Hearth Record

Vitas Healthcare of Texas, L.P.

A hospice in Fort Worth, Texas 76112

5651 Bridge Street, Fort Worth, Texas 76112. (817) 870-7070.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 69 hospices serving ZIP code 76112 had 3.

The last inspection on record was on Feb 27, 2025: a complaint inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Feb 27, 2025: complaint inspection by the state3 deficiencies
  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 2,334 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to protect the rights of the patient by failing to manage the pain and symptoms related to the terminal illness and related conditions, in that Tramadol (used to treat pain) ordered three times a day, for a patient that lived at an assisted living facility memory care, was not managing the patient’s pain as ordered for 1 (#1) of 7 patient records reviewed. The failure placed the patients at risk for uncontrolled pain and other symptoms, which could result in decreased in mobility. Patient #1:Record review of Patient #1’s clinical record revealed an Initial Plan of Care dated 12/16/2024. The Plan of Care listed Cerebral Vascular Disease (group of conditions affecting blood flow and blood vessels in the brain) as the terminal diagnosis. The Plan of Care listed Vascular Dementia Severe (condition caused by the lack of blood that carrying oxygen and nutrients to the brain causing problems with reasoning, planning, judgment, and memory) as a diagnosis. The Plan of Care listed Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen (used to treat pain) 5-325 milligrams, 1 to 2 tablets, every 4 hours as needed (effective 12/16/2024, related to terminal condition), and Tylenol (used to treat pain or fever) 325 milligrams, 2 tablets every 8 hours as needed (effective 12/16/20204 related to the terminal condition), as medications. Registered Nurse A conducted an Initial Comprehensive Assessment on 12/17/2024. Registered Nurse A identified pain as an active problem for Patient #1. Facility Medication Technician 1 from Facility X called the agency on 1/6/2025 at 7:08 a.m. to report that Patient #1 had a fall, was found on the floor. Facility Medication Technician 1 reported that Patient #1 had a small bruise and scratch on the right hip. Licensed Vocational Nurse B conducted a skilled nurse visit on 1/6/2025. Licensed Vocational Nurse B documented that the visit was an unscheduled visit due to a fall that morning. Licensed Vocational Nurse B documented that Patient #1 had a small bruise to the inner left hip and that there were no signs/symptoms of pain or discomfort noted. Facility Medication Technician 2 called the agency on 1/6/2025 at 11:34 p.m. that Patient #1 had a fall, was in pain, and was given Tylenol. Registered Nurse C conducted a skilled nurse visit on 1/7/2025. Registered Nurse C documented that the purpose of the visit was due to a report from facility staff that Patient #1 slipped off the bed when getting up. Registered Nurse C’s documentation did not address whether Patient #1 had pain. Registered Nurse D conducted a skilled nurse visit on 1/15/2025. Registered Nurse D documented that Patient #1’s pain level was scaled at 3. Registered Nurse D documented that the patient care giver called requesting an x-ray (also known as a radiograph- where a form of radiation creates pictures of the inside of the body). Patient #1 was complaining of pain. Registered Nurse D documented that x-rays and Tramadol (used to treat pain) 50 milligrams scheduled, three times each day were ordered. Patient #1’s medication profile listed Tramadol 50 milligrams three times a day (related to terminal condition). An x-ray report indicated that an x-ray of the left hip was obtained on 1/15/2025. The x-ray results did not indicate a facture or dislocation of the left hip. Patient #1’s record contained a medication list that listed Tramadol (used to treat pain) 50 milligram tablets, 1 tablet three times a day, was ordered on 1/15/2025 (Wednesday). Registered Nurse D conducted a skilled nurse visit on 1/16/2025. Registered Nurse D documented that Patient #1 had two falls, 1/6/ no year. Registered Nurse D documented that Patient #1 did not have pain based on non-verbal scoring. Facility Licensed Vocational Nurse called the agency on 1/18/2025 at 3:32 p.m. to report that Patient #1 had a fall. Registered Nurse E Conducted a skilled nurse visit on 1/19/2025. Registered Nurse E documented that Patient #1 had a witnessed fall by Patient #1 Family Member. Registered Nurse E documented that Patient #1 did not have pain. Registered Nurse E documented that Patient #1 was given Patient #1’s morning medication from facility staff. Patient #1 was taken to a minor emergency facility on 1/21/2025 by Patient #1 Family Member due to pain. Patient #1 Family Member revoked hospice services on 1/22/2025. Patient #1’s clinical record did not contain