Anchor of Hope Hospice
A hospice in Plano, Texas 75024
7708 San Jacinto Place Ste 100, Plano, Texas 75024. (469) 351-4466.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 10 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 4of 5 family caregiver rating
- 9of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
10 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 58 hospices serving ZIP code 75024 had 3.
The last inspection on record was on Mar 14, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Mar 14, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission10 deficiencies
-
Initial & comprehensive assessment of patient (42 CFR 418.54)
The inspectors’ words, 106 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 14 active patient records reviewed,, the organization failed to conduct and document a patient specific comprehensive assessment. in record RRNHV #9 there was no initial spiritual assessment documented. This was reviewed with the Administrator and the Director of Patient Services. Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 14 active patient records reviewed, the organization failed to conduct and document a patient specific comprehensive assessment. In record RRNHV#1 there was no initial spiritual assessment documented. And in records RRNHV#4 and RRNHV#5 there were no initial bereavement assessments documented. This RFI was reviewed with the Administrator, and Director of Patient Services.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 258 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 14 of 14 patient records reviewed, plan of care goals were not specific and measurable. Here are some examples: Patient will awaken rested and not be fatigued during day most of the time; patient/caregiver will verbalize or demonstrate feeling supported by hospice team, family, and/or friends and will adapt to changes, challenges and crises throughout hospice admission; patient/caregiver will verbalize understanding of oxygen safety and use of equipment; patient/caregiver will demonstrate how to care for catheter effectively. Additionally, goals were assigned a completion date of either 7, 15, or 30 days. However, most were not completed within those time frames, many had dates moved forward, and some were discontinued and re-written for the next 30 days. The Administrator said that this was done to keep them fresh in the minds of staff. Observed in Record Review. In review of the patient record 1 of 2, the record does not have plan of care goals that are specific and measurable. For example, the documentation of the goals are as follows: the patient will exhibit a decrease in pain related behaviors in 30 days, incontinence of bowel/bladder will be managed by the caregivers for 30 days, patient will receive coordinated care from hospice Interdisciplinary group (IDG) and facility staff ongoing, patient will have acute confusion/agitated behaviors reduced to manage able levels within the limits of the disease in 30 days, and caregiver will verbalize anxiety is absent or reduced to an acceptable level. This was reviewed with the Administrator and the Director of Patient Services.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 132 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 active patient records reviewed,, it was noted in RRHV#3 that the Registered Nurse on call visit documentation did not reflect an evaluation of all fall reduction activities including assessment and intervention, education, and an update to the plan of care based on the patient’s changes. For example, three incident reports attached in the patient’s record indicated the patient sustained falls within three days resulting in multiple injuries to include, bruising to bilateral upper extremities, a skin tear to the left forearm and elbow, a possible dislocation of the left thumb, and a wound on the corner of the tongue. Despite these events, the plan of care was not updated to reflect the change in condition. This was reviewed with the Administrator of hospice services.”
-
Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d ))
The inspectors’ words, 132 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 14 of 14 active patient records reviewed, interdisciplinary group meeting notes did not document patient decline, progress towards desired outcomes and goals, and plans for the following two weeks. Notes did not include what was discussed. This RFI was reviewed with the Administrator, and Director of Patient Services. Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 patient records reviewed the Interdisciplinary group (IDG) documented notes did not identify the patient’s status of decline, goals were not well defined to give a clear indication of the desired outcomes and plans of care for the upcoming two weeks. The record also did not contain documentation as to the discussion of the patient’s status at IDG. This was discussed with the Administrator of hospice and the Director of patient services.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 150 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 8 of 14 active patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure that the plan of care was current. In record RRHV#1, RRHV#2, RRNHV#2, RRNHV#3, and RRNHV#5 scheduled home health aide visits were missed. And in record RRHV#2 a scheduled spiritual care visit was also missed. There were no orders for these missed visits obtained from the Medical Director. This RFI was reviewed with the Administrator, and Director of Patient Services. Observed in Record Review. In 8 of 14 active patient records reviewed,, the organization failed to ensure that the plan of care was current. In record RRNHV#9 scheduled Registered Nurse and Hospice Aide visits were missed. Also, in record RRNHV #10 a scheduled Registered Nurse visit was also missed. There were no orders for these missed visits obtained from the Medical Director. This was reviewed with the Administrator and the Director of Patient Services.”
-
Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c)(1))
“Observed in Competency Session. In 1 of 10 HR files reviewed, the organization did not evaluate staff competence as required. There was no documented competency found in the personnel file HR#8 HHA for reinforcing or replacing a dressing that was soiled or damaged. These directions were found in the aide plan of care. This was reviewed with the Administrator and the Director of Patient Services.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 active patient record reviewed,, the Registered Nurse did not revise the care plan when there was a change in condition. In RRHV #3 it was noted, that there was no documentation to support a hospice aide care plan update for safety, the implementation of safety measures, and or additional fall risk precautions following three falls by a patient in three days. This was reviewed with the Administrator of hospice services.”
-
Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))
“Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 14 active patient records reviewed, hospice aide supervision was not documented every 14 days. Over the past three weeks, 16 days elapsed between supervisory visits by a registered nurse in the records of RRNHV#1 and RRNHV#5. This RFI was reviewed with the Administrator, and Director of Patient Services.”
-
Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))
“Observed in Tracer Activities. Documented volunteer hours equaled 2.2% of the total patient care hours for the previous year, which was well below the required 5%. This RFI was reviewed with the Administrator, and Director of Patient Services.”
-
Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 145 words
“Observed in Record Review. While conducting a review of the patient’s record RRHV #3 it was noted on the hospice aide plan of care, the Registered Nurse delegated wound care tasks to the hospice aide but failed to follow the organization’s policy in delegating tasks to the hospice aide to include documentation of teaching, ensuring supervision, and reevaluation of the delegated task. For example, on the hospice aide plan of care, the Registered Nurse documented instructions on the hospice aide care plan to replace the dressing under the chin if it becomes damaged or soiled and in an updated hospice aide care plan, additional instructions instructed the hospice aide to replace the patient’s wound dressings underneath the chin, left elbow, and left heel should either dressing become damaged or soiled and apply medihoney to the sacrum. This was reviewed with the Administrator of hospice services.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2025 | Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission | 10 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 31, 2015.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 9.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 96.8% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 21% at home, 79% in assisted living.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 9.8 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 5.4% |
| Visits near death | 96.8% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- 10 owners or officers are people: Heather Clark (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Chad Anderson (owns 5% or more directly, 21.08%); Chad Anderson (runs it (operational or managerial control), 21.08%); Jamie Lopez (owns 5% or more directly, 19.58%); William Anderson (owns 5% or more directly, 15.58%); Jennifer Plunkett (owns 5% or more directly, 14.58%); Candice Montoya (owns 5% or more directly, 11%); Heather Clark (owns 5% or more directly, 9.8%); Steven Tanner (owns 5% or more directly, 8.4%); Bryan M Lowery (managing employee (under contract), 0%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 86% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 91% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 95.63% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 80.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 9 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 58 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 75024, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3; this one had 10.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Anchor of Hope Hospice This hospice | 10 |
| The Legacy at Home Inc. | 0 |
| Prim Palliative & Hospice Care Inc. | 0 |
| Lifted Hospice | 2 |
| First Choice Hospice Care LLC | 0 |
| Lucent Health Group | 9 |
| Charlin Hospice | 3 |
| Reliant at Home Hospice | 8 |
| Remarkable Hospice | 5 |
| Kindful Health | 1 |
| Vitas Healthcare of Texas LP | 15 |
| VNA | 1 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.