Home of St Theresa Hospice LLC
A hospice in Frisco, Texas 75035
10128 Bell Rock Rd, Frisco, Texas 75035. (469) 768-9944.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 21 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- Not available CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
21 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 74 hospices serving ZIP code 75035 had 3.
The last inspection on record was on Jul 3, 2024: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.
2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
21 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Jul 3, 2024: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care8 deficiencies
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(4))
“Upon patient record review, 5 of 5 (Patient #1, 2, 3, 4, 5) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment takes into consideration the imminence of death.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 109 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 5 (Patient #2, 3) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #2 - Medication profile contained Zinc oxide to buttocks and elbows PRN - no frequency or modifier for PRN. Patient #3 - Medication profile did not contain Zyrtec 10mg 1 tab every day for seasonal allergies.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 118 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 5 (Patient #3, 4) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: • A detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs • The IDG demonstrates a proactive approach in developing each patient’s plan of care by planning ahead for anticipated patient changes and needs. Decisions should reflect the patient/family preferences rather than be solely a response to a crisis. Patient #3 - POC dated 04/28/24 MSW visit frequency PRN. Patient #4 - POC dated 05/10/24 MSW and SC visit frequency PRN.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #3) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #3 - POC 04/28/24 did not contain Zyrtec 10mg 1 tab every day for seasonal allergies.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 5 (Patient #3, 5) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient #3 - Hospital bed was not noted on POC dated 04/28/24 Patient #5 - CPAP was not noted on POC dated 05/04/24.”
-
Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))
The inspectors’ words, 94 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 5 (Patient #3, 4, 5) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient #3 - IDT dated 06/04/24 and 06/18/24 did not have evidence that the SN documented the patient progress towards goals from the plan of care. Patient #4 - IDT dated 06/04/24 and 06/18/24 did not have evidence that the SN documented the patient progress towards goals from the plan of care.”
-
Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))
“Upon patient client record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #3) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient #3 - Illegible name and credentials on visit notes 04/24/24 and 05/22/24 completed by SC.”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2))
“Upon client record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #1) did not have evidence that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice in accordance with §418.26, the hospice must forward to the patient’s attending physician: • A copy of the hospice discharge summary • The patient’s clinical record, if requested Patient #1 - No evidence that the discharge summary was sent to the PCP.”
Feb 21, 2024: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care13 deficiencies
-
IDG, care planning, coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56)
“Condition of Participation: Interdisciplinary Group, Care Planning, and Coordination of Services. L536”
-
Hospice aide and homemaker services (42 CFR 418.76)
“Condition of Participation: Hospice Aide and Homemaker Services. L607”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 159 words
“Upon patient record review, 4 of 5 (Patient ##2, #3, #4, #5) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient#2:The nurse note dated 1/5/24, 1/25/24, and 1/29/24 indicated the patient was using Tylenol PRN for pain. Tylenol is not on the medication profile. Patient#3:MiraLAX is listed on the medication profile as 16 grams of powder PO daily without evidence of a diluent. Patient#4:On 9-7-23 the RN documented “provide O2 supplement”. There was no evidence of O2 on the medication profile. Patient#5:On 8-24-23, an order for Lidocaine patch, Voltaren gel and Melatonin was written without evidence of the medications being added to the medication profile.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 5 (Patient #3, #5) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Patient #3: There was no evidence of a bereavement assessment completed within 5 days of admission. Patient#5: There was no evidence of a bereavement assessment completed within 5 days of admission.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 5 (Patient #2, #4) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #2: The nurse note dated 1/5/24, 1/25/24 and 1/29/24 indicated the patient was using Tylenol PRN for pain. There was no order for Tylenol. Patient#4: The nurse documented on 9-7-23 to “provide O2 supplement”. There is no order for O2.”
