Hearth Record

Divine Care Hospice LLC

A hospice in Carrollton, Texas 75006

1500 East Beltline Road, Suite B, Carrollton, Texas 75006. (469) 463-4302.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

9 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 84 hospices serving ZIP code 75006 had 3.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 10, 2025: an initial inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

9 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Apr 10, 2025: initial inspection by The Joint Commission9 deficiencies
  • Plan Based on All Hazards Risk Assessment (42 CFR 418.113(a)(1))

    “Observed in Emergency Management Session. The Surveyor noted the organization’s hazard vulnerability analysis did not include emerging infections. This was confirmed with the Administrator”

    Rule E0006. Standard-level.

  • EP Testing Requirements (42 CFR 418.113(d)(3)(iii))

    “Observed in Emergency Management Session. The organization reviews and makes necessary updates based on after-action reports or opportunities for improvement as evidenced by opportunities for improvement was not completed and this was observed and validated by the Administrator”

    Rule E0039. Standard-level.

  • Patient outcome measures (42 CFR 418.54(e)(2))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 6 patient records reviewed, The organization failed to maintain complete and accurate patient records as evidenced in RRHV#2 Five nursing notes did not have oxygen level documented , 6th nursing note stated 2 litres of oxygen and patient was ordered 4 litres via N/C and patient was ordered IV antibiotics via PICC line at SOC for 10 days, there was only one note at SOC and no further documentation this was observed and validated by the Administrator”

    Rule L0535. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 231 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 6 of 6 patient records reviewed, The organization written plan of care failed to be based on the patient’s goals and the time frames, settings, and services required to meet those goals, while some goals were measurable and had time frames, not all goals had realistic time frames as identified in RRHV#1 patient had lower ext edema/dyspnea and goals were that patient will be free from complications as related to cardiovascular system by end of cert period. RRDC#1: Pain is rated 5 and using pain AD guarding behavior, intervention teach change in position and observe verbal cues /pain behavior, goals goal for pain is 0 and for CG to verbalize understanding on assistance with muscle and generalized relaxation, e.g back rubs, no time frame. RRDC#3 In POC, patient is anxious, interventions to teach comfort and symptom control and outcome symptoms of anxiety are decreased, pain is 5 and interventions to teach comfort measures and medication regime to control pain, monitor pain control, outcomes : symptoms managed, compliance with medication regimen and pain is 0. RRHV#2: Dyspnea identified in interventions oxygen and teach comfort and symptom control, goals that O2 sat will be maintained above 90%. RRHV#3: Patient is incontinent of urine and goal is to maintain clear yellow urine and output of at least 30mls/hour within 24 hours, this was observed and validated by the Administrator”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 274 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 6 patient records reviewed, The organization failed to include all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions in the POC as evidenced in RRHV#1:Tylenol 325 mgs 1-2 tabs daily PRN and docusate sodium 1 tab daily/PRN with no indication. RRDC#1:Oxygen 2 litre via N/C not identified whether continuous or PRN and Tylenol 325 mgs q 8 hours for pain PRN with no indication. RRDC#2: Tylenol ES 300mgs 2 tabs po q 8 hours PRN, Fleets enema ordered per rectum q 24 hours/PRN and O2 @ 2 - 4 L via N/C PRN with no indications. RRDC#3: O2 ordered 2 litre PRN and Tylenol 325 mgs 2 tabs q 8 hourly PRN without indication. this was observed and validated by the Administrator Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 6 patient records reviewed, The organization failed to provide the patient with care, treatment, or services according to the patient’s individualized plan of care s evidenced in RRHV#1: Patient was diabetic, prescribed metformin but no orders for management of diabetes in POC. RRHV#2: patient started taking promethazine 12.5 mgs q 8 hourly/PRN for nausea and ondansetron was discontinued 3 weeks ago and no orders in the chart, in RRDC#1 : No orders for PEG tube care identified in initial assessment but not on POC and in RRHV#2: Patient was on IV antibiotic and treatment was not in IDG POC, per policy IV.6.PICC and Extended peripheral catheters, and in RRHV#3: Initial Plan of Care did not identify if patient was a DNR or Full code, this was observed and validated by the Administrator”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. In review of the bereavement program with the bereavement coordinator , the surveyor observe that the organization did not have a organized bereavement program. The program did not include a bereavement care plan, post death bereavement risk assessment or evaluation of services, this was observed and validated by the Bereavement Coordinator and the Administrator”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Initial certification of terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 152 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 6 patient records reviewed, The Certificate of Terminal Illness failed to include the patient’s life expectancy considers the following factors: Current subjective and objective medical Information about the medical management of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal condition as evidenced : RRHV#1: contains diagnosis, but no progression of disease, states incontinent of bowel and bladder and dependent on CG on majority of ADL’s. RRHV#2: CTI does not identify decline, states primary diagnosis and secondary, other description includes increased SOB, oxygen dependent, pt is bedbound, paraplegic, has colostomy, urostomy. Patient has chronic generalized pain controlled with medication ordered. RRHV#3: CTI did not have progression of illness, states diagnosis, pain and SOB controlled by prescribed medication. and in RRDC#6: CTI lacks progression of disease, CG reports incontinence of bowel and bladder, unable to communicate, confused and dependent on CG.This was observed and validated by the DON”

    Rule L0667. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 97 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 2 of 3 home visits conducted, The patient record failed to contain information that reflects the patient’s care, treatment, or services, including any medications administered and dose as evidenced inRRHV#2- Benadryl 25 mgs ordered TID and patient taking every night and PRN for itching during the day, Albuterol II puffs ordered q 4 hourly and patient taking PRN. RRHV#3: Inaccurate medication order Fluticasone 1 puff PRN instead of 1 puff once daily and clonazepam 1mg ordered PRN for anxiety but not on Medication profile, this was observed and validated by the Administrator”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Use and mintenance of equipment and supplies (42 CFR 418.106(f)(2))

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 2 of 3 home visits conducted, The organization failed to provide patient education and training for not providing education for safe oxygen cylinder storage as evidenced in HV#2 and HV#3,back up oxygen tanks stored upright but not in well ventilated area, they surrounding by equipment and clothes, this was observed and validated by the Administrator”

    Rule L0702. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 10, 2025Initial inspection by The Joint Commission9 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 29, 2025.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 84 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 75006, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3; this one had 9.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.