Hearth Record

Gentiva

A hospice in Richmond, Virginia 23236

808 Moorefield Park Drive, Moorefield II, # 113, Richmond, Virginia 23236. (804) 290-4300.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 15 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

15 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 24 hospices serving ZIP code 23236 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Nov 16, 2023: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

15 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

15 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Nov 16, 2023: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care15 deficiencies
  • EP Testing Requirements (42 CFR 418.113(d)(2))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the agency has conducted exercises to test the emergency plan every two years. There was not evidence of a full-scale exercise that is community-based every two years. The only emergency plan activation was in Jan of 2023 for an IT crash.”

    Rule E0039. Standard-level.

  • Exercise of rights/respect for proprty/person (42 CFR 418.52(b)(4)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 131 words

    “Upon observation, and record review there was not evidence that all alleged violations involving mistreatment, neglect, or verbal, mental, sexual and physical abuse, including injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of patient property by anyone furnishing services on behalf of the hospice, are reported immediately to the Administrator or appropriate designee. Patient #6: Nurse documentation dated 9/13/23 indicated that the patient was on a respite stay at a SNF and the patient told the hospice nurse that she had been in New York and was raped. A visit by the NP on 9/15/23 revealed the same verbiage but the NP also indicated that the patient was having periods of confusion and forgetfulness. There was not evidence that the Administrator of the SNF or the Hospice Administrator was notified of the claim.”

    Rule L0508. Standard-level.

  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 105 words

    “Upon patient record review 3 of 19 records (Patient #6,#9,#10) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient #6: The patient was admitted on 4/14/23. The record indicated that the spiritual assessment was completed on 4/20/23. Patient #9: The patient was admitted on 5/26/23. The record indicated that the spiritual assessment was completed on 6/1/23. Patient #10: The patient was admitted on 5/10/23. The record indicated that the spiritual assessment was completed on 5/16/23.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 19 records (Patient #2,#4) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient #2,#4: There was not evidence of a spiritual assessment.”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 189 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 records (Patient #6,#8,#12) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #6: The medication profile contained Oxygen 3L/min via nasal cannula. There was not evidence of prn in the order and there was not evidence that the patient was wearing oxygen from 10/1/23 to current. Corrected on site. Patient #8: The record indicated oxygen at 2L/min continuous via nasal cannula, dated 9/30/23. From 11/2/23 to current, nurse documentation indicated that oxygen was not in use and the patient was not short of breath. There was not evidence the oxygen was changed to prn or discontinued. Corrected on site. Patient #12: The record indicated for Miralax 17 Gm powder, 1 daily prn if no BM in 3 days. There was not evidence of a diluent. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 139 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 records (Patient #8,#11,#13) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient #8: The patient was admitted on 9/30/23. The record indicated that the bereavement assessment was not completed until 10/6/23. Patient #11: The patient was admitted on 8/11/23. The record indicated that the bereavement assessment was not completed until 8/31/23. Patient #13: The patient was admitted on 6/27/23. The record indicated that the bereavement assessment was not completed until 7/5/23.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 115 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 records (Patient #18) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse ensured continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and coordinated activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient #18: The record indicated a call through triage on 4/29/23 at 1658 that the patient’s oxygen saturation was 64%, heart rate 31, and the patient was declining. The facility requested a visit by the nurse. There was not evidence of a visit by a nurse until 4/30/23 at 1009. The patient expired on 5/1/23 at 0621.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 127 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 records (Patient #14) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient that reflects patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. patient #14: The patient was admitted with a diagnosis of ALS. The record indicated that she had difficulty eating/swallowing, she had some paralysis and had a gastrostomy tube. There was not evidence that the plan of care reflected patient/family goals and interventions based on the patient’s neurological problems or the gastrostomy tube. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 164 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 records (Patient #6,#8,#12) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #6: The record contained an order for Oxygen 3L/min via nasal cannula, dated 6/28/23. There was not evidence of prn in the order and there was not evidence that the patient was wearing oxygen from 10/1/23 to current. Corrected on site. Patient #8: The record indicated oxygen at 2L/min continuous via nasal cannula, dated 9/30/23. From 11/2/23 to current, nurse documentation indicated that oxygen was not in use and the patient was not short of breath. There was not evidence the oxygen was changed to prn or discontinued. Corrected on site. Patient #12: The record indicated an order for Miralax 17 Gm powder, 1 daily prn if no BM in 3 days, dated 10/30/23. There was not evidence of a diluent. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 records (Patient #6) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient #6: The patient’s level of care was changed to respite on 9/7/23 and then again on 9/13/23. There was not evidence that goals for respite were resolved on the plan of care. Respite remained active. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 228 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 records (Patient #2,#8,#13) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions including alerts and precautions for a hospice aide that must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care specifically indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. Patient #2: Nurse recertification documentation dated 8/31/23 and 10/31/23 indicated that the patient remains a high fall risk. In addition, the record indicated that the patient had a fall during the certification period of 5/22/23-7/20/23. There was not evidence that fall risk was on the aide plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient #8: The aide plan of care indicated to provide routine catheter care at every visit. From 10/24/23 to current, there was not evidence that the patient had a catheter in place. Corrected on site. Patient #13: The record indicated that the patient was on Eliquis 5mg daily. There was not evidence that bleeding precautions were on the aide plan of care. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 19 records (Patient #14) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care Patient #14: The aide plan of care indicated for all assigned tasks to be completed at every visit. For the date of 10/20/23, the aide documentation for transfer patient from bed to chair, transfer patient from chair to bed, assist with feeding and linen change revealed, ‘per frequency not needed.’”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 19 records (Patient #11) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient #11: The record indicated that the patient/representative wished to receive the Patient Notification of Hospice Non-Covered Items, Services, and Drugs. The election statement indicated that the requested date was 8/11/23. The Notification document indicated that it was furnished and signed on 8/18/23. A second document was requested on 10/11/23, and the furnished date was 10/19/23.”

