Hearth Record

Tlc Hospice Services

A hospice in El Paso, Texas 79925

3711 Admiral Street Suite A, El Paso, Texas 79925. (915) 529-2119.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 48 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

48 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 24 hospices serving ZIP code 79925 had 2.5.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 3, 2026: a complaint inspection by the state.

7 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

48 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

48 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 2, 2025: recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies
  • EP Training and Testing (42 CFR 418.113(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 400 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the Agency failed to review and update at least annually it’s Emergency Preparedness Training and Testing program for 1 (2023) of 3 years for which documentation was requested. This failure had the potential that Agency employees would not know their role in an emergency and has the potential to place clients at risk of harm. Findings include:During the Entrance Conference conducted with the Administrator and the Supervising Nurse on 04/29/2025 at approximately 10:30 AM, Surveyor requested documentation of Emergency Preparedness Planning and Implementation including drills for 2022, 2023 and 2024. Documentation provided by the Supervising Nurse revealed Emergency Preparedness Planning and Implementation for the years of 2022 and 2024. The documentation failed to include evidence that a drill was conducted for the year of 2023. On 04/29/2025 at approximately 4:20 PM, the Supervising Nurse stated that she had located documentation of Emergency Preparedness Drills for 2022 and 2024, however was unable to find documentation for the year of 2023. The Supervising Nurse stated that she was recently hired as the Supervising Nurse four weeks ago and was unsure if the Agency had conducted a drill in 2023. During the exit conference on 05/02/2025 at 5:00 PM, the findings were discussed with the Administrator. The Administrator stated during 2023, the Former Supervising Nurse was responsible for maintaining documentation of Emergency Preparedness. The Administrator stated the Agency did conduct evaluations of their Emergency Preparedness Plan in 2023, however documentation had been misplaced in the move when the Agency moved from Address A to Address B. No additional information was provided.Review of the Agency’s policy and procedure manual revealed a policy titled “Testing Program for Emergency Operations Plan (EOP),” with a revision date of 02/2021, which read in part, “Hospice will conduct exercises to test the EOP at least biennially. Hospice will do the following: Participate in a full-scale exercise that is community-based or when a community-based exercise is not accessible, an individual, facility-based exercise….Conduct an additional exercise that may include, but is not limited to the following: - A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or individual, facility-based. A tabletop exercise that includes a group discussion led by a facilitator, using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages or prepared questions designed to challenge the EOP…Analyze Hospice’s response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises and emergency events.””

    Rule E0036. Standard-level.

  • Cost saving (42 CFR 418.78(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 391 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the Hospice failed to maintain documentation of cost savings achieved through the use of volunteers for 1 of 2 calendar years requested (2023), for which documentation of cost savings achieved through the use of volunteers was requested.This failure resulted in the Hospice being unable to provide documentation of utilization of volunteers for the calendar year of 2023 and has the potential to result in substandard care in that it is unknown who was occupying a position as a volunteer, and what time they spent occupying those positions. Findings included:During the Entrance Conference conducted with the Administrator and the Supervising Nurse on 04/29/2025 at approximately 10:30 AM, Surveyor requested documentation of cost savings achieved through the use of volunteers for the years of 2023 and 2024. On 04/29/2025 at approximately 4:20 PM, the Supervising Nurse stated that she had located documentation of cost savings achieved through the use of volunteers for the year of 2024, however was unable to find documentation for the year of 2023.On 05/02/2025 at approximately 4:50 PM, an interview was conducted with the Administrator. The Administrator stated that Hospice Aide A was the volunteer coordinator and was responsible for maintaining documentation of volunteer utilization during the year of 2023. The Administrator stated Hospice Aide A was no longer employed by the Agency. The Administrator stated that volunteers were utilized during the year of 2023, however the Agency had misplaced the documentation when they moved from Address A to Address B. Review of the Agency’s policy and procedure manual revealed a policy titled “Volunteer Services,” with a revision date of 02/2021, which read in part, “Hospice will document the cost savings achieved through the use of volunteers and will include: Identification of each position occupied by volunteers. The work time spent by volunteer occupying those positions. Estimate of the dollar cost that Hospice would have incurred if paid employees occupied positions identified. Hospice will document and maintain a volunteer staff sufficient to provide administrative and/or direct patient care in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5% of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract staff. Hospice will document a continuing level of volunteer activity. Hospice will maintain records on the use of volunteer for patient care and administrative services, including the type of services and time worked.””

