corporate officer, 100%); Matthew J Peterson (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Thomas M Day (corporate officer, 100%); Steve Filton (corporate officer, 100%); Steve Filton (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Cheryl K Ramagano (corporate officer, 100%); Cheryl K Ramagano (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Alan B Miller (owns 5% or more through other companies, 87.4%); James M Coleman (managing employee (under contract), 50%); Matthew J Peterson (corporate director, 33.3%); Thomas M Day (corporate director, 33.3%); Steve Filton (corporate director, 33.3%); Kurt E Gunther (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Kurt E Gunther (corporate officer, 0%); Diane Airosus (managing employee (under contract)); Diane Airosus (corporate officer).
- CMS’s Provider of Services file records 1 change of ownership.
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uhsl LLC | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Dec 4, 2007 |
| Universal Health Services Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Jul 9, 2010 |
| Uhs of Delaware Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Jul 9, 2010 |
| Uhs of Delaware Inc. | Runs it (operational or managerial control) | 100% | Jul 9, 2010 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 16 hospitals CMS lists in Suffolk County, 9 have an overall star rating from CMS: 4 rated 5 of 5, 1 rated 4 of 5, 3 rated 3 of 5, 1 rated 2 of 5.
- CMS gives this hospital no overall star rating to compare.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
- QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital General Information (xubh-q36u).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital.
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital (77hc-ibv8).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Complications and Deaths - Hospital (ynj2-r877).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital (632h-zaca).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital (yv7e-xc69).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital (rrqw-56er).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program (yq43-i98g).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated yearly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities (Hospital_and_other.DATA.Q3_2026.csv).
Released Oct 14, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies (Hospital_2567s_2010_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital All Owners (Hospital_All_Owners_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital Enrollments (Hospital_Enrollments_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the hospital
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.