Hearth Record

Elegant Hospice

A hospice in San Antonio, Texas 78249

5718 University Heights Blvd Suite 203, San Antonio, Texas 78249. (210) 817-4746.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 91 hospices serving ZIP code 78249 had 4.

The last inspection on record was on Oct 15, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Oct 15, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner5 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 191 words

    “It is required that the hospice Interdisciplinary Group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completes an initial comprehensive assessment no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care, in accordance with CMS §418.24–the elements of the hospice care election statement. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 13 (8%) clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure that the hospice Interdisciplinary Group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed an initial comprehensive assessment no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care. CLINICAL RECORD 9: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 07/16/2024. There was no documented evidence that an initial spiritual care comprehensive assessment was completed within 5 days of the date of election of hospice care up to review date 10/14/2025. During an interview and a joint clinical records review on 10/14/2025 with the Director of Nursing (Personnel Record 4), she agreed that an initial spiritual care comprehensive assessment was not completed within 5 days of election of hospice services. No further information was provided.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 245 words

    “It is required that the comprehensive assessment includes an initial bereavement assessment of the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals, focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and considered in the bereavement plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 4 of 14 (29%) clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure the patient/family received an initial bereavement assessment. CLINICAL RECORD 5: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 06/21/2025. There was no documented evidence that an initial bereavement risk assessment was completed as of the record review date 10/14/2025. CLINICAL RECORD 6: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 09/02/2025. There was no documented evidence that an initial bereavement risk assessment was completed as of the record review date 10/14/2025. CLINICAL RECORD 9: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 07/16/2024. There was no documented evidence that an initial bereavement risk assessment was completed as of the record review date 10/14/2025. CLINICAL RECORD 11: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 02/28/2025. There was no documented evidence that an initial bereavement risk assessment was completed as of the record review date 10/14/2025. During an interview and a joint review of clinical records with the Director of Nursing (Personnel Record 4) on 10/14/2025 agreed with the finding.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 559 words

    “The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following a detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs. It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care includes a detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet specific patient and family needs. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 8 of 14 (57%) clinical records reviewed, revealed that the agency did not ensure the plan of care included a detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs. CLINICAL RECORD 2: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 09/30/2025. The plan of care dated 09/30/2025-12/28/2025 included the order for hospice aide services with a frequency of three (3) time a week and one (1) prn. There was no documented evidence for the reason for the prn hospice aide visit. CLINICAL RECORD 4: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 07/24/2025. The plan of care dated 07/24/2025-10/21/2025 included the order for hospice aide services with a frequency of three (3) time a week and two (2) prn. There was no documented evidence for the reason for the prn hospice aide visit. CLINICAL RECORD 5: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 06/21/2025. The plan of care dated 09/19/2025-12/17/2025 included the order for hospice aide services with a frequency of two (2) time a week and two (2) prn. There was no documented evidence for the reason for the prn hospice aide visit. CLINICAL RECORD 7: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 09/06/2025. The plan of care dated 09/06/2025-12/04/2025 included the order for hospice aide services with a frequency of two (2) time a week and one (1) prn. There was no documented evidence for the reason for the prn hospice aide visit. CLINICAL RECORD 8: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 07/11/2025. The plan of care dated 10/09/2025-12/07/2025 included the order for hospice aide services with a frequency of two (2) time a week and one (1) prn. There was no documented evidence for the reason for the prn hospice aide visit. CLINICAL RECORD 9: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 07/16/2024. The plan of care dated 09/09/2025-11/07/2025 included the order for hospice aide services with a frequency of three (3) time a week and one (1) prn. There was no documented evidence for the reason for the prn hospice aide visit. CLINICAL RECORD 10: 1 The patient elected the hospice benefit on 10/04/2025. An order dated 10/14/2025 was for hospice aide services five (5) times a week and one (1) prn. There was no documented evidence for the reason for the prn hospice aide visit. CLINICAL RECORD 12: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 05/01/2025. An order dated 05/01/2025 was for hospice aide services three (3) times a week and three (3) prn visits. There was no documented evidence for the reason for the prn hospice aide visit. During an interview and a joint review of clinical records on 10/14/2025 with the Director of Nursing agreed that the hospice aide frequencies were not specific and stated, “I was not aware of this requirement.” No further information was provided.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Nursing services (42 CFR 418.64(b)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 206 words

    “It is required that nursing care and services are provided by or under the supervision of a registered nurse and per the plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 14 (7%) clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure that nursing care and services were provided as required by agency policy. Document 1: Agency policy Titled: Wound Care Assessment Policy and procedure, stated in part, “ Initial Assessment: conduct head-to- toe skin assessment upon admission; document all wounds and notify Physician. ongoing assessment: evaluate wound size, type, drainage, odor, surrounding skin, and pain level at each dressing change. Plan of care: update and individualize treatment orders based on wound progress and IDG review. The patient elected the hospice benefit on 07/16/2024. The plan of care dated 09/09/2025-11/07/2025 included an order for the skilled nurse one (1) time a week. The hospice registered nurse documented weekly visit on 09/26/2025, 10/02/2025, 10/07/2025 and 10/13/2025. There was no documented evidence of wound assessment on those visits as required by agency policy. During an interview and a joint clinical record review with the Director of Nursing on 10/14/2025 and agreed that the wound assessments were not completed.”

    Rule L0591. Standard-level.

  • Professional management (42 CFR 418.112(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 227 words

    “It is required that the hospice assumes responsibility for the professional management of the SNF/NF or ICF/IDF resident’s hospice services including ongoing assessment, monitoring, care planning, coordination, and provision of care by the hospice Interdisciplinary Group. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 3 (100%) clinical records reviewed of patients who resided in a skilled nursing facility (SNF) revealed the agency did not ensure that the hospice assumed responsibility for the professional management of the SNF patient’s hospice services in accordance with the hospice plan of care (POC). CLINICAL RECORD 9: The patient’s election of benefits was 07/16/2024 with diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease and Sacral Wound. The patient resided in a skilled nursing facility (SNF.) During the initial comprehensive assessment date 07/16/2024, the registered nurse (RN) documented that the patient had a sacral wound with wound measurements and included a plan of care that included alteration in skin integrity. On 07/16/2024, the Physician gave the RN a verbal order for the SNF staff to provide wound care. The RN delegated the wound care to the SNF staff, however, there was no documented evidence in the clinical record that the hospice registered nurse evaluated the progress or ensured the effectiveness of the wound care. During an interview and a joint record review on 10/14/2025 with the DON, she agreed.”

    Rule L0762. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Oct 15, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Feb 14, 2020.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 7.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 81.7% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 84% at home, 11% in a nursing facility, 5% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day7.9 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5.4%
Visits near death81.7% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 5 owners or officers are people: Ravikanth Reddy R Yalamuri (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Ravikanth Reddy R Yalamuri (corporate officer, 100%); Ravikanth Reddy R Yalamuri (corporate director, 100%); Robert G Bass (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%); Kedra Lamb (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 7 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 64.65% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 51.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold7 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 91 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 78249, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.