    Rule L0646. Standard-level.

Jan 31, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care46 deficiencies
  • Establishment of the Emergency Program (EP) (42 CFR 418.113)

    “Condition of Participation: Emergency Preparedness”

    Rule E0001. Condition-level.

  • Initial & comprehensive assessment of patient (42 CFR 418.54)

    “Condition of Participation: Initial and Comprehensive Assessment of the Patient.”

    Rule L0520. Condition-level.

  • IDG, care planning, coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56)

    “Condition of Participation: Interdisciplinary Group, Care Planning, and Coordination of Services. L536”

    Rule L0536. Condition-level.

  • Quality assessment & performance improvement (42 CFR 418.58)

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the organization develops, implements, and maintains an effective, on-going, organization wide Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program.”

    Rule L0559. Condition-level.

  • Hospice aide and homemaker services (42 CFR 418.76)

    “Condition of Participation: Hospice Aide and Homemaker Services. L607”

    Rule L0607. Condition-level.

  • Volunteers (42 CFR 418.78)

    “Conditions of Participation - Volunteers. L641”

    Rule L0641. Condition-level.

  • Organizational environment (42 CFR 418.100)

    “Condition of Participation: Organization and Administration of Services.”

    Rule L0648. Condition-level.

  • Arrangement with Other Facilities (42 CFR 418.113(b)(5))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence of contracts/agreements with other facilities/agencies/hospices to receive patients in the event the hospice cannot provide care to their patients during an emergency. Corrected on site.”

    Rule E0025. Standard-level.

  • Primary/Alternate Means for Communication (42 CFR 418.113(c)(3))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the Emergency Plan communication plan must includes a primary and alternate means for communicating with hospice’s employees. Corrected on site.”

    Rule E0032. Standard-level.

  • EP Training and Testing (42 CFR 418.113(d))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence of emergency preparedness training and testing program that is based on the emergency plan, policies and procedures and the communication plan. No evidence of emergency preparedness training, no drills. A report was written for weather event that occurred last week, and the QAPI RN signed that she had reviewed the EP plan.”

    Rule E0036. Standard-level.

  • EP Training Program (42 CFR 418.113(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 106 words

    “Upon personnel record review, 10 of 13 (Personnel #1,#2,#3,#4,#5,#6,#7,#8,#9,#10 ) did not have evidence Emergency Preparedness training including: • Initial training in emergency preparedness policies and procedures to all new and existing hospice employees, and individuals providing services under arrangement, consistent with their expected roles • Demonstrate staff knowledge of emergency procedures • Provide emergency preparedness training at least annually • Periodically review and rehearse its emergency preparedness plan with hospice employees (including nonemployee staff), with special emphasis placed on carrying out the procedures necessary to protect patients and others • Maintain documentation of all emergency preparedness training Personnel #1,#2,#3,#4,#5,#6,#7,#8,#9,#10: No evidence of Emergency preparedness training.”

    Rule E0037. Standard-level.

