Athc-Hospice LLC
A hospice in Mechanicsville, Virginia 23111
8149 Walnut Grove Road, Mechanicsville, Virginia 23111. (804) 358-3480.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 6 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 4of 5 family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
6 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 25 hospices serving ZIP code 23111 had 7.
The last inspection on record was on Jul 31, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Jul 31, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner6 deficiencies
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 323 words
“It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care: includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness, including the following: measurable outcomes anticipated from implementing and coordinating the plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 19 (11%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that the written plan of care included individualized goals with measurable outcomes. CLINICAL RECORD 1: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/21/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the bladder. The initial Registered Nurse (RN) comprehensive assessment documented that the patient was receiving tramadol 50 mg every six hours as needed for pain, gabapentin 100 mg, two (2) tablets at night for neuropathy, and lidocaine 4% topical patch, apply one patch to the back of neck at bedtime and remove in the am. The patient was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. The plan of care dated 08/21/2024 through 07/30/2025 documented the patient’s goal: pain will be managed for a patient who is unable to report or articulate pain. The patient’s goal for pain did not include a measurable outcome. CLINICAL RECORD 6: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 05/30/2025 with a terminal diagnosis of fracture of the right pubis. The initial Registered Nurse (RN) comprehensive assessment dated 05/30/2025 documented the patient stated experiencing pain at “3-8/10.” The RN nursing visit on 07/30/2025 documented that the patient had pain in both wrists. The plan of care was reviewed for the dates of 05/30/2025-07/30/2025, documenting the patient’s goal: pain is managed for a patient who is unable to verbally report or articulate pain as evidenced by patient/caregiver report or visual observation. The patient’s goal for pain did not include a measurable outcome. In an interview on 07/30/2025, the Regional Compliance Officer stated that the goals were not individualized and did not include measurable outcomes.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 185 words
“It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care: includes drugs and treatment necessary to meet the needs of the patient. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 19 (5%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that the written plan of care included drugs and treatments necessary to meet the needs of the patient. CLINICAL RECORD 1: This patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/21/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the bladder. The initial Registered Nurse (RN) comprehensive assessment dated 08/21/2024 documented that the patient had a Foley catheter. The plan of care for the dates of 08/21/2024 through 11/05/2024 did not document orders for the care and maintenance of the Foley catheter. The plan of care, updated on 11/06/2024, ordered the assessment and management of the catheter but did not address the size of the catheter or how often it should be changed. During an interview on 07/30/2025, the Regional Compliance Officer stated that the care of the Foley catheter was not present in the plan of care.”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2)(i))
The inspectors’ words, 171 words
“It is required that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice per hospice regulation §418.26 (i.e., no longer terminally ill), the hospice forwards to the patient’s attending physician a copy of the hospice discharge summary. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 2 (50%) clinical records reviewed in which the patient was a live discharge, the hospice did not ensure that the discharge summary was forwarded to the patient’s attending physician. CLINICAL RECORD 16: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 07/27/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of diastolic congestive heart failure and revoked the hospice benefit on 08/14/2024. There was no documented evidence in the clinical record review that the discharge summary was forwarded to the patient’s attending physician. In an interview and a joint record review on 07/30/2025, the Regional Compliance Officer (RCO) stated that there was no documentation that the hospice forwarded the patient’s attending physician a copy of the hospice discharge summary.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3)(i))
The inspectors’ words, 228 words
“It is required that the designated IDG member provide the SNF/NF or ICF/IID with the following information for each patient/resident: the most recent hospice plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, interview and observation. In 1 of 1 (100%) home visits observed of a patient who resided in a skilled nursing facility (SNF), the agency did not ensure that the SNF received a copy of the patient’s most recent hospice plan of care. HOME VISIT 4/CLINICAL RECORD 4: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 06/30/2025 with a terminal diagnosis of end-stage heart failure. The patient resided in a SNF. During the home visit with the Registered Nurse (RN) [Personnel Record 4] on 07/29/2025, a review of the patient’s SNF hospice chart revealed no evidence of the patient’s most recent hospice plan of care. During an interview on 07/30/2025, the SNF Director of Nursing (DON) stated that this information was not included in the SNF hospice chart and that they had contacted the agency two weeks ago to request this missing documentation, with no response. The Regional Compliance Director was interviewed on 07/30/2025 and stated that the hospice agency did not have evidence that the most recent hospice plan of care was provided. The hospice agency emailed the most recent hospice plan of care to the SNF during the site visit.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3)(ii))
