Hearth Record

Refuge Hospice, LLC

A hospice in San Antonio, Texas 78217

4831 Whirlwind Dr., Ste 1, San Antonio, Texas 78217. (210) 296-6898.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 96 hospices serving ZIP code 78217 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Dec 20, 2023: an initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Dec 20, 2023: initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner5 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 284 words

    “It is required that the documented comprehensive assessment includes a drug profile that contains the patient’s current prescription and over the counter (OTC) drugs. The drug profile is updated per the hospice policy and procedure, but, at minimum, at the time of each comprehensive assessment and/or when new medication is added, or changes are made to existing medication. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 5 (40%) records reviewed revelated that the agency did not ensure that the drug profiles contained the patient’s current prescription and over the counter (OTC) drugs. Agency Policy: Medication List and Monitoring PC.17 read in part “I. the hospice will maintain a current, accurate medication profile of all prescription and over the counter (OTC) medications taken by the patient.” Clinical Record 1: The hospice election of benefit was dated 08/23/2023. A physician’s order dated 09/27/2023 read, “Vagisil cream to affected areas for itching and discomfort every day (qd) prn.” A review of the clinical record on 12/18/2023 did not include Vagisil on the medication profile. The interdisciplinary team meeting documentation dated 11/22/2023, 12/05/2023, and 12/14/2023 indicated medication profile reviews were completed. Clinical Record 2: The hospice election of benefit was dated 11/20/2023. A physician order dated 12/11/2023 read “Azithromycin 250mg tablet 2 tablets by mouth first day, then 1 tablet daily for 4 days for upper respiratory infection.” A review of the clinical record on 12/18/2023 did not include Azithromycin on the medication profile. The interdisciplinary team meeting documentation dated 12/14/2023 indicated medication profile reviews were completed. During interview on 12/20/2023, the Alternate Administrator reviewed the associated records and stated that the medication profiles had since been reviewed and corrected.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 448 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness, including the following a detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet specific patient and family needs. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 3 of 5 (60%) records reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure the hospice plan of care included a detailed statement of the scope and frequency of all services provided. Agency Policy: Plan of Care Process PC.8 read in part, “The POC includes but is not limited to: B. A detailed scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs, including level of care D. Drugs and treatments necessary to meet the needs of the patient.” Clinical Record 1: The hospice election of benefit was dated 08/23/2023. The hospice Plan of Care (POC) dated 11/21/2023 did not include an aide visit frequency. The interdisciplinary team meeting documentation dated 11/22/2023, 12/05/2023, and 12/14/2023 did not include an aide visit frequency at the time of the record review on 12/18/2023. The aide visit notes dated 11/22/2023, 11/27/2023, 11/29/2023, 12/01/2023, 12/04/2023, 12/06/2023, 12/08/2023, and 12/11/2023 stated that care was provided. Clinical Record 3: The hospice election of benefit was dated 08/21/2023. The hospice POC dated and the updated hospice POC dated 11/22/2023 included a Chaplain frequency that read, “2prn.” There was no detailed scope and frequency for the Chaplain at the time of the clinical record review on 12/18/2023. There was documentation on 08/24/2023 that the patient refused Chaplain services. Clinical Record 4: The hospice election of benefit was dated 08/23/2023. A physician’s order dated 8/29/2023 and the updated hospice POC dated 08/31/2023, 09/14/2023, 09/28/2023, 10/12/2023, and 10/23/2023 included a Social Worker (MSW) and Chaplain (CH) frequency that read “2prn.” There was no detailed scope or frequency for the MSW and CH at the time of the clinical record review on 12/19/2023. There was a MSW assessment completed on 08/28/2023. There was documentation on 08/28/2023 by the CH that the patient refused CH services. During interview on 12/20/2023, the Alternate Administrator reviewed the associated records and stated that the aide frequency had inadvertently been omitted and had since been corrected. She also added that she was unaware that as needed (PRN) visits could not serve as a stand-alone frequency and had placed them so disciplines could still provide services per patient request. Stated that she has reviewed policy and understood the need for a detailed service frequency and had since conferred with the interdisciplinary team and corrected the frequency with an updated hospice plan of care.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 403 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness, including the following the drugs and treatment necessary to meet the needs of the patient. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review and interview. In 3 of 5 (60%) records reviewed the agency did not ensure the hospice plan of care included the drugs treatments necessary to meet the needs of the patient. Agency Policy: Plan of Care Process PC.8 read in part, “The POC includes but is not limited to: B. A detailed scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs, including level of care D. Drugs and treatments necessary to meet the needs of the patient.” Clinical Record 1: The hospice election of benefit was dated 08/23/2023. A physician order dated 09/20/2023 read, “’Abdominal wound: cleanse wound with Dakin’s 1/2 strength, Pat dry, apply silver AG to wound bed and cover with dry dressing qd/PRN.” There was not an as needed (PRN) qualifier at the time of the clinical record review on 12/18/2023. Clinical Record 3: The hospice election of benefit was dated 08/24/2023. A physician order dated 08/24/2023 read “wound care to left breast: cleanse with Normal Saline, pat dry and apply dry dressing.” The comprehensive assessment dated 08/24/2023 stated the wound care was to be performed daily with caregiver assistance. There was no documented evidence that the physician order included a frequency for the wound care to be performed. The 10/23/2023 through 12/11/2023 registered nurse visit notes documentation read “cleanse wound with Normal Saline or wound cleanser, pat dry, apply CA Alginate to wound bed and cover with dry dressing daily with caregiver assistance.” There was no documented evidence of additional physician order for wound care. Clinical Record 4: The hospice election of benefit was dated 08/29/2023. A registered nurse (RN) visit note dated 11/08/2023 stated “initiation of Oxygen @ 2-4Liters via nasal cannula as needed.” There was no documented evidence in the clinical record that included an order for the Oxygen. The Oxygen was not on the initial POC or updated POCs by the interdisciplinary team on 08/31/2023, 09/14/2023, 09/28/2023, 10/12/2023, 10/23/2023, and 11/09/2023. During interview on 12/20/2023, the Alternate Administrator reviewed the associated records and stated that the Registered Nurse had since updated the medication and treatment orders per agency policy.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 231 words