  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 236 words

    “Upon patient record review 9 of 14 (Patient #1,#4,#7,#8,#9,#10,#11,#13,#14) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient #1: SOC 3/21/2024. no evidence of a spiritual assessment by SC until 5/2/2024 (not enough info in SN SOC assessment). Patient #4: SOC 4/26/2024. no evidence of a spiritual assessment by SC until 10/29/2024 (not enough info in SN SOC assessment). Patient #7: SOC 10/19/2024. no evidence of a spiritual assessment by SC until 10/25/2024 (not enough info in SN SOC assessment). Patient #8: SOC 10/5/2024. no evidence of a spiritual assessment by SC until 10/15/2024 (not enough info in SN SOC assessment). Patient #9: SOC 8/31/2023. no evidence of a spiritual assessment by SC until 9/13/2023 (not enough info in SN SOC assessment). Patient #10: SOC 12/6/2024. no evidence of a spiritual assessment by SC until 12/18/2024 (not enough info in SN SOC assessment). Patient #11: SOC 1/4/2024. no evidence of a spiritual assessment by SC until 1/23/2024 (not enough info in SN SOC assessment). Patient #13: SOC 8/13/2024. no evidence of a spiritual assessment by SC until 8/26/2024 (not enough info in SN SOC assessment). Patient #14: SOC 9/25/2024. no evidence of a spiritual assessment by SC until 10/4/2024 (not enough info in SN SOC assessment)”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #2) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient #2: No evidence of a spiritual assessment (SN Assessment does not have enough information).”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 128 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #2, #6) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #2: On home visit medication reconciliation found pt. to be taking Aspirin 81mg PO QD, No evidence on Hospice profile for this medication. Corrected on site. Patient #6: Medication profile dated 12/26/2024 included Voltaren gel 1% apply 1GM 3x day for osteo arthritis. There was no evidence of an area to apply. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 155 words

    “Upon patient record review, 9 of 14 (Patient #1,#2,#4,#7,#8,#9,#10,#11,#13) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient #1: SOC 3/21/2024. Bereavement assessment done 5/2/2024. Patient #2: No evidence of a bereavement assessment completed. Patient #4: No evidence of a bereavement assessment completed. Patient #7: SOC 10/19/2024. Bereavement assessment done 10/25/2024. Patient #8: SOC 10/5/2024. Bereavement assessment done 10/15/2024. Patient #9: No evidence of a bereavement assessment completed. Patient #10: No evidence of a bereavement assessment completed. Patient #11: No evidence of a bereavement assessment completed. Patient #13: SOC 8/13/2024. Bereavement assessment done 9/17/2024.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 131 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #1,#12,#13) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment is updated including and by: • The hospice interdisciplinary group (in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician, if any) • Changes that have taken place since the initial assessment • Information on the patient’s progress toward desired outcomes • Reassessment of the patient’s response to care • The assessment update must be accomplished as frequently as the condition of the patient requires, but no less frequently than every 15 days Patient #1: No evidence of a comprehensive assessment from 6/10/2024-11/14/2024. Patient #12: No evidence of a comprehensive assessment from 2/8/2024-through end of care (no visit for dc date of 2/28/2024). Patient #13: No evidence of a comprehensive assessment from 8/19/2024-9/6/2024.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 290 words

