Hearth Record

Lake Prince Woods at Home LLC

A hospice in Suffolk, Virginia 23434

100 Anna Goode Way, Suffolk, Virginia 23434. (757) 923-5559.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

13 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 27 hospices serving ZIP code 23434 had 7.5.

The last inspection on record was on Jan 16, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

13 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jan 16, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner13 deficiencies
  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 124 words

    “It is required that the written Patient Bill of Rights includes the right to choose his or her attending physician. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review and interview revealed the written Patient Bill of Rights confirmed that the right for the patient to choose his or her attending physician was not included. In an interview with the Hospice Administrator on 01/14/2025, it was confirmed that the written Patient Bill of Rights which was provided to all hospice patients did not include the right for the patient to choose his or her own attending physician. The review of the written Patient Bill of Rights confirmed that the right for the patient to choose his or her attending physician was not included.”

    Rule L0515. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 287 words

    “It is required that the documented comprehensive assessment includes a drug profile that contains the patient’s current prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs, supplements, herbal remedies, and other alternative treatments that could affect drug therapy. The medication review process includes the identification of the following: the effectiveness of drug therapy; drug side effects, actual or potential drug interactions; duplicate drug therapy, drug therapy associated with laboratory monitoring. The assessment includes evidence that common side effects of medication in the hospice populations are anticipated, and as appropriate, preventive measurements are implemented to manage the side effects. The drug profile is updated per the hospice policy and procedure, but, at minimum, at the time of each comprehensive assessment and/or when new medication is added, or changes are made to existing medication. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 14 (7%) clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure that the comprehensive assessment include an updated medication profile to include pain management medications, which resulted in the medication reconciliation being incomplete. CLINICAL RECORD 13: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/14/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of late onset Alzheimer’s Disease and expired on 09/26/2024. A review of the IDG notes dated 09/23/2024 revealed the Registered Nurse documented that the patient had been started on Morphine PRN, and this was helping to manage the patient’s pain. The medication administration records were reviewed for the dates of 08/27/2024-09/26/2024. There was no documented evidence of the Morphine noted in the medication administration records for these dates. In an interview with the Hospice Administrator on 01/15/2025, it was confirmed that the medication administration was not updated, which resulted in the medication reconciliation being incomplete.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 697 words

    “It is required that the comprehensive assessment includes an initial bereavement assessment of the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals, focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and considered in the bereavement plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 14 of 14 (100%) clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure that the comprehensive assessment included an initial bereavement assessment to assess the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals, focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. CLINICAL RECORD 1: This patient elected the hospice diagnosis on 07/01/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of hypertensive heart failure and chronic kidney failure. A review of the clinical record revealed there was no documented evidence that an initial bereavement assessment was completed. CLINICAL RECORD 2: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 04/30/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain A review of the clinical record revealed there was no documented evidence that an initial bereavement assessment was completed. CLINICAL RECORD 3: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 10/09/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. A review of the clinical record revealed there was no documented evidence that an initial bereavement assessment was completed. CLINICAL RECORD 4: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 10/07/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of COPD. A review of the clinical record revealed there was no documented evidence that an initial bereavement assessment was completed. CLINICAL RECORD 5: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/22/2023 with a hospice diagnosis of acute diastolic (congestive) heart failure. A review of the clinical record revealed there was no documented evidence that an initial bereavement assessment was completed. CLINICAL RECORD 6: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 09/25/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. A review of the clinical record revealed there was no documented evidence that an initial bereavement assessment was completed. CLINICAL RECORD 7: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/16/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. A review of the clinical record revealed there was no documented evidence that an initial bereavement assessment was completed. CLINICAL RECORD 8: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 04/05/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of cirrhosis of the liver. A review of the clinical record revealed there was no documented evidence that an initial bereavement assessment was completed. CLINICAL RECORD 9: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 09/30/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of atrial fibrillation. A review of the clinical record revealed there was no documented evidence that an initial bereavement assessment was completed. CLINICAL RECORD 10: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 11/20/2024 with a hospice diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the lung. A review of the clinical record revealed there was no documented evidence that an initial bereavement assessment was completed. CLINICAL RECORD 11: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 04/30/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. A review of the clinical record revealed there was no documented evidence that an initial bereavement assessment was completed. CLINICAL RECORD 12: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/22/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of intestinal obstruction. A review of the clinical record revealed there was no documented evidence that an initial bereavement assessment was completed. CLINICAL RECORD 13: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/14/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of late onset Alzheimer’s Disease. A review of the clinical record revealed there was no documented evidence that an initial bereavement assessment was completed. CLINICAL RECORD 14: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/05/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia. A review of the clinical record revealed there was no documented evidence that an initial bereavement assessment was completed. The Hospice Administrator was interviewed on 01/15/2025 and confirmed that the comprehensive assessment did not include the initial bereavement assessment.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 204 words

