A & Z Health Care LLC
A hospice in San Antonio, Texas 78248
1864 N Loop 1604 W Ste 205, San Antonio, Texas 78248. (726) 610-3523.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 13 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- 7of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
13 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 63 hospices serving ZIP code 78248 had 5.
The last inspection on record was on Jun 5, 2024: a complaint inspection by the state.
2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
13 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Jun 4, 2024: follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care2 deficiencies
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 158 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #3) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 3: Fall precautions are not included in the CHHA instructions although per RN assessment 5/30/24 and current plan of care patient is a high fall risk with prior history of recurrent falls.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 113 words
“Upon patient record review 2 of 5 (Patient #1 & 5) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 1: Ambulation with assist marked as completed by the CHHA on 5/23/24 & 5/30/24. Task is not marked to be completed on the aide instructions. Patient 2: Range of Motion is marked completed by the CHHA on 5/14/24, 5/20/24, & 6/3/24. Tasks is not marked to be completed on the aide instructions.”
Apr 17, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care11 deficiencies
-
Initial & comprehensive assessment of patient (42 CFR 418.54)
“Condition of Participation: Initial and Comprehensive Assessment of the Patient.”
-
Hospice aide and homemaker services (42 CFR 418.76)
“Condition of Participation: Hospice Aide and Homemaker Services. L607”
-
Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))
The inspectors’ words, 181 words
“Upon patient record review 7 of 14 (Patient #3, #4, #7, #9, #11, #12, #13) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient #3:The patient was admitted on 11-18-22 and the first contact and spiritual assessment by the chaplain was completed on 12-1-22. Patient #4: The patient was admitted on 11-16-22 and the first Chaplain contact and spiritual assessment was 12-1-22. Patient #7: The patient was admitted on 05-30-23 and the first MSW contact and psychosocial assessment was completed on 06-07-24. Patient #9:The patient was admitted 11-03-22 and the first contact and spiritual assessment by the SCC was 11-11-22. Patient #11:The patient was admitted on 11-16-22, the chaplain contact and spiritual assessment was 12-1-22. Patient #12:The patient was admitted on 10-19-22 and the first chaplain contact and spiritual assessment was 10-26-22. Patient #13:The patient was admitted on 06-30-23 and the first MSW contact and psychosocial assessment was completed on 07-06-23.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 194 words
“Upon patient record review, 4 of 14 (Patient #5, #6, #9, #14) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #5: The narcotic count dated 2/1/24 - 2/129 indicated the patient was using Hydrocodone 5/325mg. Hydrocodone was not listed on the medication profile. Patient #6: The narcotic count dated 3/26/24 indicated the patient was using Hydrocodone 5/325mg. Hydrocodone was not listed on the medication profile. In addition, the patient had hydrocodone in the home and this was not on the medication profile. Patient #9: Trazadone 100mg and Tramadol 100mg were on the narcotic count in March 2024. There was no evidence of Tramadol and Trazadone on the medication Profile. Patient #14: On the narcotic count dated 3/28/24, Seroquel 50 mg and Tramadol 50 mg were listed. There was no evidence of either of these medications on the medication profile.”
-
Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))
The inspectors’ words, 227 words
“Upon patient record review, 13 of 14 (Patient #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #11, #12, #13, #14 ) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment is updated including and by: • Changes that have taken place since the initial assessment • Information on the patient’s progress toward desired outcomes • Reassessment of the patient’s response to care • The assessment update must be accomplished as frequently as the condition of the patient requires, but no less frequently than every 15 days Patient #1 - #9, #13: The plans of care dated from 01-2-24 through 4-9-24 indicate the RN frequency is “once per month for RN supervisory visit and twice per month for CNA supervisory visit”. There is no evidence an assessment was completed by the RN except for recertification visits during these dates. Patient #14: POC from 01-02-24 to 03-28-24 indicate the RN frequency is “once per month for RN supervisory visit and twice per month for CNA supervisory visit”. There was no evidence a reassessment was done by an RN during these dates. Patient #11, #12: POC from 01-02-24 to 01-28-24 and prior indicated the RN frequency is “once per month for RN supervisory visit and twice per month for CNA supervisory visit”. There was no evidence a reassessment was done by an RN during these dates.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 163 words
“Upon patient record review, 4 of 14(Patient #5, #6, #9, #14) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #5: Narcotic Count completed between 2/1/24 and 2/29/24 indicated the patient had Hydrocodone 5/325 mg q 5hours PRN. There was no evidence of an order for the hydrocodone. Patient #6: The narcotic count dated 3/26/24 indicated the patient was using Hydrocodone 5/325 mg q 6 hours PRN. There was no evidence of an order for this hydrocodone. Patient #9: The narcotic count for March 2024 indicated the patient had Trazadone 100 mg and Tramadol 50mg in their possession. There was no evidence of a physician order for Tramadol or Trazadone. Patient #14: The narcotic count for 3/28/24 indicated the patient was taking Seroquel 50 mg daily, and Tramadol 50 mg PRN. There was no evidence of these medications on the medication profile”