    “Upon patient record review, 9 of 14 (Patient #1,#3,#4,#7,#8,#10,#11,#12,#13) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #1:On SN SOC identified pt. taking Plavix, issues with dysphagia and no funeral planning done. No evidence of POC for problem/interventions/goals for bleeding precautions, dysphagia or funeral planning. Corrected on site. Patient #3:On SN SOC identified pt. had no funeral planning done. No evidence of POC for problem/interventions/goals for funeral planning. Corrected on site. Patient #4:On SN SOC identified pt. had no funeral planning done. No evidence of POC for problem/interventions/goals for funeral planning. Corrected on site. Patient #7: On SN SOC identified pt. has G-tube, No evidence on POC for problem/intervention/goals for G-tube. Corrected on site. Patient #8:On SN SOC identified issues with dysphagia. No evidence of POC for problem/interventions/goals for dysphagia. Corrected on site. Patient #10: ON SN SOC identified history if aspiration and taking Eliquis. No evidence of POC for problem/interventions/goals for dysphagia/aspiration and bleeding precautions. Corrected on site. Patient #11: On SN SOC identified pt. has O2 and Clopidogrel. No evidence of POC for problem/interventions/goals for O2 and bleeding precautions. Patient #12: On SN SOC identified pt on O2, Eliquis, aspiration precautions, elimination problems and need for funeral planning. POC generated only had titles for these items and no problem/interventions/goals were included. Patient #13: On SN SOC identified pt. taking Eliquis. No evidence of POC for problem/interventions/goals for bleeding precautions.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 94 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #2,#6) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #2: On home visit medication reconciliation found pt. to be taking Aspirin 81mg PO QD, No evidence of a Hospice order for this medication. Corrected on site. Patient #6: Order dated 12/26/2024 included Voltaren gel 1% apply 1GM 3x day for osteo arthritis. There was no evidence of an area to apply. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon client record review, 10 of 14 (Patient #1,#2,#3,#4,#5,#6,#7,#8,#9,#10) did not have evidence that the IDG in collaboration with the attending physician reviewed, revised and documents the individualized plan as frequently as the patient’s condition requires but no less frequently then every 15 calendar days. Patients #1,#2,#3,#4,#5,#6,#7,#8,#9,#10: IDG occurred on 1/7/2025 and again on 1/23/2025- 16 days apart.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 234 words

    “Upon client record review, 9 of 14 (Patient #1,#5,#6,#7,#8,#9,#11,#12,#14) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #1: Order for SN visits dated 3/21/2024, no evidence of SN visits from 6/10/2024-11/14/2024. Patient #5: Order for SC dated 11/27/2024 1x month and 3 PRN. No evidence of SC visit month of December 2024. Patient #6: Order for SN dated 12/23/2024 1x week. No evidence of a visit or missed visit week of 1/19/2025. Patient #7: Order for SC dated 10/21/2024 1x month and 3 PRN. No evidence of visits months of November or December 2024. Patient #8: Order for SN dated 12/12/2024 1x week. No evidence of a visit or missed visit week of 1/19/2025. Patient #9: Order for SC dated 12/12/2024 1x month. No evidence of a SC visit for month of December 2024. Patient #11: Order for SN dated 1/10/2024 1x week. No evidence of visits or missed visits weeks of 3/10/2024, 3/24/2024 and 4/7/2024. Patient #12: Order for SN dated 1/22/2024 1x week. No evidence of SN visits for weeks of 1/28/24, 2/11/2024 and 2/25/2024. Patient #14: Pt SOC 9/25/2024. No evidence of order for SN visit frequency until 11/24/24 order of 1x week with 2 PRN. Visits were made weekly from start of care through 11/24/2024. Week of 11/24/2024 SN visited 2x with an additional PRN.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Program scope (42 CFR 418.58(a)(1))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the program shows measurable improvement in indicators related to improved palliative outcomes and hospice services. There is policy related to plan for QAPI, no audits until 1/24/2025.”

    Rule L0561. Standard-level.

  • Program scope (42 CFR 418.58(a)(2))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice measures, analyzes, and tracks quality indicators, including adverse patient events and other aspects of performance that enable the hospice to assess processes of care, hospice services, and operations. No evidence of QAPI activities since 2023, first audit of charts occurred 1/24/2025, with a meeting following on 1/27/2025.”

    Rule L0562. Standard-level.

  • Program data (42 CFR 418.58(b)(1))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the program must use quality indicator data, including patient care, and other relevant data, in the design of the program. No activity with QAPI since 2023 per DON.”

    Rule L0563. Standard-level.

  • Program data (42 CFR 418.58(b)(2))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the QAPI program uses quality indicator data, including patient care and other relevant data in the design of its program. The hospice must use the data collected to: • Monitor the effectiveness and safety of services and quality of care • Identify opportunities and priorities for improvement No evidence of patient monitoring until 1/24/2025.”

    Rule L0564. Standard-level.

  • Program data (42 CFR 418.58(b)(3))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the board of directors/governing body approves the frequency and detail of the data collection.”