    “It is required that the hospice ensures that each patient and the primary caregiver(s) receive education and training, provided by the hospice, as appropriate to their responsibilities for care as stated in the plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 14 (7%) clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure that patients received education and training, provided by hospice, as appropriate for their responsibilities for care as stated in the plan of care. CLINICAL RECORD 8: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 04/05/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of cirrhosis of the liver. The initial comprehensive assessment dated 04/05/2024 documented wounds on the right ankle, right medial foot, right heel, left knee, left mid flank, and a lumbar incision. The plan of care dated 04/05/2024, included the following goal: pt/cg will demonstrate appropriate wound care technique after instruction. There was no documented evidence of instructions in the clinical records reviewed from 04/05/2024 to date of revocation on 04/20/2024. In an interview conducted with the Hospice Administrator on 01/15/2025, the Administrator confirmed that the clinical record did not include documentation that the patient or caregiver received instructions on appropriate wound care technique.”

    Rule L0544. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 456 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care identifies planned interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments and includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness, including the following: Intervention to manage pain and symptoms. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 4 of 14 (29%) clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure that the plan of care documented all individualized interventions for problems identified in the initial comprehensive assessment or the updated assessments. CLINICAL RECORD 1: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 07/01/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of hypertensive heart and kidney disease. The MSW comprehensive assessment dated 07/02/2024 documented the patient was having nausea and vomiting. The medication administration record included Phenergan 12.5 mg rectal every 6 hours prn for nausea which was started on 07/03/2024 and changed to Phenergan 12.5 mg by mouth every 6 hours as needed for nausea on 07/14/2024. There was no documented evidence that the plan of care dated 07/01/2024-01/15/2025 included interventions to address nausea or vomiting. CLINICAL RECORD 5: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/22/2023 with a terminal diagnosis of acute diastolic (congestive) heart failure. A review of the medication administration profile, Lorazepam 2 mg/ml 0.5ml sublingual every 2 hours as needed for anxiety was ordered on 01/03/2024. A review of the plan of care dated 12/16/2024-02/13/2025 revealed there was no documented interventions added to address the patient’s anxiety. CLINICAL RECORD 6: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 09/25/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. The comprehensive assessment dated 09/25/2024 documented the patient used a Trilogy CPAP machine to assist with breathing and a suction machine to assist patient in coughing up secretions. A review of the plans of care dated 09/25/2024 through 01/22/2025 revealed there was no documented interventions for the assistance with breathing using the Trilogy CPAP machine or documented interventions for suctioning for assistance with coughing up secretions. CLINICAL RECORD 12: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/22/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of intestinal obstruction. A review of the comprehensive assessment dated 08/22/2024 revealed that the patient was admitted to the hospital on 08/11/22024 for bowel obstruction and underwent an exploratory laparotomy, small bowel resection and lysis of adhesions. An abdominal surgical incision with staples was assessed. A review of the plan of care dated 08/22/204-11/20/2024 revealed there was no documented interventions to care for the incision. In an interview with the Hospice Administrator on 01/15/2025, it was confirmed that the agency did not ensure that interventions were added to the plan of care for problems identified in the initial comprehensive assessment or the updated assessments.”

    Rule L0546. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 197 words

    “It is required that the hospice follows accepted standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable disease, including the use of standard precautions such as hand hygiene. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review, interview, and observation. In 1 of 3 (33%) home visit observations conducted revealed the agency did not ensure the staff followed the hospice policy for the use of standard precautions to prevent the spread of infection. DOCUMENT 2 : Agency Policy Hand Hygiene Policy and Compliance Program, stated in part; “Indications for hand hygiene are: before re-entering nursing bag...” HOME VISIT 3: During Home Visit 3 (Clinical Record 3) on 01/14/2025 to observe the Registered Nurse (Personnel Record 3), the Registered Nurse was observed to check the vital signs of the patient and return the blood pressure cuff and pulse oximeter back into the nursing bag without sanitizing hands. The Registered Nurse then sanitized her hands and assessed the patient’s feet. She then reached into the nursing bag without sanitizing hands. In an interview with the Hospice Administrator on 01/14/2025, it was confirmed that the agency policy for hand hygiene was not followed during the home visit.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Physician services (42 CFR 418.64(a)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 268 words

