Hearth Record

Personal Touch Home Care & Hospice-Newport News

A hospice in Newport News, Virginia 23606

11817 Canon Boulevard, Suite 600, Newport News, Virginia 23606. (757) 855-1355.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

12 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 24 hospices serving ZIP code 23606 had 8.

The last inspection on record was on Nov 20, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

12 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Nov 20, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care12 deficiencies
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 91 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patients #1) did not contain evidence that the Hospice had developed an individualized written Plan of Care for each patient. The Plan of Care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions: Patient #1: The RN SOC assessment reflected that the patient had a pacemaker. This was not included on the POC.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 139 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #7,8) did not contain evidence that the Plan of Care included all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions; specifically including medications and treatments: Patient #7: The RN SOC assessment reflected that the patient had a 16F 10cc foley in place. The POC dated 10/08/25 to 01/05/26 contained only, “SN assess function of indwelling foley and drainage system.” This is an incomplete order, as it does not include the foley size, balloon, who in the home will be providing monitoring and maintenance of such foley, and the produced urine. Patient #8: A verbal order was obtained on 10/10/25 for, “CPAP minimum/maximum pressure range of 10-20 cm, with heated humidifier, and full face mask”. This treatment was not included on the IDG POC dated 11/07/25.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #8) did not contain evidence that a revised Plan of Care included information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment: Patient #8: The record reflects that this patient is on oxygen 2-4 lpm, continuous as needed for shortness of breath. This oxygen is not included on the most recent IDG POC dated 11/07/25.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #7) did not contain evidence that the IDG had ensured that the care and services were provided in accordance with the Plan of Care: Patient #7: A Physical Therapy evaluation was ordered to be conducted between 10/10 and 10/15/25, and was completed on 10/15/25. A subsequent verbal order dated 10/16/25 ordered a PT visit frequency of 2x per week x2. Only one PT visit was made the week of 10/11 to 10/17/25.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patients #13 and 14) did not contain evidence that the Hospice had offered Bereavement Counseling that included: Ensuring that the Bereavement services provided, followed the Bereavement Plan of Care, and reflected the identified needs of the bereaved: Patients #13 and 14: Date’s of death were on 12/27/24 and 10/14/24 respectively. There was no documented evidence that the hospice had followed the bereavement POC, as there was no evidence of a 6-month mailing having been sent to these patients.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 11 (Personnel #8) did not contain evidence that an Aide Skills Competency Evaluation had been conducted per CMS guidelines: Personnel #8: An aide skills competency evaluation was conducted between 10/16 and 10/20/25. However, the following skill(s) were not evaluated for while the aide was providing care to a patient or pseudo-patient: Reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration.”

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #10) did not contain evidence that the Hospice Aide had provided services that are: • Ordered by the Interdisciplinary Group • Included in the Plan of Care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the Hospice aide training Patient #10: The 90-day SOC POC ordered aide visits at a frequency of 2x per week. There was only (1) aide visit made/documented the week of 10/04-10/10/25.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 144 words

    “Upon patient record review 3 of 14 (Patients #2, 9, and 10) did not contain documented evidence that a Registered Nurse had made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the Hospice Aide, and to ensure that services ordered by the Hospice Interdisciplinary Group was meeting these patients’ needs: Patient #2: The first documented aide visit was made on 10/31/2025. As of the date of survey 11/19/25 there had been no aide supervisory visits documented. Patient #9: The first documented aide visit was made on 10/16/2025. As of the date of survey 11/19/25 there had been no aide supervisory visits documented. Patient #10: Multiple aide visits were made between 10/16/25 and 11/19/25. As of the date of survey 11/20/25 there had been no aide supervisory visits documented.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Medical director contract (42 CFR 418.102(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 102 words

    “Upon personnel and contract review, 1 of 2 (Alternate Medical Director) there was not evidence that the hospice had an employee or contracted individual, to fulfill the role(s) of both Medical Director and Alternate Medical Director. Upon interview with the Administrator, he reported that their Medical Director had resigned such position/role in 08/2025. At that time, the then Alternate Medical Director was re-contracted with to fulfil the Medical Director position; then leaving no one to fulfil the position/role of Alternate Medical Director. The Administrator reports that the hospice has been actively recruiting for this Alternate Medical Director position. This was corrected on-site.”

    Rule L0666. Standard-level.

