Sentara Home Care Services - Chesapeake
A hospice in Chesapeake, Virginia 23320
535 Independence Parkway, Suite 500, Chesapeake, Virginia 23320. (757) 553-3000.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 18 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 3of 5 family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
18 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 25 hospices serving ZIP code 23320 had 6.5.
The last inspection on record was on Apr 23, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
18 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Apr 23, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care18 deficiencies
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))
“Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #14) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient 14: The spiritual care provider did not perform a SC assessment with in 5 days and there is no evidence the MSW or SN performed the assessment.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 226 words
“Upon patient record review, 6 of 19 (Patient #2,3,4,6,9,14) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: Patient 2: Upon home visit finding, the facility MAR contains Vit D2, Deep sea nasal spray, Flonase, Lidocaine, MiraLAX, Sodium Bicarbonate. These medications were not on the medication profile. Patient 3: The medication profile contains orders for Acetaminophen 500mg 2 tabs twice daily prn and Tylenol 650mg every 6 hours prn there is not a directive for maximum daily limit for acetaminophen. Patient 4: Upon home visit finding, the patient is not taking Sertraline and has not taken it for over a year per the caregiver. This medication remains on the medication profile Patient 6: The medication profile contains orders for Acetaminophen 500mg 2 tabs twice daily prn and Tylenol 650mg every 6 hours prn there is not a directive for maximum daily limit for acetaminophen. Patient 9: The medication profile contains an order for Depakote “take 1 tab by mouth Radiology and PVL freq” PVL and Freq are not approved abbreviations and is unclear. Patient 14: The medication profile contains Acetaminophen 325mg Q4 hours prn and Acetaminophen 500mg every 4 hours prn with no directive for maximum daily limit for acetaminophen.”
-
Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 203 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #7,11) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient 7: The agency policy “wound care at home” includes measuring a wound at each dressing change. The SN performed wound care on 4/14/26 and did not measure the wound. Patient 11: The current POC contains an order for site care to the biliary drains and JP drain for dressing changes weekly and prn if soiled. There is no evidence the JP or bilateral biliary drain sites were assessed during the visits or if the dressing change was completed by the SN or the family the weeks of 3/23/26, 3/24/26, 3/26/26. On 4/6/26 SN documented biliary drains flushed without resistance. There is no documentation regarding wound care to site or assessment of site. The last documentation regarding the JP drain was 3/26/26, the order for JP tube care remains active though there is not documentation since 3/26/26 of JP care being completed.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 161 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #13,14) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: Patient 13: The week of 12/1/25-2/22/26 there is an order for SN 1 visit a week which overlaps the order for SN 1 visit every week for 13 weeks 2/23/26-5/23/26 in the same Medicare week, there was a visit made on 2/23/26. The orders were not written correctly for the Medicare weeks. Patient 14: The SN visit schedules are overlapping the first order string is 2/12/26-4/12/26 for 1 visit every week for 10 weeks and then starting 3/2/26-4/12/26 2 visits every week for 7 weeks and then 1 visit every week for 4 weeks starting 3/26/26-4/18/26 this is causing the EMR to make it look like visits are missed though the visits were made. The orders were not written correctly for the Medicare weeks.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 381 words
“Upon patient record review, 11 of 19 (Patient #1,2,3,4,6,9,10,11,12,14,15) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 1: The current POC contains a care plan for foley catheter. There are no orders for size, frequency of change. Patient 2: Upon home visit finding, the facility MAR contains Vit D2, Deep sea nasal spray, Flonase, Lidocaine, MiraLAX,Sodium Bicarbonate. These medications were not on the POC. Patient 3: The current POC contains an order for a coude catheter with no balloon size. The POC contains orders for Acetaminophen 500mg 2 tabs twice daily prn and Tylenol 650mg every 6 hours prn there is not a directive for maximum daily limit for acetaminophen. Patient 4: Upon home visit finding, the patient is not taking Sertraline and has not taken it for over a year per the caregiver. This medication remains on the POC. Patient 6: The POC contains orders for Acetaminophen 500mg 2 tabs twice daily prn and Tylenol 650mg every 6 hours prn there is not a directive for maximum daily limit for acetaminophen. Patient 9: The POC 2/27/26 contains an order for Depakote “take 1 tab by mouth Radiology and PVL freq” PVL and Freq are not approved abbreviations and order is unclear. Patient 10: The current POC contains an order for Acetaminophen 650mg every 6 hours prn and 650mg 2 tabs daily prn with no directive for maximum daily limit for acetaminophen. Patient 11: The POC 4/7/26 contains an order for a coude foley catheter with no order for balloon size or order for frequency to change. The POC 3/20/26 contains an order for care of JP drains and biliary drains though does not state who is to perform the cares. Patient 12: The POC 3/7/26 contains duplicate orders for MSW from 3/7/26-3/11/26 for 1 visit every 5 days for 5 days. Patient 14: The POC 4/7/26 contains Acetaminophen 325mg Q4 hours prn and Acetaminophen 500mg every 4 hours prn with no directive for maximum daily limit for acetaminophen. Patient 15: The POC 8/12/25 contains Acetaminophen 650mg every 4 hours prn and Norco 5/325 1 tab every 4 hours prn with no directive for maximum daily limit for acetaminophen.”