-
Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))
The inspectors’ words, 93 words
“Upon patient record review, 13 of 14 (Patient #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #11, #12, #13, #14) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient #1-#9, and Patients #11 - #14: There was no evidence of an updated comprehensive assessment for these patients. The plan of care indicated and LVN visit was once weekly and there were no RN visits after the initial comprehensive assessment.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 151 words
“Upon patient record review, 13 of 14 (Patient #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #11, #12, #13, #14) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patients #1-#9, #11-#14: There was no evidence of a care plan for the CNA.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 167 words
“Upon patient record review 13 of 14 (Patient #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #11, #12, #13, #14) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care Patient #1, #2, 3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #11, #12, #13, #14: There is no evidence of a care plan for the aide specific duties. In all plans of care there is an open care plan for the hospice aide. The care plan indicates “bathing and ADLs” as interventions. There are no specific tasks assigned. For all patients, the aide completed the CNA documentation tool where all duties are open tasks and the aide documents the tasks that he/she completed. For example, the aide acknowledges all tasks 1)Ambulatory with assistance, 2) bedbound w/scheduled repositioning, 3)complete bed bath, 4) partial bed bath, and 5) shower. The aide then marks “completed” for some of the tasks.”
-
Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 107 words
“Upon patient record review 13 of 14 (Patient #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #11, #12, #13, #14) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patients #1-#9, #11-#14: On all documented aide supervisory visits, there was no indication that the RN made a visit to the home. The only exception was admission and recertification visits.”
-
Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))
The inspectors’ words, 392 words
“Upon patient client record review, 8 of 14 (Patient #1, #2, #3, #5, #7, #8, #9, #13) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient #1: The frequency of the aide is stated on the scheduling tool is written as 1-3 x per week. Additionally, Per Chaplain assessment, dated 02-19-24 and RN Sup Visit dated 02-28-24, the aide’s frequency is 6 x week. The IDG plan of care indicates 2 x week and is being followed by the IDG. Patient #2: The frequency of the aide is stated on the scheduling tool is written as 1-3 x per week. The IDG plan of care indicates 2 x week and is being followed by the IDG. Patient #3: The frequency of the aide is stated on the scheduling tool is written as 1-3 x per week. Additionally, per the RN supervisory visit dated 01-31-24, the hospice aide frequency is 6 x week. The IDG plan of care indicates 2 x week and is being followed by the IDG. Patient #5: On visit notes since the time of admission, Aide frequency is 4 x week, MD 1 x mo. The IDG POC indicates the aide 2 x week. There is no evidence of visit 1 x month by the MD and this is not indicated in the plan of care which is being followed by the IDG. Patient #7: On visit notes beginning on admission, 05-30-23, the aide frequency is 4 x month. The IDG plan of care indicates 2 x week and the plan of care is being followed. Patient #8: Chaplain notes dated 11-11-24 and 4-1-24 indicate the aide frequency is 4 x month. The IDG plan of care indicates 2 x week and the plan of care is being followed. Patient #9: The CNA schedule is written as 1-3 x per week. The IDG plan of care indicates 2 x week and the plan of care is being followed. Patient #13: The CNA schedule is written as 1-3 x per week. The IDG plan of care indicates 2 x week and the plan of care is being followed.”
All 3 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2024 | Complaint inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
| Jun 4, 2024 | Follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 2 deficiencies cited |
| Apr 17, 2024 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 11 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since May 12, 2021.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 6.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 4.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 83.3% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 6.4 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 4.6% |
| Visits near death | 83.3% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- 6 owners or officers are people: Arnold De Luna (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Arnold De Luna (corporate director, 100%); Arnold De Luna (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Caridad M Rebollar (managing employee (under contract)); Mylynn Dionaldo Suficiencia (owns 5% or more directly, 0%); Mylynn Dionaldo Suficiencia (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 7 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 7 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 63 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 78248, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 13.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Harbor Hospice of North San Antonio LP | 10 |
| Harbor Hospice of South San Antonio LP | 1 |
| A & Z Health Care LLC This hospice | 13 |
| Sacred Heart Enterprises, P.C. | 2 |
| Harbor Hospice of Central San Antonio LP | 9 |
| Christus VNA Hospice San Antonio | 0 |
| Vitas Healthcare of Texas LP | 3 |
| Gentiva | 10 |
| Amedisys Hospice of San Antonio | 14 |
| Elara Caring | 0 |
| Alamo Hospice | 25 |
| Compassus - San Antonio | 4 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.