Hearth Record

Harbor Hospice of Plano, L.P.

A hospice in Plano, Texas 75075

2419 Coit Road, Suite A, Plano, Texas 75075. (972) 943-0349.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

13 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 101 hospices serving ZIP code 75075 had 3.

The last inspection on record was on Feb 20, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

13 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Feb 20, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission13 deficiencies
  • EP Training Program (42 CFR 418.113(d)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. It was noted by the nurse surveyor that the Volunteer On-Boarding Training Program did not include initial training. Finding was validated by the Volunteer Coordinator.”

    Rule E0037. Standard-level.

  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 105 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 10 patient records reviewed, for active patients it was noted by the nurse surveyor that the comprehensive assessment was not completed within five calendar days of the election of the hospice benefit. For RRHV#1, the spiritual counselor completed his initial spiritual assessment six days after the patient had been admitted. For RRNHV#5, the spiritual counselor and social worker both completed their initial assessments thirteen days after admission. There was no documentation in the electronic medical record to indicate why the visits were not completed. Findings were discussed and verified with the Nurse Administrator and the Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 128 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 10 of 10 patient records reviewed, for all active records, the nurse surveyor noted that the goals were not measurable or individualized. For example, “Patient’s left hip DTI will continue healing process as evidenced by decreased need for dressing changes and wound bed decreasing in size throughout current cert period,” and “Patient will be able to make his needs known and verbalize communication during this cert period”. There were no short-term goals at start of care to address issues of immediate needs such as understanding medication management, symptom management, pain management, or safety. Additionally, time frames for completion were either at the end of the certification period or none at all. Finding was verified by the Nurse Administrator and the Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 162 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, for active patients it was noted by the nurse surveyor that the patient’s plan of care did not include all needed services. For RRHV#1, the patient developed an additional sacral decubitus. The medical director verbal order for the change of wound care was not documented by the nurse and the plan of care was not updated to include the new orders. Finding was verified by the Nurse Administrator and the Director of Nursing. Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, for active patients it was noted by the nurse surveyor that the patient’s plan of care did not include all needed services. For RRHV#1, the patient developed an additional sacral decubitus. The medical director order for the change of wound care and the plan of care was was not updated to include the new orders. Finding was verified by the Nurse Administrator and the Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, for active patients, the nurse surveyor noted that the plan of care was not followed. For RRHV#1, the Chaplain visit was one time a month, however, it was almost two months before that patient was visited by the Chaplain after the initial comprehensive spiritual assessment. No documentation was noted to explain why visit was missed. Finding was discussed with the Nurse Administrator and the Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 172 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 3 of 3 home visits conducted, it was noted by the nurse surveyor that the staff failed to follow acceptable practice and agency policy when performing patient care. During RRHV#1, the hospice aide washed her hands in the patient’s sink then dried her hands on a cloth hand towel hanging on a rack by the sink. Later after using hand sanitizer, she double gloved so she could remove a pair after applying lotion to the patient. Additionally, her nails were beyond the recommended length for patient care staff per supervisor and the Dress and Appearance policy. During RRHV#2, the registered nurse washed her hands with soap and water, then set up her barriers, nursing bag and equipment, then gloved without hand sanitizing. During RRHV#3, the social worker held the patient’s hands in prayer and in providing presence several times during the visit and did not hand sanitize prior to leaving the patient’s room. Findings were verified by the Director of Nursing who was present on the visits.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 167 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 3 home visits conducted, it was noted by the nurse surveyor that the hospice aide care plan did not contain all the necessary or current information. For RRHV#1, the patient had coccyx wound and a hip wound, however there was not anything on the hospice aide care plan regarding the hospice aide’s responsibility or what she should report regarding the wound and the dressings. Additionally, the hospice aide care plan had not been updated in over a year and now she is no longer getting into the shower two times a week but getting a bed bath five times a week instead of three times a week. For RRHV#2, the patient was on continuous oxygen when the patient was admitted, she is now on PRN oxygen, however, the hospice aide care plan did not have any information regarding what the hospice aide was supposed to do with the oxygen during the bath. Findings were discussed with the Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Recruiting and retaining (42 CFR 418.78(c))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. It was noted by the nurse surveyor during the Volunteer Program Review that there was no documentation to support recruitment and retention activities. The Volunteer Coordinator stated that she did not know until yesterday that she was supposed to document her recruitment and retention activities. Finding was discussed with the Administrator and Nursing Director.”