The inspectors’ words, 215 words
“It is required that the designated IDG member provides the SNF/NF or ICF/IID with the following information for each patient/resident: hospice election form and any advance directives. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, interview, and observation. In 1 of 1 (100%) home visits observed of a patient who resided in a skilled nursing facility (SNF), the agency did not ensure that the SNF was provided with the patient’s hospice election form. HOME VISIT 4/CLINICAL RECORD 4: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 06/30/2025 with a terminal diagnosis of end-stage heart failure. The patient resided in a SNF. During the home visit with the Registered Nurse (RN) [Personnel Record 4] on 07/29/2025, a review of the patient’s SNF hospice chart revealed no evidence of the patient’s hospice election form. During an interview on 07/30/2025, the SNF Director of Nursing (DON) stated that this information was not included in the SNF hospice chart and that they had contacted the agency two weeks ago to request this missing documentation, with no response. The Regional Compliance Director was interviewed on 07/30/2025 and stated that the hospice agency did not have evidence that the hospice election form was provided. The hospice agency emailed the hospice election form to the SNF during the site visit.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3)(iii))
The inspectors’ words, 225 words
“It is required that the designated IDG member provides the SNF/NF or ICF/IID with the following information for each patient/resident: physician certification and recertification of the terminal illness. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, interview, and observation. In 1 of 1 (100%) home visits observed of a patient who resided in a skilled nursing facility (SNF), the agency did not ensure that the SNF was provided with the physician certification and recertification of the terminal illness. HOME VISIT 4/CLINICAL RECORD 4: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 06/30/2025 with a terminal diagnosis of end-stage heart failure. The patient resided in a SNF. During the home visit with the Registered Nurse (RN) [Personnel Record 4] on 07/29/2025, a review of the patient’s SNF hospice chart revealed no evidence of the physician certification of terminal illness.. During an interview on 07/30/2025, the SNF Director of Nursing (DON) stated that this information was not included in the SNF hospice chart and that they had contacted the agency two weeks ago to request this missing documentation, with no response. The Regional Compliance Director was interviewed on 07/30/2025 and stated that the hospice agency did not have evidence that the physician certification of terminal illness was provided. The hospice agency emailed the physician certification of terminal illness to the SNF during the site visit.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2025 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner | 6 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Jan 12, 2012.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 15.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.7% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 96% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 43% at home, 52% in assisted living, 3% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 15.9 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 6.7% |
| Visits near death | 96.0% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Abode Healthcare, Inc. owns 100% directly since Jun 28, 2012.
- 9 owners or officers are people: Jay Koeper (corporate officer, 0%); Jay Koeper (corporate director, 0%); Jennifer Phipps (corporate officer); George J Mehfoud (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Margaret Sherry Pemberton (corporate officer); Margaret Sherry Pemberton (corporate director); Lauren Easter (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Michael A Mcmaude (corporate officer); Michael A Mcmaude (corporate director).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Silverton Abode Holding Corporation | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Aug 28, 2019 |
| Brightspring Health Holdings Corp | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Apr 16, 2021 |
| Silverton Intermediate Holdings, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Aug 28, 2019 |
| Phoenix Guarantor Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Apr 16, 2021 |
| Res-Care Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Apr 16, 2021 |
| Silverton Holdings, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Aug 28, 2019 |
| Phoenix Intermediate Holdings Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Apr 16, 2021 |
| Abode Healthcare, Inc. | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Jun 28, 2012 |
| Brightspring Health Services Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Apr 16, 2021 |
| Silverton Abode, LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Aug 28, 2019 |
| Kkr Phoenix Aggregator L.P. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 48% | Apr 16, 2021 |
| Kkr Americas Fund Xii LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 42% | Apr 16, 2021 |
| Walgreen Co | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 20% | Apr 16, 2021 |
| Walgreens Holding Company | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 20% | Apr 16, 2021 |
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 80% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 85% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 99.49% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 79.2% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 25 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 23111, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 6.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Athc-Hospice LLC This hospice | 6 |
| Bon Secours Hospice and Palliative Care | 4 |
| Crater Community Hospice, Inc. | 7 |
| Hospice of Virginia | 24 |
| Riverside Hospice | 6 |
| Gentiva | 15 |
| Bridge Hospice | 3 |
| Medi Home Hospice | 6 |
| Mountain Valley Hospice & Palliative Care | 2 |
| Amedisys Hospice of Richmond | 7 |
| Legacy Hospice | 9 |
| Ascend Hospice | 6 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.