evidence that Tramadol frequency of administration had been changed to be administered earlier in the mornings for the pain Patient #1 was experiencing that interfered with the ability to get up out of bed, get dressed, and ambulate to the dining room for breakfast.Patient #1’s clinical record did not contain evidence that a change in the frequency of Tramadol Administration had occurred. The clinical record did not indicate that Tramadol or other pain medication had been ordered to be given earlier in the morning to manage Patient #1’s pain. Registered Nurse C and Registered Nurse D were not available for interview. During an interview on 2/26/2025 at 3:22 p.m. with the Supervising Nurse/Alternate (been in the role for 90 days) and National Patient Care Administrator, the surveyor discussed Patient #1. Patient #1 had numerous falls; Tramadol was ordered three times a day on 1/15/2025; that a request had been made by Patient #1 Family Member for Patient #1 to receive a dose of Tramadol earlier in the morning because Patient #1 was having pain early in the morning that interfered with Patient #1’s mobility. Patient #1 was unable to get out of bed, get dressed, and walk to the dining room for breakfast due to pain. The clinical record did not indicate that the Tramadol administration was changed for Patient #1 to receive a dose of Tramadol earlier in the morning. The clinical record did not indicate that another pain medication had been schedule for earlier in the morning. The surveyor asked what the facility’s schedule for medication to be administered three times a day was. The Supervising Nurse/Alternate Administrator and National Patient Care Administrator did not know the frequency. The surveyor asked who would be responsible for getting medication administration time changed to earlier in the morning. The Supervising Nurse/Alternate Administrator informed the surveyor that the hospice would collaborate with the facility to have it provided at an earlier time. The surveyor asked where in the record it would indicate that the collaboration with the facility occurred. The Supervising Nurse/Alternate Administrator reviewed Patient #1’s record and stated, “It doesn’t (show collaboration).” The surveyor asked what the agency’s policy on communication with patients and families via texted communication was. The Supervising Nurse/Alternate Administrator stated, “We do not permit them to text.” During the record review, Team Manager F joined the review. Team Manager F had the same first name as Vitas Staff Member. The surveyor asked Team Manager F if Team Manager F had received calls or texts messages from Patient #1 Family Member regarding Patient #1’s pain. Team Manager F stated, “I don’t recall. I will check.” Team Manager F reviewed Team Manager F’s phone and informed the surveyor that Team Manager F was the manager on call on 1/6/2025 and Patient #1 had a fall on the floor and a small bruise on right hip. Team Manager F informed the surveyor that an Admit email was received on 12/18/2024 regarding requests for supplies, information of admit. During an interview on 2/27/2025 at 12:31 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse B, the surveyor asked about the services Licensed Vocational Nurse B provided for Patient #1. Licensed Vocational Nurse B informed the surveyor that Licensed Vocational Nurse B provided symptom management. Licensed Vocational Nurse B informed the surveyor that Patient #1 Family Member sent a video of Patient #1 walking. Licensed Vocational Nurse B stated, “I am not sure why [Patient #1 Family Member] sent it now. I reached out to the primary nurse. I did refer [Patient #1 Family Member] to the main number.” The surveyor asked who the primary nurse was. Licensed Vocational Nurse B informed the surveyor that Licensed Vocational Nurse B believed the primary nurse was Registered Nurse D. The surveyor asked what Registered Nurse D’s response was. Licensed Vocational Nurse B stated, “I think I just sent him a text to let [Registered Nurse D] know.” During an interview on 2/27/2025 at 4:25 p.m. with the Administrator, the Supervising Nurse/Alternate Administrator, the Vice President of Operations, the National Patient Care Administrator, the Business Manager, and Registered Nurse O, the surveyor asked how this could affect the patients. The Supervising Nurse/Alternate Administrator informed the surveyor that it could have a negative effect. During an interview on 2/28/2025 at 4:17 p.m. with Patient #1 Family Member, the surveyor asked if Patient #1 was able to request pain medication when Patient #1 was experiencing pain. Patient #1 Family Member stated, “[Patient #1] could not make needs known, could not request pain medications.” The surveyor received an email from Facility X Executive Director on 2/28/2025 at 5:23 p.m. The email read; “On TID (three times a day) we administer (medication) at 