    “It is required that hospice aides are assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse who is a member of the Interdisciplinary Group. and written patient care instructions for a hospice aide are prepared by a RN who is responsible for the supervision of the hospice aide. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 1 (100%) records reviewed with the provision of aide services revealed that the agency did not ensure written instructions for aide were provided. Clinical Record 1: The hospice election of benefits was dated 08/23/2023. The 08/23/2023 comprehensive assessment dated 08/23/2023 stated that the patient had a dehisced abdominal wound and caregiver was providing daily wound care. There was no documented evidence on the plan of care dated 08/23/2023 and the updated POC dated 11/21/2023 that included specific instructions related to the wound for the aide who was assigned and documented weekly visits 08/23/2023-12/13/2023. The aide POC dated 08/23/2023 did not include specific instructions for the wound. During interview on 12/20/2023, the Alternate Administrator reviewed the associated record and stated that while the aide did not need to do anything with the wound, she understood the aide needed directions as to how to manage protection of the dressing while providing personal care and that the Registered Nurse had since updated the aide care plan and added the instructions.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 217 words

    “It is required that all entries in the patient record are legible, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated by the person performing the care/service in accordance with hospice policy and with currently acceptable standards of practice. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review and interview. In 2 of 5 (40%) records reviewed revealed that the agency did not ensure that all entries in the patient record were appropriately authenticated and dated. Agency Policy: Authorization and Authentication of Medical Record Entries IM.7 read in part, “IV. Each medical record entry will be dated and signed with the complete name and title/credential of the person making the entry.” Clinical Record 1: The hospice election of benefit was dated 08/23/2023. The 08/23/2023 bereavement assessment and the 11/16/2023 visit documentation completed by the Chaplain (CH) did not include credentials with the associated signature and date. An aide visit note documentation for 12/06/2023 did not include a date with the associated signature and credentials. Clinical Record 2: The hospice election of benefit was dated 11/20/2023. The 11/21/2023 visit documentation completed by the CH did not include credentials with the associated signature and date. During interview on 12/20/2023, the Alternate Administrator reviewed the associated records and stated that the missing dates and credentials had since been corrected.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 20, 2023Initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jan 8, 2024.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 4 owners or officers are people: Angel Jorge Resendiz (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Dennis M. Hendrix (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Vincent G Gonzaba (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Karen A Roca (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 96 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 78217, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.