Hearth Record

Crater Community Hospice, Inc.

A hospice in Petersburg, Virginia 23805

3916 South Crater Road, Petersburg, Virginia 23805. (804) 526-4300.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 19 hospices serving ZIP code 23805 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Sep 25, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Sep 25, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner7 deficiencies
  • EP Training and Testing (42 CFR 418.113(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 777 words

    “It is required that the hospice maintains an emergency preparedness training program that is based on the emergency preparedness plan, risk assessment, policies and procedures, and the communication plan. The training program is reviewed and updated at least every two (2) years. The hospice EP training program includes the following: For all new hospice employees and those providing services under arrangement, initial training in EP policies and procedures consistent with their expected roles, demonstration of staff knowledge of emergency procedures, EP training of all hospice employees and individuals providing services under arrangement at least every two (2) years; more frequent training occurs if there is a significant update of EP policies and procedures, a periodic review and rehearsal of the hospice’s EP plan with hospice employees (including non-employee staff), with special emphasis placed on carrying out the procedures necessary to protect patients and others; and documentation of each training including the date(s), participants, and content. This standard was not met as evidenced by interview and personnel record review. In 10 of 10 (100%) personnel records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure that Emergency Preparedness training was provided to and documented for all staff per the agency’s policy. POLICY: The agency’s “Emergency Preparedness Plan (EPP): Training and Testing” policy (undated) stated in part, “B. All new staff will be trained on the EPP in orientation. C. Volunteers must be trained in the EPP. D. Emergency Preparedness training will be conducted annually. E. Documentation of the training on the EPP and annual emergency preparedness training will be maintained by the Director of Compliance and Quality Care.” PERSONNEL RECORD 1: A review of the Administrator’s personnel record (DOH 08/03/2020) revealed that there was no documented annual training on the agency’s Emergency Preparedness Plan per the agency’s policy. There was no documented evidence of training for 2022- 2024 and none year to date 2025. PERSONNEL RECORD 2: A review of the Director of Compliance’s personnel record (DOH 01/07/2019) revealed that there was no documented annual training on the agency’s Emergency Preparedness Plan per the agency’s policy. There was no documented evidence of training for 2022- 2024 and none year to date 2025. PERSONNEL RECORD 3: A review of the Director of Clinical Services’ personnel record (DOH 01/07/2019) revealed that there was no documented annual training on the agency’s Emergency Preparedness Plan per the agency’s policy. There was no documented evidence of training for 2022- 2024 and none year to date 2025. PERSONNEL RECORD 4: A review of the Registered Nurse’s personnel record (DOH 04/11/2022) revealed that there was no documented annual training on the agency’s Emergency Preparedness Plan per the agency’s policy. There was no documented evidence of training for 2023- 2024 and none year to date 2025. PERSONNEL RECORD 5: A review of the Hospice Aide’s personnel record (DOH 10/28/2014) revealed that there was no documented annual training on the agency’s Emergency Preparedness Plan per the agency’s policy. There was no documented evidence of training for 2022- 2024 and none year to date 2025. PERSONNEL RECORD 6: A review of the Social Worker’s personnel record (DOH 05/14/2007) revealed that there was no documented annual training on the agency’s Emergency Preparedness Plan per the agency’s policy. There was no documented evidence of training for 2022- 2024 and none year to date 2025. PERSONNEL RECORD 7: A review of the Spiritual Counselor’s personnel record (DOH 05/24/2021) revealed that there was no documented annual training on the agency’s Emergency Preparedness Plan per the agency’s policy. There was no documented evidence of training for 2022- 2024 and none year to date 2025. PERSONNEL RECORD 8: A review of the Medical Director’s personnel record (DOH 10/14/2021) revealed that there was no documented annual training on the agency’s Emergency Preparedness Plan per the agency’s policy. There was no documented evidence of training for 2022- 2024 and none year to date 2025. PERSONNEL RECORD 9: A review of the Volunteer Coordinator’s personnel record (DOH 02/07/2011) revealed that there was no documented annual training on the agency’s Emergency Preparedness Plan per the agency’s policy. There was no documented evidence of training for 2022- 2024 and none year to date 2025. PERSONNEL RECORD 10: A review of the Volunteer’s personnel record (DOH 05/16/2023) revealed that there was no documented annual training on the agency’s Emergency Preparedness Plan per the agency’s policy. There was no documented evidence of training for 2024 and none year to date 2025. The Director of Compliance (Personnel Record 2) was interviewed on 09/25/2025 and stated, “I don’t have any sign-in sheets or documented attendance for all employees on the Emergency plan. We have gone over it at staff meetings, but it’s not well documented.””