-
Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))
The inspectors’ words, 96 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #10) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 10: The POC 12/18/25 contains an SBAR by the volunteer that patient requested a volunteer and that volunteer placement is pending until they find a volunteer to assign. There is no order frequency written on the POC for the volunteer. This SBAR continues on each POC update until current and no volunteer was ever scheduled.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 610 words
“Upon client record review, 11 of 19 (Patient #2,3,4,6,8,9,10,11,12,13,18) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 2: The POC 12/23/25-3/11/26 contains an order for chaplain 4 visits every 30 days for 79 days. The Chaplain had missed 1 visit from 12/23/25-1/21/26, 2 Missed visits 1/22/26-2/20/26 and 2 missed visits 2/21/26-3/11/26. There was no missed visit documentation or evidence of refusal. Patient 3: The POC contains orders for the MSW has to assess community resource needs every visit and on 12/15/25,1/24/26, 2/24/26 this was not completed. Patient 4: The POC 6/12/25 contains an order for SN visit ordered once weekly, from 7/6/25-7/12/25 there is no SN visit completed. The SN is ordered once weekly and no visit made the week of 2/22/26-2/28/26. There was no missed visit documentation or evidence of refusal. Patient 6: The current POC contains an order for MSW 1 visit every week, the week of 4/12/26-4/18/26 there was no visit made and no missed visit documentation or evidence of refusal. The POC 3/5/26 contains an order for the SN to measure MAC every visit, the MAC was not measured on 3/10/26 by the SN. Patient 8: The POC 5/4/25 contains orders for SN twice weekly, the week of 5/4/25-5/10/25 there was no second visit made. The week of 5/25/25-5/31/25 there was no second visit made. There is no missed visit documentation or evidence of refusal. The current POC contains an order to measure MAC every other visit by the SN. The SN measured MAC 3/26/26 and no further MAC measurements have been completed through current. The MSW documented on 3/31/26 “arrived with Licensed Massage Therapist”, there was no order for massage on the POC. Patient 9: The POC 2/27/26 contains an order for SN once weekly. The week of 3/22/26-3/28/26 there was no visit made with and no missed visit documentation and no evidence of refusal. The POC current has orders to assess skin integrity, wound, patient ID, every visit this was not completed on 3/17/26 and 3/30/26. On 4/8/26 the SN did not document against care plan intervention patient ID which is ordered every visit. Patient 10: The 3/15/26 POC contains an order for SN twice weekly, the week of 3/15-3/21/26 there was no second visit made with no missed visit documentation or evidence of refusal. Patient 11: The SN documented on 3/22/26 flushing the biliary drains with 5ml of NS, the order is to flush with 10ml NS. Patient 12: The SN documented on 3/26/26 patient had a fall and an abrasion to the right elbow. The SN educated patient to cover with a dry dressing or band aid. There was no order for this wound care. Patient 13: The POC contains orders on 4/2/26-5/23/26 for 7 SN visits every week for 8 weeks. There were 4 missed visits the week of 3/29/26-4/4/26. The week of 12/1/25-2/22/26 there is an order for 1 visit a week, there was no visit made the week of 2/22/26. There was no missed visit documentation or evidence of refusal. The POC contains orders for chaplain 11/30/25-2/22/26 for 4 visits every 30 days. There was no visit completed the week of 2/22/26-2/28/26 with no missed visit documentation or evidence of refusal. Patient 18: The POC 1/9/25 contains orders for SN 2 times a week for 13 weeks. There was only 1 visit made the week of 1/5/25-1/11/25. The POC contains an order for SN beginning 4/9/25-7/5/25 for SN 1 visit every week for 13 weeks, the week of 4/6/25-4/12/25 there was no visit made. There was no missed visit documentation or evidence of refusal.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 96 words
“Upon patient record review 2 of 19 (Patient #10,14) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services provided are based on all assessments of the patient and family needs. Patient 10: The POC 12/18/25 contains an SBAR by the volunteer that patient requested a volunteer and that volunteer placement is pending until they find a volunteer to assign. This SBAR continues on each POC update until current and no volunteer was ever scheduled. Patient 14: The SN documented on 3/30/26 that a volunteer was requested. There have been no volunteers sent.”