8am, 2 pm and 8pm unless directed by physician otherwise.” -Texted communications between Patient #1 Family Member and Vitas staff. The texted communication to Registered Nurse D was not dated but had “Thursday 5:28 p.m.” The texted communication read as follows: “ The #1 right now is that [Patient #1] gets the Tramadol morning dose before they try to get [Patient #1] out of bed in the morning (typically 6a-8a). If you ordered it TID and they get [Patient #1] up (resisting because [Patient #1] is hurting) and make [Patient #1] walk all the way to the dining room in pain to get pain medication (like this morning)...” Texted communication, no date, Monday at 8:32 a.m. from Registered Nurse D to Patient #1 Family Member read in part; “Good morning, I work Monday through Friday. So, I cannot address these until I see these now. I have sent these messages to my leadership, and they will be sending a nurse out. Keep in mind, we are a supplement to the facility and not primary care takers. We had adjusted the pain meds and as soon as we notice it’s not working, then we can make adjustments. My recommendation is [Patient #1] can have first meal in bed so that [Patient #1] can get pain meds in [Patient#1’s] system...” Texted communication, no date, timed 6:15 (a.m. or p.m. not specified), from Patient #1 Family Member to Licensed Vocational Nurse B read in part; “...[Patient #1] was denying pain but kind of short stepping with that right leg (indicating there’s soreness somewhere, probably left ‘SI’ area). I saw them medicate [Patient #1] for pain last night...” Texted communication, no date, timed 6:15 (a.m. or p.m. not specified), from Patient #1 Family Member to Licensed Vocational Nurse B read in part; “I’m going to send you a video clip of [Patient #1] walking after [Patient #1] complained of left posterior hip/upper buttock pain this morning....Short stepping on the right, indicating pain on the left...I think it’s coming from the SI joint (or L5-S1 nerve root)...[Patient #1] was denying pain but [Patient #1] ability to verbalize anything varies and even less often can [Patient #1] point out where it hurts. This morning was an occasion where [Patient #1] was able to do both...” Texted communication with Vitas Staff Member, undated read as follows: “As you can clearly see that message has a screen shot about uncontrolled pain that I sent to [Licensed Vocational Nurse B]. [Registered Nurse D] made no effort to address the issue. Originally, I asked for 1 scheduled dose of pain medication before 6:00 a.m. Instead, Tramadol t.i.d. (three times a day) was ordered and I immediately made it clear that foreseeably the Tramadol order (which took days) would not address the problem. Saturday I saw a 0800 video of [Patient #1] saying [Patient #1] hurt so bad [Patient #1] couldn’t get up and [Patient #1] was crying out for help...I went to the facility and it was almost 10:00 before they (facility staff) took pain medication to the room for [Patient #1] and 11:00 before [Patient #1] was able to walk to the dining room and eat breakfast. Later that afternoon [Patient #1] fell again. What has [Hospice Agency] done to address the problem? Nothing. Apparently, it is just fine with [Hospice Agency] if my [Patient #1] suffers for hours and tears literally running down [Patient #1] face, no pain medicine, no food or drink. Even now Monday what has [Hospice Agency] done to address the issue? Nothing more than say they are going to ‘check’ on [Patient #1]...” Video The surveyor reviewed a video provided by Patient #1 Family Member. In the video, Patient #1 was wearing the same outfit that Patient #1 was wearing in a screen shot (provided by Patient #1 Family Member) of the video sent to Licensed Vocational Nurse B. The video was time-stamped 1/13/2025 at 8:02 a.m. The video shows a facility staff member asking if Patient #1’s back hurt and telling Patient #1 that the staff member would ask the nurse to give the patient some medicine for back pain. The surveyor reviewed a video provided by Patient #1 Family member that was timed stamped 1/18/2025 at 9:11 a.m. The video showed a conversation with a facility staff and Patient #1 Family Member regarding Patient #1’s pain. The video showed the facility staff member administering medication to Patient #1. The conversation between the facility staff member and Patient #1 Family Member referenced Tramadol was being given to Patient #1. Review of the agency’s policy titled “418.52 Condition of Participation: Patient Rights.” The policy was not dated. The policy read in part; “The patient has the right to be informed of his or her rights, and the hospice must protect and promote the exercise of these rights...(c). Standard: Rights of the patient. The patient has a right to the following: (1) Receive effective pain management and symptom control from the hospice for conditions related to the terminal illness...””