    Rule E0036. Standard-level.

  • Exercise of rights/respect for proprty/person (42 CFR 418.52(b)(1)(iii))

    The inspectors’ words, 2,529 words

    “It is required that the written Patient Bill of Rights includes the right to voice grievances to the hospice, CHAP, or a state entity without fear of discrimination or reprisal. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review and interview. In 18 of 19 (95%) clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure that patients were provided with contact information for CHAP for the purpose of voicing grievances. CLINICAL RECORD 1: A review of the clinical record revealed that the patient elected the hospice benefit and was admitted to hospice care on 01/22/2025. The signed and dated (01/22/2025 by the Power of Attorney) “Informed Consent” stated in part, “16-I understand I have a right to a timely process of review and resolution if any complaints regarding hospice services without fear of reprisal. These complaints should be made to the (Agency name and CEO name) at (phone number), or in writing, to the complaint unit of (the Department of Health-address and phone number). I understand I may also contact the State Ombudsman at (phone number), or in writing at the (State)Area on Aging - address.” The section of the consent regarding complaints did not include the contact name, address, phone number, or email for CHAP. CLINICAL RECORD 2: A review of the clinical record revealed that the patient elected the hospice benefit and was admitted to hospice care on 04/10/2025. The signed and dated (04/10/2025 by the Power of Attorney) “Informed Consent” stated in part, “16-I understand I have a right to a timely process of review and resolution if any complaints regarding hospice services without fear of reprisal. These complaints should be made to the (Agency name and CEO name) at (phone number), or in writing, to the complaint unit of (the Department of Health-address and phone number). I understand I may also contact the State Ombudsman at (phone number), or in writing at the (State)Area on Aging - address.” The section of the consent regarding complaints did not include the contact name, address, phone number, or email for CHAP. CLINICAL RECORD 5: A review of the clinical record revealed that the patient elected the hospice benefit and was admitted to hospice care on 06/05/2025. The signed and dated (06/05/2025 by the Power of Attorney) “Informed Consent” stated in part, “16-I understand I have a right to a timely process of review and resolution if any complaints regarding hospice services without fear of reprisal. These complaints should be made to the (Agency name and CEO name) at (phone number), or in writing, to the complaint unit of (the Department of Health-address and phone number). I understand I may also contact the State Ombudsman at (phone number), or in writing at the (State)Area on Aging - address.” The section of the consent regarding complaints did not include the contact name, address, phone number, or email for CHAP. CLINICAL RECORD 4: A review of the clinical record revealed that the patient elected the hospice benefit and was admitted to hospice care on 07/17/2025. The signed and dated (07/17/2025 by the patient) “Informed Consent” stated in part, “16-I understand I have a right to a timely process of review and resolution if any complaints regarding hospice services without fear of reprisal. These complaints should be made to the (Agency name and CEO name) at (phone number), or in writing, to the complaint unit of (the Department of Health-address and phone number). I understand I may also contact the State Ombudsman at (phone number), or in writing at the (State)Area on Aging - address.” The section of the consent regarding complaints did not include the contact name, address, phone number, or email for CHAP. CLINICAL RECORD 6: A review of the clinical record revealed that the patient elected the hospice benefit and was admitted to hospice care on 08/20/2025. The signed and dated (08/20/2025 by the patient’s spouse) “Informed Consent” stated in part, “16-I understand I have a right to a timely process of review and resolution if any complaints regarding hospice services without fear of reprisal. These complaints should be made to the (Agency name and CEO name) at (phone number), or in writing, to the complaint unit of (the Department of Health-address and phone number). I understand I may also contact the State Ombudsman at (phone number), or in writing at the (State)Area on Aging - address.” The section of the consent regarding complaints did not include the contact name, address, phone number, or email for CHAP. CLINICAL RECORD 7: A review of the clinical record revealed that the patient elected the hospice benefit and was admitted to hospice care on 04/13/2025. The signed and dated (04/13/2025 by the patient) “Informed Consent” stated in part, “16-I understand I have a right to a timely process of review and resolution if any complaints regarding hospice services without fear of reprisal. These complaints should be made to the (Agency name and CEO name) at (phone number), or in writing, to the