Hearth Record

James River Home Health and Hospice

A hospice in Richmond, Virginia 23236

9100 Arboretum Parkway Suite 290, Richmond, Virginia 23236. (804) 272-3300.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

9 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 24 hospices serving ZIP code 23236 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 10, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

9 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 10, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 192 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #1,#2,#11) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient#1: The medication profile indicates there are active medications including ipratropium 0.5mg-albuterol 3ml nebulizer every 4 hours for shortness of breath PRN and for albuterol sulfate 2.5mg/3ml nebulizer every 4 hours for shortness of breath PRN. There is no evidence of instructions on when to take which medication or if they can be taken close together. Patient#2: The patient’s medication profile includes polyethylene glycol and senna 8.6mg. Both medications are ordered as PRN for constipation. There is no evidence of instructions on which medication to take first or if patient can take together. Patient#11: The medication profile indicates patient is using thera calazinc 3%-20% topical two times per week per instructions. There is no evidence of a specified area of application.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 130 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #2,#5) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient#2: On 5/28/26 the aide documented the patient had a bruise to arm and was holding arm like it was hurting. Aide also documented reporting this to the RN. There is no evidence of documentation that the RN followed up regarding this. Patient#5: The record indicates patient has wound to right heel which required treatment starting on 4/17/26. There is no evidence of wound measurements from 4/19/26 - 5/18/26.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 243 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 19 (Patient #5,#6,#8,#12,#14) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient#5: The record indicates patient takes medication for seizures and has a wound to the right heel. There is no evidence of seizure precautions or wound care problems goals or interventions on the plan of care. Patient#6: On 3/23/26 the nurse documents the patient requires soft foods and she educated on aspiration precautions. There is no evidence of aspiration precautions on the plan of care. Patient#8: The record indicates the patient is receiving MSW services. However, there is no evidence of goals or interventions for the MSW on the plan of care. Patient#12: The record indicates the patient is receiving chaplain and social worker services. The initial plan of care states MSW and chaplain to develop plan of care. There is no evidence of goals or interventions on the plan of care for MSW or chaplain. Patient#14: The record indicates the patient has a Trilogy in the home. There is no evidence of problems goals of interventions related to respiratory or the Trilogy on the plan of care.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 185 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #1,#2,#5,#11) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient#1: The record indicates there are active orders for ipratropium 0.5mg-albuterol 3ml nebulizer every 4 hours for shortness of breath PRN and for albuterol sulfate 2.5mg/3ml nebulizer every 4 hours for shortness of breath PRN. There is no evidence of instructions on when to take which medication or if they can be taken close together. Patient#2: The patient is ordered polyethylene glycol and senna 8.6mg. Both medications are ordered as PRN for constipation. There is no evidence of instructions on which medication to take first or if patient can take together. Patient#5: There is no evidence of an order for wound care for right heel wound. The nurse does document that the facility has an order. Patient#11: The medication order indicates patient has an active order for thera calazinc 3%-20% topical two times per week per instructions. There is no evidence of a specified area of application.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 181 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #2,#3,#6,#12) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient#2: The record indicates patient uses a nebulizer and a wheelchair. There is no evidence of a nebulizer or wheelchair on a DME/supply order for the plan of care. Patient#3:The record indicates the patient uses oxygen, wheelchair, and hospital bed. There is no evidence of a DME order on the plan of care for these items. There is evidence of an active order on the plan of care for wound care supplies. However, the record indicates patient no longer uses wound care supplies. Patient#6: The record indicates the patient uses a hospital bed, over the bed table, and a walker. There is no evidence of an order that includes these items on the plan of care. Patient#12: The record indicates the patient is wheelchair bound. However, there is no evidence of a wheelchair on a DME order for the plan of care.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 262 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #5,#6,#12) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care Patient#5: The record indicates on 6/3/26 nurse documented patient having increased cough and aspiration with all meals. It is also documented that patient refuses puree foods and thickened liquids. It is also documented on 5/7/26 and 5/18/26 that nurse to develop plan of care for wound. There is no evidence of any updates on the plan of care regarding these patient changes or needs. Patient#6: On 5/27/26 the nurse documents patient has increase in muscle jerking that now requires patient to take muscle relaxer. On 6/5/26 the nurse documents patient having issues with balance that now requires patient to use a walker and the patient is having trouble swallowing. There is no evidence of updates to the plan of care regarding these changes in patient condition/needs. Patient#12: The nurse documents on IDG 6/3/26 that patient now requires use of compression stockings. Nurse also documents on 4/21/26 patient having increased edema to legs, and on 5/7/26 documents patient having right foot edema. It is also documented that patient has a history of bipolar. One 4/13/26 the nurse documents patient has been combative with staff at adult daycare, on 5/12/26 documents uncooperative episodes reported by daycare staff, and on 5/19/26 patient having yelling outburst with daycare staff. There is no evidence of updates made to plan of care regarding these changes in patient condition/needs.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 253 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 19 (Patient #1,#5,#7,#11,#13) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient#1: The record indicates patient takes medication for anti-coagulation and seizures. there is no evidence of bleeding precautions or seizure precautions on the aide plan of care. Patient#5: There is no evidence of fall precautions, seizure precautions, skin precautions, or aspirations precautions on the aide plan of care. There is also no evidence of wound notification on the aide plan of care. Patient#7: There is no evidence of oxygen precautions, skin precautions, or aspiration precautions on the aide plan of care. Patient#11: There is no evidence of fall precautions or skin precautions on the aide plan of care. There is no evidence of wound notification on the aide plan of care. Patient#13: There is no evidence of fall precautions or oxygen precautions on the aide plan of care.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(6))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #4) did not have evidence that each patient record contains Advance Directives. Patient#4: Upon review of the record, it was noted that the DNR was signed by a representative for the patient. However, at the top of the form it was checked that patient was capable of making decisions, which requires the patient to sign. Consent and EOB were signed by the patients daughter as patient is diagnosed with Alzheimer’s.”

    Rule L0677. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 95 words

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #5) did not have evidence that the hospice plan of care identifies the care and services that are needed and specifically identify which provider (nursing facility or hospice) is responsible for performing the respective functions that have been agreed upon and included in the hospice plan of care. Patient#5: There is no evidence regarding the wound care for patient that identifies which provider is responsible for this care on the plan of care. There is no evidence of collaboration with hospice and facility regarding the wound care.”

    Rule L0774. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 10, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 15, 2017.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.2% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 91.2% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 71% at home, 20% in assisted living, 7% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility, 1% in a hospital.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.2%
Visits near death91.2% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • James River Intermediate Holdings, LLC owns 100% directly since Jan 23, 2020.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Melissa Southerland (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Melissa Southerland (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Torino Jennings (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Shane M Maley (corporate officer); Shane M Maley (corporate director); Shane M Maley (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Tricia W. Rowsey (managing employee (on the payroll)); Tricia W. Rowsey (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
James River Intermediate Holdings, LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Jan 23, 2020
James River Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 7, 2024
James River Holdco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 7, 2024

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 78% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 79% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 98.39% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 55.4% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 24 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 23236, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 9.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.