Hearth Record

Harbor Hospice of Central San Antonio LP

A hospice in San Antonio, Texas 78248

15714 Huebner Road, Suite 2b3, San Antonio, Texas 78248. (210) 481-0500.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 9 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

9 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 63 hospices serving ZIP code 78248 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Nov 5, 2025: a follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission.

3 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

9 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

9 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Nov 5, 2025: follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission1 deficiency
  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 6 patient records reviewed, it was noted in record review #1, there was a period of 18 days following SOC with no IDG documented. Review of agency policy indicated that the initial IDG is to take place within 5 days of admission. This observation was reviewed with the administrator.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

Sep 25, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission8 deficiencies
  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 282 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 6 of 10 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the organization did not ensure that the comprehensive assessment was updated at least every 15 days. For example, during a review of the medical record for RRHV#1, it was noted that 33 days had elapsed since the last update to the comprehensive assessment was documented during benefit period #7. In addition, during benefit period #8, 23 days had elapsed since the start of care date, and an update to the comprehensive assessment had not been documented.Example #2: During a review of the medical record for RRHV#2, 57 days had elapsed since the start of the 2nd benefit period, and an update to the comprehensive assessment had not been documented, in addition, it was noted that a Registered Nurse comprehensive assessment for the interdisciplinary team was completed during week 2 of services. The subsequent Registered Nurse comprehensive assessment was completed 17 days later. Example #3: During a review of the medical record for RRHV#3, 29 days had elapsed since the start of the first benefit period, and an update to the comprehensive assessment had not been documented. Example #4: During a review of the medical record for RRNHV#2 and RRNHV#4, 56 days had elapsed since the last update to the comprehensive assessment was documented during benefit period #2.Example #5: During a review of the medical record for RRNHV#3, 28 had elapsed since the last update to the comprehensive assessment was documented during benefit period #4. In addition, 28 days had elapsed since the start of the 5th benefit period, and an update to the comprehensive assessment had not been documented. This observation was reviewed with the leadership team.”

    Rule L0533. Condition-level.

  • Core services (42 CFR 418.64)

    The inspectors’ words, 128 words

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. In 3 of 3 individual tracers, the organization did not ensure that nursing services were routinely provided directly by hospice employees. For example, during interviews with the patient’s and/or the patient’s caregiver for RRHV#1, RRHV#2, and RRHV#3, it was noted that the patient and/or the patient’s caregiver was not aware of the Registered Nurse visit schedule. The patient’s caregiver for RRHV#2 stated, the Registered Nurse is always changing, and I am not sure when the Registered Nurse will visit. During interviews with the RN/Administrator and the Regional Director it was noted that nursing services were routinely provided by contract nurses for the last 6 months. The contract nurses are not directly employed by the hospice organization. This observation was reviewed with the leadership team.”

    Rule L0587. Condition-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 124 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 2 patient records reviewed, for patients receiving Hospice Aide services, it was noted that the organization did not ensure Hospice Aide supervision was effective. For example, during the review of the medical record for RRHV#2, it was noted that Hospice Aide services started during week 2. A Hospice Aide supervision visit was documented by the Registered Nurse 24 days after Hospice Aide services started. Example #2: During a review of the medical record for RRNHV#3, it was noted that Hospice Aide services started during week 6 of the 4th benefit period. A Hospice Aide supervision visit was documented by the Registered Nurse 21 days after Hospice Aide services started. This observation was reviewed with the leadership team.”

    Rule L0629. Condition-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 93 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the organization did not ensure the plan of care goals included outcome measures for specific care activities. For example, a review of the medical record for RRHV#3, revealed that the patient’s terminal illness diagnosis was Atherosclerotic Heart Disease. The plan of care did not include a goal statement to evaluate the response to the delivery of care, treatment, and services related to the terminal illness diagnosis of Atherosclerotic Heart Disease. This observation was reviewed with the leadership team.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 223 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 10 patient’s records, it was noted that the plan of care did not include interventions based on the problems identified in the comprehensive assessment. For example, the plan of care for RRHV#2, identified potential for fall as a problem. The plan of care included the following interventions for this problem: Assess for history of falls and/or injury. The plan of care did not include interventions to maintain patient safety, and strategies to prevent injury. In addition, the patient experienced a fall without injury during week 7, and week 8 of services. The plan of care was not updated with interventions to maintain patient safety, and strategies to prevent injury. Example #2: During a review of the medical record for RRHV#3, it was noted that the patient’s terminal illness diagnosis was Atherosclerotic Heart Disease. The plan of care did not include interventions to address the delivery of care, treatment, and services related to the terminal illness diagnosis of Atherosclerotic Heart Disease. In addition, the plan of care identified potential for fall as a problem. The plan of care included the following interventions for this problem: Assess cognitive status for sensory limitation, impairments. The plan of care did not include interventions to maintain patient safety, and strategies to prevent injury. This observation was reviewed with the leadership team.”

    Rule L0546. Standard-level.

  • In-service training (42 CFR 418.76(d))

    “Observed in Competency Session. In 1 of 1 Human Resource files reviewed for Hospice Aides, it was noted that the organization did not ensure ongoing education and training was provided as required. For example, a review of the Human Resource file for a Hospice Aide, revealed no documented evidence that at least 12 hours of in-service training was provided during the most recent 12 month period. This observation was reviewed with the agency leadership team.”

    Rule L0620. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(2))

    “Observed in Competency Session. In 1 of 1 Human Resource files for Hospice Aides, it was noted that an annual on-site visit to the location where a patient is receiving care in order to observe and assess each aide while he or she was performing care was last documented August of 2024. There was no documented evidence that an annual on-site visit was completed during the last 12-month period. This observation was reviewed with the agency leadership team.”

    Rule L0632. Standard-level.

  • Initial certification of terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 128 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization did not ensure its policy titled Certification of Terminal Illness was implemented. For example, a review of the Certification of Terminal Illness statement(s) for benefit period #8, and benefit period #6 for RRHV#1, revealed that the Certifying Physician Summary documenting clinical information to support the medical prognosis and support for recertification of hospice services was not present in the medical record. Example #2: A review of the Certification of Terminal Illness statement for benefit period #1, for RRHV#3, revealed that the Certifying Physician Summary documenting clinical information to support the medical prognosis and support for certification of hospice services was not present in the medical record. This observation was reviewed with the organization leadership team.”

    Rule L0667. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 5, 2025Follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission1 deficiency cited
Sep 25, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission8 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 10, 2022.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Arfeen Properties, L.P. owns 99% directly since Aug 1, 2013.
  • Hhcs Managers LLC runs it.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: Qamar U Arfeen (owns 5% or more through other companies, 50%); Kelley L Arfeen (owns 5% or more through other companies, 50%); Karen Carter (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Cynthia Allen (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Qamar U Arfeen (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Aldo Eric Moran (managing employee (under contract), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Arfeen Properties, L.P.Owns 5% or more directly99%Aug 1, 2013
Hhcs Managers LLCGeneral partner1%Aug 1, 2013
Hhcs Managers LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)1%Aug 1, 2013

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 63 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 78248, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 9.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.