Hearth Record

Legacy Hospice

A hospice in Charlottesville, Virginia 22903

500 Faulconer Drive, Suite 100, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903. (434) 970-7776.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

9 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 6 hospices serving ZIP code 22903 had 9.

The last inspection on record was on Sep 4, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

9 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Sep 4, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 106 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 23 (Patient #6) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #6: During patient visit to SNF resident, medication review noted 8/10/26 MiraLAX q12 hours as needed on LTCF medication profile, but not updated to hospice medication profile at the time of observation visit 8/31/26.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 102 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 23 (Patient #8, 14) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient #8, 14: There is no documented evidence of initial bereavement assessment by RN, MSW or SC as part of the comprehensive assessment..”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 109 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 23 (Patient #16, 19) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #16: Patient has Eliquis prescribed but no related problems, goals, interventions specific to bleeding precautions. Patient #19 Patient had oxygen prescribed with no related problems, goals, interventions specific to oxygen safety precautions.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 23 (Patient #4) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #4: Patient admitted 7/16/26 with 7/23/26 care plan problem for skin integrity that includes intervention to: Keep site clean and cover with barrier cream and coccyx dressing every 3 days pen soiling. The type of dressing is not specified.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 99 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 23 (Patient #16) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient #16: Patient readmitted to hospice 6/9/26 with hospice diagnosis of prostate cancer. Patient presented to emergency department 8/6/26 with diagnosis of UTI. Urology consult with subsequent indwelling foley catheter placement at that time. Catheter to be maintained by urologist according to SN note, but there was no update to orders, problems, goals and interventions related to indwelling catheter.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 108 words

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 23 (Patient #13) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #13: 8/17/26 visit note documents that SN inserted 14 Fr. 10 cc catheter with 15 ml returned, and next catheter change due date of 9/17/26. The note included contact with physician, but no order was documented at time of survey. Furthermore, there was a visit from later the same evening, a PRN visit to remove catheter per patient request. There was also no documented order for the removal of catheter upon surveyor’s initial review of record.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 146 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 23 (Patient #16) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient #16: Patient had foley catheter placement during 8/6/26 emergency department visit, with no subsequent update to hospice aide care plan.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. The annual volunteer cost report does not include evidence of minimum cost savings of 5 percent. The documented volunteer cost savings for calendar year 2025 is 2.5%.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 23 (Patient #4) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient #4: 8/31/26 SN visit documents wound care performed per care plan; however, wound care dressing type is not specified in care plan.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 4, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies cited
Oct 13, 2025Complaint inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health CareNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 12, 2009.
  • Ownership: other.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95.1% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 37% at home, 40% in assisted living, 23% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.7 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6%
Visits near death95.1% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Care Hospice, Inc. owns 100% directly since Jan 1, 2014.
  • 11 owners or officers are people: John B Hunter (owns 5% or more through other companies, 9.42%); Jesse Reo Moore (corporate officer); Jesse Reo Moore (managing employee (on the payroll)); Alyssa Matthews (managing employee (on the payroll)); John F Mccue (managing employee (under contract)); Bart K Valdez (corporate officer); Bart K Valdez (managing employee (on the payroll)); Grant Brown (corporate officer); Grant Brown (managing employee (on the payroll)); Dana K Reid (corporate officer); Dana K Reid (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • A private-equity firm is among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Care Hospice, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Jan 1, 2014
Care Hospice Acquisition, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Apr 13, 2017
Hospice Care Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 9, 2020
Hospice Care Holdings, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 9, 2020
Hospice Care Intermediate I, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 9, 2020
Hospice Care Intermediate II, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 9, 2020
Thl Equity Fund VIII Investors (Hospice Care), L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies29.16%Dec 9, 2020
Thomas H. Lee Parallel Fund VIII, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies27.44%Dec 9, 2020
Thomas H. Lee Equity Fund VIII, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies15.07%Dec 9, 2020

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 85% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 86% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 90.56% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 71.5% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 6 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 22903, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 9; this one had 9.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 6 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 22903
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Legacy Hospice This hospice9
Hospice of the Piedmont Inc.18
Medi Home Hospice6
Trinity Hospice7
Gentiva II9
Trinity Hospice10

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.