    “It is required that the hospice medical director, physician employees, and contracted physician(s), in conjunction with the patient’s attending physician, are responsible for the palliation and management of the terminal illness as well as conditions related to the terminal illness. The hospice must designate a physician to serve as medical director. The medical director must be a Doctor of Medicine or osteopathy who is an employee or is under contract with the hospice. When the medical director is not available, a physician designated by the hospice assumes the same responsibilities and obligations as the medical director. This standard was not met as evidenced by interview and document review revealed the contract documents were reviewed and there was no documentation of a contract signed for a backup hospice physician. This agency did not ensure that the hospice designated a backup physician to assume the same responsibilities and obligations as the Medical Director in cases of the absence of the Hospice Medical Director. During an interview with the Administrator on 01/16/2025, the Administrator confirmed the agency did not have a backup physician assigned. She stated that the Hospice Medical Director was part of a physician’s medical group, so it was assumed that if a backup physician was needed, one of those physicians would step in. The Administrator confirmed that the agency did not have a backup hospice physician contracted or employed at the time of this visit. This agency did not ensure that the hospice designated a backup physician to assume the same responsibilities and obligations as the Medical Director in cases of the absence of the Hospice Medical Director.”

    Rule L0590. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1)(iv))

    The inspectors’ words, 609 words

    “It is required that counseling services include an organized program for providing bereavement services delivered by or under the supervision of a qualified professional with experience or education in grief or loss counseling. Bereavement services are available to the family and other individuals up to one (1) year following the death of the patient. Bereavement counseling extends to residents of a SNF/NF (skilled nursing facility/nursing facility) or ICF/IID (intermediate care facility/Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities) when appropriate and identified in the bereavement plan of care. The bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved per a bereavement plan of care that includes the types of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 6 of 6 (100%) clinical records reviewed of expired patients revealed the agency did not ensure that a bereavement plan of care that included the types of services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery was developed. CLINICAL RECORD 9: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 09/30/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of atrial fibrillation and expired on 10/01/2024. A review of the clinical record revealed there was no documented evidence of a bereavement care plan or that the bereaved family member or other individuals declined bereavement services as of the last day of the site visit 01/16/2025. CLINICAL RECORD 10: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 11/20/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the right lung and expired on 12/01/2024. A review of the clinical record revealed there was no documented evidence of a bereavement care plan or that the bereaved family member or other individuals declined bereavement services as of the last day of the site visit 01/16/2025. CLINICAL RECORD 11: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 04/30/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain and expired on 07/07/2024. In review of the clinical record, documentation was noted from 07/10/2024-12/11/2024 that the Bereavement Coordinator made phone calls and sent letters to the bereaved. A review of the clinical record revealed there was no documented evidence of a bereavement care plan or that the bereaved family member or other individuals declined bereavement services as of the last day of the site visit 01/16/2025. CLINICAL RECORD 12: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/22/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of unspecified intestinal obstruction and expired on 09/15/2024. A review of the clinical record revealed there was no documented evidence of a bereavement care plan or that the bereaved family member or other individuals declined bereavement services as of the last day of the site visit 01/16/2025. CLINICAL RECORD 13: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/14/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of late onset Alzheimer’s Disease and expired on 09/26/2024. A review of the clinical record revealed there was no documented evidence of a bereavement care plan or that the bereaved family member or other individuals declined bereavement services as of the last day of the site visit 01/16/2025. CLINICAL RECORD 14: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/05/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia and expired on 12/21/2024. A review of the clinical record revealed there was no documented evidence of a bereavement care plan or that the bereaved family member or other individuals declined bereavement services as of the last day of the site visit 01/16/2025. In an interview with the Hospice Administrator in 01/15/2025, the Administrator confirmed that the clinical records did not include bereavement care plans that documented the types of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 547 words

