Hearth Record

Amedisys Hospice of San Antonio

A hospice in San Antonio, Texas 78229

5368 Fredericksburg Road, Building A Ste 210, San Antonio, Texas 78229. (210) 541-0922.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 14 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

14 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 101 hospices serving ZIP code 78229 had 4.

The last inspection on record was on Dec 14, 2023: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

14 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

14 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Dec 14, 2023: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care13 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 102 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patients #4 and 8) did not contain a current/comprehensive Medication Profile: Patient #4: The Medication Profile included, “Remedy Calazime Protect for a wound. Apply to open area on left buttocks as per directions daily, and with each incontinence episode.” By 12/01/23 the nurse documented a “healed wound, dry skin with poor turgor.” The Nursing Supervisor reported that the Remedy was now being used as a barrier only. The Medication Profile had not been updated/modified. Patient #8: The Initial RN Assessment noted use of Oxygen 2 lpm continuous. This was not included on the Medication Profile.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 298 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patients #4, 8, 9, 13) did not contain evidence that the Plan of Care included all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications: Patient #4: The POC dated 11/30/23 included, “Remedy Calazime Protect for wound. Apply to open area on left buttocks as per directions daily, and with each incontinence episode.” By 12/01/23 the nurse documented a “healed wound, dry skin with poor turgor.” The Nursing Supervisor reported that the Remedy was now being used as a barrier only. This wound intervention remained un-modified on the Plan of Care. Patient #8: The Initial RN Assessment reflected a PICC line for this GIP patient, and documented that it was not observed as it had an occlusive dressing. There was nothing on the Hospice POC regarding the presence of this PICC line, nor that it was being managed by the hospital clinical staff. The Initial RN Assessment noted use of Oxygen 2 lpm continuous. This was not included on the Hospice POC. Patient #9: A verbal order was obtained on 11/14/23 for, “Oxygen 2 lpm via nasal canula”. This is an incomplete order as it does not include whether continuous or p.r.n. administration. The Medication Profile reflects p.r.n. use. In addition, the POC dated 10/23-12/21/23 included, “SN to perform/instruct in management of Gastrostomy/Jejunostomy including: Care of site, equipment, preparation and administration of feeding 4x per day bolus. Flush with 50 cc water QID. Check tube placement and check for residual every feeding”. This is not a complete order as it does not detail ‘what’ the site/dressing change is, nor how often. Patient #13: The Physician initial CTI dated 10/24/23 noted, “Patient has an 1800 cc fluid restriction.” This was not included on the POC.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 108 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patients #1, 3, 6) did not contain evidence that the Plan of Care included all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs: Patient #1: During Surveyor-attended home visit on 12/12/23 the patient had a hospital bed. This was not included on the most current POC. Patient #3: During Surveyor-attended home visit on 12/12/23 the patient had a Wheel Chair. This was not included on the most current POC. Patient #6: The11/03/23 CTI Narrative noted that the patient used a rollator. This was not included on the most current POC.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 219 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #’s 4, 5, 7) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient #4: The POC dated 11/30/23 reflected both Chaplain and SW had been declined. However, the POC continued to have the following content: 1) Chaplain to conduct Spiritual assessment and establish a POC; and 2) SW to evaluate social, emotional, and financial factors and establish POC. In addition, The IDG POC dated 11/30/23 indicated “Volunteer Declined”. However, there remained multiple Volunteer interventions on such POC. Patient #5: A SW evaluation was conducted on 11/02/23, noting a planned visit frequency of 1x per month x3 month; with a resultant verbal order obtained on 11/02/23 for SW 1x per month x3, including multiple planned interventions. The current IDG POC dated 11/30/23 did not include the scope/planned interventions for the Social Worker. A verbal order was obtained on 11/08/23 for Chaplain 2x per month x3, and listed multiple planned interventions. The current 11/30/23 IDG POC did not include these scope and frequency for the Chaplain. Patient #7: The IDG POC dated 11/09-01/07/24 indicated “Volunteer Declined”. However, there remained multiple Volunteer interventions on the most current IDG POC dated 12/05/23”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #7) did not contain evidence that the IDG had ensured that care and services were provided only in accordance with the Plan of Care. Patient #7: The POC dated 11/09/23-01/07/24 included, “PT to evaluate and establish a Plan of Care.” No PT visits had been made.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 127 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #5) did not contain evidence that the IDG had shared information on a on-going basis with non-hospice healthcare providers, furnishing services unrelated to the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #5: A verbal order was obtained on 11/14/23 for, “Podiatrist referral ordered for Plan of Care.” The Nurse Supervisor located evidence that a referral request had been faxed to a Podiatry provider. However, there was no documentation within the record that the Hospice had followed up with the provider or patient on this area of concern, to ascertain if the services were received. A phone call was made to the Podiatry office during survey which revealed that the patient had never received these services due to inadequate insurance coverage.”

