Hearth Record

Kindful Health

A hospice in Plano, Texas 75023

3369 Premier Drive, Ste 300, Plano, Texas 75023. (866) 733-4550.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

1 deficiency cited in the last three years

The middle of the 97 hospices serving ZIP code 75023 had 3.

The last inspection on record was on Jan 7, 2026: a complaint inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Nov 15, 2023: recertification inspection by the state1 deficiency
  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 812 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to include physician orders in patient records for 2 (#1, #9) of 3 patient records reviewed that received wound care. The failure placed the agency’s clients at risk of omission of wound care or inappropriate wound care that could result in deterioration of the wounds. Patient #1:Record review of Patient #1’s record revealed a Plan of Care dated 5/31/2023 to 8/28/2023. The Plan of Care indicated that Patient #1 started on the agency’s services on 5/31/2023. The Plan of Care listed Unspecified Sequelae of Cerebral Infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain that can cause parts of the brain to die) as the primary diagnosis. The Plan of Care indicated that Patient #1 lived at an assisted living facility, Facility X. Hospice Aide D conducted a hospice aide visit on 6/23/2023. Hospice Aide D documented “bottom sore reopen.” Registered Nurse C conducted a skilled nurse visit on 6/26/2023. Registered Nurse C documented that Patient #1 had a “Stage 2 to sacrum.” Registered Nurse C documented that Patient #1 was starting to develop a wound in the sacral area and that foam dressing had been ordered on Friday but had not been delivered. Registered Nurse C documented that education had been provided to the staff at the assisted living facility to apply a 3 x 3 dressing to the sacral area. Patient #1’s clinical record did not contain orders for wound care to the sacrum. Patient #9:Record review of Patient #9’s revealed a Plan of Care dated 9/1/2023 to 11/29/2023. The Plan of Care indicated that Patient #9 started on the agency’s services on 9/1/2023. The Plan of Care listed Senile Degeneration of the Brain (decline and death of nerve cells of the brain) as the primary diagnosis. The Plan of Care indicated that Patient #9 lived at an assisted living facility, Facility Y. Registered Nurse C conducted an as needed skilled nurse visit on 9/24/2023 due report that Patient #9 had a deep wound on the great toe. Registered Nurse C documented upon arrival, that Patient #9 was agitated and walking around the facility smearing blood throughout the facility. Registered Nurse C documented cleaning an abrasion and then wrapped the wound with gauze and tape.Registered Nurse E conducted a skilled nurse visit on 9/27/2023. Registered Nurse E documented that Patient #9 had an abrasion to the right great toe. Registered Nurse E documented cleaning the wound with soap and water and then applied a band-aid (wound care was different from the wound care that was performed on 9/24/2023). Patient #9’s clinical record did not contain orders for wound care. During an interview on 11/14/2023 at approximately 1:00 p.m. with the Administrator, the Alternate Administrator/Alternate Supervising Nurse, the Supervising Nurse, the Chief Executive Officer, and an Area Director of Clinical Services, the surveyor discussed the wound care performed on Patient #1 and Patient #9, and that there were no orders for wound care in the clinical record. The Supervising Nurse reviewed the records and informed the surveyor that the Supervising Nurse “didn’t see orders for wound care.” During an interview on 11/15/2023 at 11:38 a.m. with Registered Nurse C, the surveyor discussed the wound care that Registered Nurse C performed on Patient #1 and Patient #9 and that there were no orders for wound care in the clinical records. Registered Nurse C informed the surveyor that Registered Nurse C used the written order at the assisted living facilities. Registered Nurse C stated, “I did not put the orders in the chart.” During an interview on 11/15/2023 at 12:15 p.m. with Registered Nurse E, the surveyor discussed the wound care that Registered Nurse E performed on Patient #9 and that there were no orders for wound care in the clinical record. Registered Nurse E informed the surveyor that the order was received from the physician; Registered Nurse E was new to the computer system; and that the wound care was a “one off and if it had required more, it would have triggered [Registered Nurse E] to include the order in the chart.” During an interview on 11/15/2023 at 2:07 p.m. with the Administrator, Alternate Administrator/Alternate Supervising Nurse, the Supervising Nurse, the Chief Executive Officer, and the CNO-CCO (unknown), the agency did not present evidence to dispute the findings. The agency had a policy titled “Timeline” that was labeled IM.40 and last reviewed on 10/1/2021. The policy read in part; “Purpose To establish timely parameters for all medical record information. Policy The Hospice will ensure timely provision of care to meet patient’s needs in compliance with all federal and state laws and regulations. Procedure I. All Hospice staff, physician(s) and/or non-physician practitioner(s) and physician office staff as appropriate, will be oriented to the following parameters...G. Supplemental verbal orders may be obtained before care is provided and are written within 24 hours of receiving the orders...””

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 7, 2026Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Nov 15, 2023Recertification inspection by the state1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Feb 2, 2017.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 14 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95.2% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 27% at home, 43% in assisted living, 30% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day14.0 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.4%
Visits near death95.2% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Kindful Health, LLC owns 50% directly since Apr 28, 2023.
  • 13 owners or officers are people: Russ Krengel (owns 5% or more through other companies, 33%); John Boaz (owns 5% or more through other companies, 29.1%); Robert Parker (corporate officer); Robert Parker (managing employee (on the payroll)); John Boaz (corporate director); John W Richard (managing employee (under contract)); Misty L Dilmore (corporate officer); Misty L Dilmore (managing employee (on the payroll)); Kimberly Mcspadden (corporate officer); Kimberly Mcspadden (managing employee (on the payroll)); Russ Krengel (corporate officer); Russ Krengel (corporate director); Russ Krengel (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Kindful Mgt, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies50%Apr 28, 2023
Kindful Health, LLCOwns 5% or more directly50%Apr 28, 2023

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 86% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 86% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 90.05% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 77.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 97 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 75023, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3; this one had 1.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.