    “It is required that hospice aides are assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse who is a member of the Interdisciplinary Group. Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide are prepared by a RN who is responsible for the supervision of the hospice aide. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 7 of 14 (50%) clinical records reviewed in which a hospice aide services were accepted revealed the agency did not ensure that the Registered Nurse prepared a hospice aide plan of care that contained clear and specific instructions for the patient’s required care. CLINICAL RECORD 2: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 04/30/2024 with a hospice diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. The hospice aide plan of care written by the Registered Nurse on 12/26/2024, ordered the following tasks as PRN: fingernail care, oral care, assist with ambulation, assist with transfers, and change bed linens. There was no documented evidence of specific instructions for frequency of these task. CLINICAL RECORD 3: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 10/09/2024 with a hospice diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. The hospice plan of care written by the Registered Nurse on 10/09/2024, ordered the following hospice aide tasks as PRN: shower. There was no documented evidence of specific instructions for frequency of these task. CLINICAL RECORD 4: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 10/07/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of COPD. The hospice plan of care written by the Registered Nurse on 11/23/2024, directed the Hospice Aide to provide a shower PRN. There was no documented evidence of specific instructions for frequency of these task. CLINICAL RECORD 6: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 09/25/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. The hospice plan of care written by the Registered Nurse on 09/25/2024, directed the hospice aide to perform a shower every visit and PRN. There was no documented evidence of specific instructions for frequency of these task. CLINICAL RECORD 7: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/16/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. The hospice plan of care written by the Registered Nurse on 12/16/2924, directed the hospice aide to perform the following tasks as PRN: bed bath partial, bed bath complete, foot care, fingernail care, and oral care. There was no documented evidence of specific instructions for frequency of these task. CLINICAL RECORD 8: This patient elected the hospice benefit 04/05/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of cirrhosis of the liver. The hospice plan of care written by the Registered Nurse on 04/05/2024, directed the hospice aide to perform the following tasks PRN: clean dentures. There was no documented evidence of specific instructions for frequency of these task. CLINICAL RECORD 11: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 04/30/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. The hospice plan of care written by the Registered Nurse on 04/30/2024, directed the hospice aide to provide the following tasks PRN: shower and shampoo. There was no documented evidence of specific instructions for frequency of these task. In an interview conducted on 01/15/2025 with the Hospice Administrator confirmed that hospice aide plans of care did not contain clear and specific instructions for the patient’s required care.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    The inspectors’ words, 270 words

    “It is required that hospice volunteers provide day-to-day administrative or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals five percent (5%) of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract staff. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review and interview. This standard was not met as evidenced by the review of QAPI and interview with the Administrator. The agency did not ensure that volunteers provided day-to-day administrative or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equaled five percent (5%) of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract staff. The annual hospice volunteer percentage for 2024 documented in the QAPI data for value of volunteer hours was 3.92. The Hospice Administrator confirmed that this did not meet the requirement. This standard was not met as evidenced by the review of QAPI and interview with the Administrator. The agency did not ensure that volunteers provided day-to-day administrative or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equaled five percent (5%) of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract staff. The Administrator stated there was no documentation for 2023 that hospice volunteers provided day-to-day administrative or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equaled five percent (5%) of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract staff. The annual hospice volunteer percentage for 2024 documented in the QAPI data for value of volunteer hours was 3.92. The Hospice Administrator confirmed that this did not meet the requirement.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 250 words

    “It is required that a patient clinical record containing past and current findings is maintained for each hospice patient. The record contains correct clinical information that is available to the patient’s attending physician and hospice staff. The record may be maintained electronically or on paper. Each patient’s record includes, at a minimum: physician orders. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 14 (14%) clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure that the clinical record contained physician orders. CLINICAL RECORD 12: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/22/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of intestinal obstruction. The comprehensive assessment dated 08/22/2024 documented the patient was admitted with a foley catheter. The Registered Nurse charted she received an order to remove the foley catheter. In review of the physician’s orders in the clinical record, there was no documented evidence of a physician’s order to remove the foley catheter. CLINICAL RECORD 13: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/14/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of late onset Alzheimer’s Disease and expired on 09/26/2024. The IDG notes dated 09/23/2024 stated that the patient had been started on Morphine PRN and this was helping to manage the patient’s pain. In review of the physician’s orders in the clinical record, there was no documented evidence of a physician’s order for the administration of Morphine. In an interview conducted on 01/15/2025, the Hospice Administrator confirmed that the physician orders were not present in the clinical record.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3)(ii))

