Hearth Record

Gentiva

A hospice in Dallas, Texas 75231

7557 Rambler Rd Ste 560, Dallas, Texas 75231. (214) 231-3914.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

13 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 56 hospices serving ZIP code 75231 had 4.

The last inspection on record was on Jan 11, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

13 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jan 11, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care13 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 15 (Patients #1,#9) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient 1: The medical record contained an initial comprehensive spiritual assessment completed 12/14/23 with a start of care 12/8/23. Patient 9: The medical record contained an initial comprehensive spiritual assessment completed 4/24/23 with a start of care 4/18/23.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 15 (Patient #4) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient 4: There was no evidence of a comprehensive spiritual assessment.”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 110 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 15 (Patients #1,#10) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 1: The medication profile contained duplicative Colace listings. Corrected on site. Patient 10: The initial care plan order contained an order for oxygen equipment. There was no evidence of oxygen included in the medication profile. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 96 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 15 (Patient #1) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient 1: The medical record contained an initial bereavement assessment completed 12/14/23 with a start of care 12/8/23”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 235 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 15 (Patients #2,#3,#5,#6) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 2: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient is a high risk for falls. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to safety included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 3: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon recert visit 12/7/23 identifying patient is a high risk for falls. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to safety included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 5: The medical record identified patient was on hospice services for dysphagia following a CVA. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to the risk for aspiration included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 6: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient is a high risk for skin impairment. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to skin included in the plan of care. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 15 (Patient #10) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 10: The initial care plan order contained an order for oxygen equipment. There was no evidence of an order for the oxygen dose, frequency, and delivery method. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 143 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 15 (Patients #3,#5,#6) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 3: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of walker for ambulation. There was no evidence of the walker included as DME in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 5: The medical record contained nursing documentation 12/15/23 identifying patient use of a walker for ambulation. There was no evidence of the walker included as DME in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 6: The medical record contained IDT documentation 12/27/23 identifying patient use of a hospital bed. There was no evidence of the bed included as DME in the plan of care. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Program activities (42 CFR 418.58(c)(2))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice investigates all adverse events, incidents, accidents, variances or unusual occurrences that involve patient care and develops a plan of correction to prevent the same or similar event from occurring again. Patient 7: The medical record contained nursing documentation 12/7/23 identifying patient had a fall 12/1/23. There was no evidence of an incident report and investigation of the fall. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0569. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 166 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 15 (Patients #1,#2,#5,#6,#9,#10) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 1,2,5,9: The aide care plans did not contain instructions for transfer assist needed. Corrected on site. Patient 6,10: The aide care plans contained task for shower with no task for transfers and instructions for transfer assist needed. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(6))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 15 (Patient #1) did not have evidence that each patient record contains Advance Directives. Patient 1: The medical record contained social work documentation identifying a DNR form was completed. There was no evidence of a copy of the form in the medical record.”

    Rule L0677. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 15 (Patient #14) did not evidence that each patient record contains physician orders. Patient 14: There was no evidence of an order to discharge upon patient transfer.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 15 (Patients #11) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 11: The on-call log contained documentation of a PRN nursing visit completed but there was no documentation of the visit completed in the medical record.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 15 (Patient #14) did not have evidence that the hospice forwarded a summary and a copy of the patient record, if requested, to a facility when transferring the patient to that facility. Patient 14: There was no evidence of coordination of care with the receiving hospice agency for a transfer.”

    Rule L0682. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 11, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care13 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 18, 1988.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 10.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 4.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 92.9% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 53% at home, 38% in assisted living, 6% in a nursing facility, 2% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day10.9 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends4.9%
Visits near death92.9% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Fhi LP, Inc. owns 99% directly since Jul 17, 1998; Fhi Gp, Inc. owns 1% directly since Jul 17, 1998.
  • Curo Health Services LLC runs it.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Steven R Bray (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); Angela Alvarado (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 6, 2008
Charlotte Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Falcon Hospice, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Charlotte Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Curo Health Services LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Curo Health Services LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)100%Mar 1, 2022
Fhi Health Systems, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 17, 1998
Odyssey Healthcare Holding CompanyOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 6, 2008
Kah Hospice Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Vistacare LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 17, 1998
Ch Services Group Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Fhi LP, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly99%Jul 17, 1998
Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Dec 22, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Dec 22, 2022
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Dec 22, 2022
Fhi Gp, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly1%Jul 17, 1998

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 84% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 85% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.39% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 52.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 56 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 75231, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 13.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.