  • Initial certification of terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 95 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #4) did not contain evidence that the Hospice had obtained, no later than 2 calendar days after Hospice care was initiated, an oral or written certification of the terminal illness by the Hospice Medical Director: Patient #4: SOC 07/30/25. The initial certification of terminal illness by the Medical Director had been dated by the physician as of 08/13/25. There was no evidence of an an oral or written certification of the terminal illness having been obtained no later than 2 calendar days after hospice care was initiated.”

    Rule L0667. Standard-level.

  • Recertification of the terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 318 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patients #4 and 6) did not contain evidence that before the recertification period for each patient, the Medical Director or Physician Designee had reviewed these patients’ clinical information and provided written documentation that it is anticipated that these patients’ life expectancy is 6 months or less: Patient #4: For the recertification period of 10/28-12/26/25, the hospice Medical Director or designee, had not completed the re-certification in a timely manner. The Medical Director had not dated his signature on this CTI form. Nor was there evidence of an an oral or written certification of the terminal illness having been obtained no later than 2 calendar days after hospice care was to be continued. Patient #6: For the recertification period of 03/17-05/15/25, the Medical Director had dated his signature on the CTI as 03/20/25. There was no evidence of an an oral or written certification of the terminal illness having been obtained no later than 2 calendar days after hospice care was to be continued. For the recertification period of 05/16-07/14/25, the Medical Director had dated his signature on the CTI as 06/06/25. There was no evidence of an an oral or written certification of the terminal illness having been obtained no later than 2 calendar days after hospice care was to be continued. For the recertification period of 07/15-09/12/25, the Medical Director had dated his signature on the CTI as 07/22/25. There was no evidence of an an oral or written certification of the terminal illness having been obtained no later than 2 calendar days after hospice care was to be continued. For the recertification period of 09/13-11/11/25, the Medical Director had not yet dated his signature on the CTI form, nor was there evidence of an an oral or written certification of the terminal illness having been obtained no later than 2 calendar days after hospice care was to be continued.”

    Rule L0668. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #11) did not contain evidence that the Discharge Summary included all CMS-required information: Patient #11: Discharged/Revoked 05/19/25. The DC Summary did not include the following content: The patient’s current plan of care.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 20, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care12 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Apr 5, 1995.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 8.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 91.2% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 94% at home, 5% in assisted living, 1% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day8.7 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.4%
Visits near death91.2% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Pt Intermediate Holding Inc. owns 100% directly since Dec 13, 2010.
  • 20 owners or officers are people: Robert Marx (owns 5% or more through other companies, 8.45%); Baruch Glaubach (corporate director); Joshua Woodruff (managing employee (on the payroll)); Tsiona Eliyahu (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Ronald J Spielberger (corporate officer); Frederik Liljewall (corporate director); Mitchel Aeder (corporate director); Ephraim Tennenbaum (corporate officer); Ephraim Tennenbaum (managing employee (on the payroll)); Todd Pinkus (corporate officer); Ephraim Berger (corporate director); Altory M Miranda (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Yitzy Hollander (corporate officer); Robert Marx (corporate officer); Robert Marx (corporate director); Terry Carpenter (managing employee (on the payroll)); Esther Muschel (corporate director); Jennifer Duke (managing employee (on the payroll)); Willie Davis (managing employee (on the payroll)); Miriam Schwartz (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Pt Intermediate Holding Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Dec 13, 2010
Midcap Financial Services, LLCHolds 5% or more security interest100%Jul 13, 2011
Personal Touch Holding Corp.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 13, 2011
Sg Pt LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies39.78%Sep 1, 2024
Robert Marx 2021 Family TrustOwns 5% or more through other companies12.24%Mar 5, 2024
Frances Marx 2021 Family TrustOwns 5% or more through other companies9.42%Apr 9, 2024
Robert Marx Pthc Tr Frances Marx TteeOwns 5% or more through other companies8.45%Nov 7, 2019
Shoshana E Berger 2021 TrustOwns 5% or more through other companies8.42%Mar 5, 2024
Lja Family Irrevocable TrustOwns 5% or more through other companies6.52%Apr 9, 2024
Frances Marx Pthc Tr Robert Marx TteeOwns 5% or more through other companies6.5%Nov 7, 2019

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 76% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 75% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 95.79% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 37% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 24 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 23606, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 12.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.