complaint unit of (the Department of Health-address and phone number). I understand I may also contact the State Ombudsman at (phone number), or in writing at the (State)Area on Aging - address.” The section of the consent regarding complaints did not include the contact name, address, phone number, or email for CHAP. CLINICAL RECORD 8: A review of the clinical record revealed that the patient elected the hospice benefit and was admitted to hospice care on 07/30/2025. The signed and dated (07/30/2025 by the patient’s daughter) “Informed Consent” stated in part, “16-I understand I have a right to a timely process of review and resolution if any complaints regarding hospice services without fear of reprisal. These complaints should be made to the (Agency name and CEO name) at (phone number), or in writing, to the complaint unit of (the Department of Health-address and phone number). I understand I may also contact the State Ombudsman at (phone number), or in writing at the (State)Area on Aging - address.” The section of the consent regarding complaints did not include the contact name, address, phone number, or email for CHAP. CLINICAL RECORD 9: A review of the clinical record revealed that the patient elected the hospice benefit and was admitted to hospice care on 03/25/2025. The signed and dated (03/25/2025 by the patient’s daughter) “Informed Consent” stated in part, “16-I understand I have a right to a timely process of review and resolution if any complaints regarding hospice services without fear of reprisal. These complaints should be made to the (Agency name and CEO name) at (phone number), or in writing, to the complaint unit of (the Department of Health-address and phone number). I understand I may also contact the State Ombudsman at (phone number), or in writing at the (State)Area on Aging - address.” The section of the consent regarding complaints did not include the contact name, address, phone number, or email for CHAP. CLINICAL RECORD 10: A review of the clinical record revealed that the patient elected the hospice benefit and was admitted to hospice care on 07/31/2025. The signed and dated (07/31/2025 by the patient) “Informed Consent” stated in part, “16-I understand I have a right to a timely process of review and resolution if any complaints regarding hospice services without fear of reprisal. These complaints should be made to the (Agency name and CEO name) at (phone number), or in writing, to the complaint unit of (the Department of Health-address and phone number). I understand I may also contact the State Ombudsman at (phone number), or in writing at the (State)Area on Aging - address.” The section of the consent regarding complaints did not include the contact name, address, phone number, or email for CHAP. CLINICAL RECORD 11: A review of the clinical record revealed that the patient elected the hospice benefit and was admitted to hospice care on 08/09/2025. The signed and dated (08/09/2025 by the patient) “Informed Consent” stated in part, “16-I understand I have a right to a timely process of review and resolution if any complaints regarding hospice services without fear of reprisal. These complaints should be made to the (Agency name and CEO name) at (phone number), or in writing, to the complaint unit of (the Department of Health-address and phone number). I understand I may also contact the State Ombudsman at (phone number), or in writing at the (State)Area on Aging - address.” The section of the consent regarding complaints did not include the contact name, address, phone number, or email for CHAP. CLINICAL RECORD 12: A review of the clinical record revealed that the patient elected the hospice benefit and was admitted to hospice care on 08/26/2025. The signed and dated (08/26/2025 by the patient) “Informed Consent” stated in part, “16-I understand I have a right to a timely process of review and resolution if any complaints regarding hospice services without fear of reprisal. These complaints should be made to the (Agency name and CEO name) at (phone number), or in writing, to the complaint unit of (the Department of Health-address and phone number). I understand I may also contact the State Ombudsman at (phone number), or in writing at the (State)Area on Aging - address.” The section of the consent regarding complaints did not include the contact name, address, phone number, or email for CHAP. CLINICAL RECORD 13: A review of the clinical record revealed that the patient elected the hospice benefit and was admitted to hospice care on 02/28/2025. The signed and dated (02/28/2025 by the patient’s son) “Informed Consent” stated in part, “16-I understand I have a right to a timely process of review and resolution if any complaints regarding hospice services without fear of reprisal. These complaints should be made to the (Agency name and CEO name) at (phone number), or in writing, to the complaint unit of (the Department of Health-address and phone number). I understand I may also contact the State Ombudsman at (phone number), or in writing at the (State)Area on Aging - address.” The section of the consent regarding complaints did not include the contact