    Rule L0512. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 1,200 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to include in the plan of care all services, necessary drugs, and treatments for the palliation of the terminal diagnosis and related conditions in that wound care treatments were not included in the Plans of Care for 2 (#2, #5) of 2 patient records reviewed where hospice staff were performing wound care. The failure placed the patients at risk for wound infections and worsening of the wounds. Patient #2:Record review of Patient #2’s clinical record revealed an Initial Plan of Care dated 11/11/2024. The Plan of Care listed Renal Cell Carcinoma (kidney cancer) as the terminal diagnosis. Registered Nurse P conducted an Initial Comprehensive Assessment on 11/12/2024 and did not indicate that Patient #2 had wounds. Licensed Vocational Nurse B conducted a skilled nurse visit on 11/12/2024. Licensed Vocational B documented that it was an unscheduled visit to drop off supplies. Licensed Vocational Nurse B documented on a “Supplemental Interdisciplinary Note,” dated 11/13/2024 that supplies were dropped off to the home for a visit today. Registered Nurse A conducted a skilled nurse visit on 11/13/2024. Registered Nurse A documented that Patient #2 had a skin tear to the left forearm that measured 1.1 centimeters and a skin tear to the right forearm that measured 1 centimeter. Registered Nurse A did not document that wound care was provided. Registered Nurse Q conducted a skilled visit on 11/15/2024. Registered Nurse Q documented that the skin tears to both arms were cleaned, and a dressing was placed over them. Patient #2’s Plan of Care did not include wound care treatment to the skin tears on Patient #2’s forearms. Patient #5:Record review of Patient #5’s clinical record revealed an Initial Plan of Care dated 8/27/2024. The Plan of Care listed Rectal Cancer as the terminal diagnosis. Registered Nurse R conducted an Initial Comprehensive Assessment on 8/28/2024. Registered Nurse R did not identify that Patient #5 had wounds. Licensed Vocational Nurse S conducted a skilled nurse visit on 8/29/2024. Licensed Vocational Nurse S documented that Patient #5 had a skin tear to the mid dorsal forearm (did not specify if left or right forearm) that measured 2 centimeters by 1.75 centimeters. Licensed Vocational Nurse S documented cleaning the wound with wound cleanser and covering the wound with a dressing and self-adhesive wrap. Registered Nurse T conducted a skilled nurse visit on 10/3/2024. Registered Nurse T documented that Patient #5 had a skin tear to the left knee that measured 5 centimeters by 2 centimeters. Registered Nurse T documented cleaning the wound and applying a dressing. Patient #5’s Plan of Care did not include wound care treatment to the skin tears on Patient #5’s forearm and knee. During an interview on 2/26/2025 at 3:22 p.m. with the Supervising Nurse/Alternate Administrator and the National Patient Care Administrator, the surveyor discussed that wound care treatments were performed to skin tears on Patient #2 and Patient #5, but wound care treatments were not included in the Plans of Care. The Supervising Nurse/Alternate Administrator reviewed the records. The Supervising Nurse/Alternate Administrator stated, “I don’t see the orders for wound care.” During an interview on 2/27/2025 at 9:35 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse L, the surveyor discussed Patient #2. The surveyor asked if Patient #2 had wounds. Licensed Vocational Nurse L stated, “Not that I recall.” During an interview on 2/27/2025 at 10:07 a.m. with Registered Nurse A the surveyor discussed Patient #2. The surveyor asked if Patient #2 had wounds. Registered Nurse A stated, “No, I don’t recall. I’m sorry, I don’t remember this patient.” During an interview on 2/27/2025 at 10:41 a.m. with Registered Nurse R the surveyor asked what the process was when a patient had a new wound. Registered Nurse R stated, “I assess, take measurements, get orders from the physician, write the order on a physician order form.” The surveyor asked what the agency’s direction was on the timeframe for writing physician orders. Registered Nurse R stated, “I believe it is within 24 hours.” During an interview on 2/27/2025 at 11:46 a.m. with Registered Nurse Q the surveyor discussed that Registered Nurse Q documented performing wound care on Patient #2. The Plan of Care did not include wound care treatment, how did you know what wound care to provide. Registered Nurse Q informed the surveyor that the nurse that went prior told Registered Nurse Q. The surveyor asked what nurse told you what the wound care was for Patient #2. Registered Nurse Q stated, “[Registered Nurse A] told me.” During an interview on 2/27/2025 at 12:31 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse B, the surveyor discussed Patient #2. The surveyor discussed Licensed Vocational Nurse B’s documentation about taking supplies to Patient #2’s home. Licensed Vocational Nurse B stated, “I don’t remember. I know there were some nurses that were there, I just dropped some (supplies) off that were in my car. I don’t believe I provided wound care.” The surveyor asked what the agency’s policy regarding documenting physician orders