    Rule L0558. Standard-level.

  • Program activities (42 CFR 418.58(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 126 words

    “Upon observation, there was not evidence that the Hospice had investigated all adverse events, incidents, accidents, variances or unusual occurrences that involved patient care, and developed a Plan of Correction to prevent the same or similar event from occurring again. During clinical record review, it was noted that the Hospice Aide providing care to Patient #14 on 12/01/23, documented the following, “Patient was transferring from shower chair to WC and both knees buckled. I pulled the SNF ER cord. SNF staff responded, assisted the patient up, and examined him. No injuries were noted at this time.” Surveyor requested and reviewed the Hospice’s QI Event Report from 11/20 to 12/10/23. There was no evidence of this adverse event having been reported to/processed by the Hospice management staff.”

    Rule L0569. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 192 words

    “Upon observation, there was not evidence that the Hospice followed acceptable standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infection. During Surveyor-attended home visit on 12/12/23, the Aide was in the process of transferring the patient to the bed, when the following occurred. After the Aide assisted the patient up from the wheel chair (WC), she set the Foley drainage bag on the floor under the wheel chair. The patient was pivoted, sat down, and was then was situated in the bed. The Aide then pushed the Foley bag across the floor with her foot, in order to move the WC out of the way from the bed. The Aide then moved the bed away from the wall, and proceeded to pull the patient up in the bed. Once up in bed she rolled the patient to her side (as the Surveyor had earlier asked if the patient had been noted to have any skin breakdown). The Aide then re-positioned the patient in the bed. The Foley bag remained on the floor. As Surveyor began to leave the room, she observed the privately-paid caregiver picking up the Foley bag from the floor.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 283 words

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 16 (Personnel #7) did not contain evidence that an Aide Skills Competency assessment had been conducted, by the Aide with a patient, which contained all CMS-required subject matter, as follows. Personnel #7: The Aide documented/signed/dated a self-assessment of the following skills. However she was not individually signed off for each of these subject matter by a qualified RN. An RN had signed/dated her name on the last page only of the document. The Aide had signed/dated her competence for the following subject matter: 1. Reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration 2. Basic infection control procedures 3. Basic elements of body functioning and changes in body function that must be reported to an aide’s supervisor 4. The need for respect for the patient, his or her privacy, and his or her property 5. Adequate nutrition and fluid intake Ÿ 6. Appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming that included ŸŸ 7. Bed bath 8. Sponge, tub, and shower bath 9. Shampoo, sink, tub, and bed 10. Nail and skin care 11. Oral hygiene 12. Toileting and elimination 13. Safe transfer techniques and ambulation 14. Normal range of motion and positioning The following skills had no Aide nor RN signature/date directly associated with them: Ÿ1.Communications skills including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, caregivers, and other Hospice staff. 2. Observation, reporting, and documentation of patient status and the care or service furnished 3. Maintenance of a clean, safe, and healthy environment 4. Recognizing emergencies and knowledge of emergency procedures and their application 5.The physical, emotional, and developmental needs of and ways to work with the populations served by the Hospice”