name, address, phone number, or email for CHAP. CLINICAL RECORD 14: A review of the clinical record revealed that the patient elected the hospice benefit and was admitted to hospice care on 04/16/2025. The signed and dated (04/16/2025 by the patient’s son) “Informed Consent” stated in part, “16-I understand I have a right to a timely process of review and resolution if any complaints regarding hospice services without fear of reprisal. These complaints should be made to the (Agency name and CEO name) at (phone number), or in writing, to the complaint unit of (the Department of Health-address and phone number). I understand I may also contact the State Ombudsman at (phone number), or in writing at the (State)Area on Aging - address.” The section of the consent regarding complaints did not include the contact name, address, phone number, or email for CHAP. CLINICAL RECORD 15: A review of the clinical record revealed that the patient elected the hospice benefit and was admitted to hospice care on 01/16/2025. The signed and dated (01/16/2025 by the patient’s Power of Attorney) “Informed Consent” stated in part, “16-I understand I have a right to a timely process of review and resolution if any complaints regarding hospice services without fear of reprisal. These complaints should be made to the (Agency name and CEO name) at (phone number), or in writing, to the complaint unit of (the Department of Health-address and phone number). I understand I may also contact the State Ombudsman at (phone number), or in writing at the (State)Area on Aging - address.” The section of the consent regarding complaints did not include the contact name, address, phone number, or email for CHAP. CLINICAL RECORD 16: A review of the clinical record revealed that the patient elected the hospice benefit and was admitted to hospice care on 08/05/2025. The signed and dated (08/05/2025 by the patient) “Informed Consent” stated in part, “16-I understand I have a right to a timely process of review and resolution if any complaints regarding hospice services without fear of reprisal. These complaints should be made to the (Agency name and CEO name) at (phone number), or in writing, to the complaint unit of (the Department of Health-address and phone number). I understand I may also contact the State Ombudsman at (phone number), or in writing at the (State)Area on Aging - address.” The section of the consent regarding complaints did not include the contact name, address, phone number, or email for CHAP. CLINICAL RECORD 17: A review of the clinical record revealed that the patient elected the hospice benefit and was admitted to hospice care on 06/25/2025. The signed and dated (06/25/2025 by the patient’s spouse) “Informed Consent” stated in part, “16-I understand I have a right to a timely process of review and resolution if any complaints regarding hospice services without fear of reprisal. These complaints should be made to (Agency name and CEO name) at (phone number), or in writing, to the complaint unit of (the Department of Health-address and phone number). I understand I may also contact the State Ombudsman at (phone number), or in writing at the (State)Area on Aging - address.” The section of the consent regarding complaints did not include the contact name, address, phone number, or email for CHAP. CLINICAL RECORD 18: A review of the clinical record revealed that the patient elected the hospice benefit and was admitted to hospice care on 02/20/2025. The signed and dated (02/20/2025 by the patient’s Power of Attorney) “Informed Consent” stated in part, “16-I understand I have a right to a timely process of review and resolution if any complaints regarding hospice services without fear of reprisal. These complaints should be made to the (Agency name and CEO name) at (phone number), or in writing, to the complaint unit of (the Department of Health-address and phone number). I understand I may also contact the State Ombudsman at (phone number), or in writing at the (State)Area on Aging - address.” The section of the consent regarding complaints did not include the contact name, address, phone number, or email for CHAP. CLINICAL RECORD 19: A review of the clinical record revealed that the patient elected the hospice benefit and was admitted to hospice care on 03/10/2025. The signed and dated (03/10/2025 by the patient) “Informed Consent” stated in part, “16-I understand I have a right to a timely process of review and resolution if any complaints regarding hospice services without fear of reprisal. These complaints should be made to the (Agency name and CEO name) at (phone number), or in writing, to the complaint unit of (the Department of Health-address and phone number). I understand I may also contact the State Ombudsman at (phone number), or in writing at the (State)Area on Aging - address.” The section of the consent regarding complaints did not include the contact’s name, address, phone number, or email for CHAP. The Director of Compliance (Personnel Record 2) was interviewed on 09/23/2025 and stated, “We didn’t realize that CHAP contact information needed to be included in the booklet (for complaints).””