was. Licensed Vocational Nurse B stated, “Immediately, as soon as possible.” During an interview on 2/27/20205 at 2:16 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse S, the surveyor discussed Patient #5 and the wound care provided by Licensed Vocational Nurse S. Licensed Vocational Nurse S stated, “I don’t remember honestly.” The surveyor asked what the agency’s policy regarding writing physician orders was. Licensed Vocational Nurse S stated, “I call the registered nurse on call; I tell them I want to call the Doctor; then I call the Doctor; I send an email to team nurse. The surveyor asked Licensed Vocational Nurse S if Licensed Vocational Nurse S would write the order. Licensed Vocational Nurse S stated, “Yes, I would.” During an interview on 2/27/2025 at 2:26 p.m. with Registered Nurse T, the surveyor discussed Patient #5. The surveyor asked whether Patient #5 had any skin tears. Registered Nurse T stated, “No.” The surveyor asked what the agency’s policy about documentation of physician orders was. Registered Nurse T stated, “We write the order, you should have it as soon as possible. Repeat it to the physician and we have to upload and let the physician know so he can sign the orders.” During an interview on 2/27/2025 at 4:25 p.m. with the Administrator, the Supervising Nurse/Alternate Administrator, the Vice President of Operations, the National Patient Care Administrator, the Business Manager, and Registered Nurse O, the surveyor asked how this could affect the patients. The Supervising Nurse/Alternate Administrator informed the surveyor that it could have a negative effect. The Supervising Nurse/Alternate Administrator informed the surveyor that staff would not know what to do. Review of the agency’s policy titled “VS Care Planning,” not dated, read in part; Purpose 418.56 Condition of participation: Interdisciplinary group, care planning, and coordination of services....a...1. Standard: Plan of Care. All hospice care and services furnished to patients and their families must follow an individualized written plan of care established by the hospice interdisciplinary group in collaboration with the attending physician (is any), the patient or representative, and the primary caregiver in accordance with the patient’s needs if any of them so desire...Standard: Content of plan of care...d). Drugs and treatment necessary to meet the needs of the patient...””

    Rule L0549. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 948 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to develop and maintain a system of communication and integration, in accordance with its policies and procedures, to provide and ensure the ongoing sharing of information between all disciplines providing care and services, in all settings, in that visits or phone calls to follow up with patients that had increased pain were not done for 2 (#4, #6) of 2 patient clinical records reviewed where follow up due to patient pain was requested. The failure placed the clients at risk that pain would not be controlled. Review of the agency’s policy titled “VS Supervision, Delegation and Coordination,” that was dated 5/16/2026 read in part: “Condition of participation: Interdisciplinary group, care planning, and coordination of services. The hospice must designate an interdisciplinary group or groups as specified in paragraph (a) of this section which, in consultation with the patient’s attending physician, must prepare a written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must specify the hospice care and services necessary to meet the patient and family-specific needs identified in the comprehensive assessment as such need relate to the terminal illness and related conditions. (a) Standard: Approach to service delivery. (1) The hospice must designate an interdisciplinary group or groups composed of individuals who work together to meet the physical, medical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs of the hospice patients and families facing terminal illness and bereavement. Interdisciplinary group members must provide the care and services offered by the hospice, and the group, in its entirety, must supervise the care and services. The hospice must designate a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group to provide coordination of care and to ensure continuous assessment of each patient’s and family’s needs...” Patient #4:Record review of Patient #4’s clinical record revealed an Initial Plan of Care dated 1/16/2025. The Plan of Care listed Esophageal (muscular tube that conveys food from the mouth to the stomach) Cancer as the terminal diagnosis. The Plan of Care listed Metastasis Neoplasm (spread of cancer) to the Lymph Nodes Lymph (small glands that filter lymphatic fluid and help fight infections) of the Head, Face, Neck, Metastasis Neoplasm of the Lung, and Neoplasm Metastasis to the Bone as other diagnoses. Review of the agency’s telecare call documentation Patient #4 Family Member called on 1/18/2025 at 1:23 p.m. to report that Patient #4’s pain was not controlled with Dilaudid (used to treat pain). Registered Nurse H documented that Patient #4 was agreeable for a focused virtual visit. Patient #4 reported generalized pain, scaled pain at 7 on a 0-10 pain