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #4) did not contain evidence that the RN-assigned Hospice Aide assignments and duties (Aide Plan of Care) included: Written patient care instructions, to include all pertinent information enabling the Hospice Aide to provide care/services. Patient #4: The patient admission consent listed DNR for Advance Directives. The current Aide POC listed. “None” for the pertinent information of Advance Directives.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #13) did not contain evidence that a Registered Nurse had made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the Hospice Aide, and to ensure that services ordered by the Hospice Interdisciplinary Group meet the patient’s needs. Patient #13: had a documented Aide Supervisory visit made on 11/06/23, and then not again until 12/05/23.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(6))

    “Upon patient client record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #4, 13) did not have evidence that each patient record contains Advance Directives. Patient #4: The patient admission consent listed DNR for Advance Directives. The POC dated 11/30/23 listed “None” for Advance Directives. Patient #13: The patient admission consent listed that the patient had a Living Will, DPOA-Healthcare, and a DNR for Advance Directives. The IDG POC listed only DNR for Advance Directives.”

    Rule L0677. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 260 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patients #1 and 2) did not contain evidence that the Hospice had provided the following required information to the SNF: • The most recent Hospice Plan of Care specific to each patient • Hospice Election form and any Advance Directives specific to each patient • Physician certification and recertification of the terminal illness specific to each patient • Names and contact information for Hospice personnel involved in Hospice care of each patient • Instructions on how to access the Hospice’s 24-hour on-call system • Hospice medication information specific to each patient • Hospice Physician and Attending Physician (if any) orders specific to each patient Patient #1: During Surveyor-attended home visit on 12/12/23, the following items were not located in the SNF documents, as having been provided by the Hospice: • The Hospice Benefit Election form • Physician certification and recertification of the terminal illness. The most recent in the file was dated 08/2023. Patient #2: During Surveyor-attended home visit on 12/12/23, the following items were not located in the SNF documents, as having been provided by the Hospice: • The Hospice Benefit Election form • Physician certification and recertification of the terminal illness. The most recent in the file was dated 06/2023. • The most recent Hospice Plan of Care. The most recent in the file was dated 07/2023. • Current Hospice Medication information. The most current Hospice Medication Profile in the file was dated 07/2023. • The names and contact information for the Hospice personnel involved in the care of this patient.”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

Dec 8, 2023: complaint and recertification inspection by the state1 deficiency
  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 870 words