    Rule L0645. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 2 of 8 HR files reviewed, for active employees, it was noted by the nurse surveyor that for HR#1, (Nursing Director) and HR#3, (NP), neither had an initial competency evaluation completed at hire. Finding was verified by the Nursing Administrator.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

  • Initial certification of terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(b)(3))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 10 patient records reviewed, for active patients, it was noted by the nurse surveyor that for RRHV#2 and RRHV#5, the physician’s certificate of terminal illness (CTI) did not contain the required narrative. The CTI consisted of bullet points consisting of patient physical findings that did not demonstrate that the patient was hospice appropriate. Findings were validated by the Nurse Administrator and the Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0667. Standard-level.

  • Recertification of the terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(c))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 3 patient records reviewed, reviewed for active patients who have had recertifications, it was noted by the nurse surveyor that for RRHV#1 and RRHV#3, the physician recertification does not clearly address in a narrative or plainly stated, how the patient continues to meet the criteria for terminal status. Finding was discussed and verified with the Nurse Administrator and the Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0668. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 94 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 3 home visits conducted, it was noted by the surveyor that the electronic medical record (EMR) medication profile was inaccurate. During RRHV#2, it was noted that the patient’s family had started giving her Calcium/Magnesium/Zinc/D3/K2 as a supplement po 1/1 daily, yet the medication profile in the medical record had not updated. Also, Desitin and Dyna-shield Skin Barrier Cream were used to prevent skin breakdown and were not on the EMR medication profile. Findings were reviewed with the Director of Nursing who was present on the home visits.”

    Rule L0674. Standard-level.

  • Federal, state, local laws & regulations (42 CFR 418.116)

    The inspectors’ words, 104 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 1 patient records reviewed, for extended progress it was noted by the nurse surveyor that the Hospice did not have a process in place to ensure that a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was signed by the patient or patient’s representative at least two days prior to a planned discharge as required. For RRDC#1 the patient did not have a signed NOMNC. The Director of Nursing was not aware that a NOMNC was needed for a discharge for extended prognosis. Lack of a process was discussed with the Director of Nursing and verified by the Nurse Administrator.”

    Rule L0797. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 20, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission13 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jan 11, 2015.
  • Ownership: other.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 7.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 3.7% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 74% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 61% at home, 30% in assisted living, 8% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day7.8 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends3.7%
Visits near death74.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Arfeen Properties, L.P. owns 99% directly since Sep 24, 2012.
  • 5 owners or officers are people: Qamar U Arfeen (owns 5% or more through other companies, 50%); Kelley L Arfeen (owns 5% or more through other companies, 50%); Musaab A Zaid (managing employee (on the payroll)); Karen Carter (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Crystal Lenea Young (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Arfeen Properties, L.P.Owns 5% or more directly99%Sep 24, 2012
Hhcs Managers LLCGeneral partner1%Sep 24, 2012

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 6 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 91.95% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 37.7% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold6 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 101 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 75075, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3; this one had 13.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 101 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 75075
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Anointed Hospice Dallas1
Lucent Health Group9
Harbor Hospice of Plano, L.P. This hospice13
Charlin Hospice3
Reliant at Home Hospice8
Remarkable Hospice5
Anointed Hospice Inc.0
Anchor of Hope Hospice10
Ameri Hospice0
Kindful Health1
Goldstar Hospice Inc.Not given
The Legacy at Home Inc.0

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.