scale. Patient #4 reported that pain was throbbing, constant, and Patient #4 was unable to sleep or lay on the right side. Registered Nurse J called Physician I on 1/18/2025 at 2:41 p.m. about Patient #4’s pain. Registered Nurse J documented that Physician I wanted Patient #4 to have an additional dose of Dilaudid 2 milligrams now and have triage call back in three hours to check on Patient #4. Registered Nurse J put in a note of notification that a follow-up phone call to Patient #4 was needed at 6:00 p.m. Registered Nurse G documented on 1/18/2025 at 11:51 p.m. that a follow up call would be made in the morning due to time. Registered Nurse K called Patient #4 on 1/19/2025 at 8:17 a.m. and spoke to Patient #4 Family Member. Registered Nurse K called to follow up with Patient #4, 16 hours after Physician I wanted triage to follow-up with Patient #4 regarding pain. Patient #6:Record review of Patient #6’s clinical record revealed an Initial Plan of Care dated 2/18/2024. The Plan of Care listed Colon Cancer as the terminal diagnosis. The Plan of Care listed Metastasis to the Lung, Metastasis to the Liver, and Metastasis to Lymph Nodes as other diagnoses. Licensed Vocational Nurse L conducted a skilled nurse visit on 2/23/2024. Licensed Vocational Nurse L documented that Patient #6 reported a pain scale of 9, on a 0-10 pain scale. Patient #6 reported pain to the lower abdomen (belly) and lower back. Licensed Vocational Nurse L documented that the team will follow-up on Sunday (2/25/2024). Licensed Vocational Nurse L documented that triage was notified. Review of Patient #6’s clinical record did not contain evidence that the hospice followed up with Patient #6 regarding pain on Sunday 2/25/2024. Review of the agency’s Telecare call documentation. Licensed Vocational Nurse M documented on 2/25/2025 at 2:38 a.m. “Please have team visit patient on Sunday per [Physician N’s] request.” During an interview on 2/26/2025 at 3:22 p.m. with the Supervising Nurse/Alternate Administrator and the National Patient Care Administrator, the surveyor discussed that staff were instructed by the physicians to follow up with patients, and there was no evidence that the follow ups were done. The surveyor asked why triage did not call Patient #4 back on 1/18/2025 at 6:00 p.m. The Supervising Nurse/Alternate Administrator informed the surveyor that it was not transferred to the team until 11:51 p.m. The surveyor asked why the visit for Patient #6 for follow up on 2/25/2024 was not done. The National Patient Care Administrator went to check on it. The National Patient Care Administrator informed the surveyor that there was no visit for 2/25/2024. The Supervising Nurse/Alternate Administrator informed the surveyor that it was an issue with how the call was dispatched. During an interview on 2/27/2025 at 4:25 p.m. with the Administrator, the Supervising Nurse/Alternate Administrator, the Vice President of Operations, the National Patient Care Administrator, the Business Manager, and Registered Nurse O, the surveyor asked how this could affect the patients. The Supervising Nurse/Alternate Administrator informed the surveyor that it could have a negative effect.”

    Rule L0557. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 27, 2025Complaint inspection by the state3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Dec 10, 1991.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 14.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9.3% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 96.6% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 81% at home, 10% in assisted living, 7% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility, 1% in a hospital.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day14.7 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends9.3%
Visits near death96.6% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Vitas Hospice Services, LLC owns 100% directly since Apr 27, 2001.
  • 9 owners or officers are people: Kevin Mcnamara (corporate director, 33.3%); Eric Dengler (managing employee (on the payroll)); Syed Ather (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Joel Wherley (corporate officer, 0%); Joel Wherley (corporate director, 0%); Alexander Fernandez (corporate officer, 0%); Michael Witzeman (corporate officer); Brian Judkins (corporate officer, 0%); Brian Judkins (corporate director, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Chemed CorporationOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 22, 2014
Comfort CARE Holdings CompanyOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 22, 2014
Vitas Hospice Services, LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Apr 27, 2001
Vitas Healthcare CorporationOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 22, 2014

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 76% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 78% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 93.64% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 65.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 69 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 76112, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3; this one had 3.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.