Hearth Record

Arkansas State Hospital

A psychiatric hospital in Little Rock, Arkansas 72205

305 S Palm Street, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205. (501) 686-9000.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jul 3, 2024: a complaint inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jul 3, 2024: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Patient Rights

    The inspectors’ words, 108 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS CFR(s): 482.13 A hospital must protect and promote each patient’s rights. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 44854 Based on Review of Policy and Procedure, Review of Clinical Record, Review of Video monitoring, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide care in a safe setting in that the facility did not provide a ligature free environment for two of two (#1 and #2) patients. The failed practices did not ensure the patients could not inflict harm upon themselves. The failed practice affected Patient #1 and #2 had the likelihood to affect all patients admitted to the facility. See A-0144 for details.”

    Rule A0115. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Patient Rights: Care In Safe Setting

    The inspectors’ words, 690 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS: CARE IN SAFE SETTING CFR(s): 482.13(c)(2) The patient has the right to receive care in a safe setting. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44854 Based on Review of Policy and Procedure, Review of Clinical Record, Review of Video monitoring, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide care in a safe setting in that the facility did not provide a ligature free environment for two of two (#1 and #2) patients. The failed practices did not ensure the patients could not inflict harm upon themselves. The failed practice affected Patient #1 and #2 had the likelihood to affect all patients admitted to the facility. Findings follow. A. Review of Policy and Procedure titled, “Patient Rights” revised 08/19/2015 showed the, “Patient had the right to receive care in a safe setting.” B. Review of Policy and Procedure titled, “Patient Observations,” revised 04/10/2023, showed the following: 1. While on Line of Site (LOS) observation the patient must remain under constant observation including using the bathroom or bathing. 2. While on one-to-one observation the staff was to be within six feet and the patient was to be directly observed at all times. 3. When a patient was behind a closed door while in a restroom or bathing, staff may ask about patient status through the door and document on the “15-minute Observation Check Sheet.” C. Review of Policy and Procedure titled, “Inpatient Suicide Risk Assessment and Reassessment,” revised 07/16/2021, showed, “If the reassessment indicates moderate or high positive risk, the physician must assess the patient and complete the Inpatient Suicide Risk Assessment and Evaluation and write a Progress Note within twenty-four hours.” D. Review Clinical records on 07/02/2024 at 10:30 AM, showed the following: 1. Patient #1’s Clinical record dated 04/13/2024 at 11:59 PM and 06/30/2024 at 4:14 PM, showed while being monitored, the patient had wrapped personal clothing around their neck causing strangulation that resulted in transport to an acute care facility. 2. Patient #2’s Clinical record dated 04/21/2024 at 5:40 PM, showed while being monitored during 15 minute shower time, the patient had wrapped personal clothing around their neck causing strangulation that resulted in transport to acute care facility. There was no evidence a physician conducted an Inpatient Suicide Risk Assessment or Reassessment. E. Review of Video Monitoring on 07/02/2024 at 12:30 PM, showed the following: 1. Patient #1 video monitoring dated and 06/30/2024 at 4:14 PM, showed while being monitored, the patient had wrapped personal clothing around their neck causing strangulation that resulted in transport to acute care facility. In both occurrences the patient had covered their head with a suicide blanket which did not allow for visualization of head and neck. 2. Patient #2 video monitoring dated 04/21/2024 at 5:40 PM, showed while being monitored during scheduled 15 minute shower time, Patient #2 was not monitored for 41 minutes. F. During an interview on 07/02/2024 at 11:15 AM, with the Chief Compliance Officer and Quality Manager, Surveyor #2 asked the following: 1. Describe your review process when there are events of the same or similar type which pose a high risk for patient harm and/or death. The Chief Compliance Officer stated, “That there is no trigger for aggregating events for further administrative review or formal investigation.” She stated that Patient #1 and Patient #2’s events were reviewed in the weekly Administrative Review Team meetings. 2. What is your audit process when an investigation has been conducted and actions have been put in place to review the effectiveness of those actions? The Chief Compliance Officer stated a formal investigation had been completed for Patient #1’s event on 04/13/2024. She confirmed that since the investigation, Patient #1 had two reoccurrences of tying clothing around their neck, one of two which resulted in transfer to an acute care facility and one of two that was classified as no harm event. Patient #2 had one occurrence of tying clothing around their neck resulting in a transfer to acute care facility. No investigation for Patient #2’s event was triggered. G. During an interview on 07/03/2024 at 10:00 AM, the Chief Operations Officer confirmed the findings in A-E.”

    Rule A0144. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 3, 2024Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS gives no overall : “Data are shown only for hospitals that participate in the Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) and Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) programs.”
  • CMS publishes no patient survey results for it.
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5Not rated
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified psychiatric hospital since Dec 15, 1987.
  • Ownership: government - state.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
  • Government - State.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • CMS’s HAC Reduction Program file has no result for it: the program covers general acute care hospitals Medicare pays under its inpatient prospective payment system.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • State of Arkansas runs it.
  • 2 owners or officers are people: Charles Thomas (managing employee (on the payroll)); James Scoggins (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records no change of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 13 hospitals CMS lists in Pulaski County, 7 have an overall star rating from CMS: 1 rated 4 of 5, 3 rated 3 of 5, 2 rated 2 of 5, 1 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS gives this hospital no overall star rating to compare.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.