    Rule L0673. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 19 records (Patient #15) did not have evidence that the discharge summary includes all required information. Patient #15: There was not evidence of a summary of the patient’s stay, including treatments, symptoms and pain management.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 117 words

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 19 records (Patient #8) did not have evidence that the hospice plan of care identifies the care and services that are needed and specifically identify which provider (nursing facility or hospice) is responsible for performing the respective functions that have been agreed upon and included in the hospice plan of care. patient #8: The record indicated an order for the hospice nurse/or facility nurse to provide wound care to the sacral area wound BID. Cleanse with Dakin’s solution, sprinkle with collagen particles to wound bed, pack with Dakin’s soaked gauze. Cover with foam dressing. There was not specific evidence of which provider was to perform the wound care. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0774. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 16, 2023Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care15 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 13, 2003.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 10.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 92.4% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 83% at home, 5% in assisted living, 11% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day10.5 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5.8%
Visits near death92.4% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Odyssey Healthcare LP, LLC owns 99% directly since Nov 13, 2003; Odyssey Healthcare Gp, LLC owns 1% directly since Nov 13, 2003.
  • Curo Health Services LLC runs it.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); Kimaada Bradley (managing employee (on the payroll)); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Nov 13, 2003
Charlotte Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Falcon Hospice, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Charlotte Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare Holding CompanyOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Nov 13, 2003
Kah Hospice Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Group Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare LP, LLCOwns 5% or more directly99%Nov 13, 2003
Odyssey Healthcare LP, LLCLimited partner99%Nov 13, 2003
Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare Gp, LLCOwns 5% or more directly1%Nov 13, 2003
Odyssey Healthcare Gp, LLCGeneral partner1%Nov 13, 2003
Curo Health Services LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)Jul 11, 2018

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 82% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 82% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 97.09% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 62.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 24 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 23236, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 15.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.