    Rule L0505. Standard-level.

  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 324 words

    “It is required that the written Patient Bill of Rights includes the right to receive information about the services covered under the hospice benefit. This standard was not met as evidenced by interview and clinical record review. In 1 of 1 (100%) discharged patient records where Medicare was the primary payor, the agency did not ensure that the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage was provided to the patient as outlined in the “Notice Instructions for the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC)” instructions (form CMS-10123). CLINICAL RECORD 15: A review of the clinical record revealed that the patient elected the hospice benefit and was admitted to hospice care on 01/16/2025. Medicare was the payor source for the hospice admission. The patient was recertified two (2) times. The patient was discharged from hospice care on 08/20/2025 because the patient no longer qualified for the hospice benefit. A documented and signed Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was present in the record dated 08/19/2025. The agency did not ensure that the NOMNC was provided to the patient at least two calendar days before Medicare-covered services ended. During the interview with the Compliance Director (Personnel Record 2), it was stated, “Many of the family members want the forms emailed to them and we don’t always get them back timely.” A review of the clinical record revealed that the patient elected the hospice benefit and was admitted to hospice care on 01/11/2024. Medicare was the payor source for the hospice admission. The patient was recertified four (4) times. The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) documented in the IDT team meeting note dated 10/17/24 that the patient had stabilized and that hospice services were no longer required. The patient was discharged from hospice care on 10/28/2024. A documented and signed Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was present in the record dated 10/28/2024. The agency did not ensure that the NOMNC was provided to the patient at least two calendar days before Medicare-covered services ended.”

    Rule L0518. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 319 words

    “It is required that the comprehensive assessment includes an initial bereavement assessment of the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals, focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and considered in the bereavement plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 14 (14%) clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure that an initial bereavement assessment was completed as part of the comprehensive assessment. POLICY: The agency’s policy “Bereavement Services” (Policy Number PFC.B30, dated 10/13/2022) stated in part, “6. The hospice nurse or social worker may perform the initial bereavement assessment on admission.” CLINICAL RECORD 16: A review of the clinical record revealed that the Registered Nurse (RN) completed the initial nursing assessment on 08/25/2025. The RN’s note included documentation that stated, “Bereavement Risk Assessment: Risk assessment completed: No. Reason Bereavement Risk Assessment not completed: Other: to be completed.” There were no orders on the plan of care (POC) for Social Work services, as the patient declined. There was no documented initial bereavement risk assessment in the clinical record. CLINICAL RECORD 17: A review of the clinical record revealed that the Registered Nurse (RN) completed the initial nursing assessment on 06/25/2025. The RN’s note included documentation that stated, “Bereavement Risk Assessment: Risk assessment completed: No. Reason Bereavement Risk Assessment not completed: Other: TO BE COMPLETED BY SOCIAL WORKER.” There were no orders on the plan of care (POC) for Social Work services, as the patient declined. There was no documented initial bereavement risk assessment in the clinical record. The Bereavement Coordinator (BC) (Personnel Record 7) reviewed the records and was interviewed on 09/24/2025. The BC confirmed that the initial bereavement assessments were not completed as part of the comprehensive assessments.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 317 words

    “It is required that the hospice follows accepted standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable disease, including the use of standard precautions, such as hand hygiene, use of gloves, mask, eye protection, or face shield depending on anticipated exposure, safe handling of equipment in the patient’s care environment if it is likely to have been contaminated with body fluids, safe handling of soiled items in the patient’s care environment, and other requirements of applicable state and federal law and regulation. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review, interview, and observation. In 1 of 4 (25%) home visit observation visits revealed the agency did not ensure that clinical staff disinfected equipment per the agency’s policy. POLICY: The agency’s “Infection Control - Standard and Transmission based precautions” policy (Policy CES.I55 - dated 04/22/2025) stated in part, “Procedures: 1. All Hospice staff are required to use standard precautions in the care of all hospice patients, regardless of diagnosis or presumed infection status. Standard precautions include but are not limited to: e. Cleaning and disinfecting contaminated surfaces, equipment, and other objects in accordance with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) standards. HOME VISIT 4: A home observation visit was conducted on 09/23/2025 with the Social Worker (SW). During the visit, the SW handed the computer tablet to the patient’s daughter for her to sign. The patient’s daughter held the tablet and signed her name with her finger on the screen. The SW retrieved the tablet from the daughter, closed the tablet’s cover, and concluded the home visit. The SW did not disinfect the tablet or the screen after it was handled by the patient’s daughter. The SW did not follow the agency’s policy on cleaning and disinfecting contaminated surfaces. The Compliance Director (Personnel Record 2) was interviewed on 09/23/2025 and stated, “The tablet should be disinfected each time after patient or family contact.””