    Rule L0565. Standard-level.

  • Program activities (42 CFR 418.58(c)(1)(i))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence QAPI activities focus on high risk, high volume, or problem prone areas.”

    Rule L0566. Standard-level.

  • Program activities (42 CFR 418.58(c)(1)(ii))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement activities focus on high risk, high volume or problem-prone areas by considering incidence, prevalence, and the severity of problems.”

    Rule L0567. Standard-level.

  • Program activities (42 CFR 418.58(c)(1)(iii))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement activities focus on high risk, high volume or problem-prone areas by understanding how they affect palliative outcomes, patient safety and quality of care.”

    Rule L0568. Standard-level.

  • Performance improvement projects (42 CFR 418.58(d)(1))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the number and scope of distinct QAPI projects conducted annually is based on the needs of the hospice’s population and internal organizational needs and must reflect the scope, complexity, and past performance of the hospice’s services and operations.”

    Rule L0572. Standard-level.

  • Executive responsibilities (42 CFR 418.58(e)(1))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence of involvement of the governing body and organizational leaders in the Quality Assessment/Performance Improvement (QAPI) program.”

    Rule L0574. Standard-level.

  • Executive responsibilities (42 CFR 418.58(e)(2))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice’s governing body is responsible for ensuring that the hospice-wide Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement efforts address priorities for improved quality of care and patient safety, and that all improvement actions are evaluated for effectiveness.”

    Rule L0575. Standard-level.

  • Control (42 CFR 418.60(b)(1))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence in QAPI reports that the hospice maintains a coordinated agency-wide program for the surveillance, identification, prevention, control, and investigation of infectious and communicable diseases that is an integral part of the hospice’s Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement program. Agency is collecting data in logs for pt. and employee infection. No aggregate of same.”

    Rule L0580. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 273 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 14 (Patient #1,#2,#3,#5,#6,#7) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient #1: Per SN assessment, patient is on Plavix, has risk of falls, and is at risk of aspiration with dysphagia. No evidence on the aide assignment of fall, bleeding, or aspiration precautions. Corrected on site. Patient #2: Pt has order for O2, no evidence on the aide assignment for O2 precautions. Corrected on site. Patient #3: Pt has order for O2 and Clopidogrel, no evidence on the aide assignment for O2 and bleeding precautions. Corrected on site. Patient #5: Pt has order for O2 and SN assessed for seizure precautions, no evidence on the aide assignment for O2 and seizure precautions. Corrected on site. Patient #6: Pt has order for O2 and Eliquis, no evidence on the aide assignment for O2 and bleeding precautions. Corrected on site. Patient #7: SN identified pt. at risk for falls, no evidence on aide assignment of fall precautions. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 272 words

    “Upon patient record review 8 of 14 (Patient #1,#2,#5,#6,#7,#9,#10,#14) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient #1:Order 12/23/2024 Aide visit 2x week. Visits were performed 3x week for weeks of 12/29/2024, 1/5/2025 and 1/12/2025. No visits documented for week of 1/19/2025. Patient #2:Order 12/3/2024 aide 2 x week, order 12/8/2024 aide visits 3x week. Last IDG of 1/23/2025 continues to have aide visit frequency at 3x week. there is no evidence of any aide visits since start of care (supervisory visits were done). Patient #5: Order on IDG POC dated 12/12/2024 aide visit frequency 3x week. Week of 12/29/2024 two visits were made with no evidence of a missed visit. Patient #6: Order 12/23/2024 aide visits 3x week. Week of 1/20/2025 one visit made with no evidence of missed visits. Patient #7: Order dated 10/19/2024 aide visits 2x week. Weeks of 12/22/2024 and 1/5/2025 one visit made with no evidence of missed visits. Patient #9: Order dated 9/15/2024 aide visits 2x week. Weeks of 12/15/24, 12/22/24, 1/5/25, 1/12/25 and 1/19/2025 3 visits per week were made. Patient #10: Order dated 12/12/2024 aide visits 3x week. Weeks of 12/15/24 and 12/18/24 2 visits per week were made. No visits were made for weeks of 12/29/24, 1/5/24, 1/12/25, 1/19/25. Patient #14: Order dated 9/25/2024 aide visits 2 x week. No evidence of any aide visits made (supervisory visits made by RN).”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Recruiting and retaining (42 CFR 418.78(c))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice documents and demonstrates viable and ongoing efforts to recruit and retain volunteers.”