-
Program activities (42 CFR 418.58(c)(2))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice investigates all adverse events, incidents, accidents, variances or unusual occurrences that involve patient care and develops a plan of correction to prevent the same or similar event from occurring again. Patient 5: The medical record has evidence of a patient fall documented by the SN on 3/3/26. There was no incident report completed. Patient 12: The medical record has evidence of a patient near miss fall documented by the MSW on 3/26/26. There was no incident report completed.”
-
Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))
“Upon home visit observation 1 of 4 visits, there was no evidence the hospice follows acceptable standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases, including standard precautions. Patient 3: The RN performed wound care, cleansed wound and did not change gloves or wash hands prior to applying new clean dressing.”
-
Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #17) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: Patient 17: The patient expired 5/2/25 and there has been no bereavement counseling documented.”
-
Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c))
The inspectors’ words, 169 words
“Upon personnel record review, 1 of 15 (Personnel #7) did not have evidence in the personnel file that the following competency assessment was performed by the aide with a patient: (This standard applies to all Hospice Aides providing care/service who are directly employed by the hospice or through a contractual agreement.) ·Communication skills, including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, caregivers, and other hospice staff. ·Reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration ·Safe transfer techniques and ambulation. ·Normal range of motion and positioning ·Appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming that include-- ·(A) Bed bath ·(B) Sponge, tub, and shower bath ·(C) Shampoo, sink, tub, and bed ·(D) Nail and skin care ·(E) Oral hygiene ·(F) Toileting and elimination The other subject areas in this section may be evaluated through written examination, oral examination or after observation of a Hospice Aide with a patient. Personnel 7: The aide has not had a competency on reading and recording temperature, pulse and respirations.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 372 words
“Upon patient record review 7 of 19 (Patient #5,6,10,11,13,15,18) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: Patient 5: The aide POC contains an order for aide twice weekly. The week of 2/22/26-2/28/26 there was no second visit made that week. No evidence of refusal or missed visit documentation. Patient 6:The current aide POC contains orders for aide twice weekly the week of 2/22/26-2/28/26, The aide make only 1 visit. There is no missed visit documentation or evidence of refusal. Patient 10: There is a POC order 12/21/25 for aide visits 3 times weekly. The week of 12/28/25-1/3/26 there were no aide visits made with no missed visit documentation or evidence of refusal. The week of 1/11/16-1/17/26 there was only 2 visits made by the aide and is ordered 3 times a week. The week of 3/8/26-3/13/26 there was no third visit made, 3/22-3/28/26 there was no third visit made. There were no missed visit documentations or evidence of refusals. Patient 11: The aide POC 3/20/26 contains an order for 2 visits every week. The week of 3/20/26-3/21/26 there were no visits made. The week of 4/5/26-4/11/26 there was no third visit made, the week of 4/12/26-4/18/26 there was no third visit made. There was no missed visit documentations or evidence of refusals. Patient 13: The POC contains an order for aide visits twice weekly from 11/25/25-2/21/26. The week of 11/25-11/29/25 there was only 1 visit made. There was no missed visit documentation or evidence of refusal. Patient 15: The aide POC 9/9/25 contains an order for aide visits twice weekly. The aide did not make a second visit the week of 9/7-9/13/25. There was no missed visit documentation or evidence of refusal. Patient 18: The POC 1/9/25 contains an order for Aide care 2 visits every week for 13 weeks beginning 1/15/25-4/8/25, the weeks of 3/16-3/22/25 there were 2 visits missed, the week of 3/23/-3/29/25 there was 1 visit missed. There is an new order beginning 4/9/25-7/5/25 for 2 aide visits every week for 13 weeks. There was no visit completed the week of 4/9-4/12/25. There was no missed visit documentations completed at any of these missed visits or evidence of refusal.”