    “Based on observation, interview, and record review the agency failed to ensure the ongoing sharing of information between all disciplines providing care and services in all settings for two of four patients (#9 and #1) reviewed for home visits in that: 1. There was no coordination to ensure the medication list from the agency and nursing facility were updated for Patient #9. 2. There was no coordination to ensure the medication list from the agency and nursing facility were updated for Patient #1. This failure could affect all patients that receive medications and could result in ineffective medication management and services. The findings were: A. Record review of Patient #9’s POC for certification date 12/1/2023 to 01/29/2024 revealed a SOC dated 02/09/2022, diagnoses included Senile Degeneration of Brain and Dementia (a range of conditions that affect the brain’s ability to think, remember, and function normally). During a home visit (at a nursing facility) with RN A on 12/06/2023 at 08:20 a.m., Patient #9 was observed in the memory care unit to be pleasant and calm but was unable to answer questions. Patient #9s current medication profile and medication list (from the nursing home she resided) were reconciled. Review of both lists with LVN E (LVN from the nursing home) revealed Mucinex (medicine used to relief coughs) 600 mg tablet, extended-release oral (every 12 hours PRN for congestion) and Sertraline (used to treat depression)50 mg tablet oral daily was not listed on nursing facilitys medication list. During an interview on 12/06/2023 at 08:50 a.m., LVN E revealed the hospice agency provided her an updated medication list monthly and the list was reviewed with the visiting nurse. Further interview with LVN A revealed Sertraline was discontinued on 05/31/2023 (from the nursing facilitys medication list) she did not know where the glitch was from or why there was a discrepancy with the Mucinex and Sertraline. During an interview on 12/06/2023 at 08:52 a.m., RN A revealed the Mucinex and Sertraline were discontinued and was not sure why it was on the agencys list. Record review of Patient #9s Client Medication Report from the agency revealed Mucinex 600 mg was discontinued on 05/01/2022. Further record review of Patient #9s clinical record revealed no documentation to coordinate the changes in medications regimen from both agencies. B. Record review of Patient #1s POC for certification dates 11/26/2023 to 01/14/2024 revealed a SOC date of 08/23/2022, diagnosis included Alzheimers Disease. During a home visit (at a nursing facility) with RN A on 12/06/2023 at 09:05 a.m., Patient #1 was observed in her wheelchair, she was calm and pleasant. Patient #1s nursing facility and agencys medication list were reconciled with LVN B. Further review revealed the following medications were not listed on the nursing facilitys medication list: -Dextromethorphan-Guaifenesin (used for cough) 10 mg-100 mg/5 ml oral syrup oral (10 ml) every 4-6 hours PRN (as needed), -Docusate Sodium (used for constipation) 100 mg capsule by mouth 100 mg two times daily as needed, -Remeron (appetite stimulant) 15 mg tablet oral one tablet at bedtime, -Robitussin Cough-Sore Throat 325 mg-10mg/10ml oral liquid (every 8 hours as needed). During an interview on 12/06/2023 at 09:24 a.m., LVN B revealed PRN medications were automatically discontinued if it was not used within 14 days. Further interview revealed Remeron 15 mg was discontinued on 02/21/2023. Also, LVN B did not know why there was a discrepancy during reconciliation. During an interview on 12/06/2023 at 09:43 a.m., RN A revealed she went over the medications last week with LVN B and was not sure why there was a discrepancy in the agency and nursing homes medication lists. Record review of Patient #1s Client Medication Report (from the agency) revealed Dextromethorphan-Guaifenesin was ordered on 06/23/2023 and discontinued on 06/24/2023, Robitussin was ordered on 04/26/2023 and discontinued on 04/26/2023, Docusate Sodium was ordered on 08/23/2023 and discontinued on 06/24/2023. Further record review of Patient #1s clinical record revealed no documentation to coordinate the changes in medications regimen from both agencies. During an interview on 12/07/2023 at 03:34 p.m., the Administrator revealed the nurses making the visits were responsible for ensuring the medication list were accurate and up to date. Further interview revealed an inaccurate medication list could result in inconsistent or inaccurate medication administration. During an interview on 12/08/2023 at 11:00 a.m., the Administrator revealed the nurses are communicating and going through the medications together but whats not happening is the MARs are not printed for them to see. The Administrator further revealed its a verbal medication reconciliation. Record review of the agencys policy and procedure titled “;Professional Management (10/16/2023)”, read in part, “;...290-9-43.16 (4)(b) The written communication shall specify an individual from the hospice and an individual from the facility where the patient resides who shall be responsible for communication between service providers regarding each patients treatment and condition and for addressing any care issues. Such communication shall be ongoing throughout the period of hospice service provision and shall be documented in the patients hospice medical record...” Record review of the agencys policy and procedure titled “;Medication Management (04/28/2022)”, read in part, “;...C. Medication Profile: ...5. A current medication profile will remain in the patients home folder and will be updated as modifications are made...””

    Rule L0557. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 14, 2023Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care13 deficiencies cited
Dec 8, 2023Complaint and recertification inspection by the state1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 18, 2003.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 14.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 10.2% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97.3% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 55% at home, 11% in assisted living, 32% in a nursing facility, 2% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day14.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends10.2%
Visits near death97.3% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Amedisys Holding LLC owns 100% directly since Dec 31, 2009.
  • 11 owners or officers are people: Marcus Macip (corporate officer); Darrell R Pietsch (managing employee (under contract)); Kimberly Seymour (corporate officer); Bridget R Kaigler (managing employee (on the payroll)); Bridget R Kaigler (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Travis Miglicco (corporate officer); Richard M Ashworth (corporate officer); Kristina J Braud (managing employee (on the payroll)); Jeanne Shingleton (corporate officer); Ross Vale (managing employee (on the payroll)); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Unitedhealth Group IncorporatedOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 14, 2025
Amedisys Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 20, 2015
Amedisys Holding LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Dec 31, 2009

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 85% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 88% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.59% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 86.7% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 101 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 78229, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 14.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.