    The inspectors’ words, 163 words

    “It is required that the hospice discharge summary provided to a facility receiving a hospice patient for care—or to the patient’s community attending physician upon hospice discharge—includes at least the following: plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 1 (100%) clinical record in which the patient was discharged revealed the agency did not ensure that the patient’s hospice plan of care was provided to the attending physician upon discharge. CLINICAL RECORD 8: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 04/05/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of cirrhosis of the liver and revoked hospice services on 04/20/2024. In review of the documentation sent to the attending physician, there was no evidence in that the agency provided the attending physician with the hospice plan of care. In an interview with the Hospice Administrator on 01/15/2024, it was confirmed that the discharge summary sent to the physician did not include a hospice plan of care.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

  • Use and mintenance of equipment and supplies (42 CFR 418.106(f)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 475 words

    “It is required that the Interdisciplinary Group ensures instruction of the patient, as appropriate, and the family and/or other caregivers on the proper handling, storage, and safe utilization of durable medical equipment and/or supplies. Persons under contract with the hospice may instruct the patient and/or family. Instruction is documented in the patient record. The patient, family and/or other caregiver must be able to demonstrate the appropriate use of the DME to the satisfaction of the IDG. The IDG documents that the patient, family, and/or caregivers can demonstrate appropriate use. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 4 of 14 (29%) clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not document in the clinical record that the patient, as appropriate, and the family and/or other caregivers received instructions on proper handling, storage, and safe utilization of durable medical equipment and/or supplies. CLINICAL RECORD 1: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 07/01/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of hypertensive heart failure and chronic kidney failure stage 4. In review of the clinical record, the patient was provided with a Geri-chair. There was no documented evidence that the patient, family and/or other caregivers received instructions on proper handling, storage, and safe utilization of the Geri-chair equipment provided. CLINICAL RECORD 5: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/22/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of acute diastolic (congestive) heart failure. In review of the clinical record, the patient was provided with a hospital bed, bedside table, mattress, O2 concentrator, oxygen tanks, and bedrails. There was no documented evidence that the patient, family and/or other caregivers received instructions on proper handling, storage, and safe utilization of durable medical equipment and/or supplies that were provided. CLINICAL RECORD 6: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 09/25/2024 with a hospice diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. In review of the clinical record, the patient owned the following equipment upon admission: mechanical wheelchair, Trilogy CPAP machine, and an adjustable bed. The agency provided an oxygen concentrator and suction machine. There was no documented evidence that the patient, family and/or other caregivers received instructions on proper handling, storage, and safe utilization of the oxygen concentrator and suction machine equipment provided. CLINICAL RECORD 12: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/22/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of unspecified intestinal obstruction. In review of the clinical record, the patient was provided with a hospital bed and a wheelchair. There was no documented evidence that the patient, family and/or other caregivers received instructions on proper handling, storage, and safe utilization of the hospital bed and a wheelchair equipment provided. In an interview conducted with the Hospice Administrator on 01/15/2025, it was confirmed that the instruction to the patient, family and/or other caregivers on the proper handling, storage, and safe utilization of durable medical equipment and/or supplies was not documented in the clinical record.”

    Rule L0702. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 16, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner13 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Apr 8, 2022.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 14 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95.5% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 86% at home, 7% in assisted living, 7% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day14.0 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends9%
Visits near death95.5% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Lake Prince Center, Inc. runs it.
  • 26 owners or officers are people: Jeffrey J Gilliam (corporate director, 0%); Tammy Jones (corporate officer, 0%); Lamont D Maddox (corporate director, 0%); Anthony Branch (corporate director, 0%); Gregory Alcorn (corporate director, 0%); Michelle Horton (corporate director, 0%); Kathy Wood (corporate director, 0%); Kenneth Wayne Clapp (corporate director, 0%); Paul Allen Gray (corporate director, 0%); Diana R Sullivan (corporate director, 0%); Margaret N Wiley (corporate director, 0%); Parker Daughtry Howell (corporate director, 0%); Heather Sloan (corporate officer); Amir Hajimomenian (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Susan Stone (corporate director, 0%); Lawrence Ray Bolick (corporate director, 0%); Shane Smith (corporate director, 0%); Julius W Abernethy (corporate director, 0%); Jody Street (corporate director, 0%); Ronald Bradley Thie (corporate director, 0%); Charles W Erdman (corporate director, 0%); Aimee N Reimann (corporate officer, 0%); Mills Hunter March (corporate director, 0%); Lee B Syria (corporate officer, 0%); Katrina Esterly (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Cory Scott Tobin (corporate director, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Lake Prince Center, Inc.Runs it (operational or managerial control)100%Oct 23, 2018

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 83.87% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold8 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 27 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 23434, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7.5; this one had 13.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.