    Rule L0645. Standard-level.

  • Cost saving (42 CFR 418.78(d))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice documented the cost savings achieved through the use of volunteers. Documentation must include the following: • The identification of each position that is occupied by a volunteer • The work time spent by volunteers occupying those positions • Estimates of the dollar costs that the hospice would have incurred if paid employees occupied the positions identified in paragraph (d)(1) of CFR 418.78 for the amount of time specified in paragraph (d)(2) of CFR 418.78”

    Rule L0646. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. No reporting of use of volunteers.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice is directed by a Board of Directors/governing body which assumes full legal authority and responsibility for the operation of the hospice. There was no evidence of oversight of hospice as evidence by: -The last GB minutes presented are dated 12/22/2021, therefore not annual review since this time. -Lack of active QAPI program -Lack of active emergency preparedness program and training for staff -Lack of Administrator oversight for ensuring patient care/needs are being met and hospice agency is meeting Medicare Conditions of Participation”

    Rule L0651. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #12) did not evidence that each patient record contains physician orders. Patient #12: No evidence of a discharge order for extended prognosis.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #10) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient #10: SN note in record is dated 12/21/2025 (should have been 12/24/2024 per DON).”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #11) did not have evidence that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice in accordance with §418.26, the hospice must forward to the patient’s attending physician: • A copy of the hospice discharge summary • The patient’s clinical record, if requested Patient #11: No evidence discharge summary sent to attending physician.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))

    “Upon client record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #11,#12) did not have evidence that the discharge summary includes all required information. Patient #11,#12: No evidence of a discharge summary.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

  • Label dispose storage drugs (42 CFR 418.106(e)(2)(i)(A))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence a copy is provided of the hospice written policies and procedures on the management and disposal of controlled drugs to the patient or patient representative and family. Though there is documentation in each patient record that a copy of the hospice written policies and procedures on the management and disposal of controlled drugs to the patient or patient representative and family, there was no evidence the policy was a part of the admission packet and the DON agrees it was not.”

    Rule L0695. Standard-level.

  • Personnel qualification (42 CFR 418.114(b)(4))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 13 (Personnel # 13) did not have evidence that all Speech Therapy Services are provided by a qualified licensed Speech-Language Pathologist (SLP) or Audiologist in accordance with the state’s Speech-Language Pathology Practice Act and the hospice’s policies and procedures and/or job descriptions. Personnel #13: No employee file provided.”

    Rule L0788. Standard-level.

  • Personnel qualification (42 CFR 418.114(b)(5))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 13 (Personnel #12) did not have evidence all Occupational Therapy Services are provided by a qualified licensed Occupational Therapist (OT) in accordance with the state’s Occupational Therapy Practice Act and the hospice’s policies and procedures and/or job descriptions. Personnel #12: No employee file for OT provided.”

    Rule L0789. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))

    “Upon personnel record review, 2 of 13 (Personnel #12,#13) did not have evidence the hospice obtained a criminal background check on all contracted individuals who have direct patient care and access to patient records. No HR files available for review.”

    Rule L0795. Standard-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 3, 2026Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
May 2, 2025Recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies cited
Jan 31, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care46 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Dec 11, 2018.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 6.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 69.8% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 97% at home, 3% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day6.6 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.1%
Visits near death69.8% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 6 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 38.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold6 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 24 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 79925, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 2.5; this one had 48.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.