-
Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))
The inspectors’ words, 135 words
“Upon patient record review, 5 of 5 (Patient #1, #2, #3, #4, #5) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient#1, #2, #3, #4, #5: The plans of care were updated every 14 days using a “Case conference” template which addressed “Barriers: related to Communication, non-compliance, behavioral dysfunction, and resistive physician”; “Obstructions to meet goals” and “suggestions to move forward”. There was no evidence the plan of care addressed progress toward outcomes as determined in the individualized comprehensive plan of care, changes that had taken place since the initial assessment, or reassessment of the the patient’s response to care. In addition, there were no frequency updates to the plans of care.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 276 words
“Upon client record review, 5 of 5(Patient #1, #2, #3, #4, #5) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #1: The comprehensive plan of care dated 5/10/23 indicated SW visits were 1 wk. 12, however, there were no SW visits and the RN completed the SW Comprehensive Assessment. In addition, the Volunteer frequency was 1 wk12, and there was no evidence of a visit by the volunteer. Patient #2: The comprehensive plan of care dated 7-15-23 indicated SW frequency of 1 wk. 12, however, there was evidence of only one visit on 7-15-23. Additionally, the SCC frequency was documented as 1 wk. 12, but there were notes for the SCC visit every 2 weeks, on 12/13/23, 12/27/23, 01/10/24, 01/24/24, and 02/07/24, Also, the volunteer frequency was documented as 1 wk. 12 and there was no evidence of a volunteer visit. Patient #3:The plan of care dated 10-31-23 indicated RN visits were 1 wk. 12. There was no evidence of a visit made between the dates of 1/5/24 and 2/11/24. Patient #4:The plan of care dated 9-2-23 documented RN visit frequency 14 wk.12, Visits were made 2 x day on 9/2/23, 9/3/23, 9/4/23, 9/6/23, 9/7/23, and 9/8/23.The volunteer frequency was documented as 1 wk. 12, but there was no evidence of volunteer visits. Additionally, the SC visits were documented as 1 wk. 12 and there were 3 visits on 9/3/23, 9/4/23 and 9/8/23. Patient #5:The plan of care indicated the volunteer visits were 3 wk. 12, but there was only evidence of 2 total visits by the volunteer during the admission.”
-
Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 96 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #4) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: • Making bereavement services available to the family and other individuals in the bereavement plan of care up to 1 year following the death of the patient. • Ensuring that bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved • Development of a bereavement plan of care that notes the kind of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery Patient#4: The bereavement plan of care was incomplete without evidence of interventions and frequencies.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 291 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 5 (Patient #2,#3,#4) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient#2: The interdisciplinary plan of care dated 7-15-23 indicated aide visits were 2 x week. On the aide care plan dated 9-15-23, the RN indicated aide visits were 3 days a week. The aide continued to visit the patient 2 x week. In addition, the RN assigned “ambulation” which was not given as an option on the aide’s visit document so was not completed by the aide. The aide’s documentation sheet was inconsistent with the assignment sheet. Supervisory visits were completed q 2 weeks and the RN documented “Yes” to the questions of aide following the plan of care. Patient#3: On 10-30-23, the IDT plan of care indicated the aide visits were 2 x week. On the aide care plan of 10-31-23, the RN documented the aide visits were 3 x week. In addition, on the aide care plan dated 10-31-23, the RN ordered Bathing tasks of complete bath, 2 days a week and sponge bath 1 day a week, but the aide only visited 2 days a week throughout the patient’s admission. Supervisory visits were completed every 2 weeks by the RN, who indicated “yes” to the question of whether the aide followed the plan of care. Patient#4: On the aide plan of care dated 9-2-23, the RN ordered “shower”, “complete bed bath” and “sponge bath.””
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 390 words
“Upon patient record review 4 of 5 (Patient #2,#3,#4,#5) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care Patient#2:Beginning 11-11-23 and all weeks through week of 2-10-23, the aide care plan indicated “shower” was ordered and the aide documented “complete” indicating bed bath. “Nail care” was ordered and the aide documented, “none;” “Ambulation” was ordered, but was not an option on aides document tool and was not documented as done by the aide; Care plan indicated “diaper change” and aide documented “assist to bathroom”. Patient#3:Aide care plan indicated “Complete bed bath 2 x week” and “sponge bath” 1 x week. Aide did not complete any bath on 1/3/24 and 1/5/24, aide documented completion of “bed bath” and “shower” on 1/22/24 and 2/9/24. There were no sponge baths given throughout admission. Additionally, the aide documented “shave” on every visit During January-February of 2024, but the RN did not order “shave” as part of the plan of care. The care plan indicated “change linens” and “tidy care area” was part of the plan of care, but there was no evidence of the tasks being completed from 1/12/24 through 2/16/24. Patient#4:The aide care plan dated 9-2-23 indicated “nail care”, “Shampoo”, “change linens”, “clean patient area”, and “companion” were ordered, but the aide did not complete any of these tasks throughout the patient’s admission. The IDT care plan dated 9-2-23 ordered 5 visits per week for the aide. The aide visited 6 times during the week of 9-2-23. In addition, the patient died on 9-8-23 and the aide documented a visit on 9-10-23 due to the aide documentation tool showing the care week as Monday through Sunday, when the agency has indicated Sunday through Saturday as the care week. Patient#5:The aide documented completion of of Nutrition, Feeding, Companion, Socialization and Safety tasks on the weeks of 8-18, 8-26, 9-1, 9-9, 9-11, but there was no indication that these tasks were part of the aide care plan. In addition, the interdisciplinary care plan indicated aide visits were 0 frequency beginning 8-20-23, but the aide continued to visit 2 x week. The plan of care dated the 8-14-23 indicated the CNA visits decreased to “0” on 8-20-23, however, the CNA continued to visit 2x/week .”