-
Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. Upon observation, The hospice 2025 volunteer hours were 3.85%.”
-
Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))
“Upon personnel record review, 1 of 15 (Personnel #9) did not have evidence that a skills competency assessment, specific to each discipline had been conducted for all personnel including volunteers initially during orientation. Personnel 9: The OT had an initial OT competency evaluated and signed off by an RN.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))
“Upon patient client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #3) did not have evidence that each patient record contains responses to medications, symptom management, treatments, and services. Patient 3: The SN performed wound care 3/6/26 through current, though did not document how the patient tolerated the wound care.”
-
Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))
The inspectors’ words, 332 words
“Upon patient client record review, 6 of 19 (Patient #1,3,7,9,11,14) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 1: The SN documented on 4/20/26 cleansing wound but did not document what it was cleansed with. It is unclear if the POC was followed. Patient 3: SN documenting 3/6/26 through current, performing wound care and cleansing wound, the nurse did not document what type of dressing was applied to the wound or what the wound was cleansed with. It is unclear if the POC was followed. Patient 7: The SN documented on 4/21/26 performing wound care as ordered. It is unclear if the SN followed the POC. Patient 9: The SN documented performing “wound care per orders” on 3/12/26, 3/30/26, 4/8/26 it is unclear if the POC was followed. The medical record contains active wounds on the nursing documentation notes with a start date of 1/12/26, patient was admitted to hospice 2/27/26. This should have been resolved when patient was admitted to hospice as this is a wound from the patient’s hospitalization record. Patient 11: The POC 4/7/26 has documentation by the SN performing a procedure on the biliary drains and the patient tolerated the procedure well. It is unclear the SN followed the POC for the biliary drain care ordered. The SN documented 3/23/26 “flushed drains with NS and patient tolerated without diff” It is unclear how much NS was used in the flushes and “Diff” is not an approved abbreviation. The SN documented 3/24/26, 3/26/26 “flushed drains” though did not state which drains were flushed or what the drains were flushed with. It is unclear the POC was followed. Patient 14: The MSW documented on 8/18/26 that patient’s religious background is Pescatarian. This is not a religious affiliation.”
-
Multiple locations (42 CFR 418.116(a))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the organizational chart matches the hospice’s information submitted to CMS and/or State licensing agencies for ownership and management personnel. The agency had a change in Administrator effective 9/21/25 and the State of Virginia was not contacted until 4/14/26 and CMS was notified 4/4/26. This is greater than the 30 days required compliance. There is no evidence ACHC was notified.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2026 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 18 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 9, 1984.
- Ownership: non-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 13% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 90% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 95% at home, 4% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 12.6 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 13% |
| Visits near death | 90.0% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Sentara Health owns 100% directly since Oct 26, 1982.
- 11 owners or officers are people: Melinda Hancock (corporate officer); Melinda Hancock (corporate director); Dennis Matheis (corporate officer); Angela H Morris (managing employee (on the payroll)); Keren R Slack-Ellis (managing employee (on the payroll)); Eric Conley (corporate officer); Eric Conley (corporate director); Earl Barnes (corporate director); Katrina M Melton (corporate officer); Katrina M Melton (corporate director); Sunil Patel (corporate director).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sentara Health | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Oct 26, 1982 |
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 77% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 80% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 98.29% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 47.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 25 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 23320, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6.5; this one had 18.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Sentara Home Care Services - Chesapeake This hospice | 18 |
| Comfort Care Home Health and Hospice | 6 |
| Medi Home Health and Hospice - Chesapeake | 1 |
| Amedisys Hospice Care | 9 |
| Trinity Hospice LLC | 8 |
| Acg Hospice | 2 |
| Albemarle Home Care and Hospice | 1 |
| Bon Secours Hospice | 7 |
| Personal Touch Home Care & Hospice-Newport News | 12 |
| Hospice of Virginia | 24 |
| Promedica Hospice (Virginia Beach) | 10 |
| Gentiva | Not given |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.