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1)(iv))

    The inspectors’ words, 541 words

    “It is required that counseling services include an organized program for providing bereavement services delivered by or under the supervision of a qualified professional with experience or education in grief or loss counseling. Bereavement services are available to the family and other individuals up to one (1) year following the death of the patient. Bereavement counseling extends to residents of a SNF/NF (skilled nursing facility/nursing facility) or ICF/IID (intermediate care facility/Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities) when appropriate and identified in the bereavement plan of care. The bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved per a bereavement plan of care that includes the types of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review, and interview. In 3 of 3 (100%) discharge records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure that the bereavement plan of care included the types of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery. POLICY: The agency’s policy “Bereavement Care Planning” (Policy Number PFC.B10, dated 09/07/2022) stated in part, “5. The bereavement plan of care reflects the assessed need of the bereaved and notes the kind of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of delivery.” POLICY: The agency’s policy “Bereavement - Files” (Policy Number PFC.B15, dated 11/22/2022) stated in part, “2. The bereavement file contains a. The bereavement risk assessment(s) and care plans(s) for the person(s) for whom the hospice will provide bereavement services; and b. Bereavement notes documenting all services to and contact with the bereaved person(s).” CLINICAL RECORD 17: A review of the clinical record revealed that the patient elected the hospice benefit and was admitted to hospice care on 06/25/2025. There was no initial bereavement assessment documented during the initial comprehensive assessment dated 06/25/2025. The patient died on 08/13/2025. A bereavement plan of care did not address the needs of the bereaved and did not specify the type of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of delivery, as per the agency’s policy. CLINICAL RECORD 18: A review of the clinical record revealed that the patient elected the hospice benefit and was admitted to hospice care on 02/20/2025. An initial bereavement assessment was documented during the comprehensive assessment dated 02/20/2025. The risk assessment was documented as having a “low risk” rating. The patient died on 04/03/2025. A bereavement plan of care did not address the needs of the bereaved and did not specify the type of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of delivery, as per the agency’s policy. CLINICAL RECORD 19: A review of the clinical record revealed that the patient elected the hospice benefit and was admitted to hospice care on 03/10/2025. An initial bereavement assessment was documented during the comprehensive assessment dated 03/10/2025. The risk assessment was documented as having a “low risk” rating. The patient died on 07/12/2025. A bereavement plan of care did not address the needs of the bereaved and did not specify the type of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of delivery, as per the agency’s policy. The Bereavement Coordinator (Personnel Record 7) was interviewed on 09/24/2025 and stated, “We don’t have a specific bereavement care plan for each of the bereaved.””

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 268 words

    “It is required that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice per hospice regulation §418.26 (i.e., no longer terminally ill), the hospice forwards to the patient’s attending physician a copy of the hospice discharge summary, and the patient’s record, if requested. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 2 (100%) discharge records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure that the discharge summary was sent to the patient’s community primary care provider following discharge or revocation of services. CLINICAL RECORD 15: A review of the clinical record revealed that the patient elected the hospice benefit and was admitted to hospice service on 01/16/2025. The patient was recertified twice and was discharged on 08/20/2025 because the patient no longer met hospice criteria. A discharge summary was present in the clinical record, but there was no documentation that it was sent to the patient’s attending physician. CLINICAL RECORD 16: A review of the clinical record revealed that the patient elected the hospice benefit and was admitted to hospice service on 08/05/2025. The patient revoked the hospice benefit on and was discharged on 08/16/2025. A discharge summary was present in the clinical record, but there was no documentation that it was sent to the patient’s attending physician. The Director of Compliance (Personnel Record 2) reviewed the records and validated that the Discharge Summaries were not sent to the patients’ attending physicians. The Director of Compliance (Personnel Record 2) stated, “There would be documentation if the summaries were sent. There is no documentation in these records.””

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 25, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner7 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Dec 7, 1995.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 14.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.3% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 96.5% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 53% at home, 36% in assisted living, 10% in a nursing facility, 1% in a hospital.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day14.4 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5.3%
Visits near death96.5% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 14 owners or officers are people: Zachary C Holt (corporate officer, 80%); Nancy Odum (corporate director, 1.67%); Emily Jane Elliot (corporate director, 1.67%); Brenda D Mitchell (corporate director, 1.67%); Richard Weis (corporate director, 1.67%); Rita Baldwin (corporate officer, 1.67%); David Merritt (corporate director, 1.67%); Penny Nunnally (corporate director, 1.67%); Ernest Yerly (corporate officer, 1.67%); Joann C Glazier (corporate director, 1.67%); Jeanne E Holmes (corporate officer, 1.67%); Robert Huffman (corporate director, 1.67%); Linda J Maitland (managing employee (on the payroll), 1.63%); Lashonda Chambers (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 88% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 89% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 89.16% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 72.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 55 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 19 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 23805, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 7.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.