Hearth Record

Anchor of Hope Hospice

A hospice in Plano, Texas 75024

7708 San Jacinto Place Ste 100, Plano, Texas 75024. (469) 351-4466.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

10 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 58 hospices serving ZIP code 75024 had 3.

The last inspection on record was on Mar 14, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

10 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Mar 14, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission10 deficiencies
  • Initial & comprehensive assessment of patient (42 CFR 418.54)

    The inspectors’ words, 106 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 14 active patient records reviewed,, the organization failed to conduct and document a patient specific comprehensive assessment. in record RRNHV #9 there was no initial spiritual assessment documented. This was reviewed with the Administrator and the Director of Patient Services. Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 14 active patient records reviewed, the organization failed to conduct and document a patient specific comprehensive assessment. In record RRNHV#1 there was no initial spiritual assessment documented. And in records RRNHV#4 and RRNHV#5 there were no initial bereavement assessments documented. This RFI was reviewed with the Administrator, and Director of Patient Services.”

    Rule L0520. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 258 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 14 of 14 patient records reviewed, plan of care goals were not specific and measurable. Here are some examples: Patient will awaken rested and not be fatigued during day most of the time; patient/caregiver will verbalize or demonstrate feeling supported by hospice team, family, and/or friends and will adapt to changes, challenges and crises throughout hospice admission; patient/caregiver will verbalize understanding of oxygen safety and use of equipment; patient/caregiver will demonstrate how to care for catheter effectively. Additionally, goals were assigned a completion date of either 7, 15, or 30 days. However, most were not completed within those time frames, many had dates moved forward, and some were discontinued and re-written for the next 30 days. The Administrator said that this was done to keep them fresh in the minds of staff. Observed in Record Review. In review of the patient record 1 of 2, the record does not have plan of care goals that are specific and measurable. For example, the documentation of the goals are as follows: the patient will exhibit a decrease in pain related behaviors in 30 days, incontinence of bowel/bladder will be managed by the caregivers for 30 days, patient will receive coordinated care from hospice Interdisciplinary group (IDG) and facility staff ongoing, patient will have acute confusion/agitated behaviors reduced to manage able levels within the limits of the disease in 30 days, and caregiver will verbalize anxiety is absent or reduced to an acceptable level. This was reviewed with the Administrator and the Director of Patient Services.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 132 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 active patient records reviewed,, it was noted in RRHV#3 that the Registered Nurse on call visit documentation did not reflect an evaluation of all fall reduction activities including assessment and intervention, education, and an update to the plan of care based on the patient’s changes. For example, three incident reports attached in the patient’s record indicated the patient sustained falls within three days resulting in multiple injuries to include, bruising to bilateral upper extremities, a skin tear to the left forearm and elbow, a possible dislocation of the left thumb, and a wound on the corner of the tongue. Despite these events, the plan of care was not updated to reflect the change in condition. This was reviewed with the Administrator of hospice services.”

    Rule L0548. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d ))

    The inspectors’ words, 132 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 14 of 14 active patient records reviewed, interdisciplinary group meeting notes did not document patient decline, progress towards desired outcomes and goals, and plans for the following two weeks. Notes did not include what was discussed. This RFI was reviewed with the Administrator, and Director of Patient Services. Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 patient records reviewed the Interdisciplinary group (IDG) documented notes did not identify the patient’s status of decline, goals were not well defined to give a clear indication of the desired outcomes and plans of care for the upcoming two weeks. The record also did not contain documentation as to the discussion of the patient’s status at IDG. This was discussed with the Administrator of hospice and the Director of patient services.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 150 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 8 of 14 active patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure that the plan of care was current. In record RRHV#1, RRHV#2, RRNHV#2, RRNHV#3, and RRNHV#5 scheduled home health aide visits were missed. And in record RRHV#2 a scheduled spiritual care visit was also missed. There were no orders for these missed visits obtained from the Medical Director. This RFI was reviewed with the Administrator, and Director of Patient Services. Observed in Record Review. In 8 of 14 active patient records reviewed,, the organization failed to ensure that the plan of care was current. In record RRNHV#9 scheduled Registered Nurse and Hospice Aide visits were missed. Also, in record RRNHV #10 a scheduled Registered Nurse visit was also missed. There were no orders for these missed visits obtained from the Medical Director. This was reviewed with the Administrator and the Director of Patient Services.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c)(1))

    “Observed in Competency Session. In 1 of 10 HR files reviewed, the organization did not evaluate staff competence as required. There was no documented competency found in the personnel file HR#8 HHA for reinforcing or replacing a dressing that was soiled or damaged. These directions were found in the aide plan of care. This was reviewed with the Administrator and the Director of Patient Services.”

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 active patient record reviewed,, the Registered Nurse did not revise the care plan when there was a change in condition. In RRHV #3 it was noted, that there was no documentation to support a hospice aide care plan update for safety, the implementation of safety measures, and or additional fall risk precautions following three falls by a patient in three days. This was reviewed with the Administrator of hospice services.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 14 active patient records reviewed, hospice aide supervision was not documented every 14 days. Over the past three weeks, 16 days elapsed between supervisory visits by a registered nurse in the records of RRNHV#1 and RRNHV#5. This RFI was reviewed with the Administrator, and Director of Patient Services.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. Documented volunteer hours equaled 2.2% of the total patient care hours for the previous year, which was well below the required 5%. This RFI was reviewed with the Administrator, and Director of Patient Services.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 145 words

    “Observed in Record Review. While conducting a review of the patient’s record RRHV #3 it was noted on the hospice aide plan of care, the Registered Nurse delegated wound care tasks to the hospice aide but failed to follow the organization’s policy in delegating tasks to the hospice aide to include documentation of teaching, ensuring supervision, and reevaluation of the delegated task. For example, on the hospice aide plan of care, the Registered Nurse documented instructions on the hospice aide care plan to replace the dressing under the chin if it becomes damaged or soiled and in an updated hospice aide care plan, additional instructions instructed the hospice aide to replace the patient’s wound dressings underneath the chin, left elbow, and left heel should either dressing become damaged or soiled and apply medihoney to the sacrum. This was reviewed with the Administrator of hospice services.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 14, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission10 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 31, 2015.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 9.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 96.8% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 21% at home, 79% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day9.8 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5.4%
Visits near death96.8% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 10 owners or officers are people: Heather Clark (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Chad Anderson (owns 5% or more directly, 21.08%); Chad Anderson (runs it (operational or managerial control), 21.08%); Jamie Lopez (owns 5% or more directly, 19.58%); William Anderson (owns 5% or more directly, 15.58%); Jennifer Plunkett (owns 5% or more directly, 14.58%); Candice Montoya (owns 5% or more directly, 11%); Heather Clark (owns 5% or more directly, 9.8%); Steven Tanner (owns 5% or more directly, 8.4%); Bryan M Lowery (managing employee (under contract), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 86% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 91% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 95.63% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 80.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 58 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 75024, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3; this one had 10.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.