-
Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 222 words
“Upon patient record review 3 of 5 (Patient #2, #3, #5) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient#2:Supervisory visits completed every 14 days indicated CNA was following plan of care, “yes”, despite care plan indicating “shower”, “nail care”, “ambulation” and “diaper change” and aide documenting, “complete bed bath”, no nail care, no ambulation and “assist to bathroom.” Patient#3: Supervisory visits documented on 1/18/24 and 2/2/24 indicated aide was following plan of care, “yes”, despite aide never giving “sponge bath” as ordered 1 x week, and providing a “shave” on visits 1/12/24, 1/15, 1/22, 1/24, 1/26, 1/29, 1/31, 2/2, 2/5, 2/7, 2/9, 2/12. 2/14, and 2/16 which was not ordered as part of the plan of care. Patient#5:Supervisory visits on 8/26/23 and 9/10/23 indicated aide was following plan of care; “yes” despite aide not, “making bed”, “changing linens”, “tidying patient care area”, and “housekeeping” as assigned and instead on dates 8/18/23, 8/26, 9/1, 9/9, and 9/11 performing, nutrition, feeding, companion, socialization and safety tasks despite not being assigned on the plan of care.”
-
Recertification of the terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(c))
The inspectors’ words, 109 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 5 (Patient #1,#2, #3) did not have evidence that before the recertification period for each patient, the medical director or physician designee must review the patient’s clinical information and provide written documentation that it is anticipated that the patient’s life expectancy is 6 months or less. Patient #1: There is no evidence of a narrative explanation of clinical findings for Benefit Period 2 or benefit Period 4. Patient #2: There is no evidence of a narrative for Benefit Period 2 or the 3rd Benefit Period. Patient #3: There is a no evidence of a narrative for the the 2nd Benefit Period dated 1/29/24.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 158 words
“Upon patient client record review, 4 of 5 (Patient #1, #2, #4, #5) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed copies of the notice of patient rights in accordance with 418.52 • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient#1:The Consent to Care dated 5/10/23 was incomplete without evidence of payment amount required by patient. In addition, the chosen attending physician documentation did not include the NPI or address of the physician. Patient#2:Patient Financial Authorization dated 7/15/23 is incomplete without evidence of “primary insurance to be billed” completed. In addition, on the Medicare Hospice Election, dated 7/15/23, the patient’s representative signed without evidence of the relationship of signature or reason the patient was unable to sign. Patient#4:On “Right to Choose Physician documentation dated 9/2/23 there is no evidence of NPI or address for chosen physician. Patient#5::On “Right to Choose Physician documentation dated 8/14/23 there is no evidence of NPI or address for chosen physician.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2024 | Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 8 deficiencies cited |
| Feb 21, 2024 | Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 13 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 24, 2024.
- CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- 18 owners or officers are people: Vinh Truong (owns 5% or more directly, 25%); Vinh Truong (corporate director, 25%); Vinh Truong (managing employee (on the payroll), 25%); Vinh Truong (runs it (operational or managerial control), 25%); Duyen Nguyen (owns 5% or more directly, 25%); Duyen Nguyen (corporate director, 25%); Duyen Nguyen (managing employee (on the payroll), 25%); Duyen Nguyen (runs it (operational or managerial control), 25%); Binh D Ho (owns 5% or more directly, 25%); Binh D Ho (corporate director, 25%); Binh D Ho (managing employee (on the payroll), 25%); Binh D Ho (runs it (operational or managerial control), 25%); Phuong Tran (owns 5% or more directly, 25%); Phuong Tran (corporate director, 25%); Phuong Tran (managing employee (on the payroll), 25%); Phuong Tran (runs it (operational or managerial control), 25%); Elana Lansdell (managing employee (on the payroll)); Mary Atkins (managing employee (on the payroll)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 74 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 75035, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3; this one had 21.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Home of St Theresa Hospice LLC This hospice | 21 |
| By Grace Hospice LLC | 2 |
| Vitas Healthcare of Texas LP | 15 |
| VNA | 1 |
| Gentiva | 13 |
| Vitas Healthcare of Texas, L.P. | 3 |
| Custom Care Hospice | 4 |
| Heart to Heart Hospice of Texas Ltd | 4 |
| Faith Presbyterian Hospice | 37 |
| Elite Hospice of Texas | Not given |
| Harris Hospice Inc. | 